Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T08:47:21.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distress and burnout among psychiatrists during the COVID-19 pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

N. Bassetti*
Affiliation:
Department Of Brain And Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
S. Parente
Affiliation:
Department Of Brain And Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
P. Topa
Affiliation:
Department Of Brain And Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
N. Brondino
Affiliation:
Department Of Brain And Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
S. Damiani
Affiliation:
Department Of Brain And Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
P. Politi
Affiliation:
Department Of Brain And Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
M. Olivola
Affiliation:
Department Of Brain And Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. The WHO on March 11, 2020, has declared the novel coronavirus outbreak a global pandemic. Several studies found an association between the COVID-19 pandemic and psychiatric symptoms, such as distress, anxiety, fear of infection, depression and insomnia in the general population. Therefore, psychiatrists have been professionally overloaded, trying to manage the psychosocial impact of the pandemic and suffering its effects in person.

Objectives

To evaluate the disease perceptions, distress and burnout among psychiatrists from the Department of Mental Health and Addictions of Pavia in three different times, which correspond to the three main phases of the pandemic management in Italy: T0 is the first peak of the infections and the lock-down, from March to June; T1 is the reduction of the infections and the reopening, from June to October; T2 is the second wave of infections with a new progressive closure, the current one.

Methods

We used three questionnaires: the BIPQ (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire), the PSS-10 (Perceived Stress Scale-10), the PED (Profile of emotional distress). We also used a survey (6 items) in T0, T1 and T2 to evaluate exposure, perception, quality of life and burnout.

Results

table 1,2,3. BIPQ: no one was exposed.

Conclusions

The increase of individual, who seeking help for mental health, impact on the perception of stress and on the emotional distress, even though psychiatrists have an adequate perception of COVID-19.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.