Two SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays comparison and time-course profile of antibodies response

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115297Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Immunoresponse to COVID-19 was not fully understood.

  • We compared IgG concentration by 2 automated CLIA methods (Architect and Maglumi).

  • One hundred three specimens were evaluated from 55 patients up to 5 to 6 months from the symptoms’ onset.

  • Antibodies levels peaks within 3 to 4 weeks and decrease differently if measured with different methods.

  • Concerns could arise on the prediction of long-term immunity persistence.

Abstract

Introduction: The persistence of circulating antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection is not yet well known. We compare the results of 2 automated systems for the determination of IgG against SARS CoV-2 and assess the time-course of the IgG response. Methods: IgG were measured in 103 specimens of 55 patients with COVID-19 (time from the symptoms’ onset: 3–187 days) using the automated tests "Abbott SARS-COV-2 IgG" and "MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG". Results: The 2 methods had a concordance of 90.3%, but the quantitative correlation, although significant, showed dispersed results. All the specimens resulted positive after 17 days. However, the median concentrations of IgG rapidly increased up to 20 days and decreased for Maglumi IgG while Abbott IgG showed a constant trend up to 85 days, and then slowly declined. Conclusions: The titer of IgG against SARS-CoV-2 may significantly and rapidly decrease, but with a very different time-course depending on the method used for the determination.

Keywords

Immune response
Time course
SARS-CoV-2 antibodies
Covid-19 management
Maglumi
Architect
Method comparison

Cited by (0)

View Abstract