Special articleEthical Challenges in COVID-19 Biospecimen Research: Perspectives From Institutional Review Board Members and Bioethicists
Section snippets
Respect for Persons
The basic ethical principle of respect for persons, otherwise known as respect for an individual’s autonomy, is to ensure that individuals are truly informed about their research participation. This principle is divided into two moral requirements: 1) the requirement to acknowledge autonomy, and 2) the requirement to protect those with diminished autonomy.6, 7, 8 Thus, autonomy refers to the right of a person to decide freely and independently whether they wish to participate in research, and
Beneficence and Its Corollary, Non-Maleficence
Beneficence is an ethical principle in research that requires protection of research participants from harm and exploitation, as well as maximizing possible benefits from participating in research.6 Given that COVID-19 biospecimen research typically requires biospecimen collection as the only research intervention, oftentimes with medical record review, it may be designated as minimal risk research. However, if collection of biospecimens is established without proper disclosure or consent,
Justice
Every pandemic evokes new questions about what justice requires, even as the pandemic also potentially worsens existing inequalities. In applying the principle of justice as conceived in the Belmont Report, IRBs have traditionally focused on the equitable selection of subjects. The Belmont Report also points out that the benefits of publicly funded research ought to be fairly available to all; however, there is no specific guidance on how to actually make the benefits of research available to
Recommendations for IRB Members and Bioethicists
Specialists in human subject protections, such as IRB members, should work collaboratively with bioethicists and investigators to ensure that the principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice are met prior to research approval. Formal institutional policies and study-specific approaches must strive to balance the need to conduct biomedical research with the need to preserve the rights and autonomy of research participants. These strategies should include consideration of creative
Conclusion
Ethical concerns about autonomy, beneficence, and justice are evident in COVID-19 biospecimen research. Appropriate IRB oversight and bioethics guidance must center on protecting the rights and welfare of research participants, despite the urgent need for more knowledge about the virus and its impact. Institutional review boards must continue their essential role in protecting human research participants, especially those who are now more vulnerable because of the impact of COVID-19−related
Acknowledgments
The opinions expressed by the authors are personal and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board, the Mayo Clinic Human Research Protection Program, or the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine.
Editing, proofreading, and reference verification were provided by Scientific Publications, Mayo Clinic. Assistance with manuscript preparation was provided by Angie Lam and Vicki M. Schmidt.
References (47)
- et al.
Serology testing in the COVID-19 pandemic response
Lancet Infect Dis
(2020) - et al.
A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States
Genet Med
(2016) - et al.
Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research
Genet Med
(2014) - et al.
"I don't want to be Henrietta Lacks:" Diverse patient perspectives on donating biospecimens for precision medicine research
Genet Med
(2019) - et al.
Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research
Am J Hum Genet
(2009) - et al.
Understanding the effect of disease adaptation information on general population values for hypothetical health states
Soc Sci Med
(2011) Coronavirus Resource Center
- et al.
The urgency of utilizing COVID-19 biospecimens for research in the heart of the global pandemic
J Transl Med
(2020) - et al.
Data sharing solutions for biobanks for the COVID-19 pandemic. Biopreserv Biobank. 2020; [Published online ahead of print, August 19, 2020]
Biobanking during the COVID-19 pandemic
Biopreserv Biobank
(2020)
The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. [Bethesda, Md.]: The Commission, 1978
The concept of autonomy and the principle of respect for autonomy
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
Broad consent for biobanks is best — provided it is also deep
BMC Med Ethics
Revising the common rule: Ethics, scientific advancement, and public policy in conflict
J Law Med Ethics
Broad consent for research on biospecimens: The views of actual donors at four US medical centers
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics
The Havasupai Indian tribe case--lessons for research involving stored biologic samples
N Engl J Med
Recognition of research participants’ need for autonomy: remembering the legacy of Henrietta Lacks
JAMA
Public attitudes toward biobanking of human biological material for research purposes: a literature review
Int J Environ Res Public Health
Public perspectives on biospecimen procurement: what biorepositories should consider
Biopreserv Biobank
Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): United States, February 12–March 16, 2020
MMWR Morb Mort Wkly
COVID-19 hospitalization and death by race/ethnicity
Cited by (6)
The impact of COVID-19 on disease epidemiology, family dynamics, and social justice in Minnesota: All that you cannot see
2022, Journal of Clinical and Translational ScienceResearch recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients’ perspectives
2023, BMC Medical Research Methodology
Potential Competing Interests: The authors report no potential competing interests.
Grant Support: The research to prepare this manuscript was partly supported by the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine. The sponsor had no role in the writing of the report or the decision to submit the article for publication.