Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Selama Pandemi COVID-19 di Indonesia

Ajeng Tita Nawangsari, Mochammad Ilyas Junjunan, Imam Buchori

Abstract


This study aims to look at the differences and patterns of CSR disclosure before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The sample in this study consisted of 156 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The results showed that there were significant differences in CSR disclosure before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. CSR disclosure during the COVID-19 pandemic has decreased compared to CSR disclosure before the COVID-19 pandemic. However, economic performance indicator have actually increased. This pattern is in line with the stakeholder theory which states that in times of uncertainty such as economic and financial crises, companies tend to focus on fulfilling the interests of their definitive stakeholders, which are investors and creditors. This indicates that the company prioritizes the going concern perception by giving signals to investors and creditors through the disclosure of economic performance which is expected to strengthen positive sentiment from investors and creditors even though the company is in times of uncertainty due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat perbedaan dan pola pengungkapan CSR sebelum dan selama masa pandemi COVID-19. Sampel pada penelitian ini terdiri dari 156 perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa ada perbedaan yang signifikan pengungkapan CSR sebelum dan selama pandemi COVID-19. Pengungkapan CSR selama pandemi COVID-19mengalami penurunan dibandingkan dengan pengungkapan CSR sebelum pandemi COVID-19. Walaupun demikian, indikator kinerja ekonomi justru mengalami kenaikan. Pola yang demikian, sejalan dengan teori stakeholders yang diajukan dalam penelitian ini. Teori stakeholders menyatakan bahwa pada masa ketidakpastian seperti krisis ekonomi dan keuangan, perusahaan cenderung memfokuskan diri terhadap pemenuhan kepentingan stakeholders definitifnya yang dalam hal ini adalah investor dan kreditor. Hal tersebut mengindikasikan bahwa perusahaan lebih mengutamakan persepsi going concern dengan memberikan sinyal kepada investor dan kreditor melalui  keterbukaan informasi kinerja ekonomi yang diharapkan bisa memperkuat sentimen positif dari investor dan kreditor walaupun perusahaan sedang ada di masa-masa ketidakpastian karena pandemi COVID-19.


Keywords


Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure;COVID-19;Stakehokder Theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, W., Frynas, J. G., & Mahmood, Z. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 273-294.

Arevalo, J. A., & Aravind, D. (2010). The impact of the crisis on corporate responsibility: the case of UN global compact participants in the USA. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society.

Bhatia, A., & Makkar, B. (2019). CSR disclosure in developing and developed countries: a comparative study. Journal of Global Responsibility.

Branco, M. C., Delgado, C., Gomes, S. F., & Eugénio, T. C. P. (2014). Factors influencing the assurance of sustainability reports in the context of the economic crisis in Portugal. Managerial Auditing Journal.

Charitoudi, G., Giannarakis, G., & Lazarides, T. G. (2011). Corporate social responsibility performance in periods of financial crisis. European Journal of Scientific Research, 63(3), 447-455.

Cheney, G., & McMillan, J. J. (1990). Organizational rhetoric and the practice of criticism. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 18(2), 93-114.

Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2015). CSR disclosure: the more things change…?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

Clarkson, M. (1995), “A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance”, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), pp. 92–117.

Coluccia, D., Fontana, S., & Solimene, S. (2018). Does institutional context affect CSR disclosure? A study on Eurostoxx 50. Sustainability, 10(8), 2823.

Cuganesan, S., Guthrie, J., & Ward, L. (2010). Examining CSR disclosure strategies within the Australian food and beverage industry. In Accounting forum (Vol. 34, No. 3-4, pp. 169-183). No longer published by Elsevier.

Dias, A., Rodrigues, L. L., & Craig, R. (2016). Global financial crisis and corporate social responsibility disclosure. Social Responsibility Journal.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1), 65-91.

Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of management review, 24(2), 233-236.

Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business ethics quarterly, 12(3), 331-349.

Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder theory. Wiley encyclopedia of management, 1-6.

García-Benau, M. A., Sierra-Garcia, L., & Zorio, A. (2013). Financial crisis impact on sustainability reporting. Management decision.

Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & accountability: changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall.

Indayani, S., & Hartono, B. (2020). Analisis Pengangguran Dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Sebagai Akibat Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Perspektif, 18(2), 201-208.

Jain, A., Keneley, M., & Thomson, D. (2015). Voluntary CSR disclosure works! Evidence from Asia-Pacific banks. Social Responsibility Journal.

Karaibrahimoglu, Y. Z. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in times of financial crisis. African journal of Business management, 4(4), 382.

Mia, P., & Al Mamun, A. (2011). Corporate social disclosure during the global financial crisis. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(6), 174-187.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), 853-886.

Rahman, A., & Widyasari, K. N. (2008). The analysis of company characteristic influence toward CSR disclosure: empirical evidence of manufacturing companies listed in JSX. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 12(1).

Rodolfo, C. H. M. (2012). Examining CSR reporting and economic crisis a study of GRI reporting companies. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 2(1), 30.

Rodrigues, L. L., & Craig, R. (2016). Using a dialectic approach to understand stakeholders’ conflicts with corporate social responsibility activities. In A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 339-356). Routledge.

Samkin, G., De Villiers, C., & Pinto, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility disclosures during the global financial crisis: New Zealand evidence. New Zealand Journal of Applied Business Research, 12(2), 33-49.

Seles, B. M. R. P., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Jugend, D. (2018). “In sickness and in health, in poverty and in wealth?”: Economic crises and CSR change management in difficult times. Journal of Organizational Change Management.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jab.v21i2.685

Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JAB)
ISSN 1412-0852 (print), 2580-5444 (online)
Published by Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia


Creative Commons License
JAB on http://jab.fe.uns.ac.id/index.php/jab is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Visitor Statistic