Next Article in Journal
Photodegradation under UV Light Irradiation of Various Types and Systems of Organic Pollutants in the Presence of a Performant BiPO4 Photocatalyst
Next Article in Special Issue
Inactivation and Degradation of Influenza A Virus on the Surface of Photoactive Self-Cleaning Cotton Fabric Functionalized with Nanocrystalline TiO2
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanistic and Experimental Study of the CuxO@C Nanocomposite Derived from Cu3(BTC)2 for SO2 Removal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nanoparticle Engineered Photocatalytic Paints: A Roadmap to Self-Sterilizing against the Spread of Communicable Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Surface Inactivation of Human Coronavirus by MACOMA™ UVA-TiO2 Coupled Photocatalytic Disinfection System

1
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, 1664 N Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, USA
2
MACOMA™ Environmental Technologies, LLC Reno, Applied Research Facility, Reno, NV 89120, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(7), 690; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12070690
Submission received: 27 May 2022 / Revised: 15 June 2022 / Accepted: 17 June 2022 / Published: 24 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photocatalytic Nanomaterials for Abatement of Microorganisms)

Abstract

:
There is an immense healthcare challenge and financial pressure due to the COVID-19 pandemic caused by a newly identified human coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. Effective COVID-19 prevention efforts in healthcare, home, and community settings highlight the need for rapid, efficient, and no-contact SARS-CoV-2 inactivation strategies. Here, we examined the photocatalytic and virucidal activity of the MACOMA™ TiO2 photocatalytic film activated by an UVA-LED-12V-367 nm (MA-717836-1) lamp against the HCoV-OC43, a member of the beta coronaviruses family, like SARS-CoV-2, using quantitative RT-qPCR and virus infectivity assays. The UVA radiation-responsive TiO2 film accelerated virus inactivation (decreased viral titer) compared to the uncoated glass surface when placed at a vertical distance of 1.2 feet (~14 inches) from virus samples for 10, 30, and 60 min. UVA-LED exposure for both 10 and 30 min effectively reduced the viral RNA copies and the infectious virus in samples on TiO2-coated surfaces compared to the control surfaces. Importantly, a 60 min exposure of samples on the TiO2 completely eliminated HCoV-OC43. These results confirmed that the MACOMA™ UVA/TiO2-based disinfection system provides a rapid and complete surface inactivation of tested human coronavirus in a human-safe manner and has great potential for limiting the virus spread in poorly ventilated as well as high-traffic public places.

1. Introduction

COVID-19 infection caused by the recently discovered coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, has globally led to an extraordinary threat to public health [1,2]. Clinically, SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by acute respiratory distress symptoms, fever (88%), dry cough (68%), shortness of breath (19%), and high rates of transmission [3]. Although vaccination and anti-virals play a major role in combating COVID-19 spread, infection prevention and control (IPC) is an essential tool to reduce the transmission of any airborne disease, including COVID-19 [4].
SARS-CoV-2 transmission can primarily occur by inhaling the aerosolized droplets containing an infectious virus, by depositing the virus onto the exposed mucous membranes in the mouth, eyes, or nose, and by touching mucous membranes with soiled hands (fingers). The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection differs according to the viral load and infectiousness of the virus. The direct way to limit airborne virus spread is to inactivate the virus within a short time of its release into the environment. There are several disinfection strategies, including heat sterilization, ultraviolet germicidal irradiation/UVGI, and chemical disinfectants [5,6,7]. Among these widely used air and surface sanitization techniques, UVGI has attracted tremendous attention as an effective anti-microbial strategy for several decades. UVGI has been found to be suitable against a variety of microorganisms (for instance, bacteria, viruses, yeast, and fungi). As an anti-viral, UV radiation can cause critical viral DNA/RNA damage or disrupt viral protein, due to the absorbed UV photons/energy [8,9]. As a result, numerous UV irradiation sources such as low-pressure UV mercury vapor lamps (emitting at 254 nm), UV light-emitting diodes/LEDs (269–276 nm), and far-UVC exilamps (200–240 nm), as well as pulsed Xe/Kr lamps have been developed and utilized for microbial inactivation.
UV-based LEDs are a relatively new, but rapidly developing, technology. The use of UV LEDs that do not utilize fragile quartz material generates ozone-free UV rays and is available for different (UVA, UVB, and UVC) wavelengths, providing a reliable disinfectant on demand. A combination of UVA-LED with photocatalysts such as titanium dioxide/TiO2 further advances oxidative disinfection. Photocatalysts are potent, environment-friendly biocides against a myriad of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, and fungi [10]. Photocatalysts lead to the generation of electron-hole (e/h+) pairs when illuminated with light (such as UV or xenon lamps, or sunlight) [11]. The e/h+ pairs migrate to form reactive oxygen species such as hydroxyl radicals and superoxide radicals that trigger UV-associated biocidal mechanisms. In this regard, titanium dioxide (TiO2), owing to its stability and low-energy bandgap, is the most widely used photocatalyst [11,12].
The presence of non-toxic TiO2 nanoparticles acts as a UV filter and provides invaluable protection to human skin from harmful UV rays [13]. In this context, several UV-LEDs-based photoinactivation strategies have been explored for SARS-CoV-2 to date, with a focus on the highly germicidal UVC radiation [14,15,16]. However, amidst UV-LEDs, UVA-LEDs are energy- and cost-efficient as well as photoreactivation-resistant, thereby offering long-lasting microbial inactivation. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of the TiO2 nanomaterial coating and UVA-LED-12V-367nm (MA-717836-1) decontamination system in the inactivation of human coronavirus, HCoV-OC43, present in small droplets. Our results showed that the MACOMATM photocatalytic disinfection system effectively inactivated HCoV-OC43 present at a 1.2 feet distance in a short duration of 30 min. Since all coronaviruses are comparable in size, we hypothesized that the findings from this study could be extrapolated to SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses.

2. Methods

Cells and Human Coronavirus. The Vero-ACE2 and A549-hACE2 (HA-Flag) cells were obtained from BEI Resources and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA, USA), 2 mM L-glutamine, 25 U/mL penicillin, and 25 μg/mL streptomycin and 1 ug/mL puromycin. The cells were grown at 37 °C and 5% CO2/95% air in a humidified cell culture incubator. The HCoV-OC43 strain is a human coronavirus and belongs to the family of betacoronaviruses, like SARS-CoV-2. HCoV-OC43 was obtained from BEI Resources (NIAID, NIH) and propagated in A549-hACE2 cells by infecting the cell monolayer with the virus for 2 h at 34 °C. The unattached virus was removed by washing with 1X PBS, followed by the addition of fresh medium. After 4 days, the supernatant containing the virus was harvested, cell debris were removed by centrifugation, and the virus was aliquotted and stored at −80 °C until further use. Viral copies in the harvested supernatant were quantified by reverse transcriptase qPCR (rt-qPCR) using a standard curve as well as an infectivity assay and the detection of virally-infected cells through an immunofluorescence assay. All the assays were performed under BSL-2+ containment.
MACOMA™ TiO2 photocatalytic film and UVA LED-12V-367NM Photocatalytic Disinfection system. The experimental set-up used in this study is shown in Figure 1A. TiO2 photocatalytic films containing 100–400 nm TiO2 particles in the anatase phase were deposited onto 24 mm × 24 mm glass coverslips with mineral binder, ~80% TiO2 + 20% mineral binder (inert, water-insoluble mineral carbonates, oxycarbonates, and hydrates). The thickness of the photocatalytic film was ~10–20 microns, and the adhesion to the substrate was over 3 MPa. Glass coverslips (24 mm × 24 mm) with 20% mineral binder but without the TiO2, referred to as an ‘uncoated’ surface, were used as a control (Figure 1B). The UV source used in this study was a UVA LED-12V-367nm (MA-717836-1) lamp with two 16 W UVA LED-12V-367NM chips that emit ~500–350 µW/cm2 energy on the test sample. For the duration of this study, the UVA LED-12V-367 nm (MA-717836-1) lamp was kept inside BSL-2+ containment and controlled using a manual switch on the instrument for each disinfection experiment. The sample was positioned 1.2 feet (14 inches) below the light, with UV light directed at the center of the sample for 10, 30, and 60 min (Figure 1A). The intensity of the light was measured with a UVA light meter.
Experiment Protocol. In order to test the efficacy of the MACOMA™ UVA LED-12V-367nm (MA-717836-1) TiO2 photocatalytic film for the inactivation of HCoV-OC43, 100 µL of the virus stock (equivalent to 0.2 × 106 calculated virus copies, as detected using a standard curve, Figure 2A) were applied as 10 × 10 µL liquid droplets on top of both uncoated and TiO2-coated coverslips placed inside each well of a 6-well culture plate, kept inside the BSL-2+ containment (Figure 1). The applied virus, in the growth medium with inorganic salts, proteins, and organic compounds, may provide some resemblance to the composition of respiratory fluids. The virus-containing 6-well plate was placed vertically below the UVA LED-12V-367nm (MA-717836-1) lamp at the center and exposed to UVA radiation from ~1.2 feet for specified times (10, 30, 60 min). Original, untreated virus and virus-laden 6-well culture plates without UV treatment served as controls for calculating viral inactivation efficiencies. After each disinfection experiment, the untreated and UVA-treated viruses were recovered by adding 300 μL of culture medium on the surfaces and allowing it to resuspend for 15 min at 34 °C. The recovered viruses were either collected in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube for further extraction of total viral RNA with Trizol reagent for viral genome quantitation using qRT-PCR or applied onto permissive human lung carcinoma, A549-hACE2 cells as well as Vero-ACE2 cells, for the detection of the residual infectious virus through integrated cell culture PCR and the localization of infected cells through an immunofluorescence assay. Each assay was done in duplicates and conducted three independent times.
RNA extraction and qPCR. For the detection of viral genomic RNA through RT-qPCR, control virus, UV-treated and untreated virus supernatants from both coated and uncoated coverslips (for intact viral genomic RNA) or from infected A549-hACE2 cells (for infectious viral genomic RNA) were subjected to total RNA extraction using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. An aliquot of extracted total RNA (1 μg) was used for cDNA synthesis using a high-capacity RNA to cDNA kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A fraction of synthesized cDNA (2 μL) was used for the relative quantification of viral genomic copies using TaqMan Fast Advanced master mix and TaqMan OC43-specific gene expression assay (FAM) (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in an RT-qPCR assay. Four ten-fold serial dilutions of HCoV-OC43 genomic RNA, obtained from the BEI Resources (Cat.# NR-52727 with 2.0 × 108 genome equivalents/mL), were used to generate a standard curve of viral genome copies and corresponding Ct (cycle threshold value). The equation from this standard curve was used to quantify the number of HCoV-OC43 genome copies in the virus preparations.
Virus Infectivity through Immunofluorescence Assay. Control or UV-treated viruses were added to the human lung carcinoma, A549-hACE2 (HA-FLAG) cells, or Vero-ACE2 cells for 2 h (34 °C, 5% CO2). Following infection, the cells were incubated for 48 h at 34 °C in a humidified chamber supplemented with 5% CO2. Infected cells were detected by using the immunofluorescence assay (IFA) by localizing the nucleocapsid protein of HCoV-OC43 using anti-HCoV-OC43 antibodies (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Infected cells were fixed using 3.2% formaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, washed (2x), and blocked (0.4% FSG-0.05% Triton X-100) for 45 min at room temperature. Cell monolayers were washed (2x) and incubated with monoclonal mouse anti-HCoV-OC43 nucleocapsid antibody (1:1000 dilutions) overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with chicken anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 594 (1:1000; Molecular Probe, Carlsbad, CA, USA), a secondary antibody, for 1 h at RT in the dark. Finally, the nuclei were stained with DAPI (1:7000; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Coverslips were mounted on the glass slides using prolonged diamond antifade (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), and the slides were examined using a Carl Zeiss microscope.
Statistical analysis. The data presented are an average of three independent experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation across independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 8.0 software (Graphpad Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), the p-values were calculated using 2-way ANOVA, and the p-value cut-offs for statistical significance were *, p < 0.1; and **, p < 0.01.

3. Results and Discussion

Quantification of infectious HCoV-OC43 virus. HCoV-OC43 virus stock was subjected to the quantification of intact viral genomic RNA in an RT-qPCR assay, and the infectious virions were quantified through the documentation of infected cells in an immunofluorescence assay. The infectivity assay was performed by infecting the human lung carcinoma, A549-hACE2 cells, with the known amounts of HCoV-OC43 virus (as detected using a standard curve, Figure 2A). The amount of infectious virus added onto the A549-hACE-2 cells at various dilutions was highly correlated with the number of viral genome copies detected post-infection, as expected (Figure 2B). This assay developed a correlation between the number of detected virus copies and the number of infectious viruses added onto the cells, which was used to determine the residual live virus copies following treatments. The infectiousness of the virus stock was also confirmed by the localization of HCoV-OC43’s nucleocapsid, in A549-hACE2 cells infected with a varying amount of the virus, through an immunofluorescence assay. The detection of nucleocapsid protein (red signal) in the infected cells, but not in the control (uninfected cells), confirmed that the virally infected cells can be specifically detected (Figure 2C). Furthermore, cells infected with lower amounts of HCoV-OC43 virus showed a proportionally reduced number of cells with nucleocapsid staining, as expected (Figure 2B).
Figure 2. Assay establishment: Integrated cell culture PCR and immune detection of HCoV-OC43 infected cells. (A) Standard curve of varying HCoV-OC43 genome copies with Ct value. (B) Correlation of HCoV-OC43 viral copies added onto A549-hACE2 cells and detection of intracellular viral genome copies following infection and replication. (C) Immune localization of HCoV-OC43 nucleocapsid protein in A549-hACE2 cells infected with varying amounts of virus. Nucleocapsid was detected with anti-HCoV-OC43 antibody followed by staining with chicken anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 594 (red). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue).
Figure 2. Assay establishment: Integrated cell culture PCR and immune detection of HCoV-OC43 infected cells. (A) Standard curve of varying HCoV-OC43 genome copies with Ct value. (B) Correlation of HCoV-OC43 viral copies added onto A549-hACE2 cells and detection of intracellular viral genome copies following infection and replication. (C) Immune localization of HCoV-OC43 nucleocapsid protein in A549-hACE2 cells infected with varying amounts of virus. Nucleocapsid was detected with anti-HCoV-OC43 antibody followed by staining with chicken anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 594 (red). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue).
Catalysts 12 00690 g002
Virus inactivation assay to test the efficacy of TiO2 film activated by UVA LED-12V-367NM device. To test the inactivation efficiency of MACOMA™ UVA LED-12V-367NM irradiation coupled with the TiO2 film on HCoVs, we used human coronavirus, HCoV-OC43, which is structurally similar to the highly contagious SARS-CoV-2. We evaluated the efficacy of our disinfection system by depositing 100 μL of HCoV-OC43 virus as 10 droplets of 10 μL each into a 6-well plate with uncoated and TiO2-coated coverslips, followed by exposure with a UVA light-emitting UVA LED-12V-367NM unit placed 1.2 feet away inside a Biological Safety Cabinet (BSL-2+ containment facility) for varying times, 10, 30, and 60 min. 100 μL of the same virus stock without UV exposure was used as a reference for the virus copies and control in the infection assays. Post UV-treatment, the virus inactivation efficacies were determined by collecting and subjecting the virus to RT-qPCR and an immunofluorescence assay (using permissive human lung carcinoma (A549-hACE2) and Vero-ACE2 cells). A standard curve generated using serial dilutions of known HCoV-OC43 (Figure 2) was used to calculate the genomic copies of HCoV-OC43 in the UV-treated and untreated samples (shown in Figure 3). The residual viral RNA genomes in the samples were calculated and compared to the virus copies in samples collected from TiO2-coated surfaces with and without UVA exposures. We found that viral genome copies in samples from the TiO2-coated surfaces were drastically reduced compared to the control, uncoated surfaces even at 10 min UVA exposures (Figure 3A). Increasing the UVA exposure time to 30 min further reduced the viral genomic copies, which were further reduced by extending the exposure time to 60 min (Figure 3A). Importantly, the viral genome copies’ reduction was significantly higher among samples on the TiO2-coated surfaces than on the uncoated control surfaces at corresponding exposure times (Figure 3A). Since the detection of viral genome copies indicates the presence of viral genome, we wanted to further determine the amounts of infectious viruses in these samples exposed to UVA at different times. To this end, we performed an infectivity assay by infecting the A549-hACE2 cells with UV-treated and untreated samples collected from those uncoated and TiO2-coated surfaces (coverslips) and analyzed the levels of intracellular HCoV-OC43 genome through integrated cell culture PCR. The residual live virus was calculated by quantifying the amounts of intracellular genome copies through the standard curve generated by using known amounts of HCoV-OC43 under similar conditions (Figure 2B). The number of residual infectious virus copies was calculated based on the intracellular viral genomic copies in samples collected from the TiO2-coated and uncoated surfaces exposed to different UVA times, as above. Our data showed that the UVA light-activated TiO2 film significantly reduced the number of infectious HCoV-OC43 at all three time points (10 min, 30 min, and 60 min) (Figure 3B). Notably, UVA also reduced the number of infectious viruses on uncoated surfaces. Still, the reduction was significantly better in samples on the TiO2-coated surfaces, with a 60 min exposure on the TiO2 surface showing no infections compared to about ten infectious viruses on the uncoated control surface under a similar condition with the exact amounts of initial viral genome copies (Figure 3B).
Additionally, we confirmed the amounts of residual live virus through the localization of infected cells by adding the UVA/TiO2-treated samples onto A549-hACE2 cells and staining for HCoV-OC43 nucleocapsid protein/infectious virus by immunofluorescence assay. As shown in Figure 4, there were no red-stained cells (stain to detect virally infected cells) in wells with 30 min UVA/TiO2-exposed HCoV-OC43 virus (Figure 4C). The same amount of virus processed similarly without UVA exposure showed red-stained cells, indicating the presence of live virus in those samples. Similar results were obtained upon adding the UVA/TiO2-treated virus onto another HCoV-OC43 permissive cell line, Vero-ACE2 cells. No infected cells could be detected, confirming the total inactivation of the virus (Figure 4E,F). Overall, these results confirm that the tested TiO2-photocatalytic film/UVA LED-12V-367NM system is effective in completely inactivating HCoV-OC43 and may be used for inactivating a broad range of viruses including other human coronaviruses.

4. Conclusions

The decontamination of SARS-CoV-2-infected surfaces appears to be one of the essential elements in combating the spread of highly contagious COVID-19 infections. Most chemical disinfectants against SARS-CoV-2 have short-lived virucidal effects; however, UV-coupled photocatalysts provide renewable, self-cleaning techniques with long-term virucidal activity. The UV-based disinfection of surfaces causes the inactivation of DNA or RNA double helix strands, which makes the virus replication deficient [17]. The photocatalytic disinfection efficacy of UV-activated TiO2-based catalysts has been widely evaluated against a range of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and viruses, including Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica, E. coli, influenza virus, hepatitis B virus, and herpesviruses [6,18,19,20].
In this study, we examined the HCoV-OC43 inactivation efficacy of MACOMA™ TiO2-photocatalytic film with a 100 µW/cm2 intensity of UVA source at different exposure times. The photocatalytic TiO2 films used in this study are water-based suspensions of inert, water-insoluble mineral compounds, consisting of ~80% TiO2 (active substance) + 20% mineral binder (inert and water-insoluble mineral carbonates, oxycarbonates, hydrates). The virus inactivation was determined by estimating the residual virus after UVA-TiO2 exposure through quantitative RT-qPCR and infectivity assays. Our results showed that HCoV-OC43 was efficiently inactivated by the tested TiO2 photocatalytic film and UVA LED-12V-367NM-based disinfection system within 30 min. Importantly, the UVA-TiO2 coupled disinfection system completely reduced the virus to the background level within 60 min, under experimental conditions where virus droplets were present about 1.2 feet away from the light source. These findings confirm that this system offers a rapid, eco-friendly, and reliable disinfection tool to maximize virus inactivation on surfaces.

Author Contributions

Coceptualization, E.M.; methodology, T.U., S.R and S.C.V.; validation, T.U. and S.R.; formal analysis, T.U. and S.C.V.; investigation, T.U. and S.R.; data curation, T.U. and S.R.; resources, S.C.V.; writing-original draft preparation, T.U.; writing-review and editing, T.U. and S.C.V.; visualization, T.U. and S.C.V.; supervision, S.C.V.; project administration, S.C.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Partial funding for the work was provided by the MACOMA Environmental Technologies.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The following reagents were obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: Human Coronavirus, OC43, (NR-52725), and A549-hACE2 (NR-53522), African Green Monkey Kidney Epithelial Cells (Vero E6) Expressing High Endogenous Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2, NR-53726.

Conflicts of Interest

S.C.V., T.U. and S.R. have no conflict of interest. E.M. is CEO of MACOMA™ Environmental Technologies.

References

  1. Ye, Z.-W.; Yuan, S.; Yuen, K.-S.; Fung, S.-Y.; Chan, C.-P.; Jin, D.-Y. Zoonotic origins of human coronaviruses. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 1686–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, X.G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lai, C.C.; Shih, T.P.; Ko, W.C.; Tang, H.J.; Hsueh, P.R. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pradhan, D.; Biswasroy, P.; Kumar Naik, P.; Ghosh, G.; Rath, G. A Review of Current Interventions for COVID-19 Prevention. Arch. Med. Res. 2020, 51, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Probst, L.F.; Guerrero, A.T.G.; Cardoso, A.I.d.Q.; Grande, A.J.; Croda, M.G.; Venturini, J.; Fonseca, M.C.d.C.; Paniago, A.M.M.; Barreto, J.O.M.; de Oliveira, S.M.d.V.L. Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: A rapid review. Syst. Rev. 2021, 10, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lore, M.B.; Heimbuch, B.K.; Brown, T.L.; Wander, J.D.; Hinrichs, S.H. Effectiveness of three decontamination treatments against influenza virus applied to filtering facepiece respirators. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2012, 56, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Seresirikachorn, K.; Phoophiboon, V.; Chobarporn, T.; Tiankanon, K.; Aeumjaturapat, S.; Chusakul, S.; Snidvongs, K. Decontamination and reuse of surgical masks and N95 filtering facepiece respirators during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2021, 42, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mills, D.; Harnish, D.A.; Lawrence, C.; Sandoval-Powers, M.; Heimbuch, B.K. Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation of influenza-contaminated N95 filtering facepiece respirators. Am. J. Infect. Control 2018, 46, e49–e55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Memarzadeh, F.; Olmsted, R.N.; Bartley, J.M. Applications of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation disinfection in health care facilities: Effective adjunct, but not stand-alone technology. Am. J. Infect. Control 2010, 38, S13–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yemmireddy, V.K.; Hung, Y.C. Using Photocatalyst Metal Oxides as Antimicrobial Surface Coatings to Ensure Food Safety-Opportunities and Challenges. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bogdan, J.; Zarzyńska, J.; Pławińska-Czarnak, J. Comparison of Infectious Agents Susceptibility to Photocatalytic Effects of Nanosized Titanium and Zinc Oxides: A Practical Approach. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Schneider, J.; Matsuoka, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Zhang, J.; Horiuchi, Y.; Anpo, M.; Bahnemann, D.W. Understanding TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9919–9986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Smijs, T.G.; Pavel, S. Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens: Focus on their safety and effectiveness. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2011, 4, 95–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Trivellin, N.; Buffolo, M.; Onelia, F.; Pizzolato, A.; Barbato, M.; Orlandi, V.T.; Del Vecchio, C.; Dughiero, F.; Zanoni, E.; Meneghesso, G.; et al. Inactivating SARS-CoV-2 Using 275 nm UV-C LEDs through a Spherical Irradiation Box: Design, Characterization and Validation. Materials 2021, 14, 2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lualdi, M.; Cavalleri, A.; Bianco, A.; Biasin, M.; Cavatorta, C.; Clerici, M.; Galli, P.; Pareschi, G.; Pignoli, E. Ultraviolet C lamps for disinfection of surfaces potentially contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 in critical hospital settings: Examples of their use and some practical advice. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bhardwaj, S.K.; Singh, H.; Deep, A.; Khatri, M.; Bhaumik, J.; Kim, K.-H.; Bhardwaj, N. UVC-based photoinactivation as an efficient tool to control the transmission of coronaviruses. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 792, 148548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tseng, C.C.; Li, C.S. Inactivation of viruses on surfaces by ultraviolet germicidal irradiation. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2007, 4, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zan, L.; Fa, W.; Peng, T.; Gong, Z.K. Photocatalysis effect of nanometer TiO2 and TiO2-coated ceramic plate on Hepatitis B virus. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2007, 86, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. van der Molen, R.G.; Garssen, J.; de Klerk, A.; Claas, F.H.J.; Norval, M.; van Loveren, H.; Koerten, H.K.; Mieke Mommaas, A. Application of a systemic herpes simplex virus type 1 infection in the rat as a tool for sunscreen photoimmunoprotection studies. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2002, 1, 592–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Monmaturapoj, N.; Sri-On, A.; Klinsukhon, W.; Boonnak, K.; Prahsarn, C. Antiviral activity of multifunctional composite based on TiO2-modified hydroxyapatite. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2018, 92, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental set-up. (A) UVA LED-12V-367nm (MA-717836-1) light source was used for the inactivation of the HCoV-OC43 virus inside the biological safety containment facility (BSL-2). (B) The control and UVA LED-12V-367nm-treated viruses were collected to determine viral inactivation using RT-qPCR and immunofluorescence assays.
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental set-up. (A) UVA LED-12V-367nm (MA-717836-1) light source was used for the inactivation of the HCoV-OC43 virus inside the biological safety containment facility (BSL-2). (B) The control and UVA LED-12V-367nm-treated viruses were collected to determine viral inactivation using RT-qPCR and immunofluorescence assays.
Catalysts 12 00690 g001
Figure 3. The effect of TiO2 and UVA-LED irradiation on the stability of human coronavirus, HCoV-OC43. (A) 100 μL of HCoV-OC43 virus was spotted on uncoated as well as TiO2-coated coverslips followed by exposure to UVA light for 10, 30, and 60 min. Post UV-irradiation, total viral RNA was extracted for the detection of intact viral genome copies via RT-qPCR. (B) 100 μL of HCoV-OC43 virus was applied on both uncoated and TiO2-coated coverslips and exposed to UVA light for 10, 30, and 60 min, followed by infection of A549-hACE2 cells for 1–2 h. Post infection of A549-hACE2 cells, fresh medium was added, and the cells were incubated for 2 days. Post 48 h, total viral RNA was extracted to detect intracellular viral genome copies following infection and replication (* p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 3. The effect of TiO2 and UVA-LED irradiation on the stability of human coronavirus, HCoV-OC43. (A) 100 μL of HCoV-OC43 virus was spotted on uncoated as well as TiO2-coated coverslips followed by exposure to UVA light for 10, 30, and 60 min. Post UV-irradiation, total viral RNA was extracted for the detection of intact viral genome copies via RT-qPCR. (B) 100 μL of HCoV-OC43 virus was applied on both uncoated and TiO2-coated coverslips and exposed to UVA light for 10, 30, and 60 min, followed by infection of A549-hACE2 cells for 1–2 h. Post infection of A549-hACE2 cells, fresh medium was added, and the cells were incubated for 2 days. Post 48 h, total viral RNA was extracted to detect intracellular viral genome copies following infection and replication (* p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01).
Catalysts 12 00690 g003
Figure 4. Immune Localization of HCoV-OC43 nucleocapsid (nc) protein in virus-infected cells using immunofluorescence assay. An average number of HCoV-OC43 nucleocapsid stained (infected) cells, calculated from 3 different optical fields from each treatment, are shown in respective panels. (A). HCoV-OC43 stock virus-infected A549-hACE2 cells. Detection of virally infected A549-hACE2 cells added with viruses collected from the TiO2-coated and uncoated surfaces without and with UV exposure for (B) 10 min and (C) 30 min. (D) HCoV-OC43 stock virus-infected Vero-ACE2 cells. Detection of virally infected Vero-ACE2 cells added with viruses collected from the TiO2-coated and uncoated surfaces without and with UV exposure for (E) 10 min and (F) 30 min. Infection of these cells by the residual live HCoV-OC43 virus led to the expression of viral nucleocapsid protein and staining with anti-nucleocapsid antibody (red signals). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue signals). The infected cells were identified and quantified using the automated Image J macro method.
Figure 4. Immune Localization of HCoV-OC43 nucleocapsid (nc) protein in virus-infected cells using immunofluorescence assay. An average number of HCoV-OC43 nucleocapsid stained (infected) cells, calculated from 3 different optical fields from each treatment, are shown in respective panels. (A). HCoV-OC43 stock virus-infected A549-hACE2 cells. Detection of virally infected A549-hACE2 cells added with viruses collected from the TiO2-coated and uncoated surfaces without and with UV exposure for (B) 10 min and (C) 30 min. (D) HCoV-OC43 stock virus-infected Vero-ACE2 cells. Detection of virally infected Vero-ACE2 cells added with viruses collected from the TiO2-coated and uncoated surfaces without and with UV exposure for (E) 10 min and (F) 30 min. Infection of these cells by the residual live HCoV-OC43 virus led to the expression of viral nucleocapsid protein and staining with anti-nucleocapsid antibody (red signals). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue signals). The infected cells were identified and quantified using the automated Image J macro method.
Catalysts 12 00690 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uppal, T.; Reganti, S.; Martin, E.; Verma, S.C. Surface Inactivation of Human Coronavirus by MACOMA™ UVA-TiO2 Coupled Photocatalytic Disinfection System. Catalysts 2022, 12, 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12070690

AMA Style

Uppal T, Reganti S, Martin E, Verma SC. Surface Inactivation of Human Coronavirus by MACOMA™ UVA-TiO2 Coupled Photocatalytic Disinfection System. Catalysts. 2022; 12(7):690. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12070690

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uppal, Timsy, Sivani Reganti, Ezekiel Martin, and Subhash C. Verma. 2022. "Surface Inactivation of Human Coronavirus by MACOMA™ UVA-TiO2 Coupled Photocatalytic Disinfection System" Catalysts 12, no. 7: 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12070690

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop