You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Letter
Transitioning to job redesign: improving workplace health and safety in the COVID-19 era
  1. Carlo Caponecchia1,
  2. Elizabeth C Mayland2
  1. 1 School of Aviation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  2. 2 School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Carlo Caponecchia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2204, Australia; carloc{at}unsw.edu.au

https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106969

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Godderis and Luyten1 astutely identified key roles for occupational health professionals amidst the COVID-19 economic downturn. However, in addition to supporting the return to work, and dealing with secondary health effects of the crisis,1 Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) professionals can lead the adaptation of organisations to an altered world of work by focusing on an active agenda with long-term benefits: improving work design.

    While the lockdowns and growing economic crisis raise challenging employment issues and widening health inequalities for some,1 many others in continuing roles are working in changed conditions: with new technology, in new spaces, with reduced social and physical interaction, and less supervision and support.

    Changes to work extend beyond white collar workers in …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @psycarlogy

    • Contributors Both authors contributed equally to this work.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.