Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities
Vol. 1 (2021): Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference On Intelectuals Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2020)
Articles

Alcohol and Khamr on Fiqh Using Science Experiment Videos in Schools Affected by COVID-19

PDF
  • Rafika Dwi Rahmah MZ,
  • Suyadi,
  • Zahrul Mufrodi
Rafika Dwi Rahmah MZ
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Suyadi
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Zahrul Mufrodi
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v1i.60
Published January 30, 2021
Keywords
  • Online Teaching And Learning,
  • COVID-19,
  • Fiqh,
  • Alcohol And Khamr,
  • Islamic Educcation
How to Cite
Rahmah MZ, R. D., Suyadi, & Mufrodi, Z. (2021). Alcohol and Khamr on Fiqh Using Science Experiment Videos in Schools Affected by COVID-19. Procedia of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 284-299. https://doi.org/10.21070/pssh.v1i.60

Copyright (c) 2021 Rafika Dwi Rahmah MZ, Suyadi, Zahrul Mufrodi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Covid-19 has paralyzed Islamic and Natural Science Education in Indonesia. The impact of online learning is not optimal, teachers have difficulty explaining the material or practice making it more difficult for students to understand the material. The purpose of this study was to improve the students' understanding of grade 8 PGRI 6 Denpasar Junior High School on fiqh regarding alcohol and khamr with online learning. The media used is a science experiment video which will have implications for changing the way students perceive the use of alcohol and khamr. This study uses the Nonequivalent Control Group Design method with a comparison between the science experiment class and the control class using the traditional method. The results of the validation of experimental experts, 91.34% fiqh material with perfect criteria. Pretest in the experimental class percentage of 70% sufficient criteria from the experimental class and the control class get a presentation of 72.4% sufficient criteria. Posttest in the experimental class with a percentage of 87.4% good criteria while in the control class presentation 75%.Based on the results of the validation and pretest-posttest comparisons between classes, the experimental method is good for learning fiqh in Islamic education.

PDF

References

  1. B. Jati and G. R. A. Putra, “Optimalisasi Upaya Pemerintah dalam Mengatasi Pandemi COVID-19 sebagai Bentuk Pemenuhan Hak Warga Negara,” J. Sos. Budaya Syar-i, vol. 7, no. 10, 2020.
  2. Suyadi, Z. Nuryana, N. Alma, and F. Fauzi, “The fiqh of disaster : The mitigation of Covid-19 in the perspective of Islamic,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 51, pp. 1–9, 2020.
  3. M. Salehudin, “Dampak COVID-19: Guru Mengadopsi Media Sosial sebagai E- Learning pada Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh,” Mudarrisuna, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2, 2020.
  4. Human Development Report, “Inequalities in Human Development in the 21st Century,” New York, 2019.
  5. P. N. J. M. Sinambela, “Kurikulum 2013 dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran,” 2013, p. 17.
  6. Suyadi, Sumaryati, D. Hastuti, and A. D. Saputro, “Early childhood education teachers ’ perception of the integration of anti-corruption education into islamic religious education in Bawean Island Indonesia,” Ilkogr. Online - Elem. Educ. Online, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1703–1714, 2020.
  7. N. Kosim, “Pengembangan Dan Aplikasi Pembelajaran Pai Di Sd,” Qathrunâ, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–142, 2015.
  8. Suyadi, “Hybridization of Islamic Education and Neuroscience: Transdisciplinary Studies of ’Aql in the Quran and the Brain in Neuroscience,” Din. Ilmu, vol. 19, no. 2,pp. 1–20, 2019.
  9. K. Setemen, “Pengembangan evaluasi pembelajaran online,” J. Pendidik. dan Pengajaran, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 207–214, 2010.
  10. S. S. Cohen et al., “Neural engagement with online educational videos predicts learning performance for individual students,” Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., vol. 155, pp. 60–64, 2018.
  11. M. Ahsan and Sumiyati, Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2017.
  12. A. Mahmud, “Kajian Hadis tentang Halal, Haram, dan Syubhat,” J. Adab., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 124–142, 2018.
  13. S. K. Umah, Sudarmin, and R. N. Dewi, “Pengembangan Petunjuk Praktikum IPA Terpadu Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Tema Makanan dan Kesehatan,” Sci. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 2014, 2014.
  14. trianto, Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif, 4th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
  15. W. Listiawati, Gunawan, and Sutrio, “Pengaruh model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Simulasi Interaktif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas VIII SMP N 1 Pujut Tahun Peajaran 2013/2014,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 82–86, 2015.
  16. D. Rahmawati, S. E. Nugroho, and N. M. D. Putra, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT Berbasis Eksperimen untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMP,” vol. 3, no. 1, p. 44, 2014.
  17. R. Astuti, W. Sunarno, and S. Sudarisman, “Pembelajaran IPA dengan Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Menggunakan Metode Eksperimen Bebas Termodifikasi dan Eksperimen Terbimbing Ditinjau dari Sikap Ilmiah dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–59, 2012.
  18. R. Wahyuni and M. Taufik, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Metode Eksperimen terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 2 Mataram Tahun Pelajaran 2016 / 2017,” vol. II, no. 4, 2017.
  19. P. Brickman, G. Gormally, N. Armstrong, and B. Hallar, “Effects of Inquiry-baed Learning on Students Science Literacy Skill and Confidence.,” Int. J. Sch. Teach. Learn., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–22, 2011.
  20. Henlenti, Syamsurizal, and R. Asyhar, “Pengembangan Media Praktikum Laboratorium Virtual untuk Pembelajaran Optika Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Tungkal Ulu,” Edu-Sains, vol. 3, no. 2, 2014.
  21. Jaka, A. Permanasari, and A. Fitriani, “Penerapan Project Based Learning Terintegrasi STEM untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Ditinjau dari Gender,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 202–212, 2016.
  22. V. S. Justitia and Z. A. . Supardi, “Penerapa Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri pada Materi Elastisitas untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Kedamean Greasik,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 4, no. 33, pp. 71–76, 2015.
  23. Nurqomariah, Gunawan, and Sutrio, “PENGARUH MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DENGAN METODE EKSPERIMEN TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA FISIKA SISWA KELAS VII,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 173–178, 2015.
  24. I. Chicken and G. Sequencing, “Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution,” vol. 432, no. December, 2004.
  25. F. Application, P. Data, and Y. Konis, “( 12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No .: US 2007 / 0224143 A1,” 2007.
  26. T. Nurbiyati and A. Widyatama, “Sosialisasi Bahaya Minuman Beralkohol Bagi Remaja,” vol. 3, no. 3, p. 189, 2014.
  27. P. M. Yulian, Suratno, and I. N. Aisyah, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuirri Terbimbing dengan Menggunakan Metode eksperimen terhadap Aktiitas dan Hasil Belajaran IPA-Biologi Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Maesan Bondowoso,” J. Pancar., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 163–172, 2015.
  28. E. P. Widoyoko, Teknik Penyusunan Instrument Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.
  29. S. Fatimah and Y. Mufti, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran IPA-Fisika Smartphone Berbasis Android Sebagian Penguat,” J. Kaunia, vol. X, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 2014.
  30. L. K. Maula and A. Yuniastuti, “Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penyalahgunaan dan Adiksi Alkohol pada Remaja di Kabupaten Pati,” Public Heal. Perspect. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 168–174, 2017.
  31. R. D. R. MZ, “Alcohol and Khamr in Fiqh Based on Science Perspective,” IJISH (International J. Islam. Stud. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 121–125, 2019.
  32. M. U. Indonesia, “Standar Kehalalan Produk Kosmetika dan Penggunaannya,” 2013.
  33. M. Ali, “Konsep Makanan Halal dalam Tinjauan Syariah dan Tanggung Jawab Produk Atas Produsen Industri Halal,” AHKAMJurnal Ilmu Syariah, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 291– 306, 2016.
  34. M. A. Jamaludin, M. Mahyeddin, M. Salleh, and M. A. Ramli, “Penggunaan Alkohol Dalam Penghasilan Produk Minuman Dan Makanan Menurut Perspektif Fiqh,” pp. 978–967, 2015.
  35. J. F. Huidobro et al., “Enzymatic Determination of Primary Normal Alcohols as Apparent Ethanol Content in Honey,” J. Agric. Food Chem, vol. 42, pp. 1975–1978, 1994.
  36. M. A. Jamaludin, M. A. Ramli, and D. Mat, “Isu Penggunaan Alkohol Dalam Penghasilan Produk Gunaan Semasa : Analisis dari Perspektif Hukum Islam,” Islam. Law Contemp. Community Conf., no. January, pp. 1–12, 2011.
  37. H. Hasanah, A. Jannah, and A. G. Fasya, “Pengaruh Lama Fermentasi Terhadap Kadar Alkohol Tape Singkong (Manihot utilissima),” Alchemy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 68– 79, 2012.
  38. R. Dwi, R. Mz, and Z. Mufrodi, “Development of Learning Materials on Fiqh of Alcohol and Khamr in Islamic and Science Perspective,” Int. J. Sci. Soc., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 363–374, 2020.
  39. A. Shoufan, “Estimating the cognitive value of YouTube’s educational videos: A learning analytics approach,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 92, pp. 450–458, 2018.
  40. N. Stathakarou, F. Mueller, and S. Nifakos, “Videos as learning objects in MOOCs : A study of specialist and non-specialist participants ’ video activity in MOOCs,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 00, no. 00, 2018.
  41. M. Merkt, S. Weigand, A. Heier, and S. Schwan, “Learning with videos vs . learning with print : The role of interactive features,” Learn. Instr., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 687–704, 2011.
  42. B. Jati and G. R. A. Putra, “Optimalisasi Upaya Pemerintah dalam Mengatasi Pandemi COVID-19 sebagai Bentuk Pemenuhan Hak Warga Negara,” J. Sos. Budaya Syar-i, vol. 7, no. 10, 2020.
  43. Suyadi, Z. Nuryana, N. Alma, and F. Fauzi, “The fiqh of disaster : The mitigation of Covid-19 in the perspective of Islamic,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 51, pp. 1–9, 2020.
  44. M. Salehudin, “Dampak COVID-19: Guru Mengadopsi Media Sosial sebagai E- Learning pada Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh,” Mudarrisuna, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2, 2020.
  45. Human Development Report, “Inequalities in Human Development in the 21st Century,” New York, 2019.
  46. P. N. J. M. Sinambela, “Kurikulum 2013 dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran,” 2013, p. 17.
  47. Suyadi, Sumaryati, D. Hastuti, and A. D. Saputro, “Early childhood education teachers ’ perception of the integration of anti-corruption education into islamic religious education in Bawean Island Indonesia,” Ilkogr. Online - Elem. Educ. Online, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1703–1714, 2020.
  48. N. Kosim, “Pengembangan Dan Aplikasi Pembelajaran Pai Di Sd,” Qathrunâ, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–142, 2015.
  49. Suyadi, “Hybridization of Islamic Education and Neuroscience: Transdisciplinary Studies of ’Aql in the Quran and the Brain in Neuroscience,” Din. Ilmu, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2019.
  50. K. Setemen, “Pengembangan evaluasi pembelajaran online,” J. Pendidik. dan Pengajaran, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 207–214, 2010.
  51. S. S. Cohen et al., “Neural engagement with online educational videos predicts learning performance for individual students,” Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., vol. 155, pp. 60–64, 2018.
  52. M. Ahsan and Sumiyati, Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2017.
  53. A. Mahmud, “Kajian Hadis tentang Halal, Haram, dan Syubhat,” J. Adab., vol. 17, no.2, pp. 124–142, 2018.
  54. S. K. Umah, Sudarmin, and R. N. Dewi, “Pengembangan Petunjuk Praktikum IPA Terpadu Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Tema Makanan dan Kesehatan,” Sci. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 2014, 2014.
  55. trianto, Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif, 4th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
  56. W. Listiawati, Gunawan, and Sutrio, “Pengaruh model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Simulasi Interaktif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas VIII SMP N 1 Pujut Tahun Peajaran 2013/2014,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 82–86, 2015.
  57. D. Rahmawati, S. E. Nugroho, and N. M. D. Putra, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT Berbasis Eksperimen untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMP,” vol. 3, no. 1, p. 44, 2014.
  58. R. Astuti, W. Sunarno, and S. Sudarisman, “Pembelajaran IPA dengan Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Menggunakan Metode Eksperimen Bebas Termodifikasi dan Eksperimen Terbimbing Ditinjau dari Sikap Ilmiah dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–59, 2012.
  59. R. Wahyuni and M. Taufik, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Metode Eksperimen terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 2 Mataram Tahun Pelajaran 2016 / 2017,” vol. II, no. 4, 2017.
  60. P. Brickman, G. Gormally, N. Armstrong, and B. Hallar, “Effects of Inquiry-baed Learning on Students Science Literacy Skill and Confidence.,” Int. J. Sch. Teach. Learn., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–22, 2011.
  61. Henlenti, Syamsurizal, and R. Asyhar, “Pengembangan Media Praktikum Laboratorium Virtual untuk Pembelajaran Optika Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Tungkal Ulu,” Edu-Sains, vol. 3, no. 2, 2014.
  62. Jaka, A. Permanasari, and A. Fitriani, “Penerapan Project Based Learning Terintegrasi STEM untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Ditinjau dari Gender,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 202–212, 2016.
  63. V. S. Justitia and Z. A. . Supardi, “Penerapa Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri pada Materi Elastisitas untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Kedamean Greasik,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 4, no. 33, pp. 71–76, 2015.
  64. Nurqomariah, Gunawan, and Sutrio, “PENGARUH MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DENGAN METODE EKSPERIMEN TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA FISIKA SISWA KELAS VII,” J. Pendidik. Fis. dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 173–178, 2015.
  65. I. Chicken and G. Sequencing, “Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution,” vol. 432, no. December, 2004.
  66. F. Application, P. Data, and Y. Konis, “( 12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No .: US 2007 / 0224143 A1,” 2007.
  68. T. Nurbiyati and A. Widyatama, “Sosialisasi Bahaya Minuman Beralkohol Bagi Remaja,” vol. 3, no. 3, p. 189, 2014.
  69. P. M. Yulian, Suratno, and I. N. Aisyah, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuirri Terbimbing dengan Menggunakan Metode eksperimen terhadap Aktiitas dan Hasil Belajaran IPA-Biologi Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Maesan Bondowoso,” J. Pancar., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 163–172, 2015.
  70. E. P. Widoyoko, Teknik Penyusunan Instrument Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.
  71. S. Fatimah and Y. Mufti, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran IPA-Fisika Smartphone Berbasis Android Sebagian Penguat,” J. Kaunia, vol. X, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 2014.
  72. L. K. Maula and A. Yuniastuti, “Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penyalahgunaan dan Adiksi Alkohol pada Remaja di Kabupaten Pati,” Public Heal. Perspect. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 168–174, 2017.
  73. R. D. R. MZ, “Alcohol and Khamr in Fiqh Based on Science Perspective,” IJISH (International J. Islam. Stud. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 121–125, 2019.
  74. M. U. Indonesia, “Standar Kehalalan Produk Kosmetika dan Penggunaannya,” 2013.
  75. M. Ali, “Konsep Makanan Halal dalam Tinjauan Syariah dan Tanggung Jawab Produk Atas Produsen Industri Halal,” AHKAMJurnal Ilmu Syariah, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 291– 306, 2016.
  76. M. A. Jamaludin, M. Mahyeddin, M. Salleh, and M. A. Ramli, “Penggunaan Alkohol Dalam Penghasilan Produk Minuman Dan Makanan Menurut Perspektif Fiqh,” pp. 978–967, 2015.
  77. J. F. Huidobro et al., “Enzymatic Determination of Primary Normal Alcohols as Apparent Ethanol Content in Honey,” J. Agric. Food Chem, vol. 42, pp. 1975–1978, 1994.
  78. M. A. Jamaludin, M. A. Ramli, and D. Mat, “Isu Penggunaan Alkohol Dalam Penghasilan Produk Gunaan Semasa : Analisis dari Perspektif Hukum Islam,” Islam. Law Contemp. Community Conf., no. January, pp. 1–12, 2011.
  79. H. Hasanah, A. Jannah, and A. G. Fasya, “Pengaruh Lama Fermentasi Terhadap Kadar Alkohol Tape Singkong (Manihot utilissima),” Alchemy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 68– 79, 2012.
  80. R. Dwi, R. Mz, and Z. Mufrodi, “Development of Learning Materials on Fiqh of Alcohol and Khamr in Islamic and Science Perspective,” Int. J. Sci. Soc., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 363–374, 2020.
  81. A. Shoufan, “Estimating the cognitive value of YouTube’s educational videos: A learning analytics approach,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 92, pp. 450–458, 2018.
  82. N. Stathakarou, F. Mueller, and S. Nifakos, “Videos as learning objects in MOOCs : A study of specialist and non-specialist participants ’ video activity in MOOCs,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 00, no. 00, 2018.
  83. M. Merkt, S. Weigand, A. Heier, and S. Schwan, “Learning with videos vs . learning with print : The role of interactive features,” Learn. Instr., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 687–704, 2011.