Dear Editor-in-Chief,

We have received and read with interest the letter from Dr. Kow and Dr. Hasan [1] on our article entitled “Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibition in COVID-19” recently published on Acta Diabetologica [2].

We all appreciate the comments and the novel information provided that complement our manuscript.

Two major points have been raised in the letter. The first one is related to the recent evidences which suggest that the development of COVID-19 is associated with episodes of thromboembolism and, in general, to a hypercoagulability state. The second one relies on the fact that the use of DPP-4 inhibitors may facilitate the establishment of a prothrombotic state in treated patients, and sitagliptin in particular has been associated with a higher probability of venous thromboembolism events. We have recently published with several international collaborators a retrospective analysis conducted on patients with type 2 diabetes and COVID-19, who, at the admission to hospital, were switched from their antidiabetic drugs to either insulin as standard-of-care treatment, or to insulin plus sitagliptin [3]. Data analyzed on 338 patients demonstrated that the addition of sitagliptin to the standard-of-care was associated with a reduced mortality and improvement of clinical outcomes. We did not observe any abnormality in prothrombotic markers; indeed, we observed a reduction in sitagliptin-treated patients of LDH, D-dimer and in general of pro-inflammatory markers, which are often associated with a hypercoagulability state. Nevertheless, we need to mention that the majority of patients with type 2 diabetes were on anticoagulant and antiplatelets medications, as a prothrombotic risk is part of diabetes as well, thus the balance between pro- and anti-thrombotic factors may be already altered. The letter points out also to the fact that the use of sitagliptin was associated with an increase in reporting venous thromboembolism events in diabetic patients and that this occurred in half of the patients in concomitance with an infection. The TECOS trial, however, did not demonstrate any increase in the risk of major cardiovascular events, hospitalization, death or other adverse events in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease treated with sitagliptin [4]. In view of this, the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in COVID-19 may provide two major clinically relevant advantages. First, as stated by us and others [5], DPP-4 inhibitors may block the entry of SARSCoV2 into pulmonary epithelial cells due to the presence of DPP-4 as co-receptor for SARSCoV2, and second, DPP-4 inhibitors have an important anti-inflammatory effect [5], which may prevent the cytokine storm to take place and the onset of hypercoagulation phenomena. Indeed, the hypercoagulability state has been associated with a late stage of COVID-19, and it has not been clarified whether it is directly induced by a viral infection of endothelial cells or indirectly through the inflammatory and immune processes. In both cases, the use of a DPP-4 inhibitor may exert some benefits. We agree with the Authors that caution is mandatory when considering the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with COVID-19 but without diabetes. Despite this and given the convincing results obtained in the reduction of mortality and improvement in clinical outcomes, we strongly believe that DPP-4 inhibitors, and sitagliptin among all, may represent a therapeutic option to be considered in patients with type 2 diabetes who develop COVID-19.