Area level deprivation and monthly COVID-19 cases: The impact of government policy in England

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114413Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Area level deprivation is significantly associated with monthly COVID-19 cases.

  • Initially, areas with higher levels of deprivation had higher reported cases.

  • Government policy played a role in reversing this relationship.

Abstract

This paper aims to understand the relationship between area level deprivation and monthly COVID-19 cases in England in response to government policy throughout 2020. The response variable is monthly reported COVID-19 cases at the Middle Super Output Area (MSOA) level by Public Health England, with Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), ethnicity (percentage of the population across 5 ethnicity categories) and the percentage of the population older than 70 years old and time as predictors. A GEE population-averaged panel-data model was employed to model trends in monthly COVID-19 cases with the population of each MSOA included as the exposure variable. Area level deprivation is significantly associated with COVID-19 cases from March 2020; however, this relationship is reversed in December 2020. Follow up analysis found that this reversal was maintained when controlling for the novel COVID-19 variant outbreak in the South East of England. This analysis indicates that changes in the role of deprivation and monthly reported COVID-19 over time cases may be linked to two government policies: (1) the premature easing of national restrictions in July 2020 when cases were still high in the most deprived areas in England and (2) the introduction of a regional tiered system in October predominantly in the North of England. The analysis adds to the evidence showing that deprivation is a key driver of COVID-19 outcomes and highlights the unintended negative impact of government policy.

Keywords

COVID-19 cases
Deprivation
Panel data analysis
Government policy
England

Cited by (0)