Infect Chemother. 2022 Mar;54(1):91-101. English.
Published online Mar 08, 2022.
Copyright © 2022 by The Korean Society of Infectious Diseases, Korean Society for Antimicrobial Therapy, and The Korean Society for AIDS
Original Article

Effectiveness of Regdanvimab at Preventing the Need for Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Seong Jin Choi,1 Sang-Won Park,2,3 and Eunyoung Lee2,3
    • 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
    • 2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
    • 3Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Received December 14, 2021; Accepted February 27, 2022.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Monoclonal antibodies are a treatment option for patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease (COVID-19). We investigated the effectiveness of regdanvimab, an anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 monoclonal antibody approved in Korea, in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

Materials and Methods

Medical records of patients who were admitted to a COVID-19 designated hospital during the study period of February 1 to June 31 and met the indications for administration of regdanvimab were reviewed to assess baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes such as supplemental oxygen requirements, mortality, and length of hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with requiring supplemental oxygen. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the presence of pneumonia confirmed on a chest X-ray.

Results

Three hundred ninety-eight COVID-19 patients were included in the study, and 65 (16.3%) of them were administered regdanvimab. The proportion of patients requiring supplemental oxygen was significantly lower in the regdanvimab group than in the control group (6.2% vs. 20.1%, P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in mortality (0% vs. 1.5%, P >0.999) and the length of hospitalization (median: 10 days vs. 10 days, P = 0.267) between two groups. The multivariable analysis demonstrated that administration of regdanvimab was independently associated with lower oxygen supplement [odds ratio (OR): 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06 - 0.55, P = 0.004] after adjustment of potential risk factors related to supplemental oxygen including age, sex, chest X-ray abnormality, and underlying chronic kidney disease. Among the patients with pneumonia radiologically, administration of regdanvimab was also associated with lower risk of oxygen supplement (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02 - 0.46, P = 0.007).

Conclusion

Regdanvimab use was related to lower need for supplemental oxygen in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 for the indications for administration of regdanvimab.

Keywords
SARS-CoV-2; Monoclonal antibody; Immunotherapy; Inpatient care

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that started in December 2019 continues to affect millions of people worldwide [1, 2]. The clinical spectrum of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is diverse. Although most people with SARS-CoV-2 infection experience mild disease with spontaneous resolution, some individuals, particularly those who have risk factors such as older age, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic lung disease, develop a critical illness that requires intensive care, including mechanical ventilation [3, 4, 5, 6].

Comprehensive efforts have been made to develop therapeutic agents for treating COVID-19. These include neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The World Health Organization recommends anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 [7].

Three anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody products have been granted Emergency Use Authorization by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) for use in non-hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who are at high risk of developing the severe disease: bamlanivimab/etesevimab (Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN, USA), sotrovimab (GlaxoSmithKline, London, United Kingdom), and casirivimab/imdevimab (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY, USA). Bamlanivimab/etesevimab has been reported to be associated with a 70% reduction in the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization or death compared to placebo [8]; however, this product has limited effectiveness against the Beta (B.1.351) and Gamma (P.1) variants of SARS-CoV-2 [9]. Sotrovimab has been reported to reduce the risk of hospitalization and death by 85.0% and has been approved for the treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in many countries, including the United States, Canada, Singapore, Australia, and Japan [10]. Casirivimab/imdevimab has been reported to reduce the risk of hospitalization and death by approximately 70.0% [11, 12].

Regdanvimab (Celltrion, Incheon, Korea) is an anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody that has been approved in-Korea, Indonesia, and Brazil for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. In an interim analysis of a clinical trial published as a preprint, treatment with regdanvimab was associated with a decreased risk of requiring supplemental oxygen or hospital admission in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared to placebo [13]. Based on this result, the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety granted conditional marketing authorization for the emergency use of regdanvimab for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 on February 5, 2021.

In this study, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of regdanvimab in hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 under conditions of standard clinical use.

Materials and Methods

1. Patients and data collection

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from the medical records of patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to a hospital in Seoul, Korea designated for treating COVID-19 between February 1 and June 31, 2021. The hospital has 765 inpatient beds, including 195 nationally designated negative-pressure isolation units, and can accommodate 180 COVID-19 patients. It admits all high-risk patients with COVID-19, regardless of their age and symptoms, and also admits low-risk patients with COVID-19 if they require hospitalization. Some low-risk patients with COVID-19 are admitted to COVID-19 designated community centers for isolation and are transferred to the hospital when hospitalization is required. Among the patients hospitalized during the study period, patients who were treated with regdanvimab during their hospitalization were selected. Patients who met the criteria for regdanvimab administration but did not receive it were selected as a control group. Regdanvimab (Celltrion, Korea) was approved in Korea in February 2021 for administration to patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who do not require oxygen treatment and who meet at least one of the following criteria: are within 7 days of symptom onset, are aged 60 years or older, have abnormalities on chest X-ray, or have more than one underlying comorbidity, such as cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension. We excluded patients younger than 18 years, pregnant women, asymptomatic patients, and patients who required oxygen therapy on the day after admission. Information was collected for on sex, body mass index (BMI), presence of symptoms, and the presence of lung infiltration on chest X-ray according to the chest radiography report. We also collected information on comorbidities including chronic kidney disease (CKD), cancer, and an immunocompromised state. CKD was defined as a glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or being on dialysis. In addition, we also collected the status of COVID-19 vaccination in patients. The clinical outcome measures used in the analysis were a requirement for supplemental oxygen, mortality during hospitalization, and the length of hospitalization. The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 was described according to the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines by the National Institute of Health [9].

2. Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Boramae Medical Center (No. 20-2021-53). The IRB waived the requirement for informed consent from the study participants because of the retrospective study design.

3. Statistical analysis

Patients were divided into a regdanvimab group and a control group in the analysis. Patient descriptive characteristics were summarized as counts and percentages or medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). Baseline characteristics of the regdanvimab group and the control group were compared using chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, and the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with requiring supplemental oxygen. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed with the variables that were statistically significant in univariate logistic regression analysis. The results of the logistic regression analyses were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using R Version 4.1.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

1,171 patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the study hospital during the study period. We excluded 773 patients who were younger than 18 years, pregnant, asymptomatic, received early oxygen therapy, or did not meet the criteria for regdanvimab administration (Fig. 1). A total of 398 patients were eligible for regdanvimab administration. Of the 398 patients, 65 (16.3%) received regdanvimab (Table 1). The patients in the regdanvimab group were significantly older than those in the control group (median age: 66 years vs. 60 years, P = 0.001). The majority of patients in both groups were female. The median BMI did not differ significantly according to group (median 22.78 vs. 23.62 kg/m2,P = 0.436). Chest X-ray abnormalities were less common among patients in the regdanvimab group than those in the control group (50.8 vs. 63.4%, P = 0.077). There was no significant difference between groups in the prevalence of underlying comorbidities or the use of immunosuppressive drugs. 22 patients (5.5%) had a history of at least one dose of any COVID-19 vaccination and there was no significant difference between groups in the status of vaccination. Patients in the regdanvimab group and the control group were usually admitted on the day of diagnosis and the median duration from symptom onset to hospitalization was 2 and 3 days, respectively (P <0.001). Patients in the regdanvimab group were administered regdanvimab a median of 4 days after symptom onset (IQR: 3 - 5 days) and 2 days after admission (IQR: 1 - 3 days). The frequency of supplemental oxygen use was significantly lower in the regdanvimab group than in the control group (6.2% vs. 20.1%, P = 0.007). Most patients who received oxygen therapy (53/71, 74.6%) were provided with low-flow oxygen. The time from symptom onset to starting supplemental oxygen was longer in the patients in the regdanvimab group than those in the control group (median 10.5 days vs. 8 days), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.108) The time from admission to starting supplemental oxygen was significantly longer in the patients in the regdanvimab group (median 10 days vs. 3 days, P = 0.008). There were no deaths in the regdanvimab group and five deaths in the control group (0% vs. 1.5%, P >0.999). All patients with fatal outcomes were aged >70 years and had multiple underlying comorbidities (Supplementary Table 1). Although all patients with fatal outcomes were treated with remdesivir and steroids, they all developed progressive COVID-19 pneumonia. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from the sputum specimen of one patient with a fatal outcome; however, he received adequate antibiotics and combined bacterial pneumonia did not appear to be the cause of death. The median length of hospitalization was 10 days in both the regdanvimab group and the control group (P = 0.267).

Figure 1
Flow diagram of patient’s selection for retrospective cohort study.
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.

Table 1
Baseline Characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients who match the indications of regdanvimab administration

In the univariable logistic regression analysis, increasing age, male sex, abnormal findings on chest X-ray, and underlying CKD were found to be associated with an increased risk of requiring supplemental oxygen, and administration of regdanvimab was associated with a decreased risk of requiring supplemental oxygen (Table 2). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02 - 1.06, P <0.001), chest X-ray abnormalities (OR: 3.57, 95% CI: 1.88 - 7.23, P <0.001) were associated with a significantly higher risk of requiring supplemental oxygen. After adjustment of age, sex, chest X-ray abnormalities, and underlying CKD, administration of regdanvimab remained associated with a significantly lower risk of requiring supplemental oxygen (OR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.06 - 0.55, P = 0.004).

Table 2
Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses for supplemental oxygen

As chest X-ray abnormalities were strongly associated with requiring supplemental oxygen and were more frequent in the control group, we performed subgroup analysis according to the presence of chest X-ray abnormalities to determine whether the more frequent requirement of oxygen treatment in the control group could be attributed to the higher frequency of chest X-ray abnormalities. In patients without chest X-ray abnormalities, there was no difference between groups in age or oxygen requirement (Supplementary Table 2). The time from admission to starting oxygen was longer in patients of the regdanvimab group than those in the control group (median: 11 vs. 7 days, P = 0.037). In patients with chest X-ray abnormalities, those in the regdanvimab group were older than those in the control group (median age: 71 years vs. 57 years, P <0.001). The frequency of supplemental oxygen use was significantly lower in the regdanvimab group than in the control group (6.1% vs. 26.5%, P = 0.008). Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that increasing age was associated with a higher risk of requiring supplemental oxygen therapy in the patients without chest X-ray abnormalities (Supplementary Table 3). In the patients with chest X-ray abnormalities, increasing age was associated with a higher risk of requiring supplemental oxygen, and administration of regdanvimab was associated with a lower risk of requiring supplemental oxygen in the univariable logistic regression analysis. In the multivariable logistic regression analyses with variables including age, sex, CKD, and regdanvimab administration, older age (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.05, P = 0.003) was associated with a significantly higher risk of requiring supplemental oxygen, and administration of regdanvimab was associated with a significantly lower risk of requiring supplemental oxygen (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02 - 0.46, P = 0.007).

None of the patients who received regdanvimab experienced hypersensitivity reactions or infusion reactions. One patient reported urticaria on both arms one day after receiving a regdanvimab infusion. There were no serious adverse reactions recorded in the electronic medical records.

Discussion

This study investigated the effectiveness of regdanvimab for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Patients in the regdanvimab group were significantly less likely to require supplemental oxygen than patients in the control group, and regdanvimab administration was independently associated with a reduced likelihood of requiring supplemental oxygen during hospitalization after controlling for confounders. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the mortality rate or the length of hospitalization between the two groups. Statistical analysis of the mortality was limited because of the limited number of patients and the low mortality rates among patients in the study. However, the cause all patients died because of the progression of COVID-19, and there were no deaths due to worsening of underlying diseases not related to COVID-19 or to secondary bacterial infection. A further nationwide study is needed to determine the effectiveness of regdanvimab for preventing death in COVID-19 patients, considering the low mortality rate among COVID-19 patients who do not require supplemental oxygen on admission (0.034%, 65/1,914) [14], and the lack of fatal cases among the 307 patients who participated in the clinical trial of regdanvimab [13].

Older age, male sex, chest X-ray abnormalities, and CKD have previously been identified as risk factors for severe COVID-19 [4, 5, 6, 15, 16], and were significantly associated with requiring supplemental oxygen in this study. However, obesity, which is also known to be a risk factor for severe disease [17], was not significantly associated with requiring supplemental oxygen in this study. Administration of regdanvimab was significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of requiring supplemental oxygen, even after adjusting for age, sex, the presence of chest X-ray abnormalities, and CKD. Subgroup analysis according to the presence of chest X-ray abnormalities revealed that among patients in the regdanvimab group, the frequency requiring supplemental oxygen was similar in those with chest X-ray abnormalities and those without chest X-ray abnormalities. However, among patients in the control group, the frequency of requiring supplemental oxygen was higher in those with chest X-ray abnormalities than those without chest X-ray abnormalities. Administration of regdanvimab was associated with a decreased likelihood of requiring supplemental oxygen in patients with chest X-ray abnormalities. This finding suggests chest X-ray abnormality is an important indicator of which patients are most likely to benefit from regdanvimab administration.

Vaccination is an important factor related to the severity of COVID-19. However, a small number of patients in this study were vaccinated because the study period was before or at the beginning of the COVID-19 vaccination. In addition, there were only three patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 more than two weeks after the end of vaccination. Further study is needed to investigate the effectiveness of regdanvimab for patients with COVID-19 after vaccination.

In Korea, patients without risk factors for disease progression are primarily admitted to community treatment centers, which are facilities that provide minimum tests and few medications [18]. Patients with worsening symptoms or risk factors for disease progression are admitted or transferred to hospitals. The disease severity of patients in this study is likely to have been more severe than that of patients who participated in clinical trials because we only included hospitalized patients, although most patients who meet the indications for regdanvimab administration are hospitalized. This may explain the higher proportion of patients that required supplemental oxygen in this study than in the clinical trials [13]. Recently, another retrospective cohort study about the effectiveness of the regdanvimab under conditions of standard clinical use was published [19]. It found that administration of regdanvimab was associated with a reduced risk of hypoxemia requiring supplemental oxygen in the total cohort. Although, in the propensity-matched cohort analysis, the reduction in the likelihood of requiring supplemental oxygen among the patients who received regdanvimab was not statically significant, patients in the regdanvimab group were less likely to require supplemental oxygen than the propensity-matched controls. This is similar to our findings and suggests that the administration of regdanvimab to high risk COVID-19 patients can prevent disease progression and the requirement for supplemental oxygen under conditions of standard clinical use.

The length of hospitalization was similar between patients in the regdanvimab group and the control group. This may not adequately represent the effects of regdanvimab because a minimum of 10 days of hospitalization after symptom onset is a governmental requirement in Korea. This could have masked any effect of regdanvimab on reducing the length of hospitalization in patients with COVID-19 under conditions of standard clinical use.

In this study, more than half of the patients met the indication for regdanvimab, but, did not administrate the drug. Although it is difficult to know the reason for not using regdanvimab frequently in real clinics, we inferred several reasons. First, regdanvimab was available under emergency use authorization with insufficient in-vitro and clinical evidence. In addition, there was insufficient clinical experience from other countries because regdanvimab was first released only in Korea. Second, the indication of regdanvimab is for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection which does not need oxygen supplement, therefore, clinicians could consider the risk-benefit of regdanvimab rather than direct clinical usage of the drug in that situation. This can be inferred from that a large number of patients who received regdanvimab were the patients admitted to the department of infectious disease: 49 patients in 159 patients admitted to the department of infectious disease administered regdanvimab (30.8%) and 16 patients in 239 patients admitted to the department of other internal medicine administered regdanvimab (6.7%). Also, the indication of regdanvimab is abnormal chest X-ray, however, other clinical importance such as patients’ symptoms rather than just chest X-ray could be the indicator of decisions in real clinics. Lastly, not widely informed the regdanvimab to healthcare providers, they could reluctant to the administration of regdanvimab.

This study has some limitations. It was a retrospective cohort study. It was difficult to find an appropriate control group because of the heterogeneity of the disease manifestations. To overcome this limitation, we restricted the control group to patients who had indications for regdanvimab administration. Nevertheless, patients in the regdanvimab group were significantly older than patients in the control group and abnormalities on the initial chest X-ray were more common in patients who did not receive regdanvimab. To overcome this, we performed multivariable analysis and subgroup analysis. These analyses confirmed that the administration of regdanvimab was associated with a reduced likelihood of requiring supplemental oxygen. Another limitation of the retrospective cohort study was the incomplete medical records. Although we reviewed adverse reactions related to regdanvimab, it is possible that adverse reactions were under-ascertained because they may not have been reported in patients’ medical records.

In addition, SARS-CoV-2 variants were not investigated in this study. Mutations of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein could affect the effectiveness of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies. Bamlanivimab/etesevimab has not been approved because of its limited effectiveness against the SARS-CoV-2 Beta (B.1.351) and Gamma (P.1) variants. In Korea [20], the proportion of COVID-19 cases caused by variant strains was less than 20% during the study period (from February 1 to June 31, 2021), and during the period from April to June 2021, approximately 10% of patients were infected with the Alpha variant. Although we did not perform sequencing of the viruses of patients in our study, it is presumed that most of the patients in our study did not have SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Subsequently, novel SARS-CoV-2 variants such as the Delta (B.1.167.2) [21], and Omicron (B.1.1.529) [22] variants have emerged and spread worldwide. The Delta variant has mutations in the RBD of the spike protein that impair the binding affinity of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies targeting the RBD. Of the monoclonal antibodies approved by the US FDA, bamlanivimab does not bind to the Delta variant [23]. In addition, the Omicron variant has more mutations in the spike protein than the Delta variant and escapes neutralizing antibodies elicited by COVID-19 vaccination and natural infection [22, 24, 25]. Regdanvimab is a class I neutralizing monoclonal antibody that blocks ACE2 receptors and binds to the RBD [26, 27]. Although regdanvimab has been shown to reduce the death rate and ameliorate weight loss in ACE2-transgenic mice infected with the Delta variant, it showed reduced binding affinity and susceptibility to regdanvimab, and the neutralizing activity of regdanvimab against the Delta variant was lower than that against the original strain of SARS-VoV-2 in vitro [28]. In addition, regdanvimab has reduced neutralizing activity against the Omicron variant in vitro [29]. The effectiveness of regdanvimab against the Delta and Omicron variants in vivo is uncertain and further study is needed.

In conclusion, this study investigated the effectiveness of regdanvimab for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients under conditions of standard clinical use. In our study, the administration of regdanvimab was related to the lower requirement for supplemental oxygen in eligible patients.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary Table 1

Characteristics of 5 patients with fatal outcomes in the control group

Click here to view.(39K, xls)

Supplementary Table 2

Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients who match the indications of regdanvimab administration by Chest X-ray abnormalities

Click here to view.(45K, xls)

Supplementary Table 3

Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses for supplemental oxygen by chest X-ray abnormalities

Click here to view.(43K, xls)

Notes

Funding:None.

Conflict of Interest:No conflict of interest.

Authors contributions:

  • Conceptualization: EL.

  • Data curation: SJC, EL.

  • Formal analysis: SJC.

  • Investigation: SJC, EL.

  • Methodology: EL.

  • Project administration: EL.

  • Resources: EL.

  • Software: SJC.

  • Supervision: SWP, EL.

  • Validation: SJC, SWP, EL.

  • Visualization: SJC, EL.

  • Writing - original draft: SJC.

  • Writing – review & editing: SWP, EL.

References

    1. Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, Hu Y, Tao ZW, Tian JH, Pei YY, Yuan ML, Zhang YL, Dai FH, Liu Y, Wang QM, Zheng JJ, Xu L, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020;579:265–269.
    1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, Niu P, Zhan F, Ma X, Wang D, Xu W, Wu G, Gao GF, Tan W. China novel coronavirus investigating and research team. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 2020;382:727–733.
    1. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Hui DSC, Du B, Li LJ, Zeng G, Yuen KY, Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Chen PY, Xiang J, Li SY, Wang JL, Liang ZJ, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P, Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY, Zhong NS. China medical treatment expert group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1708–1720.
    1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395:497–506.
    1. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, Huang H, Zhang L, Zhou X, Du C, Zhang Y, Song J, Wang S, Chao Y, Yang Z, Xu J, Zhou X, Chen D, Xiong W, Xu L, Zhou F, Jiang J, Bai C, Zheng J, Song Y. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:934–943.
    1. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, Guan L, Wei Y, Li H, Wu X, Xu J, Tu S, Zhang Y, Chen H, Cao B. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1054–1062.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Therapeutics and covid-19: living guideline. [Accessed 30 December 2021].
    1. Dougan M, Nirula A, Azizad M, Mocherla B, Gottlieb RL, Chen P, Hebert C, Perry R, Boscia J, Heller B, Morris J, Crystal C, Igbinadolor A, Huhn G, Cardona J, Shawa I, Kumar P, Adams AC, Van Naarden J, Custer KL, Durante M, Oakley G, Schade AE, Holzer TR, Ebert PJ, Higgs RE, Kallewaard NL, Sabo J, Patel DR, Dabora MC, Klekotka P, Shen L, Skovronsky DM. BLAZE-1 Investigators. Bamlanivimab plus Etesevimab in mild or moderate Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1382–1392.
    1. National Institutes of Health (NIH). COVID-19 treatment guidelines. [Accessed 10 February 2022].
    1. Gupta A, Gonzalez-Rojas Y, Juarez E, Crespo Casal M, Moya J, Falci DR, Sarkis E, Solis J, Zheng H, Scott N, Cathcart AL, Hebner CM, Sager J, Mogalian E, Tipple C, Peppercorn A, Alexander E, Pang PS, Free A, Brinson C, Aldinger M, Shapiro AE. COMET-ICE investigators. Early treatment for Covid-19 with SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody Sotrovimab. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1941–1950.
    1. Weinreich DM, Sivapalasingam S, Norton T, Ali S, Gao H, Bhore R, Musser BJ, Soo Y, Rofail D, Im J, Perry C, Pan C, Hosain R, Mahmood A, Davis JD, Turner KC, Hooper AT, Hamilton JD, Baum A, Kyratsous CA, Kim Y, Cook A, Kampman W, Kohli A, Sachdeva Y, Graber X, Kowal B, DiCioccio T, Stahl N, Lipsich L, Braunstein N, Herman G, Yancopoulos GD. Trial Investigators. REGN-COV2, a neutralizing antibody cocktail, in outpatients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021;384:238–251.
    1. Weinreich DM, Sivapalasingam S, Norton T, Ali S, Gao H, Bhore R, Xiao J, Hooper AT, Hamilton JD, Musser BJ, Rofail D, Hussein M, Im J, Atmodjo DY, Perry C, Pan C, Mahmood A, Hosain R, Davis JD, Turner KC, Baum A, Kyratsous CA, Kim Y, Cook A, Kampman W, Roque-Guerrero L, Acloque G, Aazami H, Cannon K, Simón-Campos JA, Bocchini JA, Kowal B, DiCioccio AT, Soo Y, Geba GP, Stahl N, Lipsich L, Braunstein N, Herman G, Yancopoulos GD. Trial Investigators. REGEN-COV antibody combination and outcomes in outpatients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021;385:e81
    1. Eom JS, Ison M, Streinu-Cercel A, Săndulescu O, Preotescu LL, Kim YS, Kim JY, Cheon SH, Jang YR, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Chang I, Suh JH, Lee SG, Kim MR, Chung DR, Kim HN, Streinu-Cercel A. Efficacy and safety of ct-p59 plus standard of care: A phase 2/3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in outpatients with mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. Research Square. 2021
      [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Kim SW, Kim SM, Kim YK, Kim JY, Lee YM, Kim BO, Hwangbo S, Park T. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 cohort patients in Daegu metropolitan city outbreak in 2020. J Korean Med Sci 2021;36:e12
    1. CDC COVID-19 Response Team. Preliminary estimates of the prevalence of selected underlying health conditions among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 - United States, February 12-March 28, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:382–386.
    1. Gansevoort RT, Hilbrands LB. CKD is a key risk factor for COVID-19 mortality. Nat Rev Nephrol 2020;16:705–706.
    1. Cai Q, Chen F, Wang T, Luo F, Liu X, Wu Q, He Q, Wang Z, Liu Y, Liu L, Chen J, Xu L. Obesity and COVID-19 severity in a designated hospital in Shenzhen, China. Diabetes Care 2020;43:1392–1398.
    1. Lee SY, Song KJ, Lim CS, Kim BG, Chai YJ, Lee JK, Kim SH, Lim HJ. Operation and management of Seoul metropolitan city community treatment center for mild condition COVID-19 patients. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35:e367
    1. Lee JY, Lee JY, Ko JH, Hyun M, Kim HA, Cho S, Lee YD, Song J, Shin S, Peck KR. Effectiveness of regdanvimab treatment in high-risk COVID-19 patients to prevent progression to severe disease. Front Immunol 2021;12:772320
    1. Kim IH, Park AK, Lee H, Kim J, Kim DH, Kim JA, No JS, Lee CY, Woo S, Lee J, Rhee JE, Kim EJ. July 2021 status and characteristics of the covid-19 variant virus outbreak in the Republic of Korea. Public Healthy Weekly Report 2021;14:2555–2560.
    1. Cherian S, Potdar V, Jadhav S, Yadav P, Gupta N, Das M, Rakshit P, Singh S, Abraham P, Panda S, Team N. SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations, L452R, T478K, E484Q and P681R, in the second wave of COVID-19 in Maharashtra, India. Microorganisms 2021;9:1542.
    1. Liu L, Iketani S, Guo Y, Chan JF, Wang M, Liu L, Luo Y, Chu H, Huang Y, Nair MS, Yu J, Chik KK, Yuen TT, Yoon C, To KK, Chen H, Yin MT, Sobieszczyk ME, Huang Y, Wang HH, Sheng Z, Yuen KY, Ho DD. Striking antibody evasion manifested by the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2022;602:676–681.
    1. Planas D, Veyer D, Baidaliuk A, Staropoli I, Guivel-Benhassine F, Rajah MM, Planchais C, Porrot F, Robillard N, Puech J, Prot M, Gallais F, Gantner P, Velay A, Le Guen J, Kassis-Chikhani N, Edriss D, Belec L, Seve A, Courtellemont L, Péré H, Hocqueloux L, Fafi-Kremer S, Prazuck T, Mouquet H, Bruel T, Simon-Lorière E, Rey FA, Schwartz O. Reduced sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta to antibody neutralization. Nature 2021;596:276–280.
    1. Cele S, Jackson L, Khoury DS, Khan K, Moyo-Gwete T, Tegally H, San JE, Cromer D, Scheepers C, Amoako DG, Karim F, Bernstein M, Lustig G, Archary D, Smith M, Ganga Y, Jule Z, Reedoy K, Hwa SH, Giandhari J, Blackburn JM, Gosnell BI, Abdool Karim SS, Hanekom W, von Gottberg A, Bhiman JN, Lessells RJ, Moosa MS, Davenport MP, de Oliveira T, Moore PL, Sigal A. NGS-SA; COMMIT-KZN Team. Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization. Nature 2022;602:654–656.
    1. Planas D, Saunders N, Maes P, Guivel-Benhassine F, Planchais C, Buchrieser J, Bolland WH, Porrot F, Staropoli I, Lemoine F, Péré H, Veyer D, Puech J, Rodary J, Baele G, Dellicour S, Raymenants J, Gorissen S, Geenen C, Vanmechelen B, Wawina-Bokalanga T, Martí-Carreras J, Cuypers L, Sève A, Hocqueloux L, Prazuck T, Rey FA, Simon-Loriere E, Bruel T, Mouquet H, André E, Schwartz O. Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron to antibody neutralization. Nature 2022;602:671–675.
    1. Kim C, Ryu DK, Lee J, Kim YI, Seo JM, Kim YG, Jeong JH, Kim M, Kim JI, Kim P, Bae JS, Shim EY, Lee MS, Kim MS, Noh H, Park GS, Park JS, Son D, An Y, Lee JN, Kwon KS, Lee JY, Lee H, Yang JS, Kim KC, Kim SS, Woo HM, Kim JW, Park MS, Yu KM, Kim SM, Kim EH, Park SJ, Jeong ST, Yu CH, Song Y, Gu SH, Oh H, Koo BS, Hong JJ, Ryu CM, Park WB, Oh MD, Choi YK, Lee SY. A therapeutic neutralizing antibody targeting receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Nat Commun 2021;12:288.
    1. Barnes CO, Jette CA, Abernathy ME, Dam KA, Esswein SR, Gristick HB, Malyutin AG, Sharaf NG, Huey-Tubman KE, Lee YE, Robbiani DF, Nussenzweig MC, West AP Jr, Bjorkman PJ. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody structures inform therapeutic strategies. Nature 2020;588:682–687.
    1. Ryu DK, Woo HM, Kang B, Noh H, Kim JI, Seo JM, Kim C, Kim M, Kim JW, Kim N, Jeon P, Lee H, Yang JS, Kim KC, Lee JY, Lee MH, Oh SS, Chung HY, Kwon KS, Lee SY. The in vitro and in vivo potency of ct-p59 against delta and its associated variants of SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv. 2021
      [Epub ahead of print].
    1. VanBlargan LA, Errico JM, Halfmann PJ, Zost SJ, Crowe JE Jr, Purcell LA, Kawaoka Y, Corti D, Fremont DH, Diamond MS. An infectious SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron virus escapes neutralization by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Nat Med 2022:1–6.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 1

Tables

1 / 2

PERMALINK