CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int J Sports Med 2022; 43(01): 83-93
DOI: 10.1055/a-1518-7778
Behavioural Sciences

How the COVID-19 Pandemic has Changed the Game of Soccer

1   Chair for Performance Analysis and Sports Informatics Technical University Munich, Munich,Germany
,
Gabriel Anzer
2   DFL Sportec Solutions AG, German Professional Soccer League, Munchen, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

This study explores the influence of corona-specific training and playing conditions - especially empty stadiums - on match performance, contact behavior, and home advantage in the Bundesliga (BL) and Bundesliga 2 (BL2). We analyzed the 2017/18, 2018/19, and 2019/20 seasons and compared matches in rounds 26–34 before shutdown with “ghost” matches after restart. Results show increased running activity for high intensity distance: (+ 6.1%) and total distance covered (+ 4.3%). In BL2 in particular there were also changes in tactical aspects of the game (time in last third: –6.3%, pressure on pass receiver: –8.6%, success of attacking duels: –7.9%, share of long passes completed: + 15.6%, outplayed opponents per pass: –14.7%). Contact time to other players (< 2 m distance) was 15:35 mins per match. After restart, contact was reduced, especially when the ball was not in the last third (–11.2%). Away wins increased by +44.2% in BL and the home-away difference in yellow cards changed in favor of the away team (+31.2%) in BL2. We conclude that empty stadiums have reduced home advantage and decreased referee bias when awarding yellow cards. Player behavior might have been affected by tactical demands and/or conscious or unconscious self-protection.



Publication History

Received: 19 November 2020

Accepted: 12 May 2021

Article published online:
03 August 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Cyranoski D. Profile of a killer: The complex biology powering the coronavirus pandemic. Nature 2020; 581: 22-26
  • 2 Tang JW. COVID-19: interpreting scientific evidence – uncertainty, confusion and delays. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20: 653
  • 3 Sharif A, Aloui C, Yarovaya L. COVID-19 pandemic, oil prices, stock market, geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty nexus in the US economy: Fresh evidence from the wavelet-based approach. International Review of Financial Analysis 2020; 70: 101496
  • 4 Williamson B, Eynon R, Potter J. Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learn Media Technol 2020; 45: 107-114
  • 5 Wielechowski M, Czech K, Grzęda Ł. Decline in mobility: Public transport in Poland in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Economies 2020; 8: 78
  • 6 Tanne JH, Hayasaki E, Zastrow M. et al. Covid-19: how doctors and healthcare systems are tackling coronavirus worldwide. BMJ 2020; 368: m1090
  • 7 Gössling S, Scott D, Hall CM. Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. J Sustain Tour 2020; 29: 1-20
  • 8 Scudellari M. How the pandemic might play out in 2021 and beyond. Nature 2020; 584: 22-25
  • 9 Tovar J. Soccer, World War II and coronavirus: A comparative analysis of how the sport shut down. Soccer Soc 2020; 22: 66-74
  • 10 Drewes M, Daumann F, Follert F. Exploring the sports economic impact of COVID-19 on professional soccer. Soccer Soc 2020; 22: 125-137
  • 11 Horky T. No sports, no spectators – no media, no money? The importance of spectators and broadcasting for professional sports during COVID-19. Soccer Soc 2020; 22: 96-102
  • 12 Mohr M, Nassis GP, Brito J. et al. Return to elite football after the COVID-19 lockdown . Manag Sport Leis 2020 ; doi: 10.1080/23750472.2020.1768635
  • 13 Meyer T, Mack D, Donde K. et al. Successful return to professional men’s football (soccer) competition after the COVID-19 shutdown: A cohort study in the German Bundesliga. Br J Sports Med 2020; 55: 62-66
  • 14 Norddeutscher Rundfunk (NDR). Corona: Bundesliga-Training aus dem Bauch heraus (engl: Bundesliga training by instinct) (2020-05-12). Available from: https://www.ndr.de/sport/fussball/Corona-Bundesliga-Training-aus-dem-Bauch-heraus,trainer218.html Accessed: 2021-05-11
  • 15 MacIntyre CR, Wang Q. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection for prevention of COVID-19. Lancet 2020; 395: 1950-1951
  • 16 British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). Interview with Neven Subotić [Bundesliga Player] and the return of the Bundesliga (2020-05-11). Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3csztfy Accessed: 2021-05-11
  • 17 Knudsen NS, Thomasen MM, Andersen TB. Spread of virus during soccer matches . medRxiv 2020 ; 2020.04.26.20080614; doi: 10.1101/2020.04.26.20080614
  • 18 Gonçalves B, Mendes R, Folgado H. et al. Can tracking data help in assessing interpersonal contact exposure in team sports during the COVID-19 pandemic?. Sensors 2020; 20: 6163
  • 19 Courneya KS, Carron AV. The home advantage in sport competitions: A literature review. Psychol Sport Exerc 1992; 14: 13-27
  • 20 Nevill AM, Balmer NJ, Mark Williams A. The influence of crowd noise and experience upon refereeing decisions in football. Psychol Sport Exerc 2002; 3: 261-272
  • 21 Pollard R. Evidence of a reduced home advantage when a team moves to a new stadium. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 969-973
  • 22 Waters A, Lovell GP. An examination of the homefield advantage in a professional English soccer team from a psychological standpoint. Football Studies 2002; 5: 46-59
  • 23 Oberhofer H, Philippovich T, Winner H. Distance matters in away games: Evidence from the German football league. J Econ Psychol 2010; 31: 200-211
  • 24 van Damme N, Baert S. Home advantage in European international soccer: which dimension of distance matters?. Economics 2019; 50: 1-17
  • 25 Riedl D, Strauss B, Heuer A. et al. Finale furioso: referee-biased injury times and their effects on home advantage in football. J Sports Sci 2014; 33: 1-10
  • 26 Sutter M, Kocher M. Favoritism of agents – the case of referees’ home bias. J Econ Psychol 2004; 25: 461-469 doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00013-8
  • 27 Dohmen T. The influence of social forces: Evidence from the behaviour of football referees. Econ Inq 2008; 46: 411-424
  • 28 Nevill AM, Holder RL. Home advantage in sport: An overview of studies on the advantage of playing at home. Sports Med 1999; 28: 221-236
  • 29 Dawson P, Dobson S, Goddard J. et al. Are football referees really biased and inconsistent?: evidence on the incidence of disciplinary sanction in the English Premier League. J R Statist Soc A 2007; 170: 231-250
  • 30 Buraimo B, Forrest D, Simmons R. The 12th man?: Refereeing bias in English and German soccer. J R Statist Soc A 2010; 173: 431-449
  • 31 Pettersson-Lidbom P, Priks M. Behavior under social pressure: empty Italian stadiums and referee bias. Econ Lett 2010; 108: 212-214
  • 32 Ven Nvande. Supporters are not necessary for the home advantage: evidence from same-stadium derbies and games without an audience. J Appl Soc Psychol 2011; 41: 2785-2792
  • 33 Reade JJ, Schreyer D, Singleton C. Echoes: What happens when football is played behind closed doors? SSRN 2020 . doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3630130
  • 34 Bryson A, Dolton P, Reade JJ. et al. Causal effects of an absent crowd on performances and refereeing decisions during COVID-19. Econ Lett 2021; 109664
  • 35 Fischer K, Haucap J. Does crowd support drive the home advantage in professional soccer? Evidence from German ghost games during the COVID-19 pandemic. CESifo Working Paper Series 2020; 8549
  • 36 Dilger A, Vischer L. No home bias in ghost games. Diskussionspapier des Instituts für Organisationsökonomik 2020; 7 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3674876
  • 37 Harriss DJ, MacSween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
  • 38 Anzer G, Bauer P. A goal scoring probability model for shots based on synchronized positional and event data in football (soccer). Front Sports Act Living 2021; 3: 53
  • 39 Memmert D, Rein R. Match analysis, big data and tactics: current trends in elite soccer. Front Sports Act Living 2018; 69: 65-72
  • 40 Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Budziak G. et al. Visual analysis of pressure in football. Data Min Knowl Discov 2017; 31: 1-47
  • 41 Deutsche Fußball Liga (DFL). Definitionskatalog Offizielle Spieldaten (engl: Definitions for Official Gama Data Frankfurt: DFL; 2021
  • 42 Linke D, Link D, Lames M. Football-specific validity of TRACAB’s optical video tracking systems. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0230179
  • 43 Liu H, Hopkins W, Ruano M. et al. Inter-operator reliability of live football match statistics from OPTA Sportsdata. Int J Perform Anal Sport 2013; 13: 803-821
  • 44 Link D, Hoernig M. Individual ball possession in soccer. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0179953
  • 45 Link D, Weber H. Effect of ambient temperature on pacing in soccer depends on skill level. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 1766-1770
  • 46 Link D, Lorenzo MFde. Seasonal pacing - match importance affects activity in professional soccer. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0157127
  • 47 Carling C, Bloomfield J. The effect of an early dismissal on player work-rate in a professional soccer match. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13: 126-128
  • 48 Lorenzo-Martínez M, Padrón-Cabo A, Rey E. et al. Lorenzo-Martínez M , Padrón-Cabo A , Rey E et al. Analysis of physical and technical performance of substitute players in professional soccer . Res Q Exerc Sport 2020 . Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1080/02 701367.2020.1755414
  • 49 International Football Association Board (IFAB). Temporary amendment to Law 3. Circular no. 19 (2020-05-08) Available from: https://img.fifa.com/image/upload/h8hiqftyr8d9nrwdltru.pdf. Accessed: 2021-05-11
  • 50 Rosenbaum PR. Design of Observational Studies. Vol. 10. New York, USA: Springer; 2010
  • 51 Castellano J, Casamichana D. What are the differences between first and second divisions of Spanish football teams?. Int J Perform Anal Sport 2015; 15: 135-146
  • 52 Deutsche Fußball Liga (DFL). Task Force Sportmedizin/Sonderspielbetrieb im Profifußball (engl: Task Force Sports Medecine/ Special Match Operations in Professional Soccer) (2020-09-03). Available from: https://media.dfl.de/sites/2/2020/09/Anhang-I-zur-SpOL-Task-Force-Sportmedizin-Sonderspielbetrieb-Version-3.0-2020-09-03-Stand.pdf. Accessed: 2021-05-11
  • 53 Strauß B, Höfer E. The home advantage in team sports. In: Goudas M, Theodorakis Y. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of Sport Psychology. Thessaloniki: Christodoulidi Publications; 2001: 210-212
  • 54 Peeters T, van Ours JC. Seasonal home advantage in English professional football; 1974–2018. Economist 2020; 169: 107-126
  • 55 Nevill AM, Webb T, Watts A. Improved training of football referees and the decline in home advantage post-WW2. Psychol Sport Exerc 2013; 14: 220-227
  • 56 Pollard R. Home advantage in soccer: a retrospective analysis. J Sports Sci 1986; 4: 237-248
  • 57 Clarke SR, Norman JM. Home ground advantage of individual clubs in English soccer. J R Statist Soc A 1995; 44: 509-521
  • 58 Sánchez PA, García-Calvo T, Leo FM. et al. An analysis of home advantage in the top two Spanish professional football leagues. Percept Mot Skills 2009; 108: 789-797
  • 59 Lames M. Chance involvement in goal scoring in football – an empirical approach. Ger J Exerc Sport Res 2018; 48: 278-286
  • 60 Mackenzie R, Cushion C. Performance analysis in football: A critical review and implications for future research. J Sports Sci 2013; 31: 639-676
  • 61 Carling C, Wright C, Nelson LJ. et al. Comment on 'Performance analysis in football: A critical review and implications for future research'. J Sports Sci 2014; 32: 2-7