Review of hydric optimization in the Covid-19 era

Authors

  • Cruz García Lirios Department Social Work, Autonomous Mexico State University, Toluca, Mexico
  • Alejandra Navarrete Quezada Department Social Work, Autonomous Mexico State University, Toluca, Mexico
  • Margarita Juárez Nájera Department Social Work, Autonomous Mexico State University, Toluca, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31580/ojst.v4i4.2115

Keywords:

Behavior, Vulnerability, Insertion, Environmental Education

Abstract

Environmental education programs, assuming an intensive training of skills as the axis of solution in the face of scarce resources, have focused on the optimization of public services. In this sense, the objective of this work has been to observe the effects of an informative workshop in which the prevention and repair of leaks was promoted, as well as saving water through dosing and reuse. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 100 intact subjects selected intentionally. The results show significant differences before and after the informative workshop. This is the case of the indicator of pluvial catchment that in a beginning was considered the reflective indicator of the factor, but that after the workshop it reduced its value. In contrast, the maintenance of hydraulic facilities revealed a domestic awareness of heritage conservation, although the segmentation of the information workshop is recommended to corroborate latent relationships between water optimization and heritage conservation.

References

Pradhan BK. Environmental education: The tool for sustainable development. Global Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 2014;3(10):124-35.

Milana, M., Rasmussen, P. & Holford, J. (2014). Public policy and sustainability of adult education. Encyclopaidea. 2014; 18(40): 3-13

Maragakis A, van den Dobbelsteen A, Maragakis A. Stakeholders Perceptions of a Universal Sustainability Assessment in Higher Education--A Review of Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Higher Education. 2016;5(4):247-54.

Mónus F, Lechner C. An innovative way in education for sustainable development: e-School4s–e-school for sustainability in the Danube region. Journal of Applied Technical and Educational Sciences. 2017 Nov 3;7(4):89-96.

Little DL. Defining sustainability in meaningful ways for educators. Journal of Sustainability Education. 2014 Dec 1;7:1-8.

Noga J, Wolbring G. The economic and social benefits and the barriers of providing people with disabilities accessible clean water and sanitation. Sustainability. 2012 Nov;4(11):3023-41. DOI: 10.3390 / su4113023

Sandoval, FR, Bustos, JM & García, C. Exploratory testing of a local water sustainability governance model. People and Technology Management. 2018; 31: 72-87

García, C. Specification of a model with sources from 1987 to 2017 for the study of water co-responsibility in a town in central Mexico. Dialogues on Law and Politics. 2018; 19(8): 19-38

Quintero, ML, García, C., Rivera, BL, Sandoval, FR, Figueroa, O. & Molina, HD. Consciousness model for sustainability. Academic Integration in Psychology. 2018; 6(16): 4-19

García, C. Interpretation of speeches around the subsidy of the water supply service for the understanding of tariff narratives. Social Sciences. 2018b; 4(2): 25-40

Downloads

Published

2022-04-22