Favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia: Can we predict the response to treatment?

Authors

  • Abdullah Sayiner Department of Chest Diseases, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
  • Huseyin Aytac Erdem Department of Infectious Diseases, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
  • Pervin Korkmaz Ekren Department of Chest Diseases, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
  • Sezai Tasbakan Department of Chest Diseases, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
  • Ozen K Basoglu Department of Chest Diseases, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
  • Meltem Isikgoz Tasbakan Department of Infectious Diseases, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
  • Tansu Yamazhan Department of Infectious Diseases, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
  • Deniz Gokengin Department of Infectious Diseases, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
  • Mustafa Hikmet Ozhan Department of Chest Diseases, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.14033

Keywords:

COVID-19, treatment, favipiravir

Abstract

Introduction: Early experience with favipiravir in the treatment of COVID-19 is promising, but no clinical data have been published in medical journals. This study aimed to review the experience with favipiravir treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia and to examine whether there are any predictors of treatment response.

Methodology: Fifty-six patients with severe or progressive pneumonia associated with COVID-19 who were treated with favipiravir monotherapy for at least five days were included in this retrospective study. Treatment response was defined as clinical recovery without any need for admission into the intensive care unit and/or anti-cytokine therapy. The demographic, clinical, laboratory and radiographic features of the patients were compared between favipiravir-responders and non-responders.

Results: Of the 56 patients, 34 patients (60.7%) responded to treatment and recovered. There was no difference in the demographic, clinical, and radiographic findings between the responders and non-responders. The inflammatory biomarkers were also similar except for the CRP levels on the day favipiravir was started [74 (36-111) vs. 118.5 (46.5-203) mg/L, respectively, p = 0.043]. There was also a significant difference in the median time to defervescence [1 (1-2) vs. 3.5 (1.75-9.25) days, respectively]. Of clinical interest, 27 (79.4%) and 31 (91.2%) of the responders became afebrile within two and four days, respectively. The response rate was lower in patients who presented severe pneumonia associated with respiratory failure.

Conclusions: Patients with non-severe pneumonia at admission and whose fever resolved within two days of treatment are more likely to improve with favipiravir.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-31

How to Cite

1.
Sayiner A, Erdem HA, Korkmaz Ekren P, Tasbakan S, Basoglu OK, Tasbakan MI, Yamazhan T, Gokengin D, Ozhan MH (2022) Favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia: Can we predict the response to treatment?. J Infect Dev Ctries 16:422–426. doi: 10.3855/jidc.14033

Issue

Section

Coronavirus Pandemic

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.