Keywords and phrases: blended learning, principal component analysis, kernel density estimation, transition to e-learning, nursing student satisfaction.
Received: February 9, 2023; Revised: April 1, 2023; Accepted: April 15, 2023; Published: June 1, 2023
How to cite this article: N. Tayyib, F. Alsolami, H. I. Asfour, E. E. Ahmed, P. A. Ramaiah, B. A. Elfaki, H. E. Mustafa, I. Nomani and G. M. Lindsay, Male and female nursing students’ satisfaction with blended e-learning following the Covid-19 pandemic: a principal component analysis, Advances and Applications in Statistics 88(1) (2023), 25-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.17654/0972361723038
This Open Access Article is Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References:
[1] N. Albanna and H. Abu-Safe, Investigating students attitudes towards computer-based and traditional paper-pencil testing: are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Proceedings of ICERI2019 Conference 11th-13th November 2019, Seville, Spain, 2019. [2] C. Hewson, Can online course-based assessment methods be fair and equitable? Relationships between students’ preferences and performance within online and offline assessments, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28(5) (2012), 488-498. 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00473.x. [3] C. R. Graham, Blended learning systems: definition, current trends and future directions, C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, eds., The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, Pfeiffer, San Francisco, 2006, pp. 3-21. [4] N. Tayyib, F. Alsolami, H. I. Asfour, M. S. Alshhmemri, P. Ramaiah, E. Ahmed, S. A. Alsulami, H. Y. S. Ali and G. M. Lindsay, Growth of blended e-learning paradigms in nursing and health sciences and the student experience: insights from the literature, CPQ Medicine 11(2) (2021), 1-18. [5] P. Ramaiah, N. A. Tayyib, F. J. Alsolami, G. M. Lindsay and H. I. Asfour, Health professionals dynamic role amid COVID-19: nursing perspectives, Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International 32(22) (2020), 93-100. [6] N. A. Tayyib, S. Khedr, N. Fawzi, E. E. Eldin and G. M. Lindsay, A systematic review of the use of smart phones with WhatsApp messaging and practice recommendations within curriculum learning activities in undergraduate nursing programmes, CPQ Medicine 6(6) (2019), 1-17. [7] M. A. Naaj, M. Nachouki and A. Ankit, Evaluating student satisfaction with blended learning in a gender-segregated environment, Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 11 (2012), 185-200. [8] WHO, Ethical standards and procedures for research with human beings, 2020. https://www.who.int/ethics/topics/research/en/. [9] N. Tayyib, F. Alsolami, H. Asfour, M. Alshhmemri, G. Lindsay, P. Ramaiah, S. Alsulami and H. Ali, Undergraduate nursing students endorse education standards in blended e-learning theory teaching during COVID-19 pandemic, The Open Nursing Journal 15(1) (2021), 291-303. [10] F. Ke and D. Kwak, Constructs of student-centered online learning on learning satisfaction of adverse online student body: a structural equation modeling approach, Journal of Educational Computing Research 48(1) (2013), 97-122. 10.2190/EC.48.1.e. [11] Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2002. https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat505/lesson/11/11.4. [12] A. Mahmood, S. T. Mahmood and A. B. Malik, A comparative study of student satisfaction level in distance learning and live classroom at higher education level, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE) 13(1) (2012), 128-136. [13] Y. C. Kuo, A. E. Walker, B. R. Belland and K. E. Schroder, A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 14(1) (2013), 16-39. [14] J. Keengwe, W. Diteeyont and A. Lawson-Body, Student and instructor satisfaction with e-learning tools in online learning environments, International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE) 8(1) (2012), 76-86. [15] M. Cuadrado-García, M. E. Ruiz-Molina and J. D. Montoro-Pons, Are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Evidence from an interuniversity online project in Europe, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2010), 367-371. [16] L. P. McCoy and T. L. Heafner, Effect of gender on computer use and attitudes of college seniors, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 10 (2004), 55-66. [17] L. H. Shaw and L. M. Gant, Users divided? Exploring the gender gap in internet use, CyberPsychology & Behavior 5 (2002), 517-527. [18] P. Bruestle, D. Haubner, B. Schinzel, M. Holthaus, B. Remmele, D. Schirmer and U. D. Reips, Doing e-learning/doing gender? Examining the relationship between students’ gender concepts and e-learning technology, 5th European Symposium on Gender and ICT Digital Cultures: Participation - Empowerment - Diversity, University of Bremen, 2009. [19] T. Adamus, M. Kerres, B. Getto and N. Engelhardt, Gender and e-tutoring - a concept for gender sensitive e-tutor training programs, 5th European Symposium on Gender and ICT Digital Cultures: Participation - Empowerment - Diversity, University of Bremen, 2009. http://www.informatik.unibremen.de/soteg/gict2009/proceedings/GICT2009_ Adamus.pdf. [20] J. Battalio, Interaction online: a re-evaluation, Quarterly Review of Distance Education 8(4) (2007), 339-352. [21] C. D. Dziuban, P. D. Moskal, J. Brophy-Ellison and P. Shea, Student satisfaction with asynchronous learning, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(1) (2007), 87-95.
|