Telepractice as a Reaction to the COVID-19 Crisis: Insights from Croatian SLP Settings

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2020.6325

Keywords:

Client selection, COVID-19, Direct therapy, SLP satisfaction, Telepractice

Abstract

Telepractice facilitates services in exceptional settings and situations. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is certainly such a situation. Due to pandemic-related restrictions, speech-language pathologists (SLPs) needed to adopt new approaches to their professional functioning. The aim of the paper is to examine SLP professionals’ perceptions and application of telepractice in SLP settings in Croatia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Two hundred and fifty-five SLPs completed an online survey. The results demonstrated that most SLPs had provided direct online therapy, mainly those employed in health care and private practice. The chief reasons for clients’ refusal of therapy delivered via telepractice included the lack of equipment, insufficient independence, and doubts on the effectiveness of telepractice. Although only 3% of SLPs had acquired some formal knowledge of telepractice before the pandemic, over 70% expressed satisfaction with telepractice because it allowed them to provide undisturbed clinical services in an exceptional situation.

  

Author Biographies

Jelena Kuvac Kraljevic, University of Zagreb

Department of Speech and Language Pathology

Ana Matic, University of Zagreb

Department of Speech and Language Pathology

References

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2019). Telepractice: Overview. https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Telepractice/

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2020). COVID-19: Tracking of state laws and regulations for telepractice and licensure policy. https://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/State-Telepractice-Policy-COVID-Tracking.pdf

Boyle, J. M. (2007). A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of direct versus indirect and individual versus group modes of speech and language therapy for children with primary language impairment. Health technology assessment, 11(25), 1-139.

Cason, J., & Cohn, E. R. (2014). Telepractice: An overview and best practices. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac23.1.4

Cohn, E. R. (2012). Tele-ethics in telepractice for communication disorders. Perspectives on Telepractice, 2, 3-15. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/full/10.1044/tele2.1.3

Comité Permanent de Liaison des Orthophonistes-logopèdes de l’ue, CPLOL [Standing liaison Committee of EU Speech and language therapists and Logopedists] (2020). Speech-language therapy practice during COVID-19 emergency crisis. https://www.cplol.eu/documents/official-documents/1269-cplol-covid-19-statement/file.html

Comité Permanent de Liaison des Orthophonistes-logopèdes de l’ue, CPLOL [Standing liaison Committee of EU Speech and language therapists and Logopedists] (2020). COVID-19 Survey summary report. https://www.cplol.eu/documents/reports/1272-covid-19-survey-summary-report/file.html

Corp, I. B. M. (2015). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Croatian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Digital economy and society statistics - households and individuals [Online]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Digital_economy_and_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals/hr

Finch, E., Lethlean, J., Rose, T., Fleming, J., Theodoros, D., Cameron, A., Coleman, A., Copland, D., & McPhail, S. M. (2020). Conversations between people with aphasia and speech pathology students via telepractice: A Phase II feasibility study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 55(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12501

Hall, N., Boisvert, M., & Steele, R. (2013). Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with aphasia: A systematic review. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 5(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2013.6119

Ivšac Pavliša, J., Ljubešić, M., & Jerečić, I. (2012). The use of AAC with young children in Croatia-from the speech and language pathologist's view. In: G. Ježić, Y. J. Chen-Burger, R. J. Howlett, L. C. Jain, LJ. Vlačić, & R. Šperka (Eds.), Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technology and Applications' Proceedings of the 6th International Conference (pp. 221-230). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

Ivšac Pavliša, J., Peretić, M., Bohaček, A. M., & Talian, K. (2016). IKT u vrtiću – od istraživanja do primjene. [ICT in kindergarten - from research to application]. Dijete, vrtić, obitelj: časopis za odgoj i naobrazbu predškolske djece namijenjen stručnjacima i roditeljima, 80/81, 16-20.

Kuvač Kraljević, J., Pavičić Dokoza, K., & Matić, A., (2019). Croatian National Vignette. In J. Law, C. McKean, C. A. Murphy, & E. Thordardottir, E. (Eds.), Managing children with developmental language disorder: Theory and practice across Europe and beyond (1st Edition, pp. 169-178). Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group.

Law, J., Dennis, J. A., & Charlton, J. J. V. (2017). Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and/or language disorders (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1. CD012490. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012490

Law, J., Levicks, P., Rodriguez Ortiz, I., Matić, A., Lyons, R., Messarra, C., Hreich, K. E., & Stankova, M. (2019). Working with the parents and families of children with developmental language disorders: An international perspective. Journal of Communication Disorders, 82, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.15922

Matić, A., Kuvač Kraljević, J., Kologranić Belić, L., & Olujić Tomazin, M. (2018). Group-based direct and indirect approaches to language therapy for children with developmental language disorder: A pre-experimental study. Clinical Psychology 11(1-2), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.21465/2018-KP-1-2-0002

McGill, M., Noureal, N., & Siegel, J. (2019). Telepractice treatment of stuttering: A systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health, 25(5), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0319

Molini-Avejonas, D., Rondon-Melo, S., de La Higuera Amato, C. A., & Samelli, A. G. (2015). A systematic review of the use of telehealth in speech, language and hearing sciences. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 21(7), 367-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X15583215

Parsons, D., Cordier, R., Vaz, S., & Lee, H. C. (2017). Parent-mediated intervention training delivered remotely for children with autism spectrum disorder living outside of urban areas: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(8), e198. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6651

Plantak Vukovac, D. (2016). Employing educational video in speech-language telerehabilitation with children: Insight from interviews with parents. Proceedings of EDULEARN16 Conference, 5435-5444.

Plantak Vukovac, D., Novosel-Herceg, T., & Orehovački, T. (2015). Users’ needs in telehealth speech-language pathology services. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems Development. Harbin, Hong Kong, SAR: Department of Information, Systems, 1-12.

Powell, R. K. (2018). Unique contributors to the curriculum: From research to practice for speech-language pathologists in schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 140-147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0059

Weidner, K., & Lowman, J. (2020). Telepractice for adult speech-language pathology services: A systematic review. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(1), 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_PERSP-19-00146

World Health Organization (2016). Global Health Observatory (GHO) data - Telehealth: Analysis of third global survey on ehealth based on the reported data by countries. https://www.who.int/gho/goe/telehealth/en/

Published

2020-12-08

How to Cite

Kuvac Kraljevic, J., Matic, A., & Pavicic Dokoza, K. (2020). Telepractice as a Reaction to the COVID-19 Crisis: Insights from Croatian SLP Settings. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 12(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2020.6325

Issue

Section

Clinical Practice - COVID 19