Next Article in Journal
Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Obese Patients: Utility of a New Equation
Previous Article in Journal
Body Mass Index Measured Repeatedly over 42 Years as a Risk Factor for Ischemic Stroke: The HUNT Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/nu15051234
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vitamin D Supplementation and Clinical Outcomes in Severe COVID-19 Patients—Randomized Controlled Trial

by
Josipa Domazet Bugarin
1,
Svjetlana Dosenovic
1,
Darko Ilic
1,
Nikola Delic
1,
Ivana Saric
1,
Ivo Ugrina
2,
Sanda Stojanovic Stipic
1,
Bozidar Duplancic
1 and
Lenko Saric
1,*
1
Department of Anesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
2
Intellomics Ltd., 21000 Split, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(5), 1234; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051234
Submission received: 5 February 2023 / Revised: 25 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 28 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Nutrition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
COVID-19 symptoms vary from asymptomatic cases to moderate and severe illness with patients needing hospitalization and intensive care treatment. Vitamin D is associated with severity of viral infections and has an immune-modulatory effect in immune response. Observational studies showed a negative association of low vitamin D levels and COVID-19 severity and mortality outcomes. In this study, we aimed to determine whether daily supplementation of vitamin D during intensive care unit (ICU) stay in COVID-19 patients with severe illness affects clinically relevant outcomes. Patients with COVID-19 disease in need of respiratory support admitted to the ICU were eligible for inclusion. Patients with low vitamin D levels were randomized into one of two groups: the intervention group received daily supplementation of vitamin D and the control group did not receive vitamin D supplementation. In total, 155 patients were randomized: 78 into the intervention group and 77 into the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in number of days spent on respiratory support, although the trial was underpowered for the main outcome. There was no difference in any of the secondary outcomes analyzed between two groups. Our study suggests no benefit in vitamin D supplementation to patients with severe COVID-19 disease admitted to the ICU and in need of respiratory support in any of the analyzed outcomes.

1. Introduction

Since December 2019, millions of people have been infected with novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there is more than 250 million confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with more than 5 million confirmed deaths across the world [1].
The COVID-19 symptoms vary from asymptomatic cases and mild forms of disease which do not require special medical care to moderate and severe illness with patients needing hospitalization [1,2]. A number of patients requiring hospitalization will need some form of respiratory support and intensive care treatment (ICU) [1,2]. There are many risk factors associated with disease progression. Elderly and frail patients are at the most risk for adverse outcomes and complications. Furthermore, risk for developing complications of COVID-19 disease is increased in patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, malignant disease or obesity [3,4,5]. One of the factors associated with worse outcomes, severity and more complications from respiratory infections is vitamin D deficiency [6,7]. Vitamin D is known to have immuno-modulatory effects in innate and adaptive immune response [6]. It induces the production of antimicrobial proteins and could act as an anti-inflammatory agent [8,9]. It decreases viral replication rates and reduces the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines [8,9]. Vitamin D is also known to regulate various thrombotic pathways [10]. Vitamin D supplementation could, therefore, have a role in reducing the coagulopathy associated with COVID-19 [10]. Low levels of vitamin D are associated with increased incidence of respiratory infections [11]. Studies have shown that patients with vitamin D levels <50 nmol/L had a 64% higher risk of community-acquired pneumonia [12]. Low vitamin D levels were associated with increased rates of infections, sepsis and mortality [13,14,15]. Observational studies showed the association of low levels of vitamin D with COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and mortality outcomes [13,14]. The severity of hypovitaminosis D was also found to be associated with the prognosis of COVID-19, since patients with lower levels of vitamin D were more prone to severe illness and had higher mortality rates [2,5,16,17].
There is evidence that vitamin D supplementation protects against respiratory tract infections [18]. However, there is conflicting evidence about the beneficial effects of vitamin D supplementation in COVID-19 patients. While some studies found a reduction in disease severity and earlier recovery with vitamin D supplementation, others showed no difference in outcomes [13,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].
To improve vitamin D status, high dose supplementation is required [21,26]. There are a variety of doses and dosing intervals used for vitamin D supplementation. Bolus doses with longer intervals are not recommended due to the higher incidence of adverse effects [27]. Instead, daily supplementation has been shown reduce the incidence of respiratory tract infections in the general population [28]. Regarding patients in the ICU, usual doses are insufficient, and it takes too long time to increase vitamin D levels [29]. Therefore, a loading dose or higher daily doses are necessary to correct vitamin D hypovitaminosis in timely manner [29,30]. It is known that different dosing regimens could have different clinical effects [29,30]. Daily doses lead to stable and consistent availability of vitamin D and its metabolites, which could have an impact on clinical outcomes [29]. There is currently no consensus on the upper level of vitamin D supplementation. Usual daily doses range from 400 to 2000 IU daily [31]. Endocrine society recommends an upper daily limit of 10,000 IU [32]. Studies have shown that daily supplementation of vitamin D in doses of up to 10,000 IU over longer periods of time did not cause adverse effects in humans [33,34]. Furthermore, rare side effects and a wide safety margin make vitamin D supplementation an inexpensive and safe intervention for hospitalized patients [33,34,35]
In this study, we aimed to determine whether daily supplementation of vitamin D during intensive care unit (ICU) stay in COVID-19 patients with severe illness affects clinically relevant outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

This was a single center, open label randomized clinical trial. The study took place in a tertiary hospital center from November 2021 to May 2022.

2.1. Patients

All patients admitted for the first time to the ICU in the study period were tested with a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 infection upon admission. Patients who had positive PCR test were considered eligible for inclusion in the study if they had a need for invasive or non-invasive respiratory support. All these patients had vitamin D levels measured on admission. Patients with low levels of vitamin D (<50 nmol/L) were included in further study. All patients were older than 18 years and had confirmed COVID-19 disease with PCR test.
Non-inclusion criteria included patients with known vitamin D supplementation prior to hospitalization, patients with chronic hepatic dysfunction or intestinal malabsorption syndromes, concomitant use of medication affecting vitamin D metabolism or absorption (anticonvulsants, etc.), elevated serum calcium levels on admission (corrected for albumin concentration), history of hypercalciuria and kidney stones, conditions that could lead to high serum calcium levels (sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, lymphomas), pregnancy or breastfeeding, chronic dialysis, severe chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and parathyroid disease.
Patients were excluded from study in case of calcium levels that were consistently above normal serum range (>2.6 mmol/L, >10.5 mg/dL) or if vitamin D levels were >150 nmol/L.

2.2. Intervention

All patients included in this study received standard of care. Mechanical ventilation was applied with protective lung ventilation using tidal volumes 4–8 mL/kg and plato pressures ≤ 30 cm H2O. Dexamethasone was routinely administered to all eligible patients. In cases of moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) when adequate oxygenation could not be achieved, patients were ventilated in prone position in the early phase of ICU stay according to the Berlin definition [36,37]. Contraindications for prone positioning were recent cardiac, abdominal, thoracic or tracheal surgery, burns, pregnancy, unstable fractures and spinal instability. Patients randomized into the intervention group received 10,000 IU of cholecalciferol daily (2.5 mL of Plivit D3 © 4000 IU oral suspension 4000 IU/mL, Pliva). Supplement was administered orally or via gastric tube during ICU stay or for at least 14 days in case of ICU discharge before day 14. Supplementation was started within 48 h of admission to ICU. Supplement was administered by experienced nursing staff. For patients receiving supplementation, vitamin D levels were checked on days 7 and 14. In case that vitamin D levels were >150 nmol/L or if the calcium levels were consistently >2.6 mmol/L, further supplementation was stopped.

2.3. Randomization

Patients were randomly assigned into one of the two groups. The intervention group received vitamin D supplementation, and the control group did not receive vitamin D supplementation. Patients from both groups received standard of care. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or control group. A randomization list was created using a computer-generated code with block sizes of 10 (https://www.graphpad.com/, accessed on 30 September 2021) by one of the study investigators.

2.4. Blinding

The person assigned for data analysis was blinded as to which group received intervention.

2.5. Outcomes

Primary outcome was number of days spent on respiratory support (invasive or non-invasive).
Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality on days 14, 28 and 60, clinical improvement at day 28 (WHO clinical progression scale), number of days spent in ICU, number of days spent in hospital, bacterial superinfections, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and disease severity (CRP levels, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, D-dimer levels, fibrinogen, ferritin, PCT). All patients were monitored for adverse effects of vitamin D supplementation.

2.6. Assessments (Primary, Secondary Outcomes)

Data were obtained from patient electronic and paper medical records by a critical care physician. Data collection included demographic data, comorbidities, vaccination status, chronic therapy, vitamin D levels on admission, disease severity markers (arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2), C reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, fibrinogen, ferritin, procalcitonin (PCT) levels, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and severity organ failure score (SOFA)). All data were collected upon admission and before randomization. Randomization was performed within 48 h of admission.
25-OH vitamin D serum levels are not routinely measured in all ICU patients. For the purpose of this study, vitamin D levels were measured in a hospital laboratory using the ECLIA method (Elecsys Vitamin D total III kit; Roche Diagnostics, Diegem, Belgium). Vitamin D levels for patients included in this study were measured on admission to the ICU, and for patients randomized into the intervention group, vitamin D levels were checked on days 7 and 14 of ICU or hospital stay. For patients in the control group, no further vitamin D levels were measured.
Disease severity markers were collected daily during ICU stay and every third day after discharge from ICU. Assessment for bacterial superinfections included taking blood, urine and tracheal aspirations for microbiology testing. Samples were taken upon admission, on day 5, and further based on clinical and laboratory signs of possible bacterial infection. In case of patients discharge from hospital before the 28-day period, patients were contacted by phone on day 28 and day 60.

2.7. Sample Size

Since the primary outcome was number of days spent on respiratory support, a difference of two days was set arbitrarily as a difference that would mean significant clinical effect. Considering that, the calculated sample size to detect a 2-day difference in number of days on respiratory support was 274 (137 patients in each group). However, the number of severe COVID-19 patients treated in the ICU in the study period was large; almost half of them did not meet inclusion criteria. Furthermore, the number of patients admitted to the ICU declined during the study period, so we were not able to include the planned number of patients.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using the R Software (version 4.2.1) [38]. Usual descriptive statistics was performed with means, medians, standard deviations, boxplots, etc. Categorical variables were expressed as numbers, percentages or factors in modeling in R. Continuous variables were presented as means, medians and standard deviations in tables and presented through box plots on graphs. A two-sample test of proportions was used to determine whether the two populations differ significantly in survival on a specific day. A Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test was used to test the difference between laboratory parameters. FDR correction for p-values was applied, and p-values with p < 0.05 were taken as significant. Additionally, LOESS was utilized for graphs [39].

2.9. Consent Procedure

Since all patients admitted to our ICU were sedated and/or intubated and it was not possible to obtain informed consent from them, a consent for participation in this study was obtained from family members over the phone before patients’ inclusion in the study.

2.10. Ethical Considerations

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association for experiments involving humans. The study was approved by the institutional ethical board (Ethical Committee of University Hospital Split, Croatia; approval number: 500-03/21-01/170).
The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05384574).

2.11. Reporting

This study is reported in accordance with the CONSORT Statement [40].

3. Results

There were 292 patients with COVID-19 disease admitted to the ICU from November 2021 to May 2022. Of those, 137 patients had one or more non-inclusion criteria met, leaving 155 patients eligible for randomization. Of those, 78 patients were randomized into the intervention group and 77 patients were randomized into the control group. Three patients from the intervention group were excluded because they did not receive vitamin D supplementation according to the study protocol. A study flow diagram is presented in Appendix A. Demographic data of randomized patients are presented in Table 1. All patients included in this study were contacted by phone two to three months after hospital discharge.
Regarding the primary outcome results, the median number of days on respiratory support was 9 (IQR 6–16). The median number of days on respiratory support for the intervention group was 10 (IQR 6–13.9) and for the control group was 8 (IQR 6–12). There was no statistically significant difference in primary outcome between the two groups.

Secondary Outcomes

Overall 14-, 28- and 60-day survival rates were 87.8% (130/148 patients, data for four patients were unavailable), 71.3% (102/143 patients, data for nine patients were unavailable) and 66.4% (83/125 patients, data for 14 patients were unavailable), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in neither of these survival rates between the two groups.
The median number of days spent in the ICU for both groups was 13 (IQR 9–20) and the median number of days in the hospital was 19 (IQR 14–26). The median PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission was 75 (IQR 64–93). The mean WHO clinical progression scale on admission was 8.4 (SD ± 0.5). Results for the intervention and control groups are presented in Table 2.
Regarding vitamin D supplementation, the mean vitamin D level on admission was 27.1 ± 12.4 nmol/L. The mean vitamin D level for the intervention group on admission was 27.23 ± 11.8 nmol/L. There was no difference between the two groups (p 0.95). The mean vitamin D levels on days 7 and 14 in the intervention group were 38.5 ± 15.5 nmol/L and 56.2 ± 23 nmol/L, respectively, showing that vitamin D supplementation did increase vitamin D levels during the supplementation period. There was no difference between male and female subjects regarding vitamin D levels on admission (M 28 ± 12, F 25 ± 11, p 0.17).
Analysis of disease severity markers showed differences in trends for CRP, PCT and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. Patients in the intervention group had delayed increases in CRP and PCT plasma levels and also in neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio compared to the control group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups. Results are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5.
No adverse effects attributable to vitamin D supplementation were observed during this study. None of the patients in the intervention group met exclusion criteria.

4. Discussion

In our study, vitamin D supplementation in patients with severe COVID-19 treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) for invasive or non-invasive respiratory support did not reduce the number of days on respiratory support compared to patients who did not receive vitamin D supplementation. Furthermore, there were no differences in the number of days spent in the ICU, hospital length of stay or rate of bacterial superinfections. Regarding the survival, there were no differences in 14-, 28-day or 60-day survival rates. However, the study findings should be interpreted with caution due to inadequate study power for primary outcome. With this caveat, the trial should be viewed as a contribution to a still under-researched body of evidence about the effect of vitamin D supplementation in critically ill patients with COVID-19. The results of this RCT should be pooled in a systematic review, since a single trial can seldom provide a definitive answer [41]. Vitamin D deficiency is defined by the Endocrine Society Task Force on Vitamin D as vitamin D levels <50 nmol/L [32]. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency varies from region to region from 24% to 40% [42,43,44]. In critically ill patients, this prevalence is even higher and is associated with greater mortality and morbidity in both pediatric and adult ICU patients [45].
Vitamin D supplementation was shown to have benefits regarding acute respiratory infections [28,46]. However, dosage and dosing intervals have not been clearly defined, and there are various administration protocols [25,28,30,47,48,49,50]. High-dose enteral or parenteral vitamin D supplementation did not show a clear benefit on various clinical outcomes in a number of studies [23,47,48,49]. On the other hand, there are studies showing that daily vitamin D supplementation had a positive effect on respiratory tract infections [46]. Furthermore, a systematic review by Pal et al. showed that vitamin D supplementation improves clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients [20]. The majority of the analyzed studies used oral cholecalciferol with different cumulative doses ranging from 80,000 to 400,000 IU [20]. This study also showed that there was no difference in outcomes between high and low cumulative doses, with cumulative doses less than 200,000 IU categorized as low dose [20].
In this study, vitamin D supplementation was administered in daily doses of 10,000 IU of cholecalciferol. This dosage increased mean values of vitamin D concentrations from 27.2 to 56.2 nmol/L over a 14-day period, and no adverse effects were recorded. Studies showed that these doses are safe, and the cumulative dose for patients included in our study is considered low [20]. This approach also could lead to a greater availability of vitamin D metabolites, which could have a greater positive effect [29].
Results for the primary outcome in our study show that vitamin D supplementation did not reduce the number of days on respiratory support (median number of days 10 (IQR 6–15) in the intervention group and 8 (IQR 6–15) in the control group). These results are in concordance with the results published by Lan et al. in their systematic review [22]. Furthermore, similar results were published by other authors in several RCTs [23,47]. In both studies, vitamin D was given in a single dose and in much higher dose than the one used in our study.
Regarding secondary outcomes, we found no significant differences in the number of days spent in the ICU nor in hospital length of stay. Most of the published studies showed similar results [5,20,23,47,48,49,51]. Lan et al. showed in their systematic review that numerical results were better in the vitamin D supplementation group [22]. However, these results did not reach statistical significance. In another SR, the authors showed a potential beneficial use of vitamin D intervention in COVID-19 in a pooled analysis of six RCTs [51]. However, no significant effect was found for individual outcomes of ICU care and mortality [51].
In this study, there was no difference in the 14-, 28- or 60-day survival rate between the intervention and control group. Bassatne et al. showed in their systematic review increased mortality rates in COVID-19 patients with vitamin D deficiency [5]. In studies analyzing whether vitamin D supplementation improves survival in COVID-19 patients, the results did not show positive effect regardless of the dosage and methods of administration [20,23,48,49].
A systematic review by D’Ecclesiis et al. included 38 studies that assessed the association of vitamin D levels or vitamin D supplementation with SARS-CoV2 infection, severity and mortality [52]. The authors showed improved outcomes, including a halved risk of COVID-19 severity (measured as need for ICU admission or ventilation or intubation) and mortality with vitamin D supplementation [52]. The authors also pointed out some important limitations, such as the results were based mainly on observational studies with potential for bias, the possibility of unmeasured confounding factors such as different type of care in hospitals, and significant heterogeneity among studies observed, concluding that RCTs are needed to establish the causal link [52].
The results of our study show different trends in disease severity markers between patients who received vitamin D supplementation and those who did not receive supplementation. Many of the patients from our study had increases in inflammatory and disease severity markers 7–10 days after ICU admission. This can be explained by the fact that more than 70% of patients from both groups had bacterial superinfection during their ICU stay. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Similar results were reported in a rapid review where authors report that supplementing vitamin D did slightly improve fibrinogen levels but did not influence D-dimer, CRP or PCT levels [48]. Although there was no statistically significant difference, patients from the intervention group had delayed increases in CRP and PCT levels as well as in neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. These results could suggest a potential benefit of vitamin D supplementation regarding nosocomial infections in ICU. However, no conclusions can be made based on our results.

Limitations

The main limitation of our study is the small number of patients included. We planned to include at least 274 patients (137 in each group) in order to detect a 2-day difference in the number of days on respiratory support. However, many of the patients admitted to the ICU in our study period met one of the non-inclusion criteria and were not eligible for randomization. Furthermore, since the characteristics of the pandemic changed and there were lower rates of hospital admissions and ICU admissions, we were unable to reach the calculated sample size. Therefore, the results of this trial need to be further corroborated in larger, adequately powered RCTs.
The second limitation is the single center design, which could influence the external validity of the study. Large multicenter studies would obtain more conclusive evidence.
Our patients had a median PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 75 mmHg, which means that many of the patients admitted to the ICU had severe ARDS. It may be possible that vitamin D supplementation does not have a positive effect at this critical stage of illness, which does not mean that it could not have a beneficial effect at earlier stages of the disease.

5. Conclusions

In this RCT, the daily supplementation of vitamin D in severe COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU and who need respiratory support did not seem to reduce the number of days on respiratory support. Furthermore, the results suggest no statistically significant difference in any of the secondary outcomes. The results should be interpreted with caution, and further research is needed, since the trial was underpowered for the main outcome.
Results from our study are similar to results published by other authors. It seems that vitamin D supplementation does not significantly improve clinical outcomes in severe COVID-19 patients regardless of dosage and methods of administration. However, there could be a potential benefit of vitamin D supplementation in less severe COVID-19 patients. Further studies on a larger number of patients are needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation has an effect on severe COVID-19 patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.D.B., I.S. and L.S.; Data curation, J.D.B., D.I., N.D., I.S. and L.S.; Formal analysis, J.D.B., I.U. and L.S.; Investigation, J.D.B., S.D., D.I., N.D., I.S., S.S.S., B.D. and L.S.; Methodology, J.D.B., S.D., I.S. and L.S.; Supervision, L.S.; Writing—original draft, J.D.B. and L.S.; Writing—review and editing, J.D.B., S.D., D.I., N.D., I.S., S.S.S., B.D. and L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of University Hospital Split, Croatia (protocol code 500-03/21-01/170, date of approval: 29 November 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Since all patients admitted to our ICU were sedated and/or intubated and it was not possible to obtain informed consent from them, a consent for participation in this study was obtained from family members over the phone.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Study flow diagram.
Nutrients 15 01234 i001

References

  1. WHO. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed on 15 November 2021).
  2. Campi, I.; Gennari, L.; Merlotti, D.; Mingiano, C.; Frosali, A.; Giovanelli, L.; Torlasco, C.; Pengo, M.F.; Heilbron, F.; Soranna, D.; et al. Vitamin D and COVID-19 severity and related mortality: A prospective study in Italy. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Annweiler, C.; Beaudenon, M.; Gautier, J.; Simon, R.; Dubee, V.; Gonsard, J.; Parot-Schinkel, E. COVID-19 and high-dose VITamin D supplementation TRIAL in high-risk older patients (COVIT-TRIAL): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020, 21, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hossein-nezhad, A.; Holick, M.F. Vitamin D for health: A global perspective. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2013, 88, 720–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bassatne, A.; Basbous, M.; Chakhtoura, M.; El Zein, O.; Rahme, M.; El-Hajj Fuleihan, G. The link between COVID-19 and VItamin D (VIVID): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2021, 119, 154753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bouillon, R.; Marcocci, C.; Carmeliet, G.; Bikle, D.; White, J.H.; Dawson-Hughes, B.; Lips, P.; Munns, C.F.; Lazaretti-Castro, M.; Giustina, A.; et al. Skeletal and Extraskeletal Actions of Vitamin D: Current Evidence and Outstanding Questions. Endocr. Rev. 2019, 40, 1109–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Quesada-Gomez, J.M.; Entrenas-Castillo, M.; Bouillon, R. Vitamin D receptor stimulation to reduce acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 infections: Revised Ms SBMB 2020_166. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 202, 105719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hasanloei, M.A.V.; Rahimlou, M.; Eivazloo, A.; Sane, S.; Ayremlou, P.; Hashemi, R. Effect of Oral Versus Intramuscular Vitamin D Replacement on Oxidative Stress and Outcomes in Traumatic Mechanical Ventilated Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit. Nutr. Clin. Pract. Off. Publ. Am. Soc. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2020, 35, 548–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fabbri, A.; Infante, M.; Ricordi, C. Editorial—Vitamin D status: A key modulator of innate immunity and natural defense from acute viral respiratory infections. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 24, 4048–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sengupta, T.; Majumder, R.; Majumder, S. Role of vitamin D in treating COVID-19-associated coagulopathy: Problems and perspectives. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2021, 476, 2421–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ali, N. Role of vitamin D in preventing of COVID-19 infection, progression and severity. J. Infect. Public Health 2020, 13, 1373–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhou, Y.F.; Luo, B.A.; Qin, L.L. The association between vitamin D deficiency and community-acquired pneumonia: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Medicine 2019, 98, e17252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Langlois, P.L.; D’Aragon, F.; Manzanares, W. Vitamin D in the ICU: More sun for critically ill adult patients? Nutrition 2019, 61, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. De Haan, K.; Groeneveld, A.B.; de Geus, H.R.; Egal, M.; Struijs, A. Vitamin D deficiency as a risk factor for infection, sepsis and mortality in the critically ill: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Care 2014, 18, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Y.P.; Wan, Y.D.; Sun, T.W.; Kan, Q.C.; Wang, L.X. Association between vitamin D deficiency and mortality in critically ill adult patients: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Crit. Care 2014, 18, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Oscanoa, T.J.; Amado, J.; Vidal, X.; Laird, E.; Ghashut, R.A.; Romero-Ortuno, R. The relationship between the severity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection and 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration—A metaanalysis. Adv. Respir. Med. 2021, 89, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kazemi, A.; Mohammadi, V.; Aghababaee, S.K.; Golzarand, M.; Clark, C.C.T.; Babajafari, S. Association of Vitamin D Status with SARS-CoV-2 Infection or COVID-19 Severity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Adv. Nutr. 2021, 12, 1636–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amrein, K.; Hoffmann, M.; Lobmeyr, E.; Martucci, G. Vitamin D in critical care: Where are we now and what is next? Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2021, 27, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maghbooli, Z.; Sahraian, M.A.; Jamalimoghadamsiahkali, S.; Asadi, A.; Zarei, A.; Zendehdel, A.; Varzandi, T.; Mohammadnabi, S.; Alijani, N.; Karimi, M.; et al. Treatment With 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 (Calcifediol) Is Associated With a Reduction in the Blood Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Marker of Disease Severity in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Pilot Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial. Endocr. Pract. Off. J. Am. Coll. Endocrinol. Am. Assoc. Clin. Endocrinol. 2021, 27, 1242–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pal, R.; Banerjee, M.; Bhadada, S.K.; Shetty, A.J.; Singh, B.; Vyas, A. Vitamin D supplementation and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2021, 45, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Christopher, K.B. Vitamin D supplementation in the ICU patient. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2015, 18, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lan, S.H.; Lai, C.C.; Chang, S.P.; Lu, L.C.; Hung, S.H.; Lin, W.T. Vitamin D supplementation and the outcomes of critically ill adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Murai, I.H.; Fernandes, A.L.; Sales, L.P.; Pinto, A.J.; Goessler, K.F.; Duran, C.S.C.; Silva, C.B.R.; Franco, A.S.; Macedo, M.B.; Dalmolin, H.H.H.; et al. Effect of a Single High Dose of Vitamin D3 on Hospital Length of Stay in Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021, 325, 1053–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Putzu, A.; Belletti, A.; Cassina, T.; Clivio, S.; Monti, G.; Zangrillo, A.; Landoni, G. Vitamin D and outcomes in adult critically ill patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J. Crit. Care 2017, 38, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Stroehlein, J.K.; Wallqvist, J.; Iannizzi, C.; Mikolajewska, A.; Metzendorf, M.I.; Benstoem, C.; Meybohm, P.; Becker, M.; Skoetz, N.; Stegemann, M.; et al. Vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of COVID-19: A living systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 5, CD015043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Christopher, K.B. Vitamin D and critical illness outcomes. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2016, 22, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sanders, K.M.; Stuart, A.L.; Williamson, E.J.; Simpson, J.A.; Kotowicz, M.A.; Young, D.; Nicholson, G.C. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010, 303, 1815–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Martineau, A.R.; Jolliffe, D.A.; Hooper, R.L.; Greenberg, L.; Aloia, J.F.; Bergman, P.; Dubnov-Raz, G.; Esposito, S.; Ganmaa, D.; Ginde, A.A.; et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ 2017, 356, i6583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hollis, B.W.; Wagner, C.L. Clinical review: The role of the parent compound vitamin D with respect to metabolism and function: Why clinical dose intervals can affect clinical outcomes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 4619–4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Amrein, K.; Papinutti, A.; Mathew, E.; Vila, G.; Parekh, D. Vitamin D and critical illness: What endocrinology can learn from intensive care and vice versa. Endocr. Connect. 2018, 7, R304–R315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ross, A.C.; Manson, J.E.; Abrams, S.A.; Aloia, J.F.; Brannon, P.M.; Clinton, S.K.; Durazo-Arvizu, R.A.; Gallagher, J.C.; Gallo, R.L.; Jones, G.; et al. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: What clinicians need to know. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Holick, M.F.; Binkley, N.C.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Gordon, C.M.; Hanley, D.A.; Heaney, R.P.; Murad, M.H.; Weaver, C.M.; Endocrine, S. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 1911–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Amrein, K.; Scherkl, M.; Hoffmann, M.; Neuwersch-Sommeregger, S.; Kostenberger, M.; Tmava Berisha, A.; Martucci, G.; Pilz, S.; Malle, O. Vitamin D deficiency 2.0: An update on the current status worldwide. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 74, 1498–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Billington, E.O.; Burt, L.A.; Rose, M.S.; Davison, E.M.; Gaudet, S.; Kan, M.; Boyd, S.K.; Hanley, D.A. Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, 1261–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rizzoli, R. Vitamin D supplementation: Upper limit for safety revisited? Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2021, 33, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Papazian, L.; Aubron, C.; Brochard, L.; Chiche, J.D.; Combes, A.; Dreyfuss, D.; Forel, J.M.; Guerin, C.; Jaber, S.; Mekontso-Dessap, A.; et al. Formal guidelines: Management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann. Intensive Care 2019, 9, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Force, A.D.T.; Ranieri, V.M.; Rubenfeld, G.D.; Thompson, B.T.; Ferguson, N.D.; Caldwell, E.; Fan, E.; Camporota, L.; Slutsky, A.S. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012, 307, 2526–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. R_Core_Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 10 July 2022).
  39. Cleveland, W.S.; Grosse, E.; Shyu, W.M. Statistical Models in S; Chambers, J.M., Hastie, T.J., Eds.; Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  40. Cuschieri, S. The CONSORT statement. Saudi J. Anaesth. 2019, 13, S27–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guyatt, G.H.; Mills, E.J.; Elbourne, D. In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter. PLoS Med. 2008, 5, e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schleicher, R.L.; Sternberg, M.R.; Looker, A.C.; Yetley, E.A.; Lacher, D.A.; Sempos, C.T.; Taylor, C.L.; Durazo-Arvizu, R.A.; Maw, K.L.; Chaudhary-Webb, M.; et al. National Estimates of Serum Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Metabolite Concentrations Measured by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in the US Population during 2007–2010. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 1051–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cashman, K.D.; Dowling, K.G.; Skrabakova, Z.; Gonzalez-Gross, M.; Valtuena, J.; De Henauw, S.; Moreno, L.; Damsgaard, C.T.; Michaelsen, K.F.; Molgaard, C.; et al. Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: Pandemic? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 1033–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sarafin, K.; Durazo-Arvizu, R.; Tian, L.; Phinney, K.W.; Tai, S.; Camara, J.E.; Merkel, J.; Green, E.; Sempos, C.T.; Brooks, S.P. Standardizing 25-hydroxyvitamin D values from the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 102, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Amrein, K.; Zajic, P.; Schnedl, C.; Waltensdorfer, A.; Fruhwald, S.; Holl, A.; Purkart, T.; Wunsch, G.; Valentin, T.; Grisold, A.; et al. Vitamin D status and its association with season, hospital and sepsis mortality in critical illness. Crit. Care 2014, 18, R47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jolliffe, D.A.; Camargo, C.A., Jr.; Sluyter, J.D.; Aglipay, M.; Aloia, J.F.; Ganmaa, D.; Bergman, P.; Borzutzky, A.; Damsgaard, C.T.; Dubnov-Raz, G.; et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data from randomised controlled trials. Medrxiv Prepr. Serv. Health Sci. 2020, 9, 276–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Amrein, K.; Schnedl, C.; Holl, A.; Riedl, R.; Christopher, K.B.; Pachler, C.; Urbanic Purkart, T.; Waltensdorfer, A.; Munch, A.; Warnkross, H.; et al. Effect of high-dose vitamin D3 on hospital length of stay in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency: The VITdAL-ICU randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014, 312, 1520–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Da Rocha, A.P.; Atallah, A.N.; Aldrighi, J.M.; Pires, A.L.R.; Dos Santos Puga, M.E.; Pinto, A. Insufficient evidence for vitamin D use in COVID-19: A rapid systematic review. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021, 75, e14649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Guven, M.; Gultekin, H. The effect of high-dose parenteral vitamin D3 on COVID-19-related inhospital mortality in critical COVID-19 patients during intensive care unit admission: An observational cohort study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 75, 1383–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Shah, K.; Saxena, D.; Mavalankar, D. Vitamin D supplementation, COVID-19 and disease severity: A meta-analysis. QJM Monthly J. Assoc. Physicians 2021, 114, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Varikasuvu, S.R.; Thangappazham, B.; Vykunta, A.; Duggina, P.; Manne, M.; Raj, H.; Aloori, S. COVID-19 and vitamin D (Co-VIVID study): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2022, 20, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. D’Ecclesiis, O.; Gavioli, C.; Martinoli, C.; Raimondi, S.; Chiocca, S.; Miccolo, C.; Bossi, P.; Cortinovis, D.; Chiaradonna, F.; Palorini, R.; et al. Vitamin D and SARS-CoV2 infection, severity and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0268396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 15 01234 g001 550
Figure 1. Mean CRP levels and trends during 14 days from ICU admission.
Figure 1. Mean CRP levels and trends during 14 days from ICU admission.
Nutrients 15 01234 g001
Nutrients 15 01234 g002 550
Figure 2. Mean procalcitonin levels and trends during 14 days from ICU admission.
Figure 2. Mean procalcitonin levels and trends during 14 days from ICU admission.
Nutrients 15 01234 g002
Nutrients 15 01234 g003 550
Figure 3. Mean D-dimer levels and trends during 14 days from ICU admission.
Figure 3. Mean D-dimer levels and trends during 14 days from ICU admission.
Nutrients 15 01234 g003
Nutrients 15 01234 g004 550
Figure 4. Mean fibrinogen levels and trends during 14 days from ICU admission.
Figure 4. Mean fibrinogen levels and trends during 14 days from ICU admission.
Nutrients 15 01234 g004
Nutrients 15 01234 g005 550
Figure 5. Mean neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and trends during 14 days from ICU admission.
Figure 5. Mean neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and trends during 14 days from ICU admission.
Nutrients 15 01234 g005
Table
Table 1. Demographic data of patients, vaccination status, vitamin D levels, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, WHO clinical progression scale on admission to ICU.
Table 1. Demographic data of patients, vaccination status, vitamin D levels, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, WHO clinical progression scale on admission to ICU.
TotalIntervention Group Control Group
Number of patients1527577
Gender
Male 110 (72.4)52 (69.3%)58 (75%)
Female 42 (17.6)23 (30.7%)19 (25%)
Age, years (mean, min, max)64.95 (39–82)65 (59–71)65.5 (39–82)
Vaccinated37 (24.3)20 (26.7%)17 (22%)
Vitamin D levels, nmol/L 24.4 (16.95–36.8)25.3 (17.9–36.9)27.3 (16–37.3)
PaO2/FiO2, mmHg75 (65–93)75 (65–93)75.5 (65.2–92.5)
WHO clinical progression scale8 (8–9)9 (8–9)9 (8–9)
Comorbidities
Hypertension69 (45.4%)31 (41.93%)38 (49.3%)
Diabetes mellitus42 (27.6%)21 (28%)21 (27.3%)
Cardiovascular disease34 (22.4%)14 (18.7%)20 (26%)
Cerebrovascular disease8 (5.3%)5 (6.7%)3 (4%)
Chronic lung disease15 (9.9%)8 (10.7%)7 (9.1%)
Malignant disease9 (5.9%)7 (9.3%)2 (2.6%)
Autoimmune disease37 (24.3%)19 (25.3%)18 (23.4%)
Number of comorbidities
No comorbidities28 (18.4%)15 (20%)13 (16.9%)
158 (38.2%)29 (38.7%)29 (37.7%)
244 (28.9%)20 (26.7%)24 (31.1%)
≥322 (14.5%)11 (14.7%)11 (14.3%)
Data are presented as numbers (percentages) or median (interquartile range); PaO2/FiO2, ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen; WHO, World health organization.
Table
Table 2. Outcomes of intervention and control group.
Table 2. Outcomes of intervention and control group.
Intervention Group Control Groupp Value
Number of days on respirator10 (6–15)8 (6–15)0.283
Number of days in ICU13 (9–20)12 (8–20)0.515
Number of days in hospital19 (14–25.8)18 (12–25)0.757
WHO clinical progression scale on admission8 (8–9)8 (8–9)0.736
WHO clinical progression scale on day 285 (0–10)5 (0–10)0.705
Survival at day 14 (%)66 (89)64 (86.5)0.606
Survival at day 28 (%)52 (75.4)50 (71.4)0.561
Survival at day 60 (%)45 (73.8)38 (59.4)0.131
Number of bacterial superinfections (n %)56 (74.6)55 (71.4)0.789
Data are presented as median (interquartile range) and numbers (percentage); ICU, intensive care unit; WHO, World Health Organization.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Domazet Bugarin, J.; Dosenovic, S.; Ilic, D.; Delic, N.; Saric, I.; Ugrina, I.; Stojanovic Stipic, S.; Duplancic, B.; Saric, L. Vitamin D Supplementation and Clinical Outcomes in Severe COVID-19 Patients—Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051234

AMA Style

Domazet Bugarin J, Dosenovic S, Ilic D, Delic N, Saric I, Ugrina I, Stojanovic Stipic S, Duplancic B, Saric L. Vitamin D Supplementation and Clinical Outcomes in Severe COVID-19 Patients—Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2023; 15(5):1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051234

Chicago/Turabian Style

Domazet Bugarin, Josipa, Svjetlana Dosenovic, Darko Ilic, Nikola Delic, Ivana Saric, Ivo Ugrina, Sanda Stojanovic Stipic, Bozidar Duplancic, and Lenko Saric. 2023. "Vitamin D Supplementation and Clinical Outcomes in Severe COVID-19 Patients—Randomized Controlled Trial" Nutrients 15, no. 5: 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15051234

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop