Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, divergent variants of concern (VoCs) of SARS-CoV-2 have evolved and become the most prevalent SARS-CoV-2 variants in distinct locations at different times. Currently, the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) dominates infection events in large parts of the world. Immunization campaigns, however, still use SARS-CoV-2 vaccines based on the spike (S) protein of the original Wuhan virus.
The S protein of the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 harbors mutations that support replication and transmission but also weaken the binding of neutralizing antibodies. The Delta variant has been reported to evade control by antibodies induced upon infection and, arguably more relevant, after BNT162b2 (BNT) vaccination [1, 2]. Likewise, the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (ChAd) vaccine appeared less effective than the BNT vaccine in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Delta variant [2, 3].
In addition to homologous prime-boost protocols, millions of ChAd-primed vaccinees received heterologous boost immunization with mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, as vaccination with ChAd was halted due to an increased risk of thrombotic events.
The results from randomized [4, 5] and observational studies [6,7,8] demonstrated that heterologous prime-boost protocols also induce robust humoral and cellular responses accompanied by acceptable reactogenicity. These reports prompted others to suggest that mixing vaccines might be a suitable strategy to combat emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants [9]. However, information is limited regarding the neutralization capacities against the Delta variant of various immunization regimens.
We assessed plasma from 85 individuals at a mean of 68 days (range 45–91 days) after ChAd priming and a mean of 17 days (range 13–23 days) after either homologous ChAd (n = 31, 20 females) or heterologous BNT (n = 54, 40 females) prime-boost protocols [6] for their capacity to neutralize the Delta variant by applying surrogate virus neutralization tests (sVNTs). For comparison, we also tested plasma from 30 individuals (21 females) at a mean of 21 days (range 18–27 days) after BNT priming and at a mean of 30 days (range 15–65 days) after homologous BNT prime-boost protocols.
While homologous ChAd boosting only slightly increased neutralization of the Delta variant, heterologous ChAd/BNT vaccination led to a ninefold increase in neutralizing titers (Fig. 1a), resulting in detectable neutralizing sVNT titers in all individuals receiving this vaccination schedule. Similarly, homologous BNT prime-boost protocols also led to a ninefold increase but resulted in overall higher titers of neutralizing antibodies than heterologous immunization (Fig. 1b). As reported before for the Alpha, Beta, and Gamma VoCs [6], the results obtained with the Delta receptor binding domain-based sVNT were also closely correlated with data obtained with a vesicular stomatitis virus-based pseudotyped virus neutralization assay [10], which is based on particles harboring the spike protein of the Delta variant (Fig. 1c). Interestingly, although heterologous BNT boost after ChAd prime consistently resulted in higher neutralizing titers against the Alpha, Beta, and Gamma variants compared to homologous BNT vaccination [6], homologous BNT prime-boost appears to more efficiently induce neutralizing antibodies against the Delta variant.
The overall robust inhibition of the Delta variant further supports heterologous boosting with BNT of vaccinees initially primed with ChAd. However, in contrast to Alpha, Beta, and Gamma variants, homologous BNT prime-boost vaccination might be even more efficient in neutralizing the Delta variant.
Our data emphasize a high level of complexity in antibody responses that is affected not only by the vaccine or the vaccinee’s immune system but also by the VoC to be combatted. Moreover, our data indicate the urgent need for detailed studies to evaluate which vaccine schedules are best suited to combat COVID-19, once humoral immunity starts diminishing and the risk for infection and disease rises again in the vaccinated population.
References
Planas D, Veyer D, Baidaliuk A, Staropoli I, Guivel-Benhassine F, Rajah MM, et al. Reduced sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta to antibody neutralization. Nature. 2021;596:276–80.
Lopez Bernal J, Andrews N, Gower C, Gallagher E, Simmons R, Thelwall S, et al. Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:585–94.
Sheikh A, McMenamin J, Taylor B, Robertson C. SARS-CoV-2 Delta VOC in Scotland: demographics, risk of hospital admission, and vaccine effectiveness. Lancet. 2021;397:2461–2.
Shaw RH, Stuart A, Greenland M, Liu X, Nguyen Van-Tam JS, Snape MD, et al. Heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination: initial reactogenicity data. Lancet. 2021;397:2043–6.
Borobia AM, Carcas AJ, Pérez-Olmeda M, Castaño L, Bertran MJ, García-Pérez J, et al. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 booster in ChAdOx1-S-primed participants (CombiVacS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;398:121–30.
Barros-Martins J, Hammerschmidt SI, Cossmann A, Odak I, Stankov MV, Morillas Ramos G, et al. Immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants after heterologous and homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2 vaccination. Nat Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01449-9.
Normark J, Vikström L, Gwon YD, Persson IL, Edin A, Björsell T, et al. Heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and mRNA-1273 vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2110716.
Schmidt T, Klemis V, Schub D, Mihm J, Hielscher F, Marx S, et al. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/mRNA vaccination. Nat Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01464-w.
Duarte-Salles T, Prieto-Alhambra D. Heterologous vaccine regimens against COVID-19. Lancet. 2021;398:94–95.
Hoffmann M, Arora P, Groß R, Seidel A, Hörnich BF, Hahn AS, et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and P.1 escape from neutralizing antibodies. Cell. 2021;184:2384–93.e12.
Acknowledgements
The study was approved by the Internal Review Board of Hannover Medical School (institutional review board no. 8973_BO-K_2020, amendment Dec 2020). All participants gave written informed consent. Supported by the German Center for Infection Research TTU 01.938 (Grant No. 80018019238 to GMNB and RF), by the German Center for Lung Research (Grant 82DZL002B1) by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, (DFG, German Research Foundation) Excellence Strategy EXC 2155 ‘RESIST’ (Project ID39087428 to RF), by funds of the State of Lower Saxony (14-76103-184 CORONA-11/20 to RF; 14-76103-184, MWK HZI COVID-19 to SP), by funds of the BMBF (NaFoUniMedCovid19 FKZ: 01KX2021; Projects B-FAST to RF, Projects 01KI2006D, 01KI20328A, 01KI20396, 01KX2021 to SP) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 900/3 (Projects B1, 158989968 to RF; Projects PO 716/11-1, PO 716/14-1 to SP).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SIH analyzed data; SIH, BB, AD-J, GMNB and RF conceptualized the study; SIH, GB, MF, IR, MH and SP performed experiments; RF wrote manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hammerschmidt, S.I., Bosnjak, B., Bernhardt, G. et al. Neutralization of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant after heterologous and homologous BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. Cell Mol Immunol 18, 2455–2456 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-021-00755-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-021-00755-z
This article is cited by
-
Immunogenicity and safety of heterologous versus homologous prime-boost schedules with an adenoviral vectored and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: a systematic review
Infectious Diseases of Poverty (2022)
-
Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants: Genetic Variability and Clinical Implications
Current Microbiology (2022)
-
BNT162b2-boosted immune responses six months after heterologous or homologous ChAdOx1nCoV-19/BNT162b2 vaccination against COVID-19
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Delta variant (B.1.617.2) sublineages do not show increased neutralization resistance
Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2021)