What’s next for social media companies? The digital regulatory scene in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Digital Media & Policy
  4. Volume 12, Issue 1
  5. Article
COVID-19 and Digital Media Policy
  • ISSN: 2516-3523
  • E-ISSN: 2516-3531

Abstract

In the midst of the Coronavirus pandemic, on 9 April 2020, a draft bill was presented to fight against the spread of COVID-19 in Turkey. Eight articles were buried deep in the proposed legislation, which mostly included economic measures and aid packages, directly targeting any social media company that had a platform accessed by over one million users daily. Although the articles on social media were dropped from the parliamentary schedule on 14 April 2020 to make way for more urgent bills on the economy and health, the uncertainty regarding social media companies’ situation in the country remained. Then, on 29 July 2020, the new social media law, officially ‘The Law on Making Amendments to the Law on Regulation of Publications on the Internet and Combating Crimes Committed by Means of Such Publication’, numbered 7253 was adopted by the parliament. This article approaches this issue from the perspective of social media companies, specifically Facebook and Twitter, and analyses the post-Coronavirus digital scene and public policy attempts from the corporate point of view.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00049_1
2021-03-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adal, Hikmet. ( 2020;), ‘ Sosyal medya düzenlemesi muhalif sesi kısmak ve maddi çıkar için. ’, BiaNet, 21 July, http://bianet.org/bianet/ifade-ozgurlugu/227821-sosyal-medya-duzenlemesi-muhalif-sesi-kismak-ve-maddi-cikar-icin. Accessed 22 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmadbeyli, Samira. ( 2020;), ‘ Turkish president taking on YouTube, Twitter, and Netflix. ’, Jam News, 4 July, https://jam-news.net/turkish-president-erdogan-vs-youtube-twitter-netflix-offended-his-daughter-esra-albayrak/. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Akdeniz, Yaman. ( 2010), Report of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media on Turkey and Internet Censorship, Vienna:: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe;, http://www.osce.org/fom/41091. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Akdeniz, Yaman, and Altıparmak, Kerem. ( 2008), Internet: Restricted Access– A Critical Assessment of Internet Content Regulation and Censorship in Turkey, Human Rights Joint Platform;, http://www.cyber-rights.org/reports/internet_restricted_bw.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Akdeniz, Yaman, and Güven, Ozan. ( 2019), EngelliWeb 2019, Freedom of Expression Association;, https://ifade.org.tr/reports/EngelliWeb_2019.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Akgül, Mustafa, and Kırlıdoğ, Melih. ( 2015;), ‘ Internet censorship in Turkey. ’, Internet Policy Review, 4:2, pp. 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Arango, Tim. ( 2015;), ‘ Turkey blocks YouTube and, briefly, Twitter over hostage photo. ’, New York Times, 6 April, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/07/world/europe/turkey-blocks-twitter-youtube-and-sites-that-published-hostage-photo.html. Accessed 6 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BIA News ( 2020;), ‘ Investigation into insulting messages about Esra Albayrak and her family. ’, Bianet, 1 July, http://bianet.org/english/human-rights/226655-investigation-into-insulting-messages-about-esra-albayrak-and-her-family.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. boyd, danah. ( 2010;), ‘ Facebook is a utility; utilities get regulated. ’, Apophenia, 15 May, https://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2010/05/15/facebook-is-a-utility-utilities-get-regulated.html. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Celik, Can ( 2020;), ‘ Social media habits changing during Coronavirus. ’, Adcolony, 6 May, https://www.adcolony.com/blog/2020/05/06/social-media-habits-changing-during-coronavirus/. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Coldewey, Devin. ( 2016;), ‘ Facebook, Twitter and YouTube blocked in Turkey during reported coup attempt. ’, TechCrunch, 16 July, https://techcrunch.com/2016/07/15/facebook-twitter-and-youtube-blocked-in-turkey-during-reported-coup-attempt/. Accessed 6 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dilek, Şen. ( 2020;), ‘ Interview with Prof. Yaman Akdeniz. ’, MedyaScope, 14 April, https://medyascope.tv/2020/04/14/internet-kisitlamasi-torba-yasa-taslagindan-cikarildi-yaman-akdeniz-salgindan-sonra-sosyal-medyayi-zapturapt-altina-almayi-planlayacaklar/. Accessed 8 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Directorate of Communications ( 2020;), ‘ Altun: “We will continue advocating the truth on social media”. ’, 29 May, https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/english/haberler/detay/altun-we-will-continue-advocating-the-truth-on-social-media. Accessed 23 July 2020.
  14. Dreyfuss, Emily. ( 2018;), ‘ Jack Dorsey has problems with Twitter, too. ’, Wired, 16 October, https://www.wired.com/story/wired25-jack-dorsey/. Accessed 24 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Erem, Onur. ( 2020;), ‘ Türkiye’de bugüne kadar hangi siteler yasaklandı?. ’ (‘Which websites have been blocked in Turkey so far?’) , BBC Türkçe, 2 July, https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-53259839. Accessed 24 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Flew, Terry. ( 2018;), ‘ Post-globalisation. ’, Javnost: The Public, 25:1&2, pp. 102–09.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Fuchs, Doris A.. ( 2007), Business Power in Global Governance, Boulder, CO:: Lynne Rienner;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gerçek Gündem ( 2020;), ‘ Gezici Araştırma Merkezi Başkanı Murat Gezici: Türkiye’nin kaderi Z kuşağının elinde. ’, 11 June, https://www.gercekgundem.com/siyaset/188215/gezici-arastirma-merkezi-baskani-murat-gezici-turkiyenin-kaderi-z-kusaginin-elinde. Accessed 23 July 2020.
  19. Gillespie, Tarleton. ( 2018), Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Glaeser, Martin G.. ( 1927), Outlines of Public Utility Economics, New York:: Macmillan Company;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Global Network Initiative ( 2017), Annual Report, June, Washington, DC:: Global Network Initiative;, https://globalnetworkinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/GNIAnnualReport2017.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gorwa, Robert. ( 2019;), ‘ What is platform governance?. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 22:6, pp. 854–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hansen, Suzy. ( 2019;), ‘ What remains of the Turkish press. ’, Columbia Journalism Review, Summer, https://www.cjr.org/special_report/turkish-press.php. Accessed 20 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Helberger, Natali,, Pierson, Jo, and Poell, Thomas. ( 2018;), ‘ Governing online platforms: From contested to cooperative responsibility. ’, Information Society, 34:1, pp. 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jacinto, Leela. ( 2013;), ‘ Turkey’s Erdoğan takes on protesters… and Twitter. ’, 4 June, https://www.france24.com/en/20130603-turkey-erdogan-protesters-twitter-media-istanbul. Accessed 12 July 2020.
  26. Jamison, Mark A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Liberalization and regulation of telecoms, electricity, and gas in the United States. ’, in M. Finger, and R. W. Künneke. (eds), International Handbook of Network Industries: The Liberalization of Infrastructure, Cheltenham:: Edward Elgar;, pp. 366–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jamison, Mark A.. ( 2012;), ‘ Should Google search be regulated as a public utility?. ’, SSRN, 17 March, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2027543. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Küçükgöçmen, Ali. ( 2020;), ‘ Turkey will require social media giants to appoint local representatives: ~Draft law. ’, Reuters, 9 April, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-security-socialmedia/turkey-will-require-social-media-giants-to-appoint-local-representatives-draft-law-idUSKCN21R25G. Accessed 18 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Mikler, John. ( 2018), The Political Power of Global Corporations, Cambridge, MA:: Polity;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. The Motley Fool ( 2020;), ‘ Facebook Inc (FB) Q1 2020 earnings call transcript. ’, 29 April, https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2020/04/29/facebook-inc-fb-q1-2020-earnings-call-transcript.aspx. Accessed 12 July 2020.
  31. Newman, Nathan. ( 2011;), ‘ Will ITA takeover conditions move Google towards becoming public utility?. ’, Huffington Post, 6 December, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nathan-newman/will-ita-takeoverconditi_b_846754.html. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Newman, Nic. ( 2020;), ‘ Digital News Report. ’, Reuters Institute and University of Oxford;, http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2020/turkey-2020/. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. NTV ( 2020;), ‘ Corona virüs sosyal medyada geçirilen süreyi artırdı. ’, 6 June, https://www.ntv.com.tr/teknoloji/corona-virus-sosyal-medyada-gecirilen-sureyi-artirdi,zQIYz_-AjUO52ONNnrwFAQ. Accessed 23 July 2020.
  34. O’Donohue, Andrew,, Hoffman, Max, and Makovsky, Alan. ( 2020;), ‘ Turkey’s changing media landscape. ’, Center for American Progress, 10 June, https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/reports/2020/06/10/485976/turkeys-changing-media-landscape/. Accessed 18 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Özturan, Gürkan. ( 2020;), ‘ “ID number to be basis of social media profiles in Turkey” proposal by government ally MHP. ’, dokuz8News, 30 April, https://dokuz8haber.net/english/science-technology/id-number-to-be-basis-of-social-media-profiles-in-turkey-proposal-by-government-ally-mhp/. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Paylan, Garo. ( 2020;), ‘ News item and HDP MP’s opinion on the Draft Law on T24 (in Turkish). ’, T24, 13 April, https://t24.com.tr/haber/torba-yasadan-sosyal-medya-duzenlemesi-cikarildi-garo-paylan-erdogan-in-sosyal-medyayi-kapatma-niyetini-gormus-olduk-ilk-firsatta-yine-deneyecektir,872537. Accessed 8 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Phillips, Charles F. Jr. ( 1993), The Regulation of Public Utilities, Arlington, VA:: Public Utilities Reports, Inc;.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Phippen, J. Weston. ( 2017;), ‘ Why Turkey blocked access to Wikipedia. ’, The Atlantic, 29 April, https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2017/04/turkey-blocks-wikipedia/524859/. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Platform against Censorship and Self-Censorship ( 2020;), ‘ Internet censor is out of the Omnibus Bill (in Turkish). ’, 14 April, http://susma24.com/akp-torba-yasadan-internet-sansurunu-cikardi/. Accessed 8 May 2020.
  40. Rahman, K. Sabeel. ( 2018;), ‘ Regulating informational infrastructure: Internet platforms as the new public utilities. ’, Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2:2, pp. 234–51, https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/2.2-Rahman-pp-234-51.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Ranking Digital Rights ( 2019;), ‘ Ranking Digital Rights Corporate Accountability Index. ’, New America Foundation;, https://rankingdigitalrights.org/index2019/. Accessed 12 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan ( 2020;), ‘ Gençlerle Video Konferans Buluşması. ’, 26 June, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhXz8783eOU. Accessed 23 July 2020.
  43. Reuters ( 2014;), ‘ Turkey blocked YouTube over purported Syria leak: Source. ’, 27 March, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-youtube-ban/turkey-blocked-youtube-over-purported-syria-leak-source-idUSBREA2Q1EU20140327. Accessed 6 July 2020.
  44. Roberts, Sarah T.. ( 2018;), ‘ Digital detritus: “Error” and the logic of opacity in social media content moderation. ’, First Monday, 23:3, 5 March, https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/8283/6649. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Schultz, Alex, and Parikh, Jay. ( 2020;), ‘ Keeping our services stable and reliable during the Covıd-19 outbreak. ’, Facebook Newsroom, 24 March, https://about.fb.com/news/2020/03/keeping-our-apps-stable-during-covid-19/. Accessed 18 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Sezer, Can, and Dolan, David. ( 2017;), ‘ Turkey blocks access to Wikipedia. ’, Reuters, 29 April, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-security-internet-wikipedia-idUSKBN17V06Q. Accessed 6 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Simpson, John M.. ( 2011;), ‘ You can read “CQ Researcher” in-depth report on Google’s dominance. ’, Consumer Watchdog, http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/node/12509. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Stupp, Catherine. ( 2014;), ‘ Turkey’s internet law following nebulous drafting process. ’, Index on Censorship, 29 January, https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2014/01/turkish-anti-censorship-activists-anticipate-potential-restrictive-new-internet-law-proposal/. Accessed 6 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Suzor, Nicolas P.. ( 2019), Lawless: The Secret Rules That Govern Our Digital Lives, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Thema News ( 2020;), ‘ Turkey: 28.5% of generation Z have abandoned Islam. ’, 17 June, http://en.protothema.gr/turkey-285-of-generation-z-have-abandoned-islam/. Accessed 23 July 2020.
  51. Thierer, Adam. ( 2013;), ‘ The perils of classifying social media platforms as public utilities. ’, CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Policy, 21:2, 15 March, https://scholarship.law.edu/commlaw/vol21/iss2/2. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Thompson, Ambrose. ( 2010;), ‘ Social media as public expectation: The new public utility. ’, New York Public Library, 30 June, https://www.nypl.org/blog/2010/06/30/social-media-public-expectation. Accessed 24 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Topcu, Elmas. ( 2020;), ‘ Almanya sosyal medya yasası Türkiye’ye örnek olur mu?. ’ (‘Can German social media law set an example for Turkey?’) , Deutsche Welle Turkish, 2 July, https://www.dw.com/tr/alman-sosyal-medya-yasas%C4%B1-t%C3%BCrkiyeye-%C3%B6rnek-olur-mu/a-54033328. Accessed 18 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. TRT World ( 2020;), ‘ Turkey slams Twitter for suspending over 7,000 accounts. ’, 12 June, https://www.trtworld.com/turkey/turkey-slams-twitter-for-suspending-over-7-000-accounts-37230. Accessed 23 July 2020.
  55. Tüfekçi, Zeynep. ( 2010;), ‘ Google buzz: The corporatization of social commons. ’, Technosociology, 17 February, http://commcns.org/14PACNd. Accessed 24 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Tüfekçi, Zeynep. ( 2014;), ‘ Ban, what ban? Users keep tweeting in Turkey. ’, NBC News, 21 March, https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/ban-what-ban-users-keep-tweeting-turkey-n58856. Accessed 24 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Tunç, Aslı. ( 2015), Media Ownership and Finances in Turkey: Increasing Concentration and Clientelism, South East European Media Observatory;, https://www.rcmediafreedom.eu/Publications/Reports/Media-Ownership-and-Finances-in-Turkey.-Increasing-Concentration-and-Clientelism. Accessed 6 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Tunç, Aslı. ( 2018;), ‘ All is flux: A hybrid media approach to macro-analysis of the Turkish media. ’, Middle East Critique, 27:2, pp. 141–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Tunç, Asli. ( 2019), Changing Perceptions through Television, The Rise of Social Media and Our Media Adventure in the Last Decade 2008–2018, Istanbul:: Konda;, https://konda.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/KONDA_MediaReport_LS2018.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Tunç, Aslı, and Güneli, Nihan. ( 2020), in-person video interview with the author , 21 July.
  61. TV100 ( 2020;), ‘ Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Sosyal medyanın kontrol edilmesini istiyoruz. ’, YouTube, 1 July, https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=9&v=4n9bqU2eywE&feature=emb_logo. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner ( 2016;), ‘ Freedom of expression under worldwide attack, UN rights expert warns in new report. ’, OHCHR, 20 October, https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=20717. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Weber, Rolf. H.. ( 2014;) ‘ Corporate social responsibility as a gap-filling instrument?. ’, in A. P. Newell. (ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Challenges, Benefits and Impact on Business Performance, New York:: Nova Science Publishers;, pp. 87–107.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Wu, Paulina. ( 2015;), ‘ Impossible to regulate: Social media, terrorists, and the role for the UN. ’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 16:1, pp. 281–311.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Yeginsu, Ceylan. ( 2014;), ‘ Turkey lifts Twitter ban after court calls it illegal. ’, New York Times, 3 April, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/04/world/middleeast/turkey-lifts-ban-on-twitter.html. Accessed 20 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Zaman, Amberlin. ( 2020;), ‘ Ankara spouts fury as Twitter takes down pro-Erdogan trolls. ’, Al-Monitor, 12 June, https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/06/turkey-twitter-trolls-ankara-fury-erdogan-suspend-accounts.html#ixzz6RSECmHXm. Accessed 23 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Tunç, Aslı. ( 2021;), ‘ What’s next for social media companies? The digital regulatory scene in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic. ’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 12:1, pp. 81–95, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00049_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00049_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Coronavirus; COVID-19; legislation; policy; social media; Turkey

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error