Abstract
Supporting Institution
yok
Project Number
yok
References
- Luckhaupt H, Brusis T. History of intubation. Laryngologie, Rhinologie, Otologie 1986; 65: 506-10.
- Wang HE, Yealy DM. How many attempts are required to accomplish out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation? Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13: 372-7.
- Asai T, Marfin AG. Ease of insertion of the laryngeal tube during manual-in-line neck stabilisation. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 1163-6.
- Lim M, Celaschi DA. Rapid sequence intubation: how do we define success? Can J Anaesth 2004; 51: 858.
- Pant S, Deshmukh A, Murugiah K, et al. Clinical investigations assessing the credibility of the ‘“ YouTube approach ”’ to health ınformation on acute myocardial ınfarction. Clinical Cardiology 2012; 285: 281-5.
- Yuksel B, Cakmak K. Healthcare information on YouTube : Pregnancy and COVID - 19. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 150: 189-93.
- Li HO, Bailey A, Huynh D, Chan J. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5: e002604.
- Ramirez MG, Rojas Travesedo RG, Martinez AA. YouTube and coronavirus : analysis of video consumption on the COVID-19 pandemic YouTube y coronavirus : análisis del consumo de vídeos sobre la. Rev Lat Comun Soc 2020; 78: 121-53.
- Ataç Ö, Özalp YC, Kurnaz R, Güler OM, İnamlık M, Hayran O. Youtube as an Information Source During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: Evaluation of the Turkish and English Content. Cureus 2020; 12: e10795.
- Yüksel EM, İzdeş S. Safe intubation, sedation and neuromuscular block in COVID-19. In: Yamanel HL (Ed). Critical Care and COVID-19. 1st edition. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri 2020; 21-6.
- Lemire M, Sicotte C, Paré G. Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health. Health Policy 2008; 88: 130-40.
- Duggan LV, Mastoras G, Bryson GL. Tracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19. CMAJ 2020; 192: E607.
- Matava CT, Kovatsis PG, Summers JL, et al. Pediatric airway management in covıd-19 patients - consensus guidelines from the society for pediatric anesthesia’s pediatric difficult ıntubation collaborative and the Canadian Pediatric Anesthesia Society. Anesth Analg 2020; 13: 10.
- Brewster DJ, Chrimes N, Do TB, et al. Consensus statement: Safe Airway Society principles of airway management and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID-19 adult patient group. Med J Aust 2020; 212: 472-81.
- Ocak U. Evaluation of the content, quality, reliability and accuracy of YouTube videos regarding endotracheal intubation techniques. Niger J Clin Pract 2018; 21: 1651-5.
- Akça AH, Şaşmaz Mİ. YouTube for Rapid Sequence Intubation Learning , Is It Reliable ? Van Tıp Derg 2018; 25: 207-12.
- Sorensen JA, Pusz MD, Brietzke SE. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology YouTube as an information source for pediatric adenotonsillectomy and ear tube surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78: 65-70.
- Strychowsky JE, Nayan S, Farrokhyar F, Maclean J. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology YouTube : A good source of information on pediatric tonsillectomy ? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 77: 972-5.
Evaluation of YouTube videos related to intubation in the pandemic process in terms of quality and content in Turkish and English
Abstract
Aim:YouTube videos, which are used as sources of information, can also be an essential resource in intubation training. For this reason, we aimed to investigate the content, adequacy, and reliability of the training videos on intubation in our searches in Turkish and English.
Material and Method: This study was carried out between8 May to 9 May 2021by searching Youtube in Turkish and English with 'entubation' and 'intubation.' Forty four videos that met the inclusion criteria were included. Intubation indication, explanation of complications, number of views, number of likes, video power index (likes ratio*view rate/100) were recorded in the video content. Ten items were scored over ten total points after the subject content was evaluated.
Results:Although the number of views, the number of likes, and the power index values were higher in English videos, the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). No significant difference was found between Turkish and English videos in the quality evaluation (p>0.05). Although it was seen that the approach to the patient diagnosed with Covid-19 (30.4% vs. 9.5%) and the pediatric approach (8.7% vs. 0.0%) were mentioned at higher rates in the English videos, no significant difference was detected (p>0.05).
Conclusions:Video sharing on endotracheal intubation in Turkish and English has similar features. Educational videos are shared in Turkish, especially by academic institutions.
Keywords
Project Number
yok
References
- Luckhaupt H, Brusis T. History of intubation. Laryngologie, Rhinologie, Otologie 1986; 65: 506-10.
- Wang HE, Yealy DM. How many attempts are required to accomplish out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation? Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13: 372-7.
- Asai T, Marfin AG. Ease of insertion of the laryngeal tube during manual-in-line neck stabilisation. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 1163-6.
- Lim M, Celaschi DA. Rapid sequence intubation: how do we define success? Can J Anaesth 2004; 51: 858.
- Pant S, Deshmukh A, Murugiah K, et al. Clinical investigations assessing the credibility of the ‘“ YouTube approach ”’ to health ınformation on acute myocardial ınfarction. Clinical Cardiology 2012; 285: 281-5.
- Yuksel B, Cakmak K. Healthcare information on YouTube : Pregnancy and COVID - 19. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 150: 189-93.
- Li HO, Bailey A, Huynh D, Chan J. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation? BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5: e002604.
- Ramirez MG, Rojas Travesedo RG, Martinez AA. YouTube and coronavirus : analysis of video consumption on the COVID-19 pandemic YouTube y coronavirus : análisis del consumo de vídeos sobre la. Rev Lat Comun Soc 2020; 78: 121-53.
- Ataç Ö, Özalp YC, Kurnaz R, Güler OM, İnamlık M, Hayran O. Youtube as an Information Source During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: Evaluation of the Turkish and English Content. Cureus 2020; 12: e10795.
- Yüksel EM, İzdeş S. Safe intubation, sedation and neuromuscular block in COVID-19. In: Yamanel HL (Ed). Critical Care and COVID-19. 1st edition. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri 2020; 21-6.
- Lemire M, Sicotte C, Paré G. Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health. Health Policy 2008; 88: 130-40.
- Duggan LV, Mastoras G, Bryson GL. Tracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19. CMAJ 2020; 192: E607.
- Matava CT, Kovatsis PG, Summers JL, et al. Pediatric airway management in covıd-19 patients - consensus guidelines from the society for pediatric anesthesia’s pediatric difficult ıntubation collaborative and the Canadian Pediatric Anesthesia Society. Anesth Analg 2020; 13: 10.
- Brewster DJ, Chrimes N, Do TB, et al. Consensus statement: Safe Airway Society principles of airway management and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID-19 adult patient group. Med J Aust 2020; 212: 472-81.
- Ocak U. Evaluation of the content, quality, reliability and accuracy of YouTube videos regarding endotracheal intubation techniques. Niger J Clin Pract 2018; 21: 1651-5.
- Akça AH, Şaşmaz Mİ. YouTube for Rapid Sequence Intubation Learning , Is It Reliable ? Van Tıp Derg 2018; 25: 207-12.
- Sorensen JA, Pusz MD, Brietzke SE. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology YouTube as an information source for pediatric adenotonsillectomy and ear tube surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78: 65-70.
- Strychowsky JE, Nayan S, Farrokhyar F, Maclean J. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology YouTube : A good source of information on pediatric tonsillectomy ? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 77: 972-5.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Project Number | yok |
| Publication Date | July 14, 2021 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2021 Volume: 3 Issue: 3 |
Cited By
Evaluation of the quality and the content of YouTube videos in Turkish on protection from coronavirus
Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1021618
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
|
|
|
|
The platforms of the journal's are;
|
|
|
|
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"