Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases
Online ISSN : 1884-2836
Print ISSN : 1344-6304
ISSN-L : 1344-6304

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Performance evaluation of real-time RT-PCR assays for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 developed by the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan.
Kazuya ShiratoYuriko TomitaHiroshi KatohSouichi YamadaShuetsu FukushiShutoku MatsuyamaMakoto Takeda
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS Advance online publication

Article ID: JJID.2020.1079

Details
Abstract

Soon after the December 2019 outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China, a protocol for real-time RT-PCR assay detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) was established by the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) in Japan. The protocol used Charité’s nucleocapsid (Sarbeco-N) and NIID’s nucleocapsid (NIID-N2) assays. During the following months, SARS-CoV-2 spread causing a global pandemic, and a variety of SARS-CoV-2 sequences were registered to public databases, such as the Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID). In this study, we evaluated the newly developed S2 assay (NIID-S2) to replace the Sarbeco-N assay and the performance of NIID-N2 and NIID-S2 assays, referring mismatches in the primer/probe targeted region. We found the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the NIID-S2 set were comparable to the NIID-N2 assay, and the detection rate for clinical specimens was identical to that of the NIID-N2 assay. Furthermore, among available sequences (approximately 192,000), the NIID-N2 and NIID-S2 sets had 2.6% and 1.2% mismatched sequences, respectively, although most of these mismatches did not affect the amplification efficiency, with the exception of the 3′ end of the NIID-N2 forward primer. These findings indicate that the previously developed NIID-N2 assay remains suitable for the detection SARS-CoV-2 with support of the newly developed NIID-S2 set.

Content from these authors
© 2021 Authors
feedback
Top