Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Aug 13, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 6, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 21, 2021
Novel Predictors of Coronavirus Protective Behaviors among US adults: The role of trait reactance, conspiracy beliefs, and belief in the apocalypse
ABSTRACT
Background:
A central component of the public health strategy to control the 2019 Sars-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus involves encouraging mask wearing and social distancing to protect individuals from acquiring and transmitting the virus.
Objective:
Understanding the psychologic factors that drive adoption or rejection of these protective behaviors can inform public health interventions to control the pandemic.
Methods:
We conducted an online survey of a representative sample of 1,074 U.S. adults, and assessed three novel potential predictors of COVID-19 behaviors; Trait Reactance, COVID-19 Conspiracy Beliefs, and COVID-19 Apocalypse Beliefs. Key outcomes (dependent variables) included an index of COVID-19 protective behaviors, number of trips taken from the home, and COVID-19 knowledge.
Results:
In bi-variate analyses, all three predictors were significantly correlated in the hypothesized direction with the three COVID-19 outcomes. Specifically, each predictor was negatively (p < .01) correlated with the COVID-19 protective behaviors index and COVID-19 knowledge score and positively correlated with trips taken from home per week (more of which was considered higher risk). COVID-19 protective behaviors and COVID-19 knowledge were significantly lower in the top median compared to the bottom median for all three predictors. In general, these findings remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, income, education, race, and religiosity. Self-identified Republicans (vs. other political affiliations) reported the highest values for each of the novel predictors.
Conclusions:
This study can inform the development of health communication interventions to encourage adoption of COVID-19 protective behaviors. Interestingly, we found that higher scores of all three novel predictors were associated with lower COVID-19 knowledge, suggesting that lack of an accurate understanding of the virus may be driving some of these attitudes although it is also possible that these attributes may interfere with one’s willingness or ability to seek and absorb accurate health information. These individuals may be particularly immune to accepting new information and yielding their beliefs. Health communication professionals may apply lessons learned from countering similar beliefs around climate change and vaccine hesitancy. Messages designed for individuals prone to reactance should minimize controlling language and emphasize the individual’s autonomy in adopting these behavioral recommendations. Messaging for those who possess conspiracy beliefs should similarly not assume that providing evidence contrary to these beliefs will alone alter behavior. Other communication techniques such as “rolling with resistance”, a strategy used in Motivational Interviewing may be helpful. Messaging for those with apocalyptic beliefs may require using religious leaders as the message source as well as using scripture that would support the adoption of COVID-19 protection.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.