Investigating the Possibility of Dismissing an Employee on Account of Breach of COVID-19 Regulations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/10601

Keywords:

COVID-19, misconduct, dismissal, appropriate and justified

Abstract

The taking of disciplinary action against employees who fail to comply with COVID-19 regulations appears to be a route that employers would prefer to ensure the safety of employees and other people in the workplace. Generally, employers are compelled by law to provide a safe working environment. Employees, on the other hand, are also obliged to play their role in ensuring their own safety and that of fellow employees. Safety measures in the workplace will include compliance with COVID-19 regulations. If employees fail to comply with COVID-19 regulations, their conduct will put the lives of other employees or people in the workplace at risk of contracting the virus. To enforce compliance with safety rules and COVID-19 measures, employers need to adopt a policy that will regulate COVID-19-related conduct and consequences for the failure to comply with such regulations. The failure to comply with a policy that regulates the conduct of employees in the workplace may constitute misconduct. An employer may impose a sanction of dismissal on such employees. The question that arises is whether dismissal for the failure to obey COVID-19 rules will be an appropriate sanction and perhaps justified in terms of the Constitution? The article argues that the dismissal will be justified in terms of section 36 of the Constitution. It will aim to achieve the worthwhile purpose of protecting employees against COVID-19 transmission and saving their lives as the virus has killed many people in the past two years. It will also save the employer from liability for the failure to ensure a safe working environment as such employees will risk other employees with the transmission of the virus. 

References

Collins, H. 1986. “Market Power, Bureaucratic Power, and the Contract of Employment” ILJ (UK) 15: 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/15.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/15.1.1

Currie, I. and Klaaren, J. 2013. The Bill of Rights Handbook. 6th edition. Cape Town: Juta.

Du Toit, D., Woolfrey, D., Murphy, J., Godfrey, S., Bosch, D. and Christie, S. 1998. The Labour Relations Act of 1995. 2nd edition. Durban: Butterworths.

Du Toit, D., Godfrey, S., Cooper, C., Giles G., Cohen, T., Conradie, B. and Steenkamp, A. 2015. Labour Relations Law: A Comprehensive Guide. 6th edition. Durban: LexisNexis.

Grogan, J. 2017. Workplace Law. 12th edition. Cape Town: Juta.

Grogan, J. 2009. Workplace Law. 10th edition. Cape Town: Juta.

Mischke, C. and Garbers, C. 1994. Safety at Work: A Guide to Occupational Health, Safety and Accident Compensation Legislation. 2nd edition. Cape Town: Juta.

Rubenstein, L. and DeCamp, M. 2020. “Revisiting Restrictions of Rights After COVID-19” Health and Human Rights Journal 25(4): 321.

Rycroft, A. and Jordaan, J. 1992. A Guide to South African Labour Law. 2nd edition. Cape Town: Juta.

Tenza, M. 2018. “Evaluating the limitation of the right to strike in terms of the law of general application in South Africa” Stellenbosch Law Review 29(3): 471.

https://sacoronavirus.co.za/2022/01/14/update-on-COVID-19-friday-14-january-2022/ accessed on 14 January 2022.

Quarterly Labour Force Survey 2021 available at www.statssa.gov.za accessed on 15 January 2022.

Published

2022-07-20

How to Cite

Tenza, Mlungizi. 2021. “Investigating the Possibility of Dismissing an Employee on Account of Breach of COVID-19 Regulations”. Journal of Law, Society and Development 8:23 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/10601.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2022-01-17
Accepted 2022-04-22
Published 2022-07-20