Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Participatory Medicine

Date Submitted: Oct 12, 2020
Date Accepted: Dec 14, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Mar 12, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Best Practices for Virtual Engagement of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Teams During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study

Thayer EK, Pam M, Godfrey E, Mentch L, Brown G, Kazmerski TM, Al Achkar M

Best Practices for Virtual Engagement of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Teams During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study

J Particip Med 2021;13(1):e24966

DOI: 10.2196/24966

PMID: 33646964

PMCID: 7954110

Best practices for virtual patient-centered outcomes research team engagement during the era of COVID-19 and beyond: A qualitative research study

  • Erin K Thayer; 
  • Molly Pam; 
  • Emily Godfrey; 
  • Laura Mentch; 
  • Georgia Brown; 
  • Traci M Kazmerski; 
  • Morhaf Al Achkar

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) engages patients as partners in research and focuses on questions and outcomes that are important to patients. Traditionally done in person, COVID-19 has forced PCOR teams to engage via online platforms. Similarly, virtual engagement is the only safe choice for members of the cystic fibrosis (CF) community who spend their lives living under strict infection control guidelines. In the absence of universal best practices, the CF community developed its own guide to help PCOR teams engage virtually.

Objective:

To identify the important attributes, facilitators, and barriers to teams when selecting online platforms.

Methods:

We conducted semi-structured interviews with CF community members, non-profit stakeholders, and researchers about their experiences using online tools including the effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction with, and confidence using each platform. Interviews conducted via Zoom conferencing were audio recorded and transcribed. We identified key themes using content analysis with an iterative inductive and deductive coding process.

Results:

Fifteen participants reported using online platforms for meetings, project management, document sharing, scheduling, and communication. When selecting online platforms, participants valued accessibility, ease of use, and integration of the platforms with other platforms. Participants thought successful online collaboration utilized platforms that resemble in-person interactions, recognized team member technological literacy levels, provided intentional alignment of platforms with collaboration goals, and achieved team member buy-in to adopt new platforms.

Conclusions:

Successful online PCOR engagement requires using multiple platforms in order to fully meet the asynchronous or synchronous goals for the project. This study identified key attributes beneficial for conducting PCOR online, as well as common challenges and solutions to using online platforms. Our study findings provide best practices for selecting types of platforms and lessons learned from online PCOR collaborations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Thayer EK, Pam M, Godfrey E, Mentch L, Brown G, Kazmerski TM, Al Achkar M

Best Practices for Virtual Engagement of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Teams During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study

J Particip Med 2021;13(1):e24966

DOI: 10.2196/24966

PMID: 33646964

PMCID: 7954110

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement