Keywords
personality, extroversion, introversion, Covid-19, virtual learning
This article is included in the Research Synergy Foundation gateway.
personality, extroversion, introversion, Covid-19, virtual learning
One of the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic is that many universities in Malaysia were forced to deliver classes entirely online, due to the movement control order (MCO) imposed in Malaysian on 18th March 2020.1 Online classes mean students are not able to have personal or face-to-face contact with their teachers and other students and are not able to participate in discussions in the same way. Based on students respective personalities, these learning conditions may affect students’ experience of virtual classes differently. Extroversion-introversion (E-I) variations have been shown to affect how students engage in class, their learning style and the way they process knowledge.2,3 Most studies have focused on students and teachers’ engagement in online classes.4 However, very few studies have investigated how the differences in personality affect online learning, especially in relation to the acceptance and perception of virtual classes among students. As of March 2020 university classes are being conducted online, which presents a valuable opportunity to explore this question. The study's original goal was to investigate if there were any relationship between resilience and acceptance of virtual learning classes, across different personality types. However, owing to a lower number of responses from students than expected, the quantitative study was terminated, and instead, a qualitative analysis was conducted on various personalities types and students' acceptance of virtual classes. The study’s research question then evolved into trying to understand whether personality types influence students’ acceptance of virtual classes. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to explore how various personality types influence students’ acceptance of virtual learning classes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Research has shown that the psychological and emotional impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has been present from the very beginning. Roy et al. (2020), conducted a study in India using a questionnaire and non-probability snowball sampling technique; the study revealed that those who were concerned about the spread of COVID-19, had higher levels of anxiety.5 This leads us to ask how young adults are coping with the new experience of a fully virtual class load, in addition to anxiety around the pandemic and indicates the need to investigate students’ level of acceptance of virtual learning and their feelings around such experiences.
In the province of Davao del Sur, southern Philippines, another study conducted in 2020 which focused on students' knowledge, attitude, anxiety, and coping mechanisms during the COVID-19 pandemic found that they were uninterested in the online-blended learning approach.6 In the study, 59.25% (314 out of 530) of the students disagreed with the conduct of the online-blended learning approach. The study revealed that the primary reason for the disagreement was poor internet connection, which was reported by 72.29% (227 out of 314) of the students. However, even though in that study technical problems were the main cause, we believe personality factors could not be ignored since differences in personality may also affect students’ acceptance and perception of online learning.2
Extroverts are described as having a diverse range of interests, being proactive in their work and relationships, are sociable, and have a strong sense of self-expression. According to research, extroverts enjoy events such as classroom discussions, group projects, and opportunities to engage with the teachers, and brainstorming or discussing ideas.3,7
Introverts tend to engage in activities such as listening and reflection before responding to questions from the teachers and prefer writing as a means of communication and contemplation as a means of working out ideas.3 Generally, this is also their preferred way of learning and they perform best when given time to reflect and process before participating in classroom activities, while extroverts need a high degree of stimulus to stay engaged. Research has reported that various strategies have been used by students to cope with learning during the pandemic such as reminding themselves of the positive benefits it has in limiting the spread of the virus and protecting them from exposure.6 Respondents who avoided thinking about the pandemic or those struggling to cope, had significantly greater anxiety and depression.6
A PPIE individual is in-between an extrovert and introvert. PPIEs are also known as ambiverts.8 This type of personality will become agile, active, and energetic when they are within their small circle of friends or when they are with their own family.9 However, when they are with a stranger, they are quiet and seem less interested to start a conversation.10 Zholudeva et al. (2021) also found that ambiverts or PPIEs had a greater degree of preparedness for a future career, than extroverts and introverts, when looking at the readiness of students for professional careers.11
Written informed consent was obtained from the respondents, for both involvement in the study and use of data and students could also withdraw from participating in the survey. Ethical approval was granted by Research Ethics Committee of the Technology Transfer Office, Multimedia University, Malaysia. Ethical approval number: EA0712021.
We conducted a case study on a group of students (n = 31) in one of the classes taught by the second author in the research team, HR. The survey questionnaires were administered to the students via Google Forms during a virtual class12 in Grooming and Professional Etiquette, at Multimedia University, Malaysia on 27th May 2021. This subject is offered for students in their first and second year of their studies. A six item resilience questionnaire was adapted from the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)13 and included in the survey. A five-item Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree was also incorporated; including statements aimed to establish students’ resilience, such as “I tend to bounce back quickly after hard times”. Data collected included information about the demographic background of the students such as gender, religion, ethnicity, year of study, and personality traits. The students were given a link to a personality test website specifically designed for identifying their personality traits.14 The students took the test online and results were automatically generated. There are three types of personality generated: extroverts, introverts, and PPIEs. Then students were encouraged to ask questions regarding the survey, if they did not understand any of the parts. Finally, the students were instructed to submit the Google form once they have completed the survey. The analysis of students’ acceptance of online learning was carried out based on the open-ended questions which were asked, to gain insight on the students’ experience, acceptance and perception of the virtual learning experience. The questions were as follows (see Extended data for a copy of the survey12):
The responses from the students did not meet the sample size recommendation by Krejcie and Morgan.15 Thus, due to a lower than the projected number of responses from students, the resilience questions are excluded in the analysis, and instead, a qualitative analysis on various personality types and students' acceptance of virtual classrooms was done. A total of 31 students participated in the study. The demographic background of the student participants is shown in Table 1.
The findings obtained from this study revealed interesting differences between extrovert and introvert students in relation to their acceptance of virtual learning. Table 2 showed the results of personality types and the acceptance of virtual learning. Based on the test that the students took, 55% (17) of the students were categorised as introverts, 29 % (9) were extroverts, and 16% (5) met the private-public-introvert-extrovert personality type. About 61% (19) students positively accepted virtual learning and 39% (12) students did not enjoy virtual learning during the pandemic. From the 19 students who positively accepted virtual learning during the pandemic, 58% (11) of them were introverts, 32% (6) extroverts, and 10% (2) PPIEs.
The results reveal that the introverts seemed happy attending fully virtual classes and preferred staying at home rather than meeting people. This is consistent with the characteristics of introverts; being people who do not like to be around large groups and can tend to avoid public places or crowded events.10 Introverts also prefer to communicate through writing.
Compared to extroverts, introverts perform best when given time to reflect and process before participating in classroom activities.7 The results of our study confirmed the findings of research conducted by Offir et al., (2007), in which extroverts were found to dislike virtual classes.2 For the extroverts in our study, having a certain percentage of classes conducted online is acceptable; however, they could not completely focus if they had to attend fully virtual classes. They preferred meeting people, talking to friends, and consulting their lecturers face-to-face. This was evidently expressed by one of the extrovert first-year female students (respondent no. 17), who mentioned in the open-ended question that “I must see people, meet people, talk to real people. I need a high degree of stimulus to stay involved”.12
We found that PPIE students did not like virtual classes, but that they are quite tolerant of such classes because of the situation created by the pandemic. Nevertheless, they claimed that they have to contact friends and lecturers after classes, for further help to understand the topic being studied. PPIE students reported that the virtual classes are satisfying enough if they have at least one or two classes where they are able to meet up in person with other students or teachers. This is in-keeping with the traits of PPIEs, whereby being able to meet and talk to people in person every now and then, is sufficient.
Extroverts are described by C. G. Jung (1971), who is a key figure in the study of personalities, as being oriented primarily toward the outside world, and as such, they prefer to focus their observation and judgment on people and objects. Introverts, on the other hand, are more focused on the inner world and thus, prefer to focus their observation and judgment on thoughts and ideas.16 As such, in any online class, there will likely be introvert students paying close attention and focusing on what the lecturer is trying to convey and working hard to complete all the work assigned to them. The extroverts might find being confined to one place, within which they are not able express their concern to the lecturer or fellow students, annoying and stressful.10 The findings of our study suggest that online learning is valuable, but a certain percentage of face-to-face activities are needed for a better student-teacher and student-peer engagement. Furthermore, according to Lestari et al. (2013), introvert and extrovert students have different learning styles; introvert students preferring to study alone while extroverts prefer to study in groups.7
The findings indicate that the students are aware of and understand the need for online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. They have no choice but to follow the new norm of learning in the current situation. For now, online learning is the only way that teacher-student interaction can be conducted in some countries, and one must adapt to the changing environment.
The results of the open-ended questions help researchers better understand how extroverts, introverts, and PPIE students perceive and embrace completely virtual learning programs. Even though the introverts indicated that virtual classes were ok for them, they stated that they still needed to see people in person to keep them “alive” and “intact”.12 The urge to meet others, such as friends, classmates, and lecturers, is for study objectives rather than social purposes for introverts. Extroverts must interact with actual people in order to communicate, be heard and listen and love sharing their lives with others; not just for academic objectives.
Arguably, online learning, in a more structured way, could be the future of our teaching and learning. Perhaps, what we are facing now is just the beginning of a more complicated but perhaps stimulating future of education. However, the study cannot be generalised to all Malaysian students since it was only a case study with a small group of students in a Grooming and Professional Etiquette class at Multimedia University. Further research is therefore required to replicate this study on a larger scale, to aid better generalisability. More research is suggested to understand further the differences in personality and how it affects perceptions of online learning, with the hope that such research would be able to inform and improve teaching and learning methods in the future.
DANS: The influence of extroversion and introversion personality types on the acceptance of virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-2zc-x4u2.12
This project contains the following underlying data:
DANS: The influence of extroversion and introversion personality types on the acceptance of virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-2zc-x4u2.12
This project contains the following extended data:
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Thank you to the students in Grooming and Professional Etiquette class at Multimedia University, Malaysia that participated in the study.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Partly
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Social Psychology
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Partly
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Educational Psychology.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 24 Jan 22 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)