The effect of human capital, innovation capacity, and Covid-19 crisis on Knowledge-Intensive Enterprises’ growth within a VC-driven innovation ecosystem
Introduction
Recent advances in digitization and globalization have profoundly reshaped traditional businesses, providing exceptional opportunities for spawning new forms of entrepreneurship (Hafezieh et al., 2011, Markus and Loebbecke, 2013, Nambisan et al., 2019). Arguably, one of the most promising forms of entrepreneurship that can significantly boost economic growth is Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship (KIE) (Acs, Stam, Audretsch, & O’Connor, 2017). In line with the definition provided by (Malerba & McKelvey, 2019); KIE are “new innovative firms that display a significant knowledge intensity in their business activities and exploit innovative opportunities in diverse sectors”. Being at their initial stages of development, KIE have limited probability of growth compared to established firms (Malerba & McKelvey, 2019). Stinchcombe labelled this phenomenon the ‘liability of newness’ (Stinchcombe, 1965). It is becoming increasingly challenging to identify the characteristics that can lead these enterprises to growth. To date, shedding substantive light on KIE growth is still unaddressed from many aspects and is undoubtedly crucial for both the research and practice of their management.
Achieving growth is difficult for KIE, as they are confronted not only with their infancy, but also resource poverty, lack of legitimacy and weak ties with external businesses. In addition, these enterprises require radical or incremental innovation, significant knowledge about advanced science and technology but also intensive market knowledge to exploit emerging opportunities. To deal successfully with such challenges, all members of the new enterprise should contribute complementary skills, competencies, and experiences. Overriding the idea of the “lonely hero entrepreneur” (Chowdhury, 2005) and shifting attention to the “collective nature of entrepreneurship” (Johannisson, 2003), this research is directed towards the study of various characteristics of enterprise profile that can drive KIEs to realise growth. This profile is mainly outlined by the personal traits, capabilities, skills and demographics of the human capital (founders and employees). In addition, considering that innovation has been characterized as “the engine that drives revenue growth” in organizations (Patterson, 1998), KIE profile is also complemented by its innovation capability that is strongly related to long-term corporate growth (Yang, 2012).
Taking a step forward, this paper differs in that it directs attention to context. Context refers to the situations – not the physical environment, but rather the opportunities – that establish the conditions for growth (Griffin, 2007). The context perspective on new venture growth is really important, as KIE growth cannot be analyzed in dissociation from the environment (Welter, 2011). Thus, this paper tries to link KIE growth with the context of Innovation Ecosystems (IE) (Granstrand an Holgersson, 2020, Moore, 1993). The main argument behind this rationale is that participating in an IE can ensure growth, as the enterprise will receive significant support by gaining access to acceleration services, infrastructure, an established network of external actors, and intensive market knowledge or funding. More specifically, this study focuses on an IE that is built around a Venture Capital (VC) accelerator, that has a main focus on spin-offs (i.e., knowledge-intensive firms), that is located in Greece.
Against this background – and motivated by the fact that contemporary literature has not yet explored these factors as part of a unified interacting ecosystem – this work was designed to further explore how intrinsic characteristics that are known to affect innovation can shape KIE growth, especially in the context of an IE. Furthermore, the researchers’ access to financial data provided directly by the KIEs and the VC created an opportunity to further illuminate the inner workings of said ecosystems.
Given the importance of the broader environment for new venture growth and IEs in general, it is safe to assume that the global crisis brought forth by the Covid-19 pandemic had an important effect on most SMEs and their employees (Montani and Staglianò, 2021, Obrenovic et al., 2020, Thukral, 2021). During this study, Covid-19 became a global phenomenon disrupting traditional business processes. Thus, this research also examines the impact of such a period of high uncertainty, on KIE growth. Overall, the chronological circumstance of this research also provided a motivation to place this investigation in the unique context of a global crisis, given the limited amount of similar research especially within the context of KIEs.
Based on all of the above, the research objectives of this study can be articulated as follows:
• Examine the effect of enterprise profile (as defined by its innovation capability, as well as its members’ personal, organizational, and demographic characteristics) on KIEs growth (in terms of both growth potential and actual growth) within an IE that is built around a VC.
• Explore how enterprise profile affects the extent to which the Covid-19 crisis affects the KIE in terms of their members’ emotional reaction within an IE that is built around a VC.
To address these objectives, the research design is based on a combination of insight from a questionnaire-based quantitative survey and actual growth data. The quantitative analysis was conducted in eighteen (18) KIEs within the VC-driven IE, aiming to test the significance of key characteristics identified from the literature and assess their impact on their growth (both during the Covid-19 crisis, as well as under normal circumstances).
This paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the interdisciplinary rationale behind human capital characteristics and new enterprises’ growth and provides background information on the KIE and IEs. Section 3 presents the research materials and methods employed. Section 4 outlines the obtained results. Section 5 provides a discussion of the findings, their theoretical and practical implications, and Section 6 provides the conclusions, limitations, and further research propositions.
Section snippets
Knowledge-Intensive entrepreneurship (KIE) within an innovation ecosystem
Entrepreneurship research has a history of focusing on a number of questions, such as “Why do some new ventures succeed while others fail? What market, regulatory, and organizational environments foster the most successful entrepreneurial activities?” (Amit, Glosten, & Muller, 1993). An important form of entrepreneurship is that of KIE that is believed to drive economic competitiveness, and innovative capabilities (Acs et al., 2017). KIE places emphasis on: (a) knowledge - related to science,
Materials and methods
In the present research, we focus on an IE built around a Venture Capital (VC) accelerator that acts as the orchestrator for the system. The VC in question focuses on early-stage startups and spin-offs from various sectors. In order to support its investments, it has set-up an acceleration process to aid and speed up the companies’ scaling process. This process involves funding, networking, and mentoring in order to create ecosystem collaborations and help identify market fit.
Based on the
Sample characteristics
Our sample consisted of 36 participants, holding various roles within 21 KIEs. Per company, 1.71 participants participated on average in the study. Their average age was 40.2 years old, while most (91.7%) were male. Overall, they were educated to a high level (47.2% Masters’, 27.8% Doctoral diploma, 22.2% University degree). The vast majority (88.9%) also declared that their education was related to the product/service offered by their company. Almost half (47.2%) of the participants had been
Discussion
In the present research, we investigate the effect of enterprise profile (as expressed through the KIE’s innovation capability and a set of its members’ personal, organizational, and demographic characteristics) on growth within an IE that is built around a VC in Greece. Additionally, since this study took place during the Covid-19 health crisis, we also examine its effect on the growth of the participating KIEs, as well as the connection between enterprise profile and the members’ emotional
Conclusion
One of the most promising forms of entrepreneurship that can boost economic growth is KIE. KIE requires innovation, knowledge about advanced science and technology, and extensive market knowledge to exploit emerging opportunities. This research focuses on characteristics of enterprise profile that can drive KIE growth, in the context of a VC-driven IE. It also focuses on the effect of the Covid-19 crisis on KIEs. Combining insights from a quantitative survey, with actual growth data, we found
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Dimosthenis Kotsopoulos: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. Angeliki Karagianaki: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Stratos Baloutsos: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank Associate Professor Katerina Pramatari for her continued support and advice throughout our research efforts.
Dr. Dimosthenis Kotsopoulos is a post-doctoral researcher at the Department of Management Science and Technology at Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB). He holds a PhD in Management Science and Technology and an MBA from AUEB, as well as an MSc in Geographic Information Science from University College London (UCL). His research focuses on organizational behaviour, pro-environmental behaviour, IoT, information systems, and innovative entrepreneurship, while he has published
References (143)
- et al.
Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance
Journal of Business Venturing
(2006) - et al.
Initial resources’ influence on new venture survival: A longitudinal study of new technology-based firms
Technovation
(2005) - et al.
Identifying new dimensions of business incubation: A multi-level analysis of Karolinska Institute’s incubation system
Technovation
(2016) - et al.
Resources of the firm, Russian high-technology startups, and firm growth
Journal of Business Venturing
(2002) - et al.
Entrepreneurial resilience during challenging times
Business Horizons
(2013) - et al.
Does Entrereneurial Self-Efficacy Distinguish Entrepreneurs From Managers?
Journal of Business Venturing
(1998) - et al.
Growth paths and survival chances: An application of Gambler’s Ruin theory
Journal of Business Venturing
(2013) - et al.
Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view
Research Policy
(2005) Towards a framework for tourism disaster management
Tourism Management
(2001)- et al.
Revising entrepreneurial action in response to exogenous shocks: Considering the COVID-19 pandemic
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
(2020)
Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition
Technovation
The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy
Journal of Business Research
The contrasting interaction effects of improvisational behavior with entrepreneurial self-efficacy on new venture performance and entrepreneur work satisfaction
Journal of Business Venturing
Does innovativeness reduce startup survival rates?
Journal of Business Venturing. Elsevier B.V.
Startups in times of crisis – A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective
Technovation
The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes
Research Policy
From Experience: Linking Product Innovation to Business Growth From Experience: Linking Product Innovation to Business Growth * The Innovation Engine in the Revenue Loop
Journal of Product Innovation Management (JPIM)
The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach
Small Business Economics
Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem
Harvard Business Review
Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy
Journal of Management
Challenges To Theory Development in Entrepreneurship Research
Journal of Management Studies
Innovation ecosystems
The Oxford Handbook of Innovation
Discovering the entrepreneurial micro-ecosystem: The case of a corporate accelerator
Thunderbird International Business Review
Self-efficacy and entrepreneurs’ adoption of unattainable goals: The restraining effects of self-control
Journal of Business Venturing
The Proactive Component of Organizational-Behavior - a Measure and Correlates
Journal of Organizational Behavior
The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth
Journal of Applied Psychology
A Multidemensional model for venture growth
Academy of Management Journal
A Model of Crisis Perception : A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis and Mary Lou Schaalman
Administrative Science Quarterly
New players in entrepreneurial finance and why they are there
Small Business Economics
Risk Perception and the Economic Crisis: A Longitudinal Study of the Trajectory of Perceived Risk
Risk Analysis
Technology Ventures: From Idea to Enterprise
“Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem
International Journal of Technology Management
On the nature, function and composition of technological systems
Journal of Evolutionary Economics
Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale
Organizational Research Methods
Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: Is it important?
Journal of Business Venturing
Social workers, resilience, positive emotions and optimism
Practice
Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example
Academy of Management Review
‘Competitiveness and entrepreneurship rate in Europe during the economic recovery phase, 2012–2016’, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal
Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high
Academy of Management Journal
Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
The measurement of optimism and pessimism
Current Psychology
Subjective well-being
Psychological Bulletin
Why do some SME’s become high-growth firms? The role of employee competences
Journal of Intellectual Capital
Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Startup Communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city
Cited by (22)
How does digital transformation empower knowledge creation? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises
2024, Journal of Innovation and KnowledgeUnpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies
2023, Research PolicyThe measurements and decomposition of innovation inequality: Based on Industry − University − Research perspective
2023, Journal of Business ResearchCitation Excerpt :In such a case, a technological innovation system based on the deep integration of enterprises, universities, and scientific research institutions is crucial; this kind of collaboration combines heterogeneous knowledge that can contribute to the economic development of countries or regions (Rajalo & Vadi, 2017). Technological innovation activities with enterprises as the main body and their innovation resources play an essential role in improving technological progress, production efficiency, and economic growth (Guellec & Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, 2003; Kotsopoulos, Karagianaki, & Baloutsos, 2022). In addition to enterprises, two other major innovation subjects—universities and scientific research institutions—have increasingly become sources of technological innovation, undertaking several basic and applied research work (Arvanitis, 2012; Temel et al., 2021).
Regional convergence analysis of sustainable innovation efficiency in European Union countries
2023, Journal of Environmental ManagementCitation Excerpt :Technological innovation is an important driving force for national and regional development (Wang et al., 2015). With fierce competition and severe COVID-19 pandemic all over the world, more and more innovative countries and regions put emphasize on technological innovation and innovation cooperation, such as China and the European Union (EU) (Agarwal and Gaule, 2022; Caballero-Morales, 2021; Jin et al., 2022; Kotsopoulos et al., 2022; Markovic et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022). Innovation ability is not only reflected in the level of innovation inputs and outputs, but also in the innovation efficiency.
Dr. Dimosthenis Kotsopoulos is a post-doctoral researcher at the Department of Management Science and Technology at Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB). He holds a PhD in Management Science and Technology and an MBA from AUEB, as well as an MSc in Geographic Information Science from University College London (UCL). His research focuses on organizational behaviour, pro-environmental behaviour, IoT, information systems, and innovative entrepreneurship, while he has published research papers in academic journals and conferences. He has participated in various EU-funded projects focused on technologically innovative solutions and has significant work experience in a management role within an industrial setting.
Dr. Angeliki Karagiannaki is a part-time Lecturer at the Departments of Management Science and Technology, and Informatics of the Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB). She is also a founding member and the managing director of ACEin. She holds a PhD from AUEB and a Masters’ in Management Science and Operational Research from Warwick Business School. Her research interests lie in innovation and entrepreneurship, research commercialization, and supply chain management innovation. Angeliki has had active participation in several national and European research projects and has published articles in many academic Journals and conferences
Mr. Stratos Baloutsos is a doctoral candidate at the Athens University of Economics & Business (AUEB) and Business Development Manager at ACEin. His research interests concern open innovation, innovation management, and more specifically drivers that accelerate start-up development within innovation ecosystems. He holds a B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics (University of Patras) and an M.B.A. (AUEB). He has experience working on business development, R&D, and project exploitation both as an individual contractor and as a consultant for various firms. He has also worked on several EU research projects.