Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Jun 22, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 21, 2021 - Jun 30, 2021
Date Accepted: Aug 4, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Aug 12, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

COVID-19 Vaccine Perception in South Korea: Web Crawling Approach

Lee H, Noh EB, Park SJ, Nam HK, Lee TH, Lee GR, Nam EW

COVID-19 Vaccine Perception in South Korea: Web Crawling Approach

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(9):e31409

DOI: 10.2196/31409

PMID: 34348890

PMCID: 8428376

COVID-19 Vaccine Perception in South Korea: A Web-Crawling Approach

  • Hocheol Lee; 
  • Eun Bi Noh; 
  • Sung Jong Park; 
  • Hae-Kweun Nam; 
  • Tae Ho Lee; 
  • Ga Ram Lee; 
  • Eun Woo Nam

ABSTRACT

Background:

The US Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization emphasized vaccination against the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) because physical distancing proved inadequate to mitigate death, illness, and massive economic loss.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to investigate Korean citizens’ perceptions of vaccines by examining their views on COVID-19, their positive and negative perceptions of each vaccine, and ways to enhance policies to increase vaccine acceptance.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study analyzed posts on NAVER and Instagram to examine Korean citizens’ acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines. The keywords searched were “vaccine,” “AstraZeneca,” and “Pfizer.” In total 8,100 posts in NAVER and 5,291 posts in Instagram were sampled through web crawling. Morphology analysis was performed, overlapping or meaningless words were removed, sentiment analysis was implemented, and three public health professionals reviewed the results.

Results:

The findings revealed a negative perception of COVID-19 vaccines; of the words crawled, the proportion of negative words for AstraZeneca was 71.0% and for Pfizer was 56.3%. Moreover, 70.5% considered Pfizer safe, while 30.4% thought AstraZeneca safe. Among words crawled with “vaccine,” “good” ranked first, with a frequency of 312 (13.4%). Meanwhile, “side effect” ranked highest, with a frequency of 163 (18.4%) for “AstraZeneca,” but 0.6%. for “Pfizer.” With “vaccine,” positive words were more frequently used, whereas with “AstraZeneca” and “Pfizer” negative words were prevalent.

Conclusions:

There is a negative perception of AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines in Korea, with one in four people refusing vaccination. To address this, accurate information needs to be shared about vaccines including AstraZeneca, and the experiences of those vaccinated. Furthermore, government communication about risk management is required to increase the AstraZeneca vaccination rate for herd immunity before the vaccine expires.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lee H, Noh EB, Park SJ, Nam HK, Lee TH, Lee GR, Nam EW

COVID-19 Vaccine Perception in South Korea: Web Crawling Approach

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(9):e31409

DOI: 10.2196/31409

PMID: 34348890

PMCID: 8428376

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement