Previously submitted to: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (no longer under consideration since Dec 04, 2020)
Date Submitted: Jul 16, 2020
Predicting spatial and temporal responses to non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 growth rates across 58 counties in New York State: A prospective event-based modeling study on county-level sociological predictors
ABSTRACT
Background:
Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been implemented in the New York State since the COVID-19 outbreak on March 1, 2020 to control the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Projecting the growth rate of incidence as a response to key NPIs is crucial to guide future policy making. Few studies, however, considered spatial variations of incidence growth rate across different time points of NPIs.
Objective:
This study quantifies county-level predictors of the time evolution of COVID-19 incidence growth rate following key NPIs in New York State.
Methods:
County-level COVID-19 incidence data were retrieved from the Coronavirus Case Data from Social Explorer Website between March and June 2020. 5-day moving average growth rates of COVID-19 were calculated for 16 selected time points on the dates of eight NPIs and their respective 14-day-lag-behind time points. A total of 36 county-level predictors were extracted from multiple public datasets. Geospatial mapping was used to display the spatial heterogeneity of county-level COVID-19 outbreak. Generalized mixed effect least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was employed to identify significant county-level predictors related to the change of county-level COVID-19 growth rate over time.
Results:
Since March 1, the growth rate of COVID-19 infection increased and peaked by the end of March, followed by a decrease. Over time, the region with the highest growth rates shifted from New York metropolitan area towards Western and Northern areas. Proportions of population aged 45 years and above (β=3.25 [0.17–6.32]), living alone at residential houses (β=3.31 [0.39–-6.22]), and proportion of crowd residential houses (β=6.15 [2.15–10.14]) were positively associated with the growth rate of COVID-19 infection. In contrast, living alone at rental houses (β=-2.47 [-4.83–-0.12]) and rate of mental health providers (β=-1.11 [-1.95–-0.28]) were negatively associated with COVID-19 growth rate across all 16 time points.
Conclusions:
Tailored interventions and policies are required to effectively control the epidemic for different counties. Attention towards economic, racial/ethnic, and healthcare resource disparities are needed to narrow the unequal health impact on vulnerable populations.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.