Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:22:42.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emergence of NDM-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa among hospitalized patients and impact on antimicrobial therapy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2021

Leandro Reus Rodrigues Perez*
Affiliation:
Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Qualitá Laboratory, Novo Hamburgo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Eliana Carniel
Affiliation:
Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Gabriel Azambuja Narvaez
Affiliation:
Mãe de Deus Hospital, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Leandro Reus Rodrigues Perez, E-mail: leandro.reus@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

To the Editor—Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of nosocomial infection, mainly in intensive care patients. Notably, P. aeruginosa has a wide variety of resistance mechanisms that often restrict therapeutic options. Although carbapenems are considered potent agents for the treatment of Pseudomonas infections, the increased prevalence of carbapenem resistance among them has been observed worldwide in past decade. Reference Poole1

Distinct mechanisms, such as OprD porin loss, overexpression of MexAB-OprM efflux pump, and carbapenemase production may confer a carbapenem-resistance phenotype in P. aeruginosa. Reference Poole1,Reference Livermore2 Among the carbapenemase enzymes, metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) have one of the most potent resistance mechanisms because they inactivate virtually all β-lactam agents, except aztreonam. Different types of MBLs have been described among P. aeruginosa isolates, particularly the SPM-1 type in Brazil, with varied degrees of endemicity. Reference da Cunha, Carniel, Narvaez, Dias and Perez3,Reference Galetti, Andrade, Varani and Darini4 Nowadays, other MBLs have emerged around the world, mainly New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs), which are present largely in Enterobacterales, but also in nonfermenters (Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas spp). Reference Linciano, Cendron, Gianquinto, Spyrakis and Tondi5

The current antimicrobial pipeline offers short-term treatment of infections due to MBL producers. Thus, our most important tool against the spread of MBL producers relies on intensified infection control, surveillance, and antimicrobial stewardship policies. We sought to determine the prevalence of carbapenem-resistance and MBL production and to assess the impact of them on resistance rates to other antimicrobial agents among P. aeruginosa nosocomial isolates.

From October 2020 to March 2021, P. aeruginosa isolates were recovered from hospitalized patients in Porto Alegre city and its metropolitan area as part of a survey study on antimicrobial resistance. Only the first isolate of each patient was included in the survey. Isolates were confirmed as P. aeruginosa based on oxidase and pyocyanin production or, for atypical isolates, by MALDI-TOF (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Susceptibility was determined using the disk diffusion for amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam, and the results were interpreted according to CLSI guidelines. 6 Polymyxin B susceptibility was determined using broth microdilution. All isolates resistant to carbapenems were subjected to the NG-test CARBA 5 multiplex immunochromatographic assay for the detection of bla KPC, bla OXA-48-like, bla NDM, bla VIM, and bla IMP carbapenemases (NG Biotech, Gulpry, France) and were further confirmed by polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR). When an MBL enzyme was detected, an in vitro synergism between ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam was evaluated using a disk-diffusion approximation test, as published elsewhere, with modifications. Reference Gaudereto, Perdigão Neto and Leite7

Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 13.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL). Prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. P values were calculated using the χ Reference Livermore2 or Fisher exact test.

In total, 278 P. aeruginosa isolates were recovered from 156 patients during the study period. Among the 156 nonduplicate isolates, 83 (53.2%) were recovered from intensive care patients. These were more prevalent in respiratory secretions (n = 88; 56.4%), urine (n = 34; 21.8%), blood (n = 16; 10.3%), and other secretions (n = 18; 11.5%).

Overall, higher resistance rates were noted for meropenem (47.4%), followed by imipenem (43.6%), cefepime (39.1%), piperacillin/tazobactam (37.2%), ciprofloxacin (33.3%), ceftazidime (32.7%), amikacin (28.2%), and gentamicin (22.4%).

An MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolate was recovered at least once from 27 (17.3%; 95% CI, 12.2%–24.0%) of these 156 patients, and the bla NDM-1 was the sole MBL enzyme detected. All isolates were susceptible to polymyxin B. However, NDM-1 production was responsible for a high β-lactam resistance rate (Fig. 1). Additionally, resistances to amikacin (74.1% vs 17.0%; PR, 4.34; 95% CI, 2.1%–9.0%; P < .001), gentamicin (70.4% vs 12.4%; PR, 5.67; 95% CI, 2.6%–12.4%; P < .001), and ciprofloxacin (100.0% vs 19.4%; PR, 5.16; 95% CI, 2.6%–10.2%; P < .001) were significantly higher among NDM-1 producers than nonproducing P. aeruginosa isolates.

Fig. 1. Antimicrobial resistance rates for the NDM-1–producing and –nonproducing P. aeruginosa isolates evaluated in this study.

Table 1 illustrates the susceptibility profile of the 27 NDM-1–producing P. aeruginosa isolates. Ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam showed an in vitro synergistic result in all NDM isolates, despite the resistance to both drugs when they were individually tested.

Table 1. Susceptibility Profile, PMB Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Ceftazidime/Avibactam Plus Aztreonam Synergism Among 27 NDM-Producing P. aeruginosa Isolates

Note. AMK, amikacin; ATM, aztreonam; CZA, ceftazidime/avibactam; GEN, gentamicin; PMB, polymyxin B.

a Antimicrobials tested: amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam.

The relatively low prevalence of carbapenem-resistance driven by MBL enzyme revealed in this survey allowed us to discourage coverage with empirical therapy because there are therapeutic options for non–carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa isolates (eg, ceftolozane/tazobactam, data not shown). However, we emphasize the potential for dissemination of an NDM-1–producing P. aeruginosa among critically ill patients in Southern Brazil which possibly could displace other MBL enzyme (mostly SPM-1) or another resistance mechanism as driver for carbapenem resistance.

All NDM-1–producing P. aeruginosa isolates showed an in vitro synergism for the ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam. This association has been described as an option to treat infections due to MBL-producing organisms. Reference Khan, Shropshire and Hanson8,Reference Perez, El Chakhtoura, Papp-Wallace, Wilson and Bonomo9 The rationale is based on the ability of avibactam to inhibit serine-β lactamases and the lack of hydrolytic activity of MBLs against aztreonam. Reference Marshall, Hujer and Rojas10 Despite the lack of knowledge about its effectiveness in MBL-related infections, this synergistic activity may be an important strategy because polymyxins can appear active in vitro but can be flawed in achieving a clinical response.

In conclusion, the emergence of NDM-1–producing P. aeruginosa isolates and its impact on a high resistance rate was observed. Because nosocomial antimicrobial resistance can result in higher cost of treatment and increased mortality, it becomes crucial to limit the risk of NDM-1–producing P. aeruginosa infection and its spreading. For this, proper use of antimicrobials and strict infection control measures avoiding coinfections in a pandemic scenario is mandatory.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Pfizer for providing the ceftazidime/avibactam disks.

Financial support

No financial support was provided relevant to this article.

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

Poole, K. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance to the max. Front Microbiol 2011;2:65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livermore, D. Interplay of impermeability and chromosomal β-lactamase activity in imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992;36:20462048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
da Cunha, RSR, Carniel, E, Narvaez, GA, Dias, CG, Perez, LRR. Impact of the blue-carba rapid test for carbapenemase detection on turnaround time for an early therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Am J Infect Control 2021;49:352354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galetti, R, Andrade, LN, Varani, AM, Darini, ALC. SPM-1–producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST277 carries a chromosomal pack of acquired resistance genes: an example of high-risk clone associated with 'intrinsic resistome'. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2019;16:183186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linciano, P, Cendron, L, Gianquinto, E, Spyrakis, F, Tondi, D. Ten Years with New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1 (NDM-1): from structural insights to inhibitor design. ACS Infect Dis 2019;5:934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 31st edition. Supplement M100. Pittsburgh, PA: CLSI; 2021.Google Scholar
Gaudereto, JJ, Perdigão Neto, LV, Leite, GC, et al. Synergistic effect of ceftazidime-avibactam with meropenem against panresistant, carbapenemase-harboring Acinetobacter baumannii and Serratia marcescens investigated using time-kill and disk approximation assays. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019;63:e0236718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, A, Shropshire, WC, Hanson, B, et al. Simultaneous infection with Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa harboring multiple carbapenemases in a returning traveler colonized with Candida auris . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020;64:e0146619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, F, El Chakhtoura, NG, Papp-Wallace, KM, Wilson, BM, Bonomo, RA. Treatment options for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: can we apply “precision medicine” to antimicrobial chemotherapy? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2016;17:761781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, S, Hujer, AM, Rojas, LJ, et al. Can ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam overcome β-lactam resistance conferred by metallo-β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017;61:e0224316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Antimicrobial resistance rates for the NDM-1–producing and –nonproducing P. aeruginosa isolates evaluated in this study.

Figure 1

Table 1. Susceptibility Profile, PMB Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Ceftazidime/Avibactam Plus Aztreonam Synergism Among 27 NDM-Producing P. aeruginosa Isolates