“Uncovered in the glass cages”. Rethinking neoliberal governance in the times of COVID-19: Critical performativity for performance management in higher education
Abstract
This conceptual article draws on social harm theory and critical management studies to critically examine the neoliberal governance of academics’ performance management in higher education, particularly in the emerging “normal” of COVID-19. The article argues that the COVID-19 pandemic has created a crisis that lays bare the deleterious global ramifications of the dominant political-economic ideology of neoliberalism in every aspect of societal life, more so in education. Moreover, the justifiably lauded shift to the digital space of teaching and learning is increasing the already problematic panoptic surveillance and is invading the hiding spaces within the glass cages.
The neoliberal approach to PM is inflicting social harms, unintentionally and intentionally. With the COVID-19 pandemic offering us the “rega” moment of opportunity to rethink and pragmatically insert critical alternatives to the neoliberal governance of universities’ performance management practices, this article proposes a critical performativity approach to work towards incremental micro-emancipations.
References
Alvesson, M. and A. Spicer. 2016. “(Un)Conditional Surrender? Why Do Professionals Willingly Comply with Managerialism.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 29(1): 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2015-0221.
Badat, S. 2016. “Deciphering the meanings and explaining the South African higher education student protests of 2015–16.” https://wiser.wits.ac.za/system/files/documents/Saleem%20Badat%20%20Deciphering%20the%20Meanings%2C. (Accessed 10 March 2019).
Ball, S. J. 2016. “Neoliberal education? Confronting the slouching beast.” Policy Futures in Education 14(8): 1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316664259.
Butler, N. and S. Spoelstra. 2014. “The Regime of Excellence and the Erosion of Ethos in Critical Management Studies.” British Journal of Management 25(3): 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12053.
Cabantous, L., J. Gond, N. Harding, and M. Learmonth. 2015. “Critical Essay: Reconsidering Critical Performativity.” Human Relations 69(2): 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715584690.
Clare, J. and R. Sivil. 2014. “Autonomy lost: The bureaucratisation of South African Higher Education.” South African Journal of Higher Education 28(1): 60–71. https://doi.org/10.20853/28-1-326.
Clarke, C. A. and D. Knights. 2015. “Careering through Academia: Securing Identities or Engaging Ethical Subjectivities?” Human Relations 68(12): 1865–1888. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715570978.
Collins, H. J., H. Glover, and F. Myers. 2020. “Behind the digital curtain: A study of academic identities, liminalities and labour market adaptations for the ‘Uber-isation’ of HE, Teaching in Higher Education.” https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.17061.
Couch, D. L., P. Robinson, and P. A. Komesaroff. 2020. “COVID-19 ‒ Extending Surveillance and the Panopticon.” Bioethical Inquiry 17: 809–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10036-5.
Cruickshank, J. 2019. “Economic Freedom and the Harm of Adaptation: On Gadamer, Authoritarian Technocracy and the Re-Engineering of English Higher Education.” Social Epistemology 33(4): 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1638988.
Davies, W. 2016. “The New Neoliberalism.” New Left Review 101: 121–134. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii101/articles/william-davies-the-new-neoliberalism.
Fitzgerald, T. and H. Gunter. 2017. “Debating the agenda: The incremental uberisation of the field.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 49(4): 257‒263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2017.1342980.
Fleming, P. and S. Banerjee. 2015. “When Performativity Fails: Implications for Critical Management Studies.” Human Relations 69(2): 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715599241.
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Fournier, V. and C. Grey. 2000. “At the Critical Moment: Conditions and Prospects for Critical Management Studies.” Human Relations 53(7): 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700531002.
Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hafermalz, E. 2020. “Out of the Panopticon and into Exile: Visibility and control in distributed new culture organisations.” Organization Studies 42(5): 697–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620909962.
Hillyard, P. and S. Tombs. 2007. “From ‘crime’ to social harm?” Crime Law Soc Change 48: 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-007-9079-z.
King, D. and M. Learmonth. 2015. “Can Critical Management Studies ever be Practical? A Case Study in Engaged Scholarship.” Human Relations 68(3): 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714528254.
Lassett, K. 2010. “Crime or Social Harm: A dialectical perspective.” Crime, Law and Social Change 54(1): 1–19. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00597958.
Le Grange, L. 2020. “Could the Covid-19 pandemic accelerate the uberfication of the university?” South African Journal of Higher Education 34(4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20853/34-4-4071.
Lloyd, A. 2018. The Harms of Work: An Ultra-realist account of the service economy. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Lorenz, C. 2014. “Fixing the Facts: The Rise of New Public Management, the Metrification of ‘Quality’ and the Fall of the Academic Professions.” Moving the Social 52: 5–26. https://doi.org/10.13154/mts.52.2014.5-26.
Lyotard, J. F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Morrish, L. and H. Sauntson. 2016. “Performance Management and the Stifling of Academic Freedom and Knowledge Production.” Journal of Historical Sociology 29(1): 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12122.
Morrissey, J. 2015. “Regimes of Performance: Practices of the Normalised Self in the Neoliberal University.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 36(4): 614–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2013.838515.
Pemberton, S. 2016. Harmful Societies: Understanding Social Harm. Bristol: Policy Press.
Raymen, T. W. 2019. “The Enigma of Social Harm and the Barrie of Liberalism: Why Zemiology Needs a Theory of the Good.” https://peral.plymouth.ac.uk.
Seyama, S. M. 2017. “Performance Management in the African University as Panopticism.” In Knowledge and Change in African Universities, Volume 2 – Re-Imagining the Terrain, ed. Michael Cross and Amasa Ndofirepi, 155–173. Rotterdam: Brill Sense.
Seyama, S. 2018. “Performance Management in Higher Education: Critical Leadership Perspectives for Academic Heads of Department.” PhD dissertation, University of Johannesburg.
Seyama, S. 2020. “‘Hiding Within the Glass Cage’: Performance Management as Surveillance ‒ A Case of Academic Spaces as Resistance Spaces: Hiding Within The Glass Cage.” Education As Change 24. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/7223.
Shore, C. and S. Roberts. 1995. “Higher education and the panopticon paradigm: Quality assurance assessment as disciplinary technology.” Higher Education Review 27(3): 8–17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED368243.pdf.
Spicer, A., M. Alvesson, and D. Kärreman. 2009. “Critical Performativity: The Unfinished Business of Critical Management Studies.” Human Relations 62(4): 537–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708101984.
Tombs, S. 2018. “For Pragmatism and Politics: Crime, Social Harm and Zemiology.” In Zemiology: Reconnecting Crime and Social Harm, ed. A. Boukli and J. Kotzé, 11–31. Zurich: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Wickert, C. and S. M. Schaefer. 2015. “Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies.” Human Relations 68(1): 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 00187267135192.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
