Ill Fares the Land: Has COVID-19 Killed the Principle of Legality?

25 Pages Posted: 2 Feb 2022 Last revised: 29 Sep 2022

See all articles by Nicholas McBride

Nicholas McBride

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law

Date Written: February 1, 2022

Abstract

This paper is part of a larger project, arguing that the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed public law as being unprincipled and ineffectual in virtually all common law jurisdictions. This paper focuses on the treatment of the 'principle of legality' in judicial review proceedings in England, Australia and New Zealand, seeking to challenge the lawfulness of various governmental actions to tackle the pandemic. While up until 2020, the principle of legality was employed to declare unlawful governmental actions in a number of very important cases - most notably, the UK Supreme Court's decision in Miller 2 - in cases involving challenges to the lawfulness of government attempts to deal with COVID-19, the principle of legality has been consistently sidelined and ignored, using various techniques described in this paper.

Keywords: COVID-19, coronavirus, public law, judicial review, principle of legality, rule of law, proportionality, lockdowns, vaccine passports, vaccine mandates, Liversidge, Korematsu, Miller 2, Dolan

JEL Classification: K23

Suggested Citation

McBride, Nicholas, Ill Fares the Land: Has COVID-19 Killed the Principle of Legality? (February 1, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4023242 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4023242

Nicholas McBride (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law ( email )

10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
425
Abstract Views
1,081
Rank
127,558
PlumX Metrics