Next Article in Journal
Visual Assessment of Blood Plasma versus Optical Transmittance and Refractive Index Measurements for Quantifying Lipemia
Next Article in Special Issue
COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review of the RT-qPCR Method for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution of Diagnostic Methods for Helicobacter pylori Infections: From Traditional Tests to High Technology, Advanced Sensitivity and Discrimination Tools
Previous Article in Special Issue
COVID-19 Detection in Chest X-ray Images Using a New Channel Boosted CNN
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/diagnostics12020509
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biomarkers during COVID-19: Mechanisms of Change and Implications for Patient Outcomes

by
Cheng-Han Chen
1,2,3,
Sheng-Wen Lin
1,
Ching-Fen Shen
4,
Kai-Sheng Hsieh
5,* and
Chao-Min Cheng
1,*
1
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
2
Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
3
School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
4
Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
5
Department of Pediatrics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 23561, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(2), 509; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020509
Submission received: 27 January 2022 / Revised: 7 February 2022 / Accepted: 14 February 2022 / Published: 16 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Virus Diagnostic Methods and Techniques: Learning from the COVID-19 Global Outbreak)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As the COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 19) pandemic spreads worldwide, the massive numbers of COVID-19 patients have created a considerable healthcare burden for every country. The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection is broad, ranging from asymptomatic to mild, moderate, severe, and critical. Most COVID-19 patients present with no or mild symptoms, but nearly one-fifth of all patients develop severe or life-threatening complications. In addition to localized respiratory manifestations, severe COVID-19 cases also show extra-pulmonary complications or induce multiorgan failure. Identifying, triaging, and treating patients at risk early is essential and urgent. This article reviews the potential prognostic value of various biomarkers at different clinical spectrum stages of COVID-19 infection and includes information on fundamental prognostic mechanisms as well as potential clinical implications. Biomarkers are measurable biochemical substances used to recognize and indicate disease severity or response to therapeutic interventions. The information they provide is objective and suitable for delivering healthcare providers with a means of stratifying disease state in COVID-19 patients. This, in turn, can be used to help select and guide intervention efforts as well as gauge the efficacy of therapeutic approaches. Here, we review a number of potential biomarkers that may be used to guide treatment, monitor treatment efficacy, and form individualized therapeutic guidance based on patient response. Implementation of the COVID-19 biomarkers discussed here may lead to significantly improved quality of care and patient outcomes for those infected with SARS-CoV-2 worldwide.

1. Introduction

COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, originated in Wuhan, China, in 2020 and quickly grew to pandemic levels, infecting approximately three hundred million people and claiming approximately five million lives worldwide [1]. This pandemic caused a tremendous socioeconomic impact due to necessary population isolation efforts including “lockdowns,” social distancing, and travel restrictions. The large numbers of COVID-19 patients also hoisted a considerable healthcare burden upon every country worldwide, stretching the capacities of limited human as well as material resources. Most COVID-19 patients present no symptoms or only mild, flu-like symptoms such as a dry cough or fever [2,3]. However, approximately 20% of all COVID-19 patients, develop severe or life-threatening complications, including hypoxia, respiratory failure, hemodynamic instability, and multiorgan failure [4]. For these severe cases, there were increased demands for intensive care efforts, mechanical ventilation equipment, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support [5]. The reported overall mortality rate for patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) was approximately 30% [6], whereas the mortality rate for mildly afflicted COVID 19 patients was low [4]. Among those who survived severe infections, many subsequently suffer from long-term health issues [7].
In addition to localized respiratory manifestations, severe COVID-19 cases also present extra-pulmonary complications or multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS), which is more common in children [8]. During SARS-CoV-2 infection, both innate and adaptive host immune responses are triggered, increasing the potential for tissue and organ damage as a result of dysregulated host response and the body’s excessive pro-inflammatory reaction. The widespread and massive release of cytokines and chemokines, often called the “cytokine storm”, that ensues induces extrapulmonary involvement and possibly fatal complications associated with multisystem inflammatory syndrome [9,10]. It is, therefore, essential and urgent to identify, triage, and treat patients, especially those who may be progressing to severe disease stages, as early as possible.
Healthcare providers typically stratify COVID-19 patients based on clinical presentations, such as symptoms, peripheral pulse oxygen saturation, and blood pressure. These clinical assessments are essential but somewhat subjective, and sometimes only manifest at late stages of the disease. To identify at-risk patients early, some laboratory biomarkers can provide accessory, objective information that can significantly influence the quality of patient care.
Biomarkers are defined as measurable biochemical substances that are used to recognize and indicate the presence and severity of a disease, or a patient’s response to therapeutic interventions [11,12]. Various biomarkers are available to assess the severity of COVID-19 infection. These markers have various potential benefits: (1) identification and recognition of at-risk patients; (2) stratification of COVID-19 severity; (3) assistance in the establishment of admission or intensive care criteria; (4) treatment guidance via response assessment; (5) prognosis evaluation; and (6) ICU or ordinary ward discharge criteria framing [9]. These biomarkers can also be sorted into different categories: (1) host immune response markers that are immunological and inflammatory in nature; (2) hematological abnormality markers; and (3) end-organ injury and systemic response markers including, but not limited to, coagulation factors, cardiac enzymes, and renal function markers [9,13]. Please see Table 1 for biomarker examples associated with each of these categories.

2. Immunological and Inflammatory Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection

As the SARS-CoV-2 virus enters host cells, binding to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) receptor, viral replication in the cytoplasm releases many virions, causing local infection of neighboring cells and a viremia-induced systemic immune response [5]. Both innate and adaptive immune responses are therefore activated. Meanwhile, the SARS-CoV-2 also induces the secretion of soluble serum and urine ACE2, further releasing a vast quantity of cytokines and causing a systemic inflammatory response [14]. Excessive cytokines stimulate and recruit immune cells, causing dysregulated, overcompensating host responses leading toward “cytokine storm syndrome” [3,9]. This dysregulated immune response is a life-threatening, urgent-care condition that may be progressively characterized by persistent fever, nonspecific muscle pain, hemodynamic instability, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), multiorgan failure, and, in the absence of suitable treatment, death [13].

2.1. Cytokines

The rapid deterioration of severely affected COVID patients may be attributable to an over-reacting immune system. This response may evolve from multiple pathways, including, but not limited to, NF-κB signaling, the JAK/STAT pathway, the NLRP3 pathway, and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) activation pathways [13,15]. While SARS-CoV-2 virus infects epithelial cells, the above immune pathways are activated, and several pro-inflammatory cytokines are released, including interleukin 1β, (IL-1β), IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α, and interferons (INFs) [3,9,13]. Elevated cytokine levels result in the recruitment of immune cells such as macrophages, T cells, and neutrophils to the infected area. Meanwhile, released serum cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), lead to increased synthesis of prototypic acute phase reactants, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), from the liver and into the bloodstream. Eventually, all of these dysregulated immune responses elicit various sequelae, such as the destabilization of endothelial cell-to-cell interactions, the destruction of the capillary and vascular barrier, tissue damage, and multiple organ failure, which may eventually result in the death of the infected individual [3,16].
The relationship between interleukin-6 and COVID-19 severity has been investigated by many studies [17,18,19]. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), a cytokine secreted by stimulated monocytes and macrophages, mediates a broad range of biological reactions [20]. Plasma IL-6 increases only 1 h after bodily insult and peaks after about 3–6 h [21,22]. Measurably increased IL-6 levels have been noted following trauma, stress, and infection [20]. A multifunctional cytokine that transmits cell signals and regulates immune cells, IL-6 has a strong proinflammatory effect associated with multiple biological functions and plays an important role in inflammation, tumor growth, and hematological diseases [23,24]. IL-6 triggers multiple immune responses by forming a positive feedback loop that eventually results in a cytokine storm, and elevated serum IL-6 may indicate disease severity and prognosis. Among COVID-19 patients admitted to the hospital, IL-6 was higher in the non-survival group than in the survival group [25,26]. Many studies have recognized IL-6 as a pivotal marker for implying the prognosis and severity of various diseases [27,28,29,30]. In addition, serum IL-6 may be useful for monitoring treatment response and evaluating the efficacy of medications such as tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor blockade used for treating severe COVID-19 infections [19,31].
Other pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-17, G-CSF, GMCSF, inducible protein-10 (IP-10), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and TNFα) are significantly increased in severely ill patients [15,32,33]. Thus, elevated cytokines levels in the bloodstream may be used as a diagnostic/predictive factor in COVID-19 patients.
Interferons (INFs) are natural antiviral and immune-modulating agents that initially inhibit viral replication and enhance the immune response to improve clearance of the viral infection [34,35]. An impaired type I IFN response, featuring no IFN-β and low IFN-α production and activity, should be related to severe COVID-19 [36]. Paradoxically, delayed but exaggerated type I IFN responses are involved in hyper inflammation and contribute to the severe progression of COVID-19. These responses may be attributable to genetic and immunological factors [37].

2.2. C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin and Ferritin

As serum cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α are released, they further stimulate several downstream immune pathways, increasing the production of acute-phase reactants such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). CRP is a non-specific acute-phase protein induced by IL-6 in the liver and a sensitive biomarker of inflammation, infection, and tissue damage [38].
CRP level is usually low in the bloodstream. Following acute inflammatory reactions, serum CRP increases significantly within 12–24 h, with a 20–72 h plateau and a subsequent return to baseline levels in 3–7 days [39,40,41]. As most CRP components are synthesized in the liver, liver failure would hinder the production of CRP [42]. COVID-19 patients with higher serum CRP are prone to evolve to severe disease states [43]. Among these COVID-19 patients, higher circulating CRP is associated with a higher rate of adverse events, such as venous thromboembolism events, acute kidney injury, and higher in-hospital mortality [44].
Procalcitonin (PCT), the precursor of calcitonin, is a glycoprotein consisting of a 116-amino acid, which is typically synthesized and released by thyroid parafollicular C cell [45,46]. Procalcitonin increases within four hours of response to infection or acute injury as an acute inflammatory marker, peaks at 6 h with a plateau at 8–24 h, and a return to baseline levels in 2–3 days [41]. Increased serum PCT level is associated with a high risk of bacterial infections and sepsis rather than viral infections, and PCT has previously been used to distinguish between bacterial and viral infections [47]. However, elevated PCT levels are correlated with the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection [48,49,50]. Compared to moderate COVID-19 patients with abnormal image findings and clinical symptoms only, severe cases demonstrated a four to eight times higher procalcitonin level during severe or critical SARS-CoV-2 infection, respectively [50]. PCT levels appear to be useful as a disease severity predictor and may further imply concomitant bacterial infections. Co-infection rates were higher during severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and were accompanied by raised PCT levels [50]. For this reason, gradually increasing serum PCT levels may indicate a poorer prognosis.
Ferritin, an acute-phase protein, may interfere with iron metabolism [51]. Iron parameters, such as ferritin and transferrin, are not yet considered standard biomarkers for monitoring COVID-19 disease progression because the relationship between iron metabolism and COVID-19 remains unclear [52]. Some studies have claimed that elevated ferritin is a risk factor for COVID-19 severity [53,54,55].

3. Hematological Abnormality

SARS-CoV-2 infection alters the hematopoietic system and hemostasis, causing hematological abnormality and coagulopathy.
Lymphocytopenia, a hallmark of COVID-19, may be considered a crucial laboratory finding in terms of being a prognostic predictor. The degree of lymphopenia is correlated with the severity of the disease, while absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) lower than 1000/mm3 indicate a poor prognosis [56]. The pathological mechanism of lymphopenia during severe COVID-19 disease states remains unclear, but the current evidence has led to multiple hypothesized mechanisms: (1) because SARS-CoV-2 is known to affect tissues (lung, heart, gastrointestinal tract) and induce ACE2 expression in the process, and because lymphocytes express ACE2 receptor on their surface [57], SARS-CoV-2 may directly infect lymphocytes and induce lysis or apoptosis; (2) the cytokine storm, a significantly increased cytokine response provoked by SARS-CoV-2 infection, attributes significant elevation of interleukins (primarily IL-6, IL-2, IL-7, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, interferon-γ inducible protein 10, MCP-1, and MIP1-a) and raised tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, which leads to lymphocyte apoptosis [58,59,60]; (3) coexisting lactic acidosis may interfere with lymphocyte proliferation [61]; and, (4) increased cytokines may also contribute to lymphoid organ atrophy (including the spleen) and further hinder lymphocyte turnover [62].
From an adaptive immunity perspective, SARS-CoV-2 infection influences total lymphocyte count and balance. This hematological presentation, the result of an increase in circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines, is most impactful in patients with severe COVID-19 infection, who have shown significant reductions in the absolute number of CD4+, CD8+, B, and natural killer (NK) cells [63,64]. Additionally, decreased numbers of other mononuclear leukocytes, such as monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils, have also been documented [65], and may provide a strong predictive value for in-hospital mortality, organ injury, and severe respiratory injury and complications [66].
Eosinopenia seems to have a significant role in COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis, as significantly reduced eosinophils were found in severe cases [67,68]. Eosinophils are primarily responsible for allergic reactions and anti-parasitic infections [69]. Previous animal studies have demonstrated an antiviral effect of eosinophils in various respiratory infections [70,71]. Persistent eosinopenia was associated with higher mortality, but an increased eosinophil count was associated with disease improvement [72,73]. Interestingly, asthmatic patients with higher eosinophil counts have lower hospitalization rates and are less likely to succumb to severe disease. Patients with pre-existing conditions associated with eosinophilia, such as asthma or allergic rhinitis, may be more protected from severe SARS-CoV-2 infection [67].
Neutrophilia in COVID-19 patients may be also be used as a predictive marker for disease severity. Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, the increased emergence of immature neutrophils in the blood has been directly correlated with the severity of COVID-19 [74,75]. The recruitment of neutrophils from the circulation into tissues occurs in most organs, especially in highly vascularized areas such as the lungs and kidneys [76]. This influx of neutrophils somehow damages neighboring vessels and parenchyma. Neutrophils are provoked to release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) upon facing threat signals. NETs immobilize and limit pathogens and facilitate their killing by antimicrobial agents. However, excessive formation or impaired removal would endanger the host [77]. The dysregulated NET formation may contribute to direct vascular injury and indirectly induce autoimmune vasculitis by forming autoantibodies [78]. Histopathological evidence suggests that NET-induced immune-thrombosis is associated with thrombotic events and organ damage in severe COVID-19 infections [79].
Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been recognized as essential independent predictive factors for identifying at-risk COVID-19 patients [80,81]. Elevated NLR or PLR indicate that patient health is deteriorating and that they require increased oxygen, and that they are at higher risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [82]. The unique hematological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infections may indicate the possible utility of a prognostic test base on hematological responses. Continuous assessment of lymphocyte count dynamics may provide valuable information for predicting patient prognoses. At the point of symptom onset, patients presenting lower lymphocyte percentages have been associated with increased disease severity over time [83].

Hypercoagulation and Coagulopathy

Coagulation abnormalities and coagulopathy are associated with severe COVID-19 disease. Hyper-coagulation status, a unique manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, results in thromboembolic events, such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and microvascular thrombosis [84]. COVID-19 infection induces massive endothelial dysfunction and damage via direct virus invasion or indirect adaptive immunity mediated endothelial injury (either the NETs or complements) [84,85]. This immune response-triggered thrombosis causes widespread vascular damage, complement-induced thrombosis, systemic microangiopathy, and thromboembolism, that may ultimately lead to multi-organ failure [84,85,86]. Additionally, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) with fulminant activation of coagulation, also reported in COVID-19 patients, has been shown to induce massive microvascular thrombosis and coagulation factor consumption [87]. Prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time, elevated D-dimer, and thrombocytopenia are all associated with the development of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection [88].
D-dimer is a soluble fibrin degradation product used as a marker for evaluating ongoing thrombotic and thrombolytic events such as pulmonary embolism [89]. D-dimer has been found in increased quantities among COVID-19 patients following the activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis [87]. As raised D-dimer has been associated with higher in-hospital mortality and increasing COVID-19 severity, it may be a reliable prognostic factor [90].

4. Organ Damage Indicator

4.1. Acute COVID–19 Cardiovascular Syndrome

A host of cardiovascular complications and involvements, called “acute COVID-19 cardiovascular syndrome”, occur during SARS-CoV-2 infection [91]. Acute coronary syndrome, myocardial injury, decompensated heart failure, stress-induced cardiomyopathy, pericardial effusion, viral myocarditis, or arrhythmia may be induced by various pathogenic routes following COVID-19 infection. Among patients with pre-existing cardiovascular comorbidities, cardiovascular diseases become more compromised or decompensated during COVID-19 infection. Systemic inflammatory response, thromboembolic events, and direct viral invasion compromise the cardiovascular system in COVID-19 patients, as do particular medication side-effects and hospital-acquired infections [91,92].

4.2. Cardiac Troponin

Myocardial injury is associated with poorer prognosis and outcome [91]. Cardiac troponins, consisting of troponin T, troponin I, and troponin C, are sensitive and specific for myocardial injury, and will appear elevated 4–10 h after acute myocardial ischemia [93]. They have been correlated with poor prognosis in cases involving pulmonary embolism or ischemic heart disease [92]. Cardiac complications have been more prevalent among COVID-19 cases compared to cases of SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome). Epidemiological evidence indicates that 12% to 20% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have cardiac injuries, as implied by raised cardiac troponin levels [91,94]. For this reason, cardiac troponin may be useful as a potential prognostic marker to estimate patient outcome and mortality risk.

4.3. Brain Type NPs and N-Terminal Pro-BNP

Plasma natriuretic peptides (NPs), such as BNP (brain type NPs) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), are commonly examined to evaluate acute heart failure (HF) patients [95]. Elevated NT-proBNP levels are associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates in COVID-19 cases [96] and provide more predictive value in combination with cardiac troponin [97]. However, although higher serum brain natriuretic peptide levels have been associated with cardiogenic pulmonary edema in COVID-19 patients with ARDS, some may have high levels of brain natriuretic peptide without significant ventricular dysfunction [98]. These cardiac biomarkers should be carefully considered when evaluating heart failure, as there are multiple mechanisms of cardiac injury. A point-of-care cardiac ultrasound should be considered to assess heart function to tailor treatment [98].

4.4. COVID 19-Associated Acute Renal Injury

In addition to the pulmonary manifestations associated with COVID-19, acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Several pathogeneses injure renal tissues: local or systemic inflammatory responses and reactions, endothelial injury, coagulation-induced thromboembolic event, and renin–angiotensin system activation [99]. According to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), guidelines, which provides the consensus definition of AKI, previous studies have reported that nearly 30–50% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 develop some form of AKI [100,101,102]. Near half of all patients in intensive care units (ICU) with acute kidney injury require renal replacement therapy [101,102], and in-hospital mortality is higher among patients with acute kidney injury [99]. The clinical manifestations of renal function deterioration range from mild proteinuria/hematuria to a drop in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), increased serum creatinine, or evolution to chronic kidney disease [99]. Notably, patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease are vulnerable to severe clinical presentations and higher mortality [103]. For these reasons, deteriorated renal function or pre-existing renal disease during COVID-19 infection may indicate a poorer prognosis.

4.5. Markers for Other End-Organ Injury

Lactate dehydrogenase, an enzyme ubiquitously present in all human tissue, can be used as an indicator of gluconeogenesis and DNA metabolism [104]. Inflammatory responses and thromboembolic events hinder microcirculatory function and compromise oxygen delivery, increasing the likelihood of gluconeogenesis and DNA metabolism. Higher serum LDH might, therefore, be used to indicate COVID-19 disease severity and predict mortality risk [105,106,107].
Furthermore, higher serum lactate level is frequently considered an indicator of organ hypoperfusion or tissue hypoxia and is associated with more severe COVID-19 conditions. Higher serum lactate level is associated with poor prognosis and higher mortality [108,109].

4.6. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) is a rare but severe condition associated with post-COVID-19 infection in which various body parts become inflamed. MIS may involve the heart, lungs, kidneys, brain, skin, eyes, and/or the gastrointestinal organs. The presence of the symptoms in people <21 years old (or ≤19 years old per the World Health Organization definition is defined as MIS-children (MIS-C), and the presence of symptoms in people >21 years old is defined as MIS-adult (MIS-A). MIS-C is more common than MIS-A [8,110]. MIS shares similar clinical features with Kawasaki disease, an acute pediatric medium-vessel vasculitis. Symptoms, which include fever, elevated inflammatory markers, and multiple organ dysfunction, develop during or after SARS-CoV-2 infection [111].
Additional MIS-associated abnormalities include leukopenia/lymphopenia, elevated serum D-dimer, PCT, creatine kinase, and IL-6. Moreover, children with severe complications may have higher CRP, procalcitonin, or troponin levels and lower lymphocyte/platelet count [112,113]. The biomarkers listed in Table 2 may help establish the relationship between diagnostic criteria and clinical presentations [110,113].

5. Biomarkers in Different Clinical Courses

SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by triphasic clinical courses: initial manifestations, acute phase, and recovery. Some patients are asymptomatic during the first stage; however, symptomatic patients may present with cough, myalgias, headache, diarrhea, sore throat, or smell/taste abnormalities [115]. Mild lymphopenia was reported during this stage, but other hematological abnormalities were relatively rare.
Three-to-seven days after the initiation of symptoms, patients may enter the acute phase stage [115,116,117]. Some patients deteriorate to become severe cases during this stage, which variously includes respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and thromboembolic events. During this period, more severe hematological abnormalities, such as lymphopenia, neutrophilia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia develop, and immunological parameters such as IL-6, CRP, and PCT, increase in severe cases. Additionally, organ damage frequently occurs during this deteriorated stage. Elevated cardiac troponin, serum creatine, or D-dimer imply end-organ injury and poorer prognosis. This deterioration may occur as early as two days after admission, requiring intensive care, and some patients may later require intubation or ECMO. These parameters may improve after 15–16 days but if they do not, the persistent parameter abnormality is indicative of a poor prognosis [50,115,116,117]. Longitudinal and continuous monitoring of these parameters may help identify critical, at-risk patients and may therefore, provide impactful and timely intervention and improved outcomes.
The time to recover from COVID-19 infection is highly variable, accounting for age, pre-existing comorbidities, and illness severity. Most mild cases will fully recovery, but some long-term sequelae may persist in severe cases [118,119]. Different presentations of variable biomarkers are provided in Table 3.

6. Tailor to the Guidance of Treatment

Biomarkers are not only useful for prognostic evaluation but may be used for treatment guidance and response monitoring. These biomarkers may be useful for formulating targeted COVID-19 therapy. Serum IL-6 may help monitor treatment response and assess the efficacy of tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor blockade, for treating severe COVID-19 cases [19,31]. COVID-19 patients with higher serum IL-6 levels may benefit more from IL-6 receptor antagonist therapy or the IL-6 receptor antagonist therapy combined with systemic corticosteroids [123,124]. Two classes of Food and Drug Administration (FDA.US)-approved IL-6 inhibitors: anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (e.g., sarilumab, tocilizumab) and anti-IL-6 mAbs (i.e., siltuximab) are now available for COVID-19 patients. However, these medications should be caution. Patients with systemic inflammations caused by non-SARS-CoV-2 viral infections, or other biologic immunomodulating drugs are not eligible for these medications [125].
Another pro-inflammatory cytokine or receptor inhibitor, the IL-1 receptor inhibitor, demonstrated some improved survival benefit for patients with COVID-19. Anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) antagonist, has been approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disorder [126,127]. A meta-analysis has reported the administration of Anakinra in COVID-19 patients was safe and associated with reductions in both mortality and the requirement for mechanical ventilation [128]. A recent clinical trial, a double-blind, randomized controlled study, has successfully demonstrated the positive utility of using increased soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor(suPAR) to help select the best patients for Anakinra treatment. As the suPAR examination is currently widely used, one study also suggests that CRP, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and ferritin may be used as alternative biomarkers [129]. However, because there is insufficient evidence regarding the use of IL1R antagonist for treating COVID-19 patients, COVID-19 treatment guidelines are not firm regarding the use of anakinra [130].
Reducing the level of serum pro-inflammatory cytokines may be used to treat COVID-19. Corticosteroids, therefore, may be used to decrease cytokine storm severity and improve patient mortality among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 [127]. The RECOVERY trial showed that dexamethasone significantly reduced 28-day mortality in patients who needed respiratory support or extra oxygen [131]. In consideration of the adverse effect of corticosteroids, current guidance for COVID-19 treatment only recommends using corticosteroids in hospitalized patients who require oxygen or ventilation support [132]. On the other hand, interferon therapy for anti-viral therapy is not recommended currently because of the controversial effect on COVID-19 patients [133].
Changes in biomarkers may be used to indicate successful treatment and disease recovery. Following successful treatment, IL-2R, IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP levels decreased significantly among recovering COVID-19 patients. This was followed by reductions in IL-8, IL-10, and PCT. Further, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes normalized significantly, in patients who recovered, but only limited changes in B lymphocytes and natural killer cells were observed [134].

7. Conclusions

The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection is broad, ranging from asymptomatic, to mild, moderate, severe, and critical. To recognize case severity early, biomarkers may be used to provide additional and objective information, helping healthcare providers stratify COVID-19 patients accordingly. Here, we have reviewed: (1) the protective effect of eosinophilia during the initial presentation of the disease; (2) prognostic marker values associated with acute disease stages including various interleukins, CRP, PCT, as well as lymphopenia, neutrophilia, and other end-organ damage markers; and (3) recovery hallmarks of hematological neutralization and decreased cytokine levels. These biomarkers might also be leveraged for formulating treatment guidance, or individualized therapy based on the patient responses. We believe that more thorough review and clinical utilization of COVID-19 biomarkers could improve the quality of patient care and significantly improve the management of SARS-CoV-2 infections worldwide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-F.S., K.-S.H. and C.-M.C.; methodology, C.-F.S., K.-S.H. and C.-M.C.; software, C.-H.C. and S.-W.L.; validation, C.-F.S., K.-S.H. and C.-M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-H.C. and S.-W.L.; writing—review and editing, C.-F.S., K.-S.H. and C.-M.C.; supervision, C.-F.S., K.-S.H. and C.-M.C.; project administration, C.-M.C.; funding acquisition, C.-H.C., C.-F.S. and C.-M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by research grants from Taiwan’s National Tsing Hua University (110F7MBBE1), Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 109-2222-E-075-001 & MOST 110-2628-E-007-003), and Taiwan’s Taipei Veteran General Hospital (V111B-009).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 3 January 2022).
  2. Zaim, S.; Chong, J.H.; Sankaranarayanan, V.; Harky, A. COVID-19 and Multiorgan Response. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2020, 45, 100618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tabassum, T.; Rahman, A.; Araf, Y.; Ullah, A.; Hosen, M.J. Prospective selected biomarkers in COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment. Biomark. Med. 2021, 15, 1435–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, Z.; McGoogan, J.M. Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020, 323, 1239–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Badulak, J.; Antonini, M.V.; Stead, C.M.; Shekerdemian, L.; Raman, L.; Paden, M.L.; Agerstrand, C.; Bartlett, R.H.; Barrett, N.; Combes, A.; et al. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19: Updated 2021 Guidelines from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. ASAIO J. 2021, 67, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Carbonell, R.; Urgelés, S.; Rodríguez, A.; Bodí, M.; Martín-Loeches, I.; Solé-Violán, J.; Díaz, E.; Gómez, J.; Trefler, S.; Vallverdú, M.; et al. Mortality comparison between the first and second/third waves among 3,795 critical COVID-19 patients with pneumonia admitted to the ICU: A multicentre retrospective cohort study. Lancet Reg. Health-Eur. 2021, 11, 100243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Desai, A.D.; Lavelle, M.; Boursiquot, B.C.; Wan, E. Long-term Complications of COVID-19. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS). Updated 25 June 2021. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/mis/about.html (accessed on 11 January 2022).
  9. Samprathi, M.; Jayashree, M. Biomarkers in COVID-19: An Up-To-Date Review. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 8, 607647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rivas, M.N.; Porritt, R.A.; Cheng, M.H.; Bahar, I.; Arditi, M. COVID-19–associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C): A novel disease that mimics toxic shock syndrome—the superantigen hypothesis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 147, 57–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Robb, M.A.; McInnes, P.M.; Califf, R.M. Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints: Developing Common Terminology and Definitions. JAMA 2016, 315, 1107–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Downing, G. Biomarkers definitions working group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2001, 69, 89–95. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, L.; Xie, X.; Tu, Z.; Fu, J.; Xu, D.; Zhou, Y. The signal pathways and treatment of cytokine storm in COVID-19. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bortolotti, D.; Gentili, V.; Rizzo, S.; Schiuma, G.; Beltrami, S.; Strazzabosco, G.; Fernandez, M.; Caccuri, F.; Caruso, A.; Rizzo, R. TLR3 and TLR7 RNA Sensor Activation during SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Catanzaro, M.; Fagiani, F.; Racchi, M.; Corsini, E.; Govoni, S.; Lanni, C. Immune response in COVID-19: Addressing a pharmacological challenge by targeting pathways triggered by SARS-CoV-2. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ragab, D.; Eldin, H.S.; Taeimah, M.; Khattab, R.; Salem, R. The COVID-19 Cytokine Storm; What We Know So Far. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Du, P.; Geng, J.; Wang, F.; Chen, X.B.; Huang, Z.W.; Wang, Y. Role of IL-6 inhibitor in treatment of COVID-19-related cytokine release syndrome. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 18, 1356–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mojtabavi, H.; Saghazadeh, A.; Rezaei, N. Interleukin-6 and severe COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 2020, 31, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Giannakodimos, I.; Gkountana, G.-V.; Lykouras, D.; Karkoulias, K.; Tsakas, S. The Role of Interleukin-6 in the Pathogenesis, Prognosis and Treatment of Severe COVID-19. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 5328–5338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zaric, B.; Andrijevic, I.; Matijasevic, J.; Andrijevic, L.; Kovacevic, T.; Zaric, B. Interleukin-6 and procalcitonin as biomarkers in mortality prediction of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia. Ann. Thorac. Med. 2014, 9, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shimazui, T.; Matsumura, Y.; Nakada, T.; Oda, S. Serum levels of interleukin-6 may predict organ dysfunction earlier than SOFA score. Acute Med. Surg. 2017, 4, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Gebhard, F.; Pfetsch, H.; Steinbach, G.; Strecker, W.; Kinzl, L.; Brückner, U.B. Is interleukin 6 an early marker of injury severity following major trauma in humans? Arch. Surg. 2000, 135, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lai, H.-S.; Lin, W.-H.; Lai, S.-L.; Lin, H.-Y.; Hsu, W.-M.; Chou, C.-H.; Lee, P.-H. Interleukin-6 Mediates Angiotensinogen Gene Expression during Liver Regeneration. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Taniguchi, K.; Karin, M. IL-6 and related cytokines as the critical lynchpins between inflammation and cancer. In Seminars in Immunology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen, R.; Sang, L.; Jiang, M.; Yang, Z.; Jia, N.; Fu, W.; Xie, J.; Guan, W.; Liang, W.; Ni, Z.; et al. Longitudinal hematologic and immunologic variations associated with the progression of COVID-19 patients in China. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 146, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, T.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Ma, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Xia, Z.; et al. The role of interleukin-6 in monitoring severe case of coronavirus disease 2019. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e12421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Song, J.; Park, D.W.; Moon, S.; Cho, H.-J.; Park, J.H.; Seok, H.; Choi, W.S. Diagnostic and prognostic value of interleukin-6, pentraxin 3, and procalcitonin levels among sepsis and septic shock patients: A prospective controlled study according to the Sepsis-3 definitions. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Weidhase, L.; Wellhöfer, D.; Schulze, G.; Kaiser, T.; Drogies, T.; Wurst, U.; Petros, S. Is Interleukin-6 a better predictor of successful antibiotic therapy than procalcitonin and C-reactive protein? A single center study in critically ill adults. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Emami, A.M.; Zaerin, O. Role of Serum Interleukin 6, Albumin and C-Reactive Protein in COPD Patients. Tanaffos 2015, 14, 134–140. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jekarl, D.W.; Lee, S.-Y.; Lee, J.; Park, Y.-J.; Kim, Y.; Park, J.H.; Wee, J.H.; Choi, S.P. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker and IL-6 as a prognostic marker for sepsis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 75, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Galván-Román, J.M.; Rodríguez-García, S.C.; Roy-Vallejo, E.; Marcos-Jiménez, A.; Sánchez-Alonso, S.; Fernández-Díaz, C.; Alcaraz-Serna, A.; Mateu-Albero, T.; Rodríguez-Cortes, P.; Sánchez-Cerrillo, I.; et al. IL-6 serum levels predict severity and response to tocilizumab in COVID-19: An observational study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 147, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. D’Ardes, D.; Boccatonda, A.; Rossi, I.; Guagnano, M.T.; Santilli, F.; Cipollone, F.; Bucci, M. COVID-19 and RAS: Unravelling an Unclear Relationship. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, P.; Ding, Y.; Xu, Z.; Pu, R.; Li, P.; Yan, J.; Liu, J.; Meng, F.; Huang, L.; Shi, L.; et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of COVID-19 patients with and without pneumonia in Beijing, China. medRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Hasselbalch, H.; Skov, V.; Kjær, L.; Ellervik, C.; Poulsen, A.; Poulsen, T.; Nielsen, C. COVID-19 as a mediator of interferon deficiency and hyperinflammation: Rationale for the use of JAK1/2 inhibitors in combination with interferon. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2021, 60, 28–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Darazam, I.A.; Shokouhi, S.; Pourhoseingholi, M.A.; Irvani, S.S.N.; Mokhtari, M.; Shabani, M.; Amirdosara, M.; Torabinavid, P.; Golmohammadi, M.; Hashemi, S.; et al. Role of interferon therapy in severe COVID-19: The COVIFERON randomized controlled trial. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hadjadj, J.; Yatim, N.; Barnabei, L.; Corneau, A.; Boussier, J.; Smith, N.; Péré, H.; Charbit, B.; Bondet, V.; Chenevier-Gobeaux, C.; et al. Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients. Science 2020, 369, 718–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kim, Y.-M.; Shin, E.-C. Type I and III interferon responses in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Exp. Mol. Med. 2021, 53, 750–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pepys, M.B.; Hirschfield, G. C-reactive protein: A critical update. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 1805–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hahn, W.-H.; Song, J.-H.; Kim, H.; Park, S. Is procalcitonin to C-reactive protein ratio useful for the detection of late onset neonatal sepsis? J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018, 31, 822–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mooiweer, E.; Luijk, B.; Bonten, M.J.; Ekkelenkamp, M.B. C-reactive protein levels but not CRP dynamics predict mortality in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. J. Infect. 2011, 62, 314–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rowland, T.; Hilliard, H.; Barlow, G. Chapter Three-Procalcitonin: Potential Role in Diagnosis and Management of Sepsis. In Advances in Clinical Chemistry; Makowski, G.S., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 71–86. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sproston, N.R.; Ashworth, J.J. Role of C-Reactive Protein at Sites of Inflammation and Infection. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, F.; Li, L.; Xu, M.; Wu, J.; Luo, D.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Song, X.; Zhou, X. Prognostic value of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in patients with COVID-19. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 127, 104370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Smilowitz, N.R.; Kunichoff, D.; Garshick, M.; Shah, B.; Pillinger, M.; Hochman, J.S.; Berger, J.S. C-reactive protein and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 2270–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Choi, J.J.; McCarthy, M.W. Novel applications for serum procalcitonin testing in clinical practice. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2017, 18, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Saeed, K.; Dale, A.P.; Leung, E.; Cusack, T.; Mohamed, F.; Lockyer, G.; Arnaudov, S.; Wade, A.; Moran, B.; Lewis, G.; et al. Procalcitonin levels predict infectious complications and response to treatment in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal malignancy. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 42, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rodríguez, A.; Reyes, L.; Monclou, J.; Suberviola, B.; Bodí, M.; Sirgo, G.; Solé-Violán, J.; Guardiola, J.; Barahona, D.; Díaz, E.; et al. Relationship between acute kidney injury and serum procalcitonin (PCT) concentration in critically ill patients with influenza infection. Med. Intensiv. 2018, 42, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wang, D.; Hu, B.; Hu, C.; Zhu, F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Xiang, H.; Cheng, Z.; Xiong, Y.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus—Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020, 323, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guan, W.J.; Ni, Z.Y.; Hu, Y.; Liang, W.H.; Ou, C.Q.; He, J.X.; Liu, L.; Shan, H.; Lei, C.; Hui, D.S.C.; et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1708–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hu, R.; Han, C.; Pei, S.; Yin, M.; Chen, X. Procalcitonin levels in COVID-19 patients. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 106051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Narazaki, M.; Kishimoto, T. The Two-Faced Cytokine IL-6 in Host Defense and Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Banchini, F.; Cattaneo, G.M.; Capelli, P. Serum ferritin levels in inflammation: A retrospective comparative analysis between COVID-19 and emergency surgical non-COVID-19 patients. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2021, 16, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lin, Z.; Long, F.; Yang, Y.; Chen, X.; Xu, L.; Yang, M. Serum ferritin as an independent risk factor for severity in COVID-19 patients. J. Infect. 2020, 81, 647–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kappert, K.; Jahić, A.; Tauber, R. Assessment of serum ferritin as a biomarker in COVID-19: Bystander or participant? Insights by comparison with other infectious and non-infectious diseases. Biomarkers 2020, 25, 616–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, I.; Pranata, R.; Lim, M.A.; Oehadian, A.; Alisjahbana, B. C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, D-dimer, and ferritin in severe coronavirus disease-2019: A meta-analysis. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2020, 14, 1753466620937175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lee, J.; Park, S.-S.; Kim, T.; Lee, D.-G.; Kim, D.-W. Lymphopenia as a Biological Predictor of Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Cancers 2021, 13, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Xu, H.; Zhong, L.; Deng, J.; Peng, J.; Dan, H.; Zeng, X.; Li, T.; Chen, Q. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2020, 12, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Aggarwal, S.; Gollapudi, S.; Gupta, S. Increased TNF-α-induced apoptosis in lymphocytes from aged humans: Changes in TNF-α receptor expression and activation of caspases. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 2154–2161. [Google Scholar]
  59. Liao, Y.-C.; Liang, W.-G.; Chen, F.-W.; Hsu, J.-H.; Yang, J.-J.; Chang, M.-S. IL-19 Induces Production of IL-6 and TNF-α and Results in Cell Apoptosis Through TNF-α. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 4288–4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Singh, S.; Sharma, A.; Arora, S.K. High producer haplotype (CAG) of-863C/A,-308G/A and-238G/A poly-morphisms in the promoter region of TNF-α gene associate with enhanced apoptosis of lymphocytes in HIV-1 subtype C infected individuals from North India. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98020. [Google Scholar]
  61. You, B.; Ravaud, A.; Canivet, A. The official French guidelines to protect patients with cancer against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 619–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Fischer, K.; Hoffmann, P.; Voelkl, S.; Meidenbauer, N.; Ammer, J.; Edinger, M.; Gottfried, E.; Schwarz, S.; Rothe, G.; Hoves, S.; et al. Inhibitory effect of tumor cell–derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood 2007, 109, 3812–3819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xu, Z.; Shi, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Huang, L.; Zhang, C.; Shuhong, L.; Peng, Z.; Hongxia, L.; Li, Z.; et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory dis-tress syndrome. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 420–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Qin, C.; Zhou, L.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Yang, S.; Tao, Y.; Xie, C.; Ma, K.; Shang, K.; Wang, W.; et al. Dysregulation of Immune Response in Patients with Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 762–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Li, D.; Chen, Y.; Liu, H.; Jia, Y.; Li, F.; Wang, W.; Wu, J.; Wan, Z.; Cao, Y.; Zeng, R. Immune dysfunction leads to mortality and organ injury in patients with COVID-19 in China: Insights from ERS-COVID-19 study. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Dastoli, S.; Bennardo, L.; Patruno, C.; Nisticò, S.P. Are erythema multiforme and urticaria related to a better outcome of COVID -19? Dermatol. Ther. 2020, 33, e13681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dosanjh, A. Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin and Respiratory Tract Infection and Inflammation: Implications for COVID-19 Management. J. Interf. Cytokine Res. 2020, 40, 443–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rosenberg, H.F.; Foster, P.S. Eosinophils and COVID-19: Diagnosis, prognosis, and vaccination strategies. Semin. Immunopathol. 2021, 43, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Adamko, D.J.; Yost, B.L.; Gleich, G.J.; Fryer, A.; Jacoby, D. Ovalbumin sensitization changes the inflammatory response to subsequent parainfluenza infection: Eosinophils mediate airway hyperresponsiveness, M2 muscarinic receptor dysfunction, and antiviral effects. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 190, 1465–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Samarasinghe, A.E.; Melo, R.C.N.; Duan, S.; LeMessurier, K.; Liedmann, S.; Surman, S.L.; Lee, J.J.; Hurwitz, J.L.; Thomas, P.G.; McCullers, J.A. Eosinophils Promote Antiviral Immunity in Mice Infected with Influenza A Virus. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 3214–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Du, Y.; Tu, L.; Zhu, P.; Mu, M.; Wang, R.; Yang, P.; Wang, X.; Hu, C.; Ping, R.; Hu, P.; et al. Clinical Features of 85 Fatal Cases of COVID-19 from Wuhan. A Retrospective Observational Study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 201, 1372–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Zhang, J.J.; Dong, X.; Cao, Y.Y.; Yuan, Y.D.; Yang, Y.B.; Yan, Y.Q.; Akdis, C.A.; Gao, Y.D. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy 2020, 75, 1730–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Schulte-Schrepping, J.; Reusch, N.; Paclik, D.; Baßler, K.; Schlickeiser, S.; Zhang, B.; Krämer, B.; Krammer, T.; Brumhard, S.; Bonaguro, L.; et al. Severe COVID-19 is marked by a dysregulated mye-loid cell compartment. Cell 2020, 182, 1419–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wilk, A.J.; Rustagi, A.; Zhao, N.Q.; Roque, J.; Martínez-Colón, G.J.; McKechnie, J.L.; Ivison, G.T.; Ranganath, T.; Vergara, R.; Hollis, T.; et al. A single-cell atlas of the peripheral immune response in patients with severe COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1070–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, Y.; Du, X.; Chen, J.; Jin, Y.; Peng, L.; Wang, H.H.; Luo, M.; Chen, L.; Zhao, Y. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an independent risk factor for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J. Infect. 2020, 81, e6–e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Papayannopoulos, V. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 18, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Hakkim, A.; Fürnrohr, B.G.; Amann, K.; Laube, B.; Abu Abed, U.; Brinkmann, V.; Herrmann, M.; Voll, R.E.; Zychlinsky, A. Impairment of neutrophil extracellular trap degradation is associated with lupus nephritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9813–9818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Morris, G.; Bortolasci, C.C.; Puri, B.K.; Olive, L.; Marx, W.; O’Neil, A.; Athan, E.; Carvalho, A.; Maes, M.; Walder, K.; et al. Preventing the development of severe COVID-19 by modifying immunothrombosis. Life Sci. 2020, 264, 118617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Liu, Q.; Chen, H.; Zeng, Q. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with complication of cardiac arrhythmia. J. Infect. 2020, 81, e6–e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Simadibrata, D.M.; Pandhita, B.A.W.; Ananta, M.E.; Tango, T. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, a novel biomarker to predict the severity of COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Intensiv. Care Soc. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wu, C.; Chen, X.; Cai, Y.; Xia, J.; Zhou, X.; Xu, S.; Huang, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, X.; Du, C.; et al. Risk Factors Associated with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 934–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Tan, L.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, D.; Ding, J.; Huang, Q.; Tang, Y.-Q.; Wang, Q.; Miao, H. Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: A descriptive and predictive study. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Perico, L.; Benigni, A.; Casiraghi, F.; Ng, L.F.P.; Renia, L.; Remuzzi, G. Immunity, endothelial injury and complement-induced coagulopathy in COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2020, 17, 46–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ackermann, M.; Anders, H.-J.; Bilyy, R.; Bowlin, G.L.; Daniel, C.; De Lorenzo, R.; Egeblad, M.; Henneck, T.; Hidalgo, A.; Hoffmann, M.; et al. Patients with COVID-19: In the dark-NETs of neutrophils. Cell Death Differ. 2021, 28, 3125–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chilosi, M.; Poletti, V.; Ravaglia, C.; Rossi, G.; Dubini, A.; Piciucchi, S.; Pedica, F.; Bronte, V.; Pizzolo, G.; Martignoni, G.; et al. The pathogenic role of epithelial and endothelial cells in early-phase COVID-19 pneumonia: Victims and partners in crime. Mod. Pathol. 2021, 34, 1444–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Polimeni, A.; Leo, I.; Spaccarotella, C.; Mongiardo, A.; Sorrentino, S.; Sabatino, J.; De Rosa, S.; Indolfi, C. Differences in coagulopathy indices in patients with severe versus non-severe COVID-19: A meta-analysis of 35 studies and 6427 patients. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Al-Samkari, H.; Leaf, R.S.K.; Dzik, W.H.; Carlson, J.C.T.; Fogerty, A.E.; Waheed, A.; Goodarzi, K.; Bendapudi, P.K.; Bornikova, L.; Gupta, S.; et al. COVID-19 and coagulation: Bleeding and thrombotic manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Blood 2020, 136, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Lichey, J.; Reschofski, I.; Dissmann, T.; Priesnitz, M.; Hoffmann, M.; Lode, H. Fibrin degradation product D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Klin. Wochenschr. 1991, 69, 522–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yao, Y.; Cao, J.; Wang, Q.; Shi, Q.; Liu, K.; Luo, Z.; Chen, X.; Chen, S.; Yu, K.; Huang, Z.; et al. D-dimer as a biomarker for disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients: A case control study. J. Intensiv. Care 2020, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hendren, N.S.; Drazner, M.H.; Bozkurt, B.; Cooper, L.T., Jr. Description and Proposed Management of the Acute COVID-19 Cardiovascular Syndrome. Circulation 2020, 141, 1903–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Khan, S.; Rasool, S.T.; Ahmed, S.I. Role of Cardiac Biomarkers in COVID-19: What Recent Investigations Tell Us? Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2021, 46, 100842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Garg, P.; Morris, P.; Fazlanie, A.L.; Vijayan, S.; Dancso, B.; Dastidar, A.G.; Plein, S.; Mueller, C.; Haaf, P. Cardiac biomarkers of acute coronary syndrome: From history to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2017, 12, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Bozkurt, B.; Kamat, I.; Hotez, P.J. Myocarditis With COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines. Circulation 2021, 144, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Selçuk, M.; Keskin, M.; Çınar, T.; Günay, N.; Doğan, S.; Çiçek, V.; Kılıç, Ş.; Asal, S.; Yavuz, S.; Keser, N.; et al. Prognostic significance of N-Terminal Pro-BNP in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia without previous history of heart failure. J. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Res. 2021, 13, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Gao, L.; Jiang, D.; Wen, X.-S.; Cheng, X.-C.; Sun, M.; He, B.; You, L.-N.; Lei, P.; Tan, X.-W.; Qin, S.; et al. Prognostic value of NT-proBNP in patients with severe COVID-19. Respir. Res. 2020, 21, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Calvo-Fernández, A.; Izquierdo, A.; Subirana, I.; Farré, N.; Vila, J.; Durán, X.; García-Guimaraes, M.; Valdivielso, S.; Cabero, P.; Soler, C.; et al. Marcadores de daño miocárdico en la predicción del pronóstico a corto plazo de los pacientes con COVID-19. Rev. Española Cardiol. 2020, 74, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Ranard, L.S.; Fried, J.A.; Abdalla, M.; Anstey, D.; Givens, R.C.; Kumaraiah, D.; Kodali, S.K.; Takeda, K.; Karmpaliotis, D.; Rabbani, L.E.; et al. Approach to Acute Cardiovascular Complications in COVID-19 Infection. Circ. Heart Fail. 2020, 13, e007220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Legrand, M.; Bell, S.; Forni, L.; Joannidis, M.; Koyner, J.L.; Liu, K.; Cantaluppi, V. Pathophysiology of COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2021, 17, 751–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Cheng, Y.; Luo, R.; Wang, K.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Z.; Dong, L.; Li, J.; Yao, Y.; Ge, S.; Xu, G. Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. Kidney Int. 2020, 97, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mohamed, M.M.; Lukitsch, I.; Torres-Ortiz, A.E.; Walker, J.B.; Varghese, V.; Hernandez-Arroyo, C.F.; Alqudsi, M.; LeDoux, J.R.; Velez, J.C.Q. Acute Kidney Injury Associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Urban New Orleans. Kidney360 2020, 1, 614–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cummings, M.J.; Baldwin, M.R.; Abrams, D.; Jacobson, S.D.; Meyer, B.J.; Balough, E.M.; Aaron, J.G.; Claassen, J.; LeRoy, E.R.; Hastie, J. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: A prospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 1763–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zarębska-Michaluk, D.; Jaroszewicz, J.; Rogalska, M.; Lorenc, B.; Rorat, M.; Szymanek-Pasternak, A.; Piekarska, A.; Berkan-Kawińska, A.; Sikorska, K.; Tudrujek-Zdunek, M.; et al. Impact of Kidney Failure on the Severity of COVID-19. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Farhana, A.; Lappin, S.L. Biochemistry, Lactate Dehydrogenase; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557536/ (accessed on 7 May 2021).
  105. Vidal-Cevallos, P.; Higuera-De-La-Tijera, F.; Chávez-Tapia, N.C.; Sanchez-Giron, F.; Cerda-Reyes, E.; Rosales-Salyano, V.H.; Servin-Caamaño, A.; Vázquez-Medina, M.U.; Méndez-Sánchez, N. Lactate-dehydrogenase associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Mexico: A multi-centre retrospective cohort study. Ann. Hepatol. 2021, 24, 100338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Szarpak, L.; Ruetzler, K.; Safiejko, K.; Hampel, M.; Pruc, M.; Koda, L.K.; Filipiak, K.J.; Jaguszewski, M.J. Lactate dehydrogenase level as a COVID-19 severity marker. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 45, 638–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Martha, J.W.; Wibowo, A.; Pranata, R. Prognostic value of elevated lactate dehydrogenase in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Postgrad. Med. J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Carpenè, G.; Onorato, D.; Nocini, R.; Fortunato, G.; Rizk, J.G.; Henry, B.M.; Lippi, G. Blood lactate concentration in COVID-19: A systematic literature review. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 2021, 60, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Bruno, R.R.; Wernly, B.; Flaatten, H.; Fjølner, J.; Artigas, A.; Pinto, B.B.; Schefold, J.C.; Binnebössel, S.; Baldia, P.H.; Kelm, M.; et al. Lactate is associated with mortality in very old intensive care patients suffering from COVID-19: Results from an international observational study of 2860 patients. Ann. Intensive Care 2021, 11, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. WHO. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children and Adolescents Temporally Related to COVID-19. Updated 15 May 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/multisystem-inflammatory-syndrome-in-children-and-adolescents-with-covid-19 (accessed on 22 January 2022).
  111. Nalbandian, A.; Sehgal, K.; Gupta, A.; Madhavan, M.V.; McGroder, C.; Stevens, J.S.; Cook, J.R.; Nordvig, A.S.; Shalev, D.; Sehrawat, T.S.; et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 601–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Pierce, C.A.; Preston-Hurlburt, P.; Dai, Y.; Aschner, C.B.; Cheshenko, N.; Galen, B.; Garforth, S.J.; Herrera, N.G.; Jangra, R.K.; Morano, N.C.; et al. Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalized pediatric and adult patients. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Fernandes, D.M.; Oliveira, C.R.; Guerguis, S.; Eisenberg, R.; Choi, J.; Kim, M.; Abdelhemid, A.; Agha, R.; Agarwal, S.; Aschner, J.L.; et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Clinical Syndromes and Predictors of Disease Severity in Hospitalized Children and Youth. J. Pediatr. 2021, 230, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Information for Healthcare Providers about Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C). Updated 20 May 2021. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/mis/mis-c/hcp/index.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fmis%2Fhcp%2Findex.html (accessed on 22 January 2022).
  115. Wang, D.; Yin, Y.; Hu, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, S.; Jian, M.; Xu, H.; Prowle, J.; Hu, B.; et al. Clinical course and outcome of 107 patients infected with the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, discharged from two hospitals in Wuhan, China. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Cruz, A.S.; Mendes-Frias, A.; Oliveira, A.I.; Dias, L.; Matos, A.R.; Carvalho, A.; Capela, C.; Pedrosa, J.; Gil Castro, A.; Silvestre, R. Interleukin-6 Is a Biomarker for the Development of Fatal Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pneumonia. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 613422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. El-Solh, A.A.; Meduri, U.G.; Lawson, Y.; Carter, M.; Mergenhagen, K.A. Clinical Course and Outcome of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Data From a National Repository. J. Intensiv. Care Med. 2021, 36, 664–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Mitrani, R.D.; Dabas, N.; Goldberger, J.J. COVID-19 cardiac injury: Implications for long-term surveillance and outcomes in survivors. Heart Rhythm 2020, 17, 1984–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. van den Borst, B.; Peters, J.B.; Brink, M.; Schoon, Y.; Bleeker-Rovers, C.P.; Schers, H.; van Hees, H.W.H.; van Helvoort, H.; van den Boogaard, M.; van der Hoeven, H.; et al. Comprehensive Health Assessment 3 Months After Recovery from Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, e1089–e1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Terpos, E.; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I.; Elalamy, I.; Kastritis, E.; Sergentanis, T.N.; Politou, M.; Psaltopoulou, T.; Gerotziafas, G.; Dimopoulos, M.A. Hematological findings and complications of COVID -19. Am. J. Hematol. 2020, 95, 834–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Sun, B.; Tang, N.; Peluso, M.J.; Iyer, N.S.; Torres, L.; Donatelli, J.L.; Munter, S.E.; Nixon, C.C.; Rutishauser, R.L.; Rodriguez-Barraquer, I.; et al. Characterization and Biomarker Analyses of Post-COVID-19 Complications and Neurological Manifestations. Cells 2021, 10, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Yip, C.Y.; Yap, E.S.; De Mel, S.; Teo, W.Z.; Lee, C.T.; Kan, S.; Lee, M.C.C.; Loh, W.N.H.; Lim, E.L.; Ying, S. Temporal changes in immune blood cell parameters in COVID-19 infection and recovery from severe infection. Br. J. Haematol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Neumann, A.U.; Goekkaya, M.; Dorgham, K.; Traidl-Hoffmann, C.; Gorochov, G. Tocilizumab in COVID-19 therapy: Who benefits, and how? Lancet 2021, 398, 299–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group. Association Between Administration of IL-6 Antagonists and Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Meta-analysis. JAMA 2021, 326, 499–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. The National Institute of Health. Interleukin-6 Inhibitors. Updated 16 December 2021. Available online: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/immunomodulators/interleukin-6-inhibitors/ (accessed on 22 January 2022).
  126. Ramírez, J.; Cañete, J.D. Anakinra for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A safety evaluation. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2018, 17, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhou, Y.-W.; Xie, Y.; Tang, L.-S.; Pu, D.; Zhu, Y.-J.; Liu, J.-Y.; Ma, X.-L. Therapeutic targets and interventional strategies in COVID-19: Mechanisms and clinical studies. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Pasin, L.; Cavalli, G.; Navalesi, P.; Sella, N.; Landoni, G.; Yavorovskiy, A.G.; Likhvantsev, V.V.; Zangrillo, A.; Dagna, L.; Monti, G. Anakinra for patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2021, 86, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Kyriazopoulou, E.; Poulakou, G.; Milionis, H.; Metallidis, S.; Adamis, G.; Tsiakos, K.; Fragkou, A.; Rapti, A.; Damoulari, C.; Fantoni, M.; et al. Early treatment of COVID-19 with anakinra guided by soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor plasma levels: A double-blind, randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1752–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. The National Institute of Health. Interleukin-1 Inhibitors. Updated 19 October 2021. Available online: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/immunomodulators/interleukin-1-inhibitors/ (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  131. The RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. The National Institute of Health. Corticosteroids. Updated 16 December 2021. Available online: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/immunomodulators/corticosteroids/ (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  133. The National Institute of Health. Interferons. Updated 16 December 2021. Available online: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/interferons/ (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  134. Ni, M.; Tian, F.; Xiang, D.; Yu, B. Characteristics of inflammatory factors and lymphocyte subsets in patients with severe COVID-19. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 2600–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Classification of biomarkers that predicts the severity of COVID-19.
Table 1. Classification of biomarkers that predicts the severity of COVID-19.
Host immune responseCytokines
Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) Interleukin 1β, (IL-1β,), IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α, interferon γ, IP-10, MCP-1
Inflammatory markers
C-reactive Protein, Procalcitonin and Ferritin
Hematological AbnormalityLymphopenia,
Neutrophilia
Decreased CD4+ CD8+
Decreased NK cell or B cell
Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio
Eosinopenia
Thrombocytopenia
End-organ InjuryCardiac troponin,
Brain type NPs and N-terminal pro-BNP
Serum creatinine
Lactate dehydrogenase
Serum lactate
Table
Table 2. Diagnostic criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) [110,114].
Table 2. Diagnostic criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) [110,114].
World Health OrganizationCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (United States) *
  • Children and adolescents 0–19 years of age with fever > 3 days
    AND
  • Two of the following:
    ◆
    Rash or bilateral non-purulent conjunctivitis or muco-cutaneous inflammation signs (oral, hands or feet).
    ◆
    Hypotension or shock.
    ◆
    Features of myocardial dysfunction, pericarditis, valvulitis, or coronary abnormalities (including ECHO findings or elevated Troponin/NT-proBNP),
    ◆
    Evidence of coagulopathy (by PT, PTT, elevated d-Dimers).
    ◆
    Acute gastrointestinal problems (diarrhea, vomiting, or abdominal pain).
    AND
  • Elevated markers of inflammation such as ESR, C-reactive protein, or procalcitonin.
    AND
  • No other obvious microbial cause of inflammation, including bacterial sepsis, staphylococcal, or streptococcal shock syndromes.
    AND
  • Evidence of COVID-19 (RT-PCR, antigen test or serology positive), or likely contact with patients with COVID-19.
  • An individual aged <21 years presenting with fever >38.0 °C for ≥24 h
  • Laboratory evidence of inflammation, > 1 finding
    ◆
    An elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fibrinogen, procalcitonin, d-dimer, ferritin, lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH), or interleukin 6 (IL-6), elevated neutrophils, reduced lymphocytes, and low albumin
  • Evidence of clinically severe illness requiring hospitalization, with >2 organ involvement
    ◆
    Cardiac, renal, respiratory, hematologic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, or neurological);
    AND
  • No alternative plausible diagnoses.
    AND
  • Positive for current or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection
    ◆
    Confirmed by RT-PCR, serology, or antigen test; or exposure to a suspected or confirmed COVID-19 case within the 4 weeks prior to the onset of symptoms.
* (1) Some individuals may fulfill full or partial criteria for Kawasaki disease but should be reported if they meet the case definition for MIS-C. (2) Consider MIS-C in any pediatric death with evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Table
Table 3. The change of biomarkers referring severe cases in different clinical stage.
Table 3. The change of biomarkers referring severe cases in different clinical stage.
SymptomsChange of Biomarkers Referring to Severe Cases
Initial manifestationsMost patients are asymptomatic; Symptomatic patients may present with cough, myalgias, headache, diarrhea, sore throat, or smell/taste abnormalities [117].
  • Mild lymphopenia was reported during this stage, but other hematological abnormalities were relatively rare [120]
  • Pre-existing comorbidities consisting of ↑ eosinophils may be a protective factor [67].
Acute phaseMild to severe cases are admitted owing to desaturation, septic shock, or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Severe cases developed during this stage, complicated with respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, thromboembolic events [117,118,119]Immunologically
  • Markedly ↑ interleukins (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-17, G-CSF, GMCSF, inducible protein-10 (IP-10), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and TNFα)
  • ↓ or ↑ INFs *
  • ↑ CRP and ↑ PCT, ↑ Ferritin
Hematologically
  • Markedly ↓ Lymphocyte ¶
  • ↓ CD4+ cells, CD8+ cells, B cells, and natural killers (NK) cells
  • ↓ Eosinophils
  • ↑ Neutrophils
  • ↑ neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), ↑ platelet and lymphocyte ratio (PLR)
Hypercoagulation and coagulopathy
  • ↑ D-Dimer
End-Organ damage
  • ↑ Cardiac Troponin, ↑ BNP, ↑ NT-proBNP, ↑ LDH, ↑ serum creatinine, ↑ serum lactate.
Recovery stageMost mild cases will fully recovery. but some long-term sequelae might last in severe casesHigher risk for neurological sequelae
  • ↑ antibody response, ↑ plasma IL-6 levels, during acute phase [121].
Persistent biomarker abnormality
  • The persist abnormality of the biomarkers during indicate the patients’ poor prognosis [50,115,116,117] §
Post-COVID 19 multisystem inflammatory syndromes #
* An impaired type I IFN response, featured by no IFN-β and low IFN-α production and activity, should be related to severe COVID-19 [36]. Delayed but exaggerated type I IFN responses, however, contribute to the severe progression of COVID-19 [37]; ¶ The degree of lymphopenia is correlated with disease severity, while absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) lower than 1000/mm3 indicate a poor prognosis [56]; § Hematological abnormality generally recovered on day 15–16 after admission [122]; # Biomarkers and symptoms related to multisystem inflammatory syndromes are listed in Table 2.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.-H.; Lin, S.-W.; Shen, C.-F.; Hsieh, K.-S.; Cheng, C.-M. Biomarkers during COVID-19: Mechanisms of Change and Implications for Patient Outcomes. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020509

AMA Style

Chen C-H, Lin S-W, Shen C-F, Hsieh K-S, Cheng C-M. Biomarkers during COVID-19: Mechanisms of Change and Implications for Patient Outcomes. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(2):509. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020509

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Cheng-Han, Sheng-Wen Lin, Ching-Fen Shen, Kai-Sheng Hsieh, and Chao-Min Cheng. 2022. "Biomarkers during COVID-19: Mechanisms of Change and Implications for Patient Outcomes" Diagnostics 12, no. 2: 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020509

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop