Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A national study of burnout and spiritual health in UK general practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • Ishbel Orla Whitehead ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    orla.whitehead@newcastle.ac.uk

    Affiliation Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

  • Suzanne Moffatt,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

  • Carol Jagger,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

  • Barbara Hanratty

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Abstract

Objectives

To quantify the burnout and spiritual health of general practitioners (GPs) in the United Kingdom (UK) who worked during the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Design

Online survey, April/May 2021, distributed via emails to general practices, Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), Health boards, Clinical Research Networks, professional groups, social media GP groups and networks.

Setting

United Kingdom.

Participants

1318 GPs who had worked in the National Health Service (NHS) during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 –May 2021).

Main outcome measures

Burnout scores, measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) for Medical Personnel; spiritual health, measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Spiritual Well-Being, Non-Illness (FACIT-SP-NI).

Results

19% of surveyed GPs were at the highest risk for burnout, using accepted MBI ‘cut off’ levels. There was no evidence of a difference in burnout by gender, ethnicity, or length of service. GP burnout was associated with GP spiritual health, regardless of identification with a religion. GPs with low spiritual health were five times more likely to be in the highest risk group for burnout.

Conclusions

Burnout is at crisis levels amongst GPs in the UK NHS. A comprehensive response is required, identifying protective and precipitating factors for burnout. The potentially protective impact of spiritual health merits further investigation.

Introduction

The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted concerns about burnout in doctors across Europe [1, 2]. Burnout is understood to be an occupational phenomenon rather than mental or physical illness and has been described as an ‘erosion of the soul’ [3]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has defined burnout as a syndrome resulting from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed, characterized by feelings of exhaustion, increased mental distance from one’s job and reduced professional efficacy [4]. Burnout was already thought to be contributing to current workforce crises, along with higher rates of hazardous drinking and suicide among doctors [5]. General Practitioners (GPs) are particularly vulnerable to burnout [6], and, as manpower levels fall and workload increases [7], burnout amongst remaining GPs becomes more likely [8].

Spiritual health has been linked with reduced risk of burnout in doctors and other groups [9, 10]. Definitions of ‘spiritual health’ provided by GPs in a recent online survey mirror the WHO framing of burnout [11]. Sixty nine percent of the 177 respondents described themselves as a spiritual person with spiritual health defined as self-actualisation and meaning, transcendence and relationships beyond the self, and expressions of spirituality- including religious practice, meditation or yoga. Self-actualisation included concepts of soul and adhering to personal ethical and moral codes. Meaning referred to personal meaning to life and relationships; transcendence to a concept of something beyond the observable/physical, and relationships with communities, friends, family, nature and/or the divine. The link between spiritual health and burnout in doctors has been explored in previous studies. Previous studies on the relationship between spiritual health and burnout have been vulnerable to response or sampling bias, used unvalidated instruments, analysed single domains of burnout or single domains of spiritual health in isolation, and conflated religion, and wider spiritual health [1214]. Two studies from outside the UK included primary care doctors showing some association between spiritual health and personal accomplishment, and higher perceived stress associated with lower religious activity [9, 15]. While burnout in GPs has been quantified using the MBI-HSS previously [16], this study adds an up to date quantification of burnout levels during the heart of the pandemic, using robust scores. GPs appear to be at risk of an epidemic of ‘erosion of the soul’ [3], poor holistic health, and burnout [8]. Identifying whether spiritual health and burnout are related in UK GPs will potentially allow a novel view of research into organisational and individual interventions to improve GPs spiritual health, possibly mitigating the current workforce crisis.

This survey compares burnout and spiritual health scores in the GP population in the UK who have worked during the Covid-19 pandemic, aiming to generate robust data to better understand relationships between practitioner health, wellbeing and burnout.

Public and patient involvement

Patients and the public were involved in the conception and design of this research, raising concerns over strains on primary care, and in the interpretation of the results.

Participants and methods

Measuring burnout

We used the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI) [3], a measure of burnout [17]. This measure includes three burnout domains—depersonalisation (DP), emotional exhaustion (EE) and personal accomplishment (PA). High scores in DP, EE and low scores in PA are thought to indicate high risk of burnout. While the MBI authors and others caution against use of dichotomous ‘cut-offs’ within the scores [18], traditional ‘cut offs’ (DP>10, EE>27 and PA<33) have been used in other studies to denote high risk of burnout [19]. Participants were not blinded as to the topic of the study.

Measuring spiritual health

We used the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Spiritual Well-Being, non-illness version(FACIT-Sp-NI) measure of spiritual health, for use in a non-patient population [20]. The FACIT-Sp is a validated measure of spiritual wellbeing, judged as one of the two best in a systematic review [21]. Previous work led us to expect a significant group of GPs to be secular [11], with some GPs hostile to concepts of spiritual health, especially religious practice. The three domains in the scale (meaning, peace and faith) reflected GP definitions of ‘spiritual health’ from previous research [11], and was suitable for both religious and secular populations. As the MBI has 22 questions, it was required that the spiritual health measure be as concise as possible. We decided to assess spiritual wellbeing, rather than religious or spiritual coping, or spiritual distress. Spiritual wellbeing best addressed the question of the relationship between spiritual health and burnout. Religiosity or spiritual beliefs were not assessed. To allow comparison with the MBI, the spiritual health measure needed to be a similarly on the day measure. The FACIT-Sp-NI was used in October 2020 for a similar study comparing the MBI and spiritual health in the USA [22].

An online survey was written using JISC online surveys, using the MBI and the FACIT-SP-NI to measure burnout and spiritual health. It was advertised via email and social media to UK GPs who had worked since March 2020, for completion during April and May 2021. Ethical approval was given by Newcastle University on 2nd February 2021, and HRA approval 12th April 2021. Written consent was sought online as a condition for proceeding with the survey. Demographic information: age, gender, ethnicity, number of sessions (half a day, or 4–5 hours) worked as a GP, geographical area of work, number of years as a GP, country of primary medical qualification (PMQ), country of GP training; was requested to describe the sample and enable comparison with the wider GP population.

Data analysis

The MBI cannot be analysed as a sum total ‘burnout score’, so each domain was split into high, moderate and low tertiles. Those in the highest tertile of depersonalisation (DP), emotional exhaustion (EE) and lowest tertile of personal accomplishment (PA) were considered to be at highest risk for burnout, and those in the lowest tertile of depersonalisation (DP), emotional exhaustion (EE) and highest tertile of personal accomplishment (PA) were considered to be lowest risk of burnout [23] (S2 and S3 Tables). Therefore, those in the intermediate risk category covered a broad spectrum of burnout risk.

Differences in mean DP, EE and PA scores by religion, country of PMQ, and ethnicity were assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis test, differences in burnout domain scores by gender, by Mann-Whitney test and differences in mean spiritual score by religion/no religion by Student’s t test, and the relationship between religion and burnout by Chi squared tests. The relationship between burnout and spiritual health scores adjusting for potential confounding factors such as gender, ethnicity, years working as a GP, number of sessions worked, country of PMQ and GP training, and religion was investigated by multinomial logistic regression.

Data analysis was conducted using the Stata SE 17.0 package [24].

Results

In total 1320 general practitioners responded. Two were excluded due to an incomplete MBI (n = 1), and implausible responses (work pattern of 60 sessions/week) (n = 1), therefore the analytic sample comprised 1318 responses. There were few missing data: gender (n = 7), religion (n = 4), ethnic group (n = 3), with no overlap.

Respondent characteristics

Compared to GP Workforce data, survey responses showed an underrepresentation of GPs who were male or from a minority ethnicity, and likely under-representation of those of non-Christian religions (Table 1). Most GPs in the sample worked between 5 and 8 sessions (Table 1), and this was used as the baseline group in further analyses.

Burnout scores

Differences in burnout domains by gender, ethnicity, religion and country of PMQ were generally small although women had higher mean EE than men, Asian or Asian British participants had lower PA scores, and GPs who graduated in the European Economic Area (EEA) or other countries outside the UK had lower mean DP scores (Table 2). Number of sessions worked correlated weakly with all domains of the burnout score, however there was no difference in mean sessions worked for those at highest and lowest risk of burnout.

thumbnail
Table 2. Median burnout domain scores compared by gender, ethnicity, and country of primary medical education.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276739.t002

The median score for each burnout domain was compared with the cut offs for ‘high risk’ of burnout used in previous research [27] (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Box plots of the scores by domain of the Maslach Burnout Inventory, with the commonly used ’cut off’ for high risk for burnout scores marked.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276739.g001

As participants disagreed on whether humanism should be classified as a religion, the 2% (n = 20) humanists were omitted to allow comparison of religious identification with no religion. Atheists were included in ‘no religion.’ Those identifying with a religion had a higher mean spiritual score, 30.20 (95%CI 24.25 to 25.86) compared with those identifying as not having a religion (25.01, 95%CI 29.47 to 30.94) (Table 3), this was the case for each domain (meaning, peace and faith) of the spiritual score. Identification with a religion did not affect classification as being at highest or lowest risk of burnout overall (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Burnout and spiritual scores compared for those who identified as having a religion, compared with those stating ‘no religion’ or atheist.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276739.t003

Relationship between burnout and spiritual health

According to traditional ‘cut offs’ used in other studies [27], 256 participants (19%) had high DP, high EE and low PA defining a high risk of burnout. Cut offs based on tertiles suggested 48% had high depersonalisation, 68% had high emotional exhaustion and 30% had low personal accomplishment, with 12% (n = 155) falling into the high tertile for DP and EE, together with the low tertile for PA, and at the highest risk for burnout. The 13% (n = 169) who fell into the low tertile for DP and EE, as well as high for PA were considered lowest risk. All other participants were analysed as intermediate risk. The total spiritual score was similarly split into tertiles of high, moderate and low spiritual health.

In unadjusted analyses, participants with low spiritual health (compared to moderate) were five times more likely to be in the highest risk group for burnout than the intermediate group (RR = 5.09, 95%CI 3.33–7.78) (Table 4). After adjustment for gender, ethnicity, religion, years working as a GP, area of primary medical qualification and number of sessions worked, these associations persisted (RR = 5.46, 95%CI 3.52–8.46).

thumbnail
Table 4. Association between spiritual health score and risk of burnout: Multinomial logistic regression analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276739.t004

Statement of principal findings

This large survey of UK GPs examined the relationship between burnout and spiritual health. We found that one in five GP participants were at very high risk of burnout using traditional cut off scores. Nearly half of all GPs scored highly on depersonalisation, two thirds scored highly on emotional exhaustion, and a third had low personal accomplishment. GPs with lower levels of spiritual wellbeing were more likely to be at higher risk of burnout whilst higher levels of spiritual wellbeing appear to be protective against burnout. The relative risk of being most liable to burnout is five times higher for GPs who score lower on the FACIT-SP-NI score of spiritual wellbeing. The risk of being in the lowest risk group for burnout is nearly four times higher for those with a higher score on the FACIT-SP-NI.

Burnout appears to be a potential problem for all GPs. Overall, the effects of gender, length of service, ethnicity, and religion were small. Doctors who graduated outside the UK appear to have lower depersonalisation scores, and a lower risk for burnout. The number of sessions worked was positively correlated with both DP and EE scores, but the association with burnout risk did not reach statistical significance. High burnout levels are concerning for the wellbeing of GPs and their patient populations, with implications for the workforce, economic costs, and patient safety [6].

Strengths and weaknesses

This study is the first within the UK to use validated measures of both burnout and spiritual wellbeing score in doctors. While the spiritual score included a faith domain, religiosity was not assessed. While the participants worked during the pandemic, no specific questions related to the pandemic- this study offers a mid-covid pandemic snapshot. Doctors from minority ethnic groups and international medical graduates were under-represented in this study. It is also likely that many participants had a particular interest in the topics, due to the volunteer nature of the sample. However, the consequences of possible sampling bias were mitigated by the number of participants, which was larger than previous studies [28], and from an often difficult to reach group.

Comparison with other studies

This study has described greater EE, yet higher PA compared to previous studies. Twenty years ago, a study of 564 UK GPs (considered to be the largest sample of the MBI at the time) [28] described high EE in 46%; high DP in 42%; and low PA in 34%. Comparable surveys have described lower levels of burnout amongst GPs in other countries. In a 2018 sample of Danish GPs, 31% had high EE, 21% high DP and 37% low PA [29], similarly, German GPs surveyed in 2014, reported high EE in 34.1%, high DP in 29.0% and low PA in 21.5%, with 7.5% of their sample considered high risk for burnout [19]. French GPs in 2019 reported similar levels of EE and DP (23.8%, 27.3%) but fewer with low PA (13.3%) [30]. A recent systematic review of data prior to the pandemic found heterogeneity in approaches to analysis of the MBI-HSS, as well as a wide variation in burnout prevalence, and lower pooled burnout scores on meta-analysis [16]. None of these studies measured spiritual health. In the UK, the most recent (10th) GP worklife survey from 2019 showed that job satisfaction for GPs had improved slightly since 2017 (but not to previous levels) [31]. Other surveys of doctors found a perception that burnout had risen during the pandemic [32], despite already being at intolerable levels.6 A systematic review of GP burnout during the pandemic found two European studies that found 24.5% to 46.1% GPs had emotional exhaustion [33]. A recent survey by the British Medical Association reported that over half of UK doctors who responded felt the term moral injury resonated with them [34], particularly for those from an ethnic minority [34]. This study does not show that gender affects risk of being at high risk of burnout, in contrast with other studies identified in a recent systematic review, which found female doctors more at risk of stress [33]. There is a dearth of data from UK GPs using the ‘gold standard’ measure of burnout, as shortened versions of the MBI or self-rating have been more commonly used [35].

The authors have found no published studies to date that measure burnout and spiritual health simultaneously in doctors using the validated measures used here (MBI and the FACIT-Sp-NI). An unpublished survey of 44 doctors (residents and residency faculty) in Kansas, USA using these measures reported a significant negative correlation between the DP and EE domains of the MBI and the FACIT score, and positive correlation between PA and the FACIT score [22]. The qualitative themes in their work included connection to others, camaraderie, empathy, and the use of religious coping [22]. Other research included a study of doctors at a 2013 US conference, which found MBI domains were correlated with the Hatch Spiritual Involvement and Beliefs score (SIBS) [36]. The same authors have reported positive (r = 0.35) correlations between the SIBS score and the PA domain of the MBI amongst residency doctors in the USA [15].

Implications for policy and practice

There is considerable attention on burnout amongst GPs [16, 37], primarily focussing on workplace pressure, appointments, retirement and recruitment issues, increasing workloads over time, and the multiple challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic [16, 37]. Concern and suggestions of remedies for burnout are not new. Almost two decades ago, Chambers made three suggestions to reduce burnout, including managing trainee expectations, reducing the stigma of mental illness, and reducing isolation [38], all three of which remain pertinent today. The rise in burnout suggests that there is merit in looking at this issue from different perspectives. The traditional approaches of resilience, and mental and physical health support have failed to stem the rising tide of GP burnout. Increasing focus on the role of spiritual health, and the relationship between spiritual health and burnout, may offer new insights into how to improve the health and wellbeing of GPs. Destigmatisation of both burnout and spiritual distress may also be important. It is timely and important, to explore the relationship between burnout and spiritual health during the pandemic, to inform and protect the workforce during and after this crisis.

Future work could usefully consider the wellbeing of the wider team in primary care, including practice managers, as they may also be liable to burnout. GPs experiences of burnout and spiritual healthcare currently being explored using qualitative methods.

Conclusion

This study gives evidence that high levels of concern about UK primary care are justified. GPs appear to be at higher risk of burnout than ever before. Decades of reporting on burnout has recorded increasing levels. Further research into GP spiritual health, and how this relates to burnout, may offer a breakthrough, to help improve the life and work of GPs, and keep them well in work through difficult times.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Comparison of burnout classification and spiritual score: Adjusted multinomial regression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276739.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Classifications of burnout risk for analysis used for this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276739.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Burnout tertile ‘cut offs’ used in analysis of this data, with cut offs used in literature for comparison.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276739.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Voice North PPI group, whose discussion prompted this research, and to all the General Practitioners who took the time to take part, and help distribute the survey, along with other primary care staff. Thanks to Mindgarden and FACIT for use of their licenced tools. Thanks to Holly Bennett for her support with using the Stata package, and Daniel Stowe for statistical support.

References

  1. 1. Rochfort A, Collins C and Burgers J. Emotional distress, occupational stress and burnout among Family Doctors in Europe: Monitoring and testing of interventions is required. European Journal of General Practice 2021; 27: 271–273. pmid:34633274
  2. 2. Rimmer A. Covid-19: Two fifths of doctors say pandemic has worsened their mental health. BMJ 2020; 371: m4148. pmid:33109530
  3. 3. Maslach C and Leiter MP. The Truth About Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Do About It. Wiley, 2008.
  4. 4. World Health Organisation. Burn-out an "occupational phenomenon": International Classification of Diseases, https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases (2019, accessed 27/07/21).
  5. 5. Jones D and Davies P. Burnout in general practice. InnovAiT 2016; 9: 364–369.
  6. 6. Hall LH, Johnson J, Watt I, et al. Association of GP wellbeing and burnout with patient safety in UK primary care: a cross-sectional survey. British Journal of General Practice 2019; 69: e507. pmid:31015224
  7. 7. Nussbaum C, Massou E, Fisher R, et al. Inequalities in the distribution of the general practice workforce in England: a practice-level longitudinal analysis. BJGP Open 2021; 5: BJGPO.2021.0066. pmid:34404634
  8. 8. House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee. Workforce burnout and resilience in the NHS and social care. In: Health and Social Care Committee, (ed.). House of Commons8 June 2021.
  9. 9. Leonelli LB, Andreoni S, Martins P, et al. Perceived stress among Primary Health Care Professionals in Brazil. Estresse percebido em profissionais da Estrategia Saude da Familia 2017; 20: 286–298.
  10. 10. Kim HS and Yeom HA. The association between spiritual well-being and burnout in intensive care unit nurses: A descriptive study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2018; 46: 92–97. 2018/04/08. pmid:29625870
  11. 11. Whitehead IO. Discussing spiritual health in primary care in England. Innovation in Aging 2019; 3: S884–S884.
  12. 12. Antonsdottir I, Rushton CH, Nelson KE, et al. Burnout and moral resilience in interdisciplinary healthcare professionals. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2022; 31: 196–208. pmid:34145678
  13. 13. Correia I and Almeida AE. Organizational Justice, Professional Identification, Empathy, and Meaningful Work During COVID-19 Pandemic: Are They Burnout Protectors in Physicians and Nurses? Frontiers in Psychology 2020; 11.
  14. 14. Harper L, Alshammari D, Ferdynus C, et al. Burnout amongst members of the French-speaking Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Urology (SFUPA). Are there specific risk factors? Journal of pediatric urology 2020; 16: 482–486. pmid:32591316
  15. 15. Doolittle B, Windish D, Doolittle BR, et al. Correlation of burnout syndrome with specific coping strategies, behaviors, and spiritual attitudes among interns at Yale University, New Haven, USA. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions 2015; 12.
  16. 16. Karuna C, Palmer V, Scott A, et al. Prevalence of burnout among GPs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of General Practice 2021: BJGP.2021.0441. pmid:34990391
  17. 17. Williamson K, Lank PM, Cheema N, et al. Comparing the Maslach Burnout Inventory to Other Well-Being Instruments in Emergency Medicine Residents. J Grad Med Educ 2018; 10: 532–536. 2018/11/06. pmid:30386478
  18. 18. Mindgarden. The Problem with Cut-Offs for the Maslach Burnout Inventory, https://www.mindgarden.com/documents/MBI-Cutoff-Caveat.pdf (accessed 05/03/2021).
  19. 19. Dreher A, Theune M, Kersting C, et al. Prevalence of burnout among German general practitioners: Comparison of physicians working in solo and group practices. PLOS ONE 2019; 14: e0211223. pmid:30726284
  20. 20. Facit.org. FACIT-Sp Non-Illness, https://www.facit.org/measures/FACIT-Sp-Non-Illness (accessed 02/07/2021).
  21. 21. Monod S, Brennan M, Rochat E, et al. Instruments Measuring Spirituality in Clinical Research: A Systematic Review. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2011; 26: 1345. pmid:21725695
  22. 22. Schmidt C and Roffler M. Coping with the Practice of Medicine: Religion, Spirituality, and Other Personal Strategies. Journal of Religion and Health 2021; 60: 2092–2108. pmid:33118137
  23. 23. Brady KJS, Ni P, Sheldrick RC, et al. Describing the emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment symptoms associated with Maslach Burnout Inventory subscale scores in US physicians: an item response theory analysis. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2020; 4: 42. pmid:32488344
  24. 24. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC, 2021.
  25. 25. General Medical Council. What our data tells us about general practitioners working in the NHS in England and Scoland. 2018.
  26. 26. NHS Workforce. NHS Workforce Ethnicity Facts and Figures, https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/workforce-and-business/workforce-diversity/nhs-workforce/latest#by-ethnicity-and-grade-medical-staff (2021, accessed 13/12/21).
  27. 27. Doulougeri K, Georganta K and Montgomery A. “Diagnosing” burnout among healthcare professionals: Can we find consensus? Cogent Medicine 2016; 3: 1.
  28. 28. Orton P, Orton C and Pereira Gray D. Depersonalised doctors: a cross-sectional study of 564 doctors, 760 consultations and 1876 patient reports in UK general practice. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e000274. pmid:22300669
  29. 29. Nørøxe KB, Pedersen AF, Bro F, et al. Mental well-being and job satisfaction among general practitioners: a nationwide cross-sectional survey in Denmark. BMC Family Practice 2018; 19: 130. pmid:30055571
  30. 30. Picquendar G, Guedon A, Moulinet F, et al. Influence of medical shortage on GP burnout: a cross-sectional study. Family Practice 2019; 36: 291–296. pmid:30184075
  31. 31. NIHR Policy Research Unit In Health And Social Care Systems And Commissioning. Tenth National GP Worklife Survey. 2019.
  32. 32. Doctors’ burnout worsens as GMC report reveals pandemic impact. GMC News, 27/07/2021 2021.
  33. 33. Jefferson L, Golder S, Heathcote C, et al. GP wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice 2022; 72: e325. pmid:35314428
  34. 34. Rimmer A. Covid-19: Eight in 10 doctors have experienced moral distress during pandemic, BMA survey finds. BMJ 2021; 373: n1543. pmid:34135019
  35. 35. Imo UO. Burnout and psychiatric morbidity among doctors in the UK: a systematic literature review of prevalence and associated factors. BJPsych Bull 2017; 41: 197–204. pmid:28811913
  36. 36. Doolittle BR, Windish DM and Seelig CB. Burnout, coping, and spirituality among internal medicine resident physicians. Journal of graduate medical education 2013; 5: 257–261. pmid:24404269
  37. 37. Pulse. Gerada: 22% more GPs presenting to burnout service than pre-Covid, https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/workload/gerada-22-more-gps-presenting-to-burnout-service-than-pre-covid/ (2021, accessed 16/11/2021).
  38. 38. Chambers R. Avoiding burnout in general practice. British Journal of General Practice 1993; 43: 442. pmid:8292412