Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Correspondence on “Associations of baseline use of biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs with COVID-19 severity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician registry” by Sparks et al
  1. Elisa Gremese1,2,
  2. Gianfranco Ferraccioli3
  1. 1 Division of Rheumatology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Roma, Lazio, Italy
  2. 2 Institute of Rheumatology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Roma, Lazio, Italy
  3. 3 Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Roma, Lazio, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Professor Elisa Gremese, Division of Rheumatology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Lazio, Italy; elisa.gremese{at}unicatt.it

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We read with great interest the Global Rheumatology Alliance report on COVID-19 on biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).1 The first important result of the registry database is that B-cell depletion, by compromising the primary antibody response, increases the severity of infected patients. Considering the critical role of B cells in the adaptive immune response, this sounds quite correct.2 Even the data on interleukin 6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors appear quite understandable considering the systemic inflammation raised by SARS-CoV-2 infection, the results of the Randomised Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for Community-acquired Pneumonia (REMAP-CAP) trial in patients on National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ordinal scale (NIAID)-Ordinal Scale 6 and 73 and the demonstrated role of TNF–TNF receptor 1 in inducing lymphopenia and T-cell dysfunction in severe–critical disease.4 Importantly, the death rate in abatacept was found close to that in JAK inhibitors. This …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors EG: Substantial contribution to study concept, drafted the paper for its intellectual content and approved the version of the submitted article. GF: Conceptualized the study, drafted the paper and approved the final version.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles