Evaluating the Impact of Using Mobile Vaccination Units to Increase COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: A Synthetic Control Analysis for Cheshire and Merseyside, UK

21 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2022

See all articles by Xingna Zhang

Xingna Zhang

University of Liverpool - Department of Public Health Policy and Systems

John Tulloch

University of Liverpool - Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences

Shane Knott

Liverpool City Council

Rachel Allison

Russells Hall Hospital

Paula Parvulescu

Liverpool City Council

Iain Buchan

University of Liverpool - Department of Public Health Policy and Systems

Marta García-Fiñana

University of Liverpool; Clinical Trials Research Centre, Liverpool

Roberta Piroddi

University of Liverpool - Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems

Mark Green

University of Liverpool - Department of Geography & Planning

Ben Barr

University of Liverpool - Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems

Date Written: January 27, 2022

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact on COVID-19 vaccine uptake of mobile vaccination units; vaccine provision that is temporally introduced into a neighbourhood using a large vehicle such as a bus or ‘pop-up clinic’. We further investigate whether such an effect differed by level of deprivation, ethnicity and age.

Design: Synthetic control analysis.

Setting: The population registered with General Practices in nine local authority areas in Cheshire and Merseyside in the Northwest of England.

Intervention: Mobile vaccination units that visited 37 sites on 54 occasions between 12th April and 28th June in 2021. We defined populations as having received the intervention if they lived within 1km of a mobile vaccination site. A weighted combination of neighbourhoods that had not received the intervention was used to construct a synthetic control group.

Outcome: The weekly number of first-dose vaccines received among people aged 18 and over as a proportion of the population.

Results: The introduction of a mobile vaccination unit into a neighbourhood increased the number of first vaccinations conducted in the neighbourhood by 25% (95% CI: 21% to 28%) within the three weeks after the first visit to a neighbourhood, compared to the synthetic control group. This effect was smaller amongst 30–65-year-olds compared to 18-30-year-olds, amongst Asian and Black ethnic groups compared to White ethnic groups, and the most socioeconomically deprived populations compared to the least deprived areas.

Conclusions: Mobile vaccination units are effective interventions to increase vaccination uptake, at least in the short-term. While mobile units can be geographically targeted to reduce inequalities, we found evidence that they may increase inequalities in vaccine uptake within targeted areas, as the intervention was less effective amongst groups that tended to have lower vaccination uptake. Mobile vaccination units should be used in combination with activities to maximise outreach with Black and Asian communities and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.

Note:
Funding: This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Gastrointestinal Infections, the NIHR Policy Research Programme (RESTORE) and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest Coast (NWC ARC).

Declaration of Interests: We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethics Approval Statement: University Research Ethics Committee review is not required by the University of Liverpool for the secondary analysis of data which have been anonymised by an external party and are provided to the research team in a fully anonymised format.

Keywords: COVID-19, mobile vaccination units, intervention, synthetic control, UK

Suggested Citation

Zhang, Xingna and Tulloch, John and Knott, Shane and Allison, Rachel and Parvulescu, Paula and Buchan, Iain and García-Fiñana, Marta and Piroddi, Roberta and Green, Mark and Barr, Ben, Evaluating the Impact of Using Mobile Vaccination Units to Increase COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: A Synthetic Control Analysis for Cheshire and Merseyside, UK (January 27, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4018689 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4018689

Xingna Zhang (Contact Author)

University of Liverpool - Department of Public Health Policy and Systems

Liverpool, L69 3GB
United Kingdom

John Tulloch

University of Liverpool - Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences ( email )

United Kingdom

Shane Knott

Liverpool City Council ( email )

Public Health Department, Liverpool City Council
Cunard Building, Water Street
Liverpool, L3 1DS
United Kingdom

Rachel Allison

Russells Hall Hospital ( email )

Pensnett Road
Dudley
United Kingdom

Paula Parvulescu

Liverpool City Council ( email )

Public Health Department, Liverpool City Council
Cunard Building, Water Street
Liverpool, L3 1DS
United Kingdom

Iain Buchan

University of Liverpool - Department of Public Health Policy and Systems ( email )

Marta García-Fiñana

University of Liverpool

Chatham Street
Brownlow Hill
Liverpool, L69 7ZA
United Kingdom

Clinical Trials Research Centre, Liverpool

United Kingdom

Roberta Piroddi

University of Liverpool - Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems

Mark Green

University of Liverpool - Department of Geography & Planning

United Kingdom

Ben Barr

University of Liverpool - Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems ( email )

Liverpool, L69 3GB
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
302
Abstract Views
1,851
Rank
185,123
PlumX Metrics