Next Article in Journal
Impact on Prevalence of the Application of NAFLD/MAFLD Criteria in Overweight and Normal Weight Patients
Previous Article in Journal
How Did Zero-Markup Medicines Policy Change Prescriptions in the Eyes of Patients?—A Retrospective Quasi-Experimental Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

COVID-19 Vaccine in Inherited Metabolic Disorders Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study on Rate of Acceptance, Safety Profile and Effect on Disease

1
Department of Metabolic Diseases, Clinical Genetics and Diabetology, Giovanni XXIII Children Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale, 70126 Bari, Italy
2
Medical Direction, Giovanni XXIII Children Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale, 70126 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12227; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912227
Submission received: 31 July 2022 / Revised: 15 September 2022 / Accepted: 21 September 2022 / Published: 27 September 2022

Abstract

:
Background: Vaccines for COVID-19 have had a significant impact on the spread of COVID-19 infection, reducing the incidence and mortality of the infection in several countries. However, hesitancy toward this vaccine is a global health issue for the general population The Vaccine acceptance rate among patients affected with inherited metabolic disorders (IMD), as well as safety profile, has not been described. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study, based on a telephone survey, investigating the COVID-19 vaccination rate, the incidence and type of adverse effects (AEs), the reasons for vaccine refusal and the effects on the underlying disease in a cohort of IMD patients followed at a single center and invited directly to vaccination by specialistic team. Results: Seventy-four patients were included in the study, the median age was 23.4 years (min 12.1–max 61.7), 47% (n = 85) were females and 61% (107) were affected from impaired metabolism of phenylalanine. By October 2021, 94% (n = 163) of them had received at least one dose of the vaccine, which was, in 98% of cases, mRNA-based vaccine, given at the referral hospital in 65% of cases. Overall, 72% of patients with IMD reported AE to the vaccine: 60% after the first dose, 81% after the second. The highest rate of adverse events at the first dose was reported in patients with amino acids related disorders other than impaired phenylalanine metabolism (PKU/HPA) (88%). For the second dose, the PKU/HPA group reported the highest rate of AEs (89% of cases). There was no effect on the underlying disease or acute decompensation after the vaccine. Eleven patients (6%) were not vaccinated because they considered it dangerous. Conclusion: Among individuals with IMD, the vaccination rate was high, the incidence and severity of AEs were comparable to those in the general population with no effects on the disease. Direct contact with the specialist medical team, has proven to reassure patients and effectively contrast hesitancy.

1. Introduction

Vaccines represent one of the most effective measures in public health; many infectious diseases have been effectively reduced, eliminated, or prevented through the use of vaccinations over the past century [1]. Vaccines are estimated to prevent up to 3 million deaths each year worldwide [1,2].
Since late 2020, the COVID-19 vaccine has become available in many countries and has been administered to millions of people around the world [3,4]. Vaccination is showing a satisfactory safety profile in the general population as demonstrated by several clinical trials [5,6,7,8]. However, the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in subpopulations, such as children, pregnant and lactating women, have not yet been fully studied, although many reports describe comparable efficacy and safety in healthy subjects [9,10].
Patients with rare and chronic diseases have also been invited to be vaccinated by European Organizations [11,12]. However, a number of patients affected by these diseases remain unvaccinated, as the uncertainty for vaccinations seems to also affect patients with rare diseases [13,14,15].
In Italy, vaccination was offered to all patients suffering from genetic and/or chronic diseases from March 2021 onward [16]. From May 2021, patients 12 years of age and older could also be vaccinated [17]. It was free in Puglia, where it was managed in the reference Hospitals after direct contact with specialist reference teams.
Patients with Inherited Metabolic Diseases (IMD) have been involved in this campaign, as COVID-19 vaccines are not contraindicated in this patient group, including those who have had COVID-19 infection [18].
To date, there is a lack of data on COVID-19 vaccination in these patients and, more importantly, the effect of vaccination on the disease, which is a concern for patients with IMD, has not been reported. In our study we aimed to investigate the COVID-19 vaccination rate and the incidence and type of adverse effects (AEs), as well as the reasons for vaccine refusal and the effect on disease, among IMD patients followed in a single center.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This is a cross-sectional study conducted on patients followed-up for IMD at a single specialist center in Southern Italy (reference center for the Regions of Puglia and Basilicata). Patients 12 years of age and older were identified through the hospital’s patient database and were contacted by telephone. The Interviews were conducted between September and October 2021 by the specialist team involved in the follow-up of this group of patients.
The following characteristics were recorded: demographic information, including age, sex, underlying disease, comorbidity and previous COVID-19 infection or post COVID-19 vaccine infection; information on vaccination against COVID-19, including first dose +/− second dose, when and where they were given and type of vaccine; information on AEs, including type of reaction, need for medical referral and possible treatment; and information on the effect of the vaccine on the management of the underlying disease, including acute decompensation, altered biochemical parameters (levels of ammonia, phenylalanine and homocysteine), change in the normal treatments regimen and missed scheduled visit. Based on the survey results, we compared the rate of systemic reactions observed in our population after the first and second dose with those reported by other studies conducted in the general population.
In case of no vaccination, the reason for the refusal was investigated through the following open questions: belief that the vaccine would be dangerous, fear of possible vaccine consequences, fear of effects of the vaccine on disease, previous COVID-19 infection or other reasons (e.g., allergies, comorbidities, previous vaccine reaction or other concomitant vaccinations).
All patients were asked to administer the vaccine at the referral hospital, contacted by the referring physician, who administered the vaccine. LSD patients with ongoing enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) were advised to administer the vaccine at least two days after the ERT injection.
This study was approved by the local ethic committee. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants and, in the case of subjects between the ages of 12 and 18 years, from both participants and parents.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean (±standard deviation, SD) or median and minimum–maximum value, depending on their distribution; categorical data were expressed as frequency and percentage, and the Chi-squared test was used to compare the two groups. Differences in continuous variables between groups were compared using a Student’s t-test for normally distributed parameters, or a non-parametric Mann–Whitney U Test in case of non-normal distribution. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft® Excel 2016 MSO, version 2206.

3. Results

3.1. Study Population

A total of 192 IMD patients were contacted by telephone. Of these, 12 were not available by phone or refused to participate in the study. Six patients provided fragmentary or incomplete information and were excluded. Finally, 174 patients were included in the study (power 0.86, alfa error 0.05). Their median age was 23.4 years (min 12.1–max 61.7), of which 47% (n = 85) of them were females (Table 1)
All had regular follow-ups at our specialist center, laboratory monitoring of biochemical parameters, and clinical follow-ups were not interrupted. Most (61%, n = 107) had a diagnosis of Phenylalanine metabolism alteration (hyperphenylalaninemia/phenylketonuria—HPA/PKU); a female PKU patient was administered with the COVID-19 vaccine while breastfeeding. The remaining 39% of patients, were affected by other IMD, individual groups of conditions are shown in Table 1. Ninety percent (n = 162) lived in Puglia, while 18 (10%) lived in another Italian region.
Nineteen patients (11%) had contracted COVID-19 infection, fourteen (8%) prior to the first vaccine dose, from January 2021; their clinical course was included in our previous paper [19]. Four patients (2%) tested positive for COVID-19 infection between the first and the second scheduled dose of vaccine; in one case, positivity was detected concurrently with the first dose. The clinical course was, in all cases, mild and characterized by chills and/or headache. In these cases, the second dose was not administered, according to the technical information of the vaccine [20].

3.2. Vaccination Rate

By October 2021, 94% of our patients received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 87% received both doses (Table 2).
The second dose was not given for the following reasons: COVID-19 infection after the first dose (n = 4) or second scheduled dose after our interview (n = 8).
Ninety-eight percent of patients received an mRNA-based vaccine: 152 (93%) received Pfizer Biontech (BNT162b2) vaccine and 8 (5%) received Moderna (mRNA-1273) vaccine.
Less administered was the adenovirus vaccine (Astra-Zeneca), as reported in Table 2. Two patients did not remember the type of vaccine received. In all cases of full course, with known type of vaccines, the same type was administered for both doses.
In 107 patients (65%), the vaccine was administered at the referral hospital. The reasons for the refusal were: distance from the center and/or concomitant infections. No immediate reactions were detected in any vaccinations administered. The vaccine was administered by the general practitioner or family pediatrician in the remaining number of patients. Even in these cases, no immediate reactions were reported.

3.3. Adverse Event Rate and Disease Effects

Overall, 118 of 163 with IMD patients (72%) reported AEs to the vaccine: 99 after the first dose (60%), 123 after the second (81%) and 52 after both vaccination doses (34%). Table 3 reports the vaccination rate and AE according by type of conditions.
The highest rate of AEs at the first dose was reported by patients with other amin acids-related disorders (OARD) (88%), 7/8 of them experienced systemic reactions. However, medical referral, in this group, was never reported. AEs were always treated at home with paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Within the subgroup of urea cycle disorders (UCD), only two subjects (16%) reported AEs, in both cases presenting pain from local injection, not requiring medical advice (Table 3).
For the second dose, the PKU/HPE group reported AEs in 89% of cases, requiring treatment in 21 of them (21%). The most common systemic AE was fever, reported in 80% of cases (Table 3). The PKU woman, who was breastfeeding at the time of vaccination, received the first dose one month after giving birth. The vaccine was administered at the reference hospital and had no reaction after the first dose. Local pain at the injection site after the second was reported and managed with paracetamol for 48 h. Moreover, for the second dose, the subgroup of patients with UCD reported fewer AEs than others (36%), requiring paracetamol in one case (Table 3).
Effects on underlying disease were reported by one patient (0.6%); the girl had PKU and reported increased Phe levels after the second dose: mean values ± SD before vaccine (six dosages), 468.6 ± 121 µmol/L; mean ± SD values after vaccine (six doses):,567.6 ± 79 µmol/L (p-value: 0.15). There was no increase in ammonia levels, no change in diet and/or therapy were made due to AE after the vaccine. No scheduled visits were cancelled or postponed due to the vaccine.

3.4. Type of Adverse Events

After the first dose, injection site pain was the most common local AE, while fatigue and headache were the most frequent of systemic reactions (Figure 1)
For the second dose, local pain remained the most frequently reported AE, while fever and fatigue were the most frequently reported systemic reactions.
Overall, systemic reactions were reported in 68.9% of cases, and local reactions in 33% of cases.
Comparing the rate of systemic reactions after the first and the second dose in our population with those reported by studies on healthy young adult subjects (considering the median age of our population) [21,22,23,24] (Figure 2) no statistically significant differences emerged between both doses in all cases (lowest p-value: 0.89).

3.5. Vaccination Refusals

Eleven patients (6%) received no vaccine dose at the time of interview, six females and 5 males, with median age of 27.1 years (min 12.5–max 34.7). Of these, eight (72%) were affected by HPE/PKU, one (9%) by congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG), one (9%) by OARD, (Homocystinuria) and one (9%) by UCD (Table 3). The reasons for not vaccinating against COVID-19 were: belief that the vaccine would be dangerous (six patients), that it could have effects on disease, worsening of the clinical condition (two cases), fear of the vaccine due to comorbidity (two cases) and other concomitant vaccination (one case) who, however, would have considered COVID-19 vaccination in the near future.

4. Discussion

As of early March 2022, more than 880 million doses of vaccines have been administered to people in the EU and the European Economic Area [25]. Although licensed COVID-19 vaccines are declared safe and effective, by the European Medicine Agency, concerns about COVID-19 vaccines mainly relate to the new technology used to manufacture some of the approved vaccines, but also the idea that vaccination can cause adverse effects [14]. In the context of rare diseases and, more specifically, of inherited metabolic disorders, doubts also concern the possible effects that this approach could have on underlying genetic disease, in particular on those at risk of decompensation.
On March 2021, MetabERN experts recommended that IMD patients receive vaccination against COVID-19, when they were offered this opportunity. All IMDs should be considered a top priority for COVID-19 vaccination, particularly those patients at high risk of acute metabolic decompensation, respiratory or cardiac complications, and frequent exacerbation [18].
The COVID-19 pandemic has shown, for the first time, the effects of a worldwide phenomenon on this group of rare disorders, showing that, while , on the one hand, the infection did not produce dramatic consequences on the course of IMDs in the vast majority of cases [19,26], on the other hand, children with IMDs, their families [27] and clinicians involved in their management [28,29] had important and specific needs, unmet during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In this paper, we report that by October 2021, 94% of our patients received at least one dose of the vaccine, which was an mRNA-based vaccine, in almost all cases.
Studies on vaccine acceptance and safety in rare disease are scarce and, to our knowledge, this is the first study COVID-19 vaccine in IMDs.
In reports of COVID-19 vaccination in chronic conditions, the acceptance rate is influenced by the period in which the investigations were conducted. A recently published survey by Tsai et al. [30] studied vaccine hesitation in a cohort of patients with cancer, autoimmune diseases and other comorbid conditions. By February 2021, 25% had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine injection. After the first injection, 69% self-reported local and 40% systemic reactions, which increased after the second injection to 76% and 67%, respectively.
JK Gordon et al. between April and May 2021, studied the effects of the COVID-19 vaccine on a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis; 75% received at least one dose of the vaccine and 38% received two vaccine doses, at the time of the survey. Adverse reactions were reported after the first dose in 39% of participants and after the second dose in 58% [31]. In this context of disorders, most of the AEs were not serious and did not require hospital admission [32].
Our survey was conducted between September and October 2021, that is, six months after the start of the vaccination campaign for frail patients in Italy [16] and subsequently to other reports. However, the high acceptance rate may be also secondary to the fact that patients were directly invited to receive the vaccine by the referral team and the vaccine was administered at the referral center. It has been reassuring for patients and families and has increased the acceptance rate.
Although we do not have sufficient data to suggest that one vaccine is more suitable for any specific IMD than another, the results of our study support the safety of COVID-19 vaccines based on mRNA technology in this patient group. The vast majority of our sample received the Pfizer Biontech BNT162b2 vaccine. Comparing the systemic effects rate of our data with the clinical trial results of Pfizer BNT162b1/BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines in healthy young adults, we found a comparable prevalence of systemic AEs after both doses as shown in Figure 2, in line with other reports on chronic conditions [30,31].
Our results also pointed out that the vaccine was not able to raise ammonia levels, nor was it a cause of decompensation in the subgroup of IMD with decompensation risk. In fact, for the two cases that reported laboratory changes after the vaccine, the influence of other concomitant factors occurring during that period and influencing those data, cannot be excluded. The vaccine has also demonstrated a safety profile in PKU breastfeeding woman, as reported for the general population [33].
Vaccination in patients with IMD has been a subject of discussion in recent decades, as some metabolic experts still hesitate to vaccinate patients with IMD for fear of the risk of acute decompensation and serious adverse events related to the administration of the vaccine. Some studies report sub-optimal vaccination coverage among IMD patients compared to healthy peers [34], others report the same immunization schedule between IMD children and healthy infants [35].
According to recent evidence, immunization in this patient group was not associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events [36]. Regarding IMD with risk of decompensation, Morgan et al. [37], report that childhood vaccinations were unable to trigger episodes of hyperammonaemia in children with UCDs. Accordingly, in another study on 271 vaccinated children with IMD, the vaccinated subjects did not appear to be at increased risk for serious adverse events [38]
Our study has some limitations, being a cross-sectional study based on telephone interviews, conducted over a month-time and not at the end of the vaccination campaign. Although we have used this method, instead of online questionnaires to reduce self-reporting bias, this may not be completely ruled out. The severity of reported AEs also cannot be objectified, although AE leading to referral to specialist physicians and/or hospitalization can be excluded as all patients were under close clinical supervision by the center. We do not have a control group of people without IMD, although comparison with other studies have shown that AEs are largely similar in type and frequency.
On the other hand, this study has also some strengths, as it represents the only available evidence on the COVID-19 vaccine in patients suffering from different types of IMD, both with and without decompensation risk.

5. Conclusions

Among individuals with inherited metabolic disorders, the rate and the severity of AEs were comparable to that of the general population with no effect on the disease. The acceptance rate was high, as direct contact with the specialist medical team on the COVID-19 vaccine was shown to counteract hesitation. This approach should be intensified as misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines also involves patients and families with rare diseases.

Author Contributions

A.T. interpreted data and wrote the manuscript; G.P. and R.C. made contributions to study sample follow-up; L.M. made statistical analysis and interpreted data; D.D.G. and A.D. contributed to data collection. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Etic Commettee of Policlinico of Bari (protocol code 73656).

Informed Consent Statement

Written Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviations

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19); inherited metabolic disorders (IMD); adverse effects (AEs); hyperphenylalaninemia/phenylketonuria (HPA/PKU); urea cycle disorders (UCD); OAD (Organic acids related disorders); LSD (lysosomal storage disorders); UCD (urea cycle disorders); C-FAOD (carbohydrate-fatty acids oxidation disorders); OARD (other amino acids related); CDG (congenital disorders of glycosylation), NSAIDs: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

References

  1. World Health Organization Media Center. Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization. 2011. Fact Sheet No. 169. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/79077?show=full (accessed on 15 May 2000).
  2. Fritsche, P.J.; Helbling, A.; Ballmer-Weber, B.K. Vaccine hypersensitivity—Update and overview. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2010, 140, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organisation. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://COVID-19.who.int (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  4. Tatar, M.; Wilson, F.A. The largest vaccination campaign in history: A golden opportunity for bundling public health interventions. J. Glob. Health 2021, 11, 03076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Zeng, G.; Pan, H.; Li, C.; Hu, Y.; Chu, K.; Han, W.; Chen, Z.; Tang, R.; Yin, W.; et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Han, B.; Song, Y.; Li, C.; Yang, W.; Ma, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Li, M.; Lian, X.; Jiao, W.; Wang, L.; et al. Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy children and adolescents: A randomised, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 1645–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bueno, S.M.; Abarca, K.; González, P.A.; Gálvez, N.M.; Soto, J.A.; Duarte, L.F.; Schultz, B.M.; Pacheco, G.A.; González, L.A.; Vázquez, Y.; et al. Interim report: Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in healthy chilean adults in a phase 3 clinical trial. MedRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, Q.; Dudley, M.Z.; Chen, X.; Bai, X.; Dong, K.; Zhuang, T.; Salmon, D.; Yu, H. Evaluation of the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines: A rapid review. BMC Med. 2021, 19, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dagan, N.; Barda, N.; Biron-Shental, T.; Makov-Assif, M.; Key, C.; Kohane, I.S.; Hernán, M.A.; Lipsitch, M.; Hernandez-Diaz, S.; Reis, B.Y.; et al. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1693–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lv, M.; Luo, X.; Shen, Q.; Lei, R.; Liu, X.; Liu, E.; Li, Q.; Chen, Y. Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Clinical Guidance on COVID-19 Vaccines for People with Metabolically Unstable Inborn Errors of Metabolism. Available online: http://www.bccdc.ca/Health-Info-Site/Documents/COVID19_vaccine/IEM_Clinical_Guidance.pdf (accessed on 22 August 2022).
  12. National Advisory Committee on Immunization. Recommendations on the Use of COVID-19 Vaccine(s). Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/immunization/national-advisory-committee-on-immunization-naci/recommendations-use-covid-19-vaccines.html (accessed on 1 March 2021).
  13. Machingaidze, S.; Wiysonge, C.S. Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1338–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. MacDonald, N.E. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine 2015, 33, 4161–4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dubé, E.; Laberge, C.; Guay, M.; Bramadat, P.; Roy, R.; Bettinger, J. Vaccine hesitancy: An overview. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2013, 9, 1763–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Raccomandazioni ad Interim sui Gruppi Target Della Vaccinazione Anti SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Published on Gazzetta Ufficiale on 24 Marzo 2021. Available online: https://www.vaccinarsi.org/scienza-conoscenza/combattere-le-pandemie/covid-19-disposizioni-e-normative/raccomandazioni-ad-interim-sui-gruppi-target-della-vaccinazione-anti-sars-cov-2/covid-19 (accessed on 8 May 2021).
  17. Determina AIFA n. 73 del 31 Maggio 2021 “Estensione Indicazioni Terapeutiche di Specialità Medicinali”. Available online: https://www.aifa.gov.it/documents/20142/1289678/Det_73-2021_est_COMIRNATY.pdf (accessed on 31 May 2021).
  18. European Reference Network. Hereditary Metabolic Disorders and COVID-19 Vaccination. Available online: https://metab.ern-net.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/COVID-19-Vaccine.pdf (accessed on 2 March 2021).
  19. Tummolo, A.; Paterno, G.; Dicintio, A.; Stefanizzi, P.; Melpignano, L.; Aricò, M. COVID-19 and Inherited Metabolic Disorders: One-Year Experience of a Referral Center. Children 2021, 8, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. COVID-19 Vaccination Program Operational Guidance. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/covid19-vaccination-guidance.html (accessed on 6 February 2022).
  21. Li, J.; Hui, A.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Tang, R.; Ye, H.; Ji, R.; Lin, M.; Zhu, Z.; Türeci, Ö.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b1 mRNA vaccine in younger and older Chinese adults: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 1 study. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1062–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Polack, F.P.; Thomas, S.J.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S. C4591001 Clinical Trial Group: Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mulligan, M.J.; Lyke, K.E.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Neuzil, K.; Raabe, V.; Bailey, R.; Swanson, K.A.; et al. Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults. Nature 2020, 586, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chu, L.; McPhee, R.; Huang, W.; Bennett, H.; Pajon, R.; Nestorova, B.; Leav, B.; on behalf of the mRNA-1273 Study Group. A preliminary report of a randomized controlled phase 2 trial of the safety and immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Vaccine 2021, 39, 2791–2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Available online: https://vaccinetracker.ecdc.europa.eu/public/extensions/covid-19/vaccine-tracker.html#uptake-tab (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  26. Paneghetti, L.; Bellettato, C.M.; Sechi, A.; Stepien, K.M.; Scarpa, M. One year of COVID-19: Infection rates and symptoms in patients with inherited metabolic diseases followed by MetabERN. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2022, 17, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Akın, E.Ö.; Eminoğlu, F.T.; Doğulu, N.; Yekeduz, M.K.; Öncül, U.; Akpınar, F.; Hayran, G. Unmet needs of children with inherited metabolic disorders in the COVID-19 pandemic. Turk. Arch. Pediatrics 2022, 57, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Elmonem, M.A.; Belanger-Quintana, A.; Bordugo, A.; Boruah, R.; Cortès-Saladelafont, E.; Endrakanti, M.; Giraldo, P.; Grünert, S.C.; Gupta, N.; Kabra, M.; et al. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and management of inborn errors of metabolism: A global perspective. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2020, 131, 285–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brunetti-Pierri, N.; Fecarotta, S.; Staiano, A.; Strisciuglio, P.; Parenti, G. Ensuring continuity of care for children with inherited metabolic diseases at the time of COVID-19: The experience of a metabolic unit in Italy. Genet. Med. 2020, 22, 1178–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tsai, R.; Hervey, J.; Hoffman, K.; Wood, J.; Johnson, J.; Deighton, D.; Clermont, D.; Loew, B.; Goldberg, S.L. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptance Among Individuals With Cancer, Autoimmune Diseases, or Other Serious Comorbid Conditions: Cross-sectional, Internet-Based Survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022, 8, e29872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gordon, J.K.; Showalter, K.; Wu, Y.; Kwakkenbos, L.; Carrier, M.E.; Henry, R.S.; Østbø, N.; Nordlund, J.; Bourgeault, A.; Cañedo-Ayala, M.; et al. Systemic sclerosis and COVID-19 vaccines: A SPIN Cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2022, 4, e243–e246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Haslak, F.; Gunalp, A.; Cebi, M.N.; Yildiz, M.; Adrovic, A.; Sahin, S.; Barut, K.; Kasapcopur, O. Early experience of COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events among adolescents and young adults with rheumatic diseases: A single-center study. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2022, 25, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Davanzo, R.; Agosti, M.; Cetin, I.; Chiantera, A.; Corsello, G.; Ramenghi, L.A.; Staiano, A.; Tavio, M.; Villani, A.; Viora, E.; et al. Breastfeeding and COVID-19 vaccination: Position statement of the Italian scientific societies. Ital. J. Pediatrics 2021, 47, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cerutti, M.; De Lonlay, P.; Menni, F.; Parini, R.; Principi, N.; Esposito, S. Vaccination coverage of patients with inborn errors of metabolism and the attitudes of their parents towards vaccines. Vaccine 2015, 33, 6520–6524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Klein, N.P.; Aukes, L.; Lee, J.; Fireman, B.; Shapira, S.K.; Slade, B.; Baxter, R.; Summar, M. Evaluation of immunization rates and safety among children with inborn errors of metabolism. Pediatrics 2011, 127, e1139–e1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hady-Cohen, R.; Dragoumi, P.; Barca, D.; Plecko, B.; Lerman-Sagie, T.; Zafeiriou, D. Safety and recommendations for vaccinations of children with inborn errors of metabolism. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2021, 35, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Morgan, T.M.; Schlegel, C.; Edwards, K.M.; Welch-Burke, T.; Zhu, Y.; Sparks, R.; Summar, M. Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium. Vaccines are not associated with metabolic events in children with urea cycle disorders. Pediatrics 2011, 127, e1147–e1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Klein, N.P. Children with inherited disorders tolerate routine vaccines as well as healthy children. Pediatrics 2011, 24, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Rates and types of AEs after the first and second dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
Figure 1. Rates and types of AEs after the first and second dose of COVID-19 vaccine.
Ijerph 19 12227 g001
Figure 2. Prevalence of systemic AEs in our cohort and general population as reported by several studies: no significant differences were found between our data and data from other studies for both doses [22,23,24,25].
Figure 2. Prevalence of systemic AEs in our cohort and general population as reported by several studies: no significant differences were found between our data and data from other studies for both doses [22,23,24,25].
Ijerph 19 12227 g002
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of patients and diseases.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of patients and diseases.
NumberPercentage
Total patients contacted192
Total responder patients/available info 17490
Female gender8547
Median age (min-max values)23.4 (12.1–61.7)
Diseases
HPA/PKU10761
OAD 169
LSD 74
UCD127
C-FAOD127
OARD106
CDG21
OTHER IMDs84
HPA/PKU (hyperphenylalaninemia/Phenylketonuria); OAD (Organic acids related disorders); LSD (lysosomal storage disorders), UCD (urea cycle disorders), C-FAOD (carbohydrate-fatty acids oxidation disorders), OARD (other amino acids related disorders); CDG (congenital disorders of glycosylation), OTHER IMDs (5,10-methilenetetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency, type 1 osteogenesis imperfecta, type 1 congenital generalized lipodystrophy).
Table 2. Information on COVID-19 vaccination.
Table 2. Information on COVID-19 vaccination.
NumberPercentage
Tot 174
Fully vaccinated (with second dose)151 87
Partially vaccinated (only one dose)16394
Not vaccinated116
Previous COVD19 infection148
Subsequent COVID19 infection5 3
Tot 163
Type of vaccine
Pfizer Biontech15293
Moderna85
Astra-Zeneca10.6
Do not remember21
Vaccine administered at referral Hospital10765
Adverse reaction to
first dose9960
second dose (tot 151)12381
both doses (tot 151)5234
Table 3. Effects of the first and second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine based on the type of conditions.
Table 3. Effects of the first and second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine based on the type of conditions.
Effects to First DoseEffects to Second Dose, n (%)
Disease, n of PatientsMedian AgeNot Vaccinated n (%)Number/
Rate of Aes
Medical Referral, n (%)Necessity of TreatmentDrug UsedNumber/
Rate of AEs
Medical referral, n (%)Necessity of Treatment, n (%)Drug UsedEffect on Disease
HPE/PKU
107
22
(12–51)
8 (7)73 (73)3 (3)8 (8)paracetamol, NSAIDs, corticosteroids89 (89)3 (3)21 (21)paracetamol1 increase in Phe levels
OAD
16
21
(13–39)
0 3 (19)01 (6) 5/13 (38) 1 (8)2 (15)paracetamolnone
UCD
12
20
(12–43)
1 (8)2 (16) 01 (9)paracetamol4 (36)01 (9)paracetamolnone
C-FAOD
12
25
(12–42)
06 (54)0 paracetamol5 (45)01 (9)paracetamolnone
OARD
10
21
(15–53)
1(10)8 (88)03 (33)paracetamol, NSAIDs8 (88)02 (22)paracetamolnone
LSD
7
20
(15–49)
05 (71)00none4 (57)01 (7)paracetamolnone
OTHER
10
21
(12–61)
1(10)3 (33)01 (11)none8 (88)3 (33)4 (44)paracetamol
NSAIDs
none
NSAIDs: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tummolo, A.; Dicintio, A.; Paterno, G.; Carella, R.; Melpignano, L.; De Giovanni, D. COVID-19 Vaccine in Inherited Metabolic Disorders Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study on Rate of Acceptance, Safety Profile and Effect on Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912227

AMA Style

Tummolo A, Dicintio A, Paterno G, Carella R, Melpignano L, De Giovanni D. COVID-19 Vaccine in Inherited Metabolic Disorders Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study on Rate of Acceptance, Safety Profile and Effect on Disease. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(19):12227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tummolo, Albina, Annamaria Dicintio, Giulia Paterno, Rosa Carella, Livio Melpignano, and Donatella De Giovanni. 2022. "COVID-19 Vaccine in Inherited Metabolic Disorders Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study on Rate of Acceptance, Safety Profile and Effect on Disease" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 19: 12227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop