Crisis Communication by the Indonesian Government in Handling Covid-19
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the crisis communication strategy of DKI Jakarta and the Banten Provincial Government in handling Covid-19 through the @dkijakarta and @pemprov.banten Instagram accounts. According to SCCT, there are two functions of crisis communication, namely to ensure public safety and manage the reputation of the organization. This research was conducted using a qualitative content analysis method, where the researcher examined the content of the Instagram accounts @dkijakarta and @pemprov.banten in the period of June 2021. The results showed that DKI Jakarta and the Banten Regional Government used their Instagram accounts to disseminate instructions on handling Covid-19 and at the same time to publish their performance in overcoming the crisis. However, more posts contained performance details than instructions. Hence, the West Java Regional Government prioritized the image of their institution, rather than managing the public’s safety. In addition, the researchers found that in providing instructive messages, @dkijakarta and @pemprov.banten used a persuasive strategy, which combined logical and emotional aspects to create behavior changes.
Keywords: crisis communication, government communication, social media
References
[1] Department of Global Communications. UN tackling infodemic misinformation and cybercrime Covid-19. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/uncoronaviruscommunications- team/un-tackling-’infodemic’-misinformation-andcybercrime- covid-19. February 2020
[2] Public Information Disclosure Act no. 14 of 2008. Testimony of the Minister of Law and Human Rights. Putra: IGN; 2008.
[3] Kim S, Avery EJ, Lariscy RW. Reputation repair at the expense of providing instructing and adjusting information following crises. International Journal of Strategic Communication. 2011;5(3):183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2011.566903
[4] Coombs WT. Situational theory of crisis: Situational crisis communication theory and corporate reputation. 2013.
[5] Wahyuni H. Local government policies and public communications handling RCCE: Risk communication and community. DIY local government policy & public communication on COVID-19 handling. Yogyakarta. 2020.
[6] Barry TE, Howard DJ. A review and critique of the hierarchy of effects in advertising. International Journal of Advertising. 1990;9(2):121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.1990.11107138
[7] Venus A. Campaign management: A theoretical and practical guide to effective public communications campaigns. Rekatama Symbiosis; 2019.
[8] Association of Indonesian Internet Service Providers & Indonesian Polls. Penetration survey report and profile of Indonesian internet user actors. Jakarta. 2019.
[9] Maulida RA. Tabsyir Journal of Islamic Broadcasting Communication, At-Tabsyir IAIN Kudus. 2020;7(1):1–20. https://doi.org/: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/at-tabsyir.v7i1.7455
[10] Liu BF, Austin L, Jin Y. How publics respond to crisis communication strategies: The interplay of information form and source. Public Relations Review. 2011;37(4):345– 353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.004
[11] Guidry JPD, Jin Y, Orr CA, Messner M, Meganck S. Ebola on Instagram and Twitter: How health organizations address the health crisis in their social media engagement. Public Relations Review. 2017;43(3):477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.009
[12] Dahono Y. Data: This is the most popular social media in Indonesia 2020-2021. Beritasatu; 2021. Available from: https://www.beritasatu.com/digital/733355/datainimedia- social-most-popular-di-indonesia-20202021. Februari 2021
[13] Sloan L, Quan-Haase A, Kitchin R, Beninger K. Social media research methods. University of Aberdeen ; Aberdeen. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526413642
[14] Hovland CI, Janis IL, Kelley HH. Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press; United States.1953 .