Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:56:24.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The provision of undergraduate clinical placements in ENT during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic – exploring patient perspectives on a variety of approaches

Part of: JLO Coronavirus Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2021

B Patel Open the ORCID record for B Patel [Opens in a new window] ,
R Gera ,
A Lozidou ,
S A Hannan  and
S R Saeed
B Patel*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, UK
R Gera
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
A Lozidou
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, UK
S A Hannan
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, UK
S R Saeed
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, UK Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Bhavesh Patel, Department of ENT, Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, Huntley Street, LondonWC1E 6DG, UK E-mail: bhav.patel@nhs.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has greatly disrupted routine ENT services. Subsequently, universities have chosen to either augment or suspend clinical placements.

Objective

This study aimed to elicit patients’ perspectives toward various approaches to clinical placements in ENT during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Methods

Cross-sectional questionnaires were given to patients attending the ENT department for routine out-patient care. Responses were measured using a five-point Likert scale. Seventy-nine patients completed the survey.

Results

Ninety-five per cent of respondents felt the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic had not reduced their comfort in interacting with medical students. Most participants reported being comfortable with students participating directly or remotely in their care, and with students having access to their anonymised data. Twenty-five per cent of participants stated that they are uncomfortable with consultations being recorded and shared for medical education purposes.

Conclusion

A number of approaches to clinical placements remain acceptable to patients. Educational leads should continue to offer placements in ENT that can incorporate direct or remote observation of consultations.

Keywords

EducationMedicalUndergraduateOtolaryngologyCOVID-19Patient Preference
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 135 , Issue 8 , August 2021 , pp. 737 - 740
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr B Patel takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Mace, AD, Narula, AA. Survey of current undergraduate otolaryngology training in the United Kingdom. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:217–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, MM, Saeed, SR. Provision of undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching within General Medical Council approved UK medical schools: what is current practice? J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:340–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biswas, D, Rafferty, A, Jassar, P. Night emergency cover for ENT in England: a national survey. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:899–902CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, GR, Bacila, IA, Swamy, M. Does current provision of undergraduate education prepare UK medical students in ENT? A systematic literature review. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ENT-UK. ENT-UK Guidelines for changes in ENT during COVID-19 Pandemic. In: https://www.entuk.org/entuk-guidelines-changes-ent-during-covid-19-pandemic [20 March 2020]Google Scholar
Patterson, JM, Govender, R, Roe, J, Clunie, G, Murphy, J, Brady, G et al. COVID-19 and ENT SLT services, workforce and research in the UK: a discussion paper. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2020;55:806–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, B, Jegatheeswaran, L, Minocha, A, Alhilani, M, Nakhoul, M, Mutengesa, E. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on final year medical students in the United Kingdom: a national survey. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijk, SW, Duijzer, EJ, Wienold, M. Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2020;10:e37217CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courteille, O, Fahlstedt, M, Ho, J, Hedman, L, Fors, U, von Holst, H et al. Learning through a virtual patient vs. recorded lecture: a comparison of knowledge retention in a trauma case. Int J Med Educ 2018;9:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, T, Gerits, M, Bouquillon, D, Schoenmakers, B. Video training with peer feedback in real-time consultation: acceptability and feasibility in a general-practice setting. Postgrad Med J 2016;92:431–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krug, B, Colliers, A, Matthys, J, Anthierens, S, Philips, H, Damen, J et al. Video-recording consultations for educational purposes in out-of-hours primary care: patients and physicians are willing to participate. Acta Clin Belg 2019;74:65–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, PA, Herron, RL. Use and misuse of the Likert item responses and other ordinal measures. Int J Exerc Sci 2015;8:297–302Google ScholarPubMed