Elsevier

World Development

Volume 136, December 2020, 105107
World Development

Letters on Urgent Issues
Psychological stress responses to COVID-19 and adaptive strategies in China

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105107Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Measures of quarantine and social-distancing to contain COVID-19 spread caused an extent of stress responses in the general public.

  • The front-line medical workers, COVID-19 patients and their relatives were more susceptible to psychological disorders.

  • China issued principles and guidelines for psychological crisis intervention to help affected people get out mental stress.

  • The strategies to COVID-19 stress and encountered difficulties during implementation may provide implications for other countries.

Abstract

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) developed into a pandemic on March 11. COVID-19 not only brought life crisis, but also incurred psychological stress: tension, anxiety, fear and despair among affected populations. How to help people overcome traumatic stress reactions and get out of psychological crisis has become a public concern that needs to be resolved in time. This article reported the psychological responses caused by the COVID-19 epidemic in China based on relevant experience and studies. The anti-epidemic measures of self-quarantine and social-distancing were deployed to contain the spread of COVID-19, but inevitably caused a certain extent of side effect: frustration and anxiety in the general public. Especially, the front-line medical rescue staff and COVID-19 patients were more susceptible to developing psychological disorders. Correspondingly, adaptive strategies and public health policies were rapidly implemented in China to deal with outbreak-caused mental stress. The psychological impact of COVID-19 and coping strategies adopted in China provided warning and reference for countries that are and going to be affected by this natural disaster.

Keywords

COVID-19
Psychological stress
Quarantine
Public health policy
Psychological intervention

Cited by (0)

View Abstract