Download This Paper
Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact preprints@lancet.com.
High Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Frontline Healthcare Workers in Northeast Brazil: A Respondent-Driven Sampling Approach
28 Pages Posted: 1 Oct 2021
More...Abstract
Background: The disparities in the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among frontline health care workers (HCWs) and the unique work circumstances are poorly documented for low-and middle-income countries.
Methods: We assessed the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection, personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages, PPE use, and accidents involving biological material among HCWs in the Recife metropolitan area, Northeast Brazil. Using respondent driven sampling, we included HCWs attending suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients from May 2020 to February 2021.
Findings: We analyzed 1,525 HCWs (527 physicians, 471 registered nurses, 263 nursing assistants/technicians, and 264 physical therapists). Women predominated in all categories (81·1%). Nurses were older and had more comorbidities (hypertension and overweight/obesity) than the other HCWs. The overall prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 61·8% after adjustment for the cluster random effect, weighted by network, and reference population size. The independent risk factors for a positive RT-PCR test were being a nursing assistant (OR adjusted: 2·56), not always using all recommended PPE in routine practice (ORadj: 2·15), and reporting a splash of biological fluid/respiratory secretion in the eyes (ORadj: 3·37).
Interpretation: The high risk of infection among HCWs reflects PPE shortages and younger, possibly less experienced, frontline HCWs. There were disparities in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs, with nursing assistants being the most vulnerable, possibly due to their longer and frequent contact with COVID-19 patients.
Funding Information: This investigation was funded by Health Technology Assessment Institute (IATS) and by MCTIC/CNPq/FNDCT/MS/SCTIE/Decit Nº 07/2020.
Declaration of Interests: We declare no competing interests.
Ethics Approval Statement: Providing electronic informed consent was mandatory to participate and access the questionnaire. The project was approved by the National Ethics Committee (CONEP; CAAE: 30629220.8.0000.0008).
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation