Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Coris COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip should not be used alone for COVID-19 diagnosis.

  • Coris COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip shows no benefit in reducing the use of RT-qPCR.

  • Highest viral load is associated with better antigen detection rates.

Abstract

Background

Ensuring accurate diagnosis is essential to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and for the clinical management of COVID-19. Although real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT- qPCR) is the current recommended laboratory method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 acute infection, several factors such as requirement of special equipment and skilled staff limit the use of these time-consuming molecular techniques. Recently, several easy to perform rapid antigen detection tests were developed and recommended in some countries as the first line of diagnostic.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances of the Coris COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip test, a rapid immunochromatographic test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen, in comparison to RT-qPCR.

Results

148 nasopharyngeal swabs were tested. Amongst the 106 positive RT-qPCR samples, 32 were detected by the rapid antigen test, given an overall sensitivity of 30.2%. All the samples detected positive with the antigen rapid test were also positive with RT-qPCR.

Conclusions

Higher viral loads are associated with better antigen detection rates. Unfortunately, the overall poor sensitivity of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip does not allow using it alone as the frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis.

Keywords

COVID-19
Rapid antigen detection test
SARS-CoV-2

Cited by (0)

View Abstract