Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2023; 40(13): 1484-1494
DOI: 10.1055/a-1877-7951
Original Article

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prenatal Care Utilization at a Public Hospital

Shae M. Boguslawski
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Naima T. Joseph
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Kaitlyn K. Stanhope 
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Angeline J. Ti
3   Department of Family Medicine, Wellstar Atlanta Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Franklyn H. Geary
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Sheree L. Boulet 
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
› Author Affiliations Funding This project was supported by grants from the Emory Medical Care Foundation and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award number UL1TR002378. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Funding for some of the blood pressure cuffs used for patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic was provided through an Immediate Needs Community Health Grant from the Georgia Health Family Alliance.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study is to compare rates of prenatal care utilization before and after implementation of a telehealth-supplemented prenatal care model due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Study Design Using electronic medical record data, we identified two cohorts of pregnant persons that initiated prenatal care prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic following the implementation of telehealth (from March 1, 2019 through August 31, 2019, and from March 1, 2020, through August 31, 2020, respectively) at Grady Memorial Hospital. We used Pearson's Chi-square and two-tailed t-tests to compare rates of prenatal care utilization, antenatal screening and immunizations, emergency department and obstetric triage visits, and pregnancy complications for the prepandemic versus pandemic-exposed cohorts.

Results We identified 1,758 pregnant patients; 965 entered prenatal care prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and 793 entered during the pandemic. Patients in the pandemic-exposed cohort were more likely to initiate prenatal care in the first trimester (46.1 vs. 39.0%, p = 0.01), be screened for gestational diabetes (74.4 vs. 67.0%, p <0.001), and receive dating and anatomy ultrasounds (17.8 vs. 13.0%, p = 0.006 and 56.9 vs. 47.3%, p <0.001, respectively) compared with patients in the prepandemic cohort. There was no difference in mean number of prenatal care visits between the two groups (6.9 vs. 7.1, p = 0.18). Approximately 41% of patients in the pandemic-exposed cohort had one or more telehealth visits. The proportion of patients with one or more emergency department visits was higher in the pandemic-exposed cohort than the prepandemic cohort (32.8 vs. 12.3%, p < 0.001). Increases in rates of labor induction were also observed among the pandemic-exposed cohort (47.1 vs. 38.2%, p <0.001).

Conclusion Rates of prenatal care utilization were similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, pregnant persons receiving prenatal care during the pandemic entered care earlier and had higher utilization of certain antenatal screening services than those receiving prenatal care prior to the pandemic.

Key Points

  • Patients initiated prenatal care earlier during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Uptake of telehealth services was low.

  • Rates of diabetes screening and ultrasound use increased during the pandemic.

Keywords

COVID-19 - prenatal care - telehealth - antenatal screening

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 20 January 2022

Accepted: 03 June 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 June 2022

Article published online:
16 September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Patel SY, Mehrotra A, Huskamp HA, Uscher-Pines L, Ganguli I, Barnett ML. variation in telemedicine use and outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic in The United States. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021; 40 (02) 349-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dotters-Katz SK, Hughes BL. Considerations for obstetric care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (08) 773-779
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mehrotra A, Chernew M, Linetsky D, Hatch H, Cutler D. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Outpatient Visits: A Rebound Emerges. The Commonwealth Fund. 2020. . Accessed July 7, 2022 at: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/2020/apr/impact-covid-19-outpatient-visits
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Mehrotra A, Ray K, Brockmeyer DM, Barnett ML, Bender JA. Rapidly Converting to “Virtual Practices”: Outpatient Care in the Era of Covid-19. NEJM Catalyst Non Issue Content. 2020 . Accessed July 7, 2022 at: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0091
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rasmussen SA, Smulian JC, Lednicky JA, Wen TS, Jamieson DJ. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pregnancy: what obstetricians need to know. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222 (05) 415-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Joseph NT, Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ. The effects of COVID-19 on pregnancy and implications for reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril 2021; 115 (04) 824-830
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Duryea EL, Adhikari EH, Ambia A, Spong C, McIntire D, Nelson DB. Comparison between in-person and audio-only virtual prenatal visits and perinatal outcomes. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (04) e215854
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Duzyj CM, Thornburg LL, Han CS. Practice modification for pandemics: a model for surge planning in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (02) 237-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Aziz A, Zork N, Aubey JJ. et al. Telehealth for High-Risk Pregnancies in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (08) 800-808
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Veinot TC, Mitchell H, Ancker JS. Good intentions are not enough: how informatics interventions can worsen inequality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (08) 1080-1088
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rodriguez JA, Saadi A, Schwamm LH, Bates DW, Samal L. Disparities in telehealth use among California patients with limited English proficiency. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021; 40 (03) 487-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gadson A, Akpovi E, Mehta PK. Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome. Semin Perinatol 2017; 41 (05) 308-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Madden N, Emeruwa UN, Friedman AM. et al. Telehealth uptake into prenatal care and provider attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (10) 1005-1014
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 8th ed.. In: Kilpatrick S, Papile L. eds. . Accessed August 20, 2022 at: https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/physician-faqs/-/media/3a22e153b67446a6b31fb051e469187c.ashx
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Kotelchuck M. An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. Am J Public Health 1994; 84 (09) 1414-1420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jones J, Sullivan PS, Sanchez TH. et al. Similarities and differences in COVID-19 awareness, concern, and symptoms by race and ethnicity in the United States: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (07) e20001
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Krogstad JM, Gonzalez-Barrera A, Lopez MH. Hispanics More Likely than Americans Overall to See Coronavirus as a Major Threat to Health And Finances. Pew Research Center. 2020. . Accessed July 7, 2022 at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/03/24/hispanics-more-likely-than-americans-overall-to-see-coronavirus-as-a-major-threat-to-health-and-finances/
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Rodriguez JA, Betancourt JR, Sequist TD, Ganguli I. Differences in the use of telephone and video telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Manag Care 2021; 27 (01) 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lott A, Sacks H, Hutzler L, Campbell KA, Lajam CM. Telemedicine utilization by orthopedic patients during COVID-19 pandemic: demographic and socioeconomic analysis. Telemed J E Health 2021; 27 (10) 1117-1122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Eberly LA, Kallan MJ, Julien HM. et al. Patient characteristics associated with telemedicine access for primary and specialty ambulatory care during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (12) e2031640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gould E, Perez D, Wilson V. Latinx Workers—Particularly Women—Face Devastating Job Losses in the COVID-19 Recession. Economic Policy Institute. 2020. . Accessed July 7, 2022 at: https://www.epi.org/publication/latinx-workers-covid/
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Klein A, Smith E. Explaining the Economic Impact of COVID-19: Core Industries and the Hispanic Workforce. Brookings. 2021. . Accessed July 7, 2022 at: https://www.brookings.edu/research/explaining-the-economic-impact-of-covid-19-core-industries-and-the-hispanic-workforce/
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Dhongde S. Multidimensional economic deprivation during the coronavirus pandemic: early evidence from the United States. PLoS One 2020; 15 (12) e0244130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Macias Gil R, Marcelin JR, Zuniga-Blanco B, Marquez C, Mathew T, Piggott DA. COVID-19 pandemic: disparate health impact on the Hispanic/Latinx population in the United States. J Infect Dis 2020; 222 (10) 1592-1595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Georgia Medicaid. Citizenship and Residency FAQs. . Accessed July 7, 2022 at: https://medicaid.georgia.gov
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Adjemian J, Hartnett KP, Kite-Powell A. et al. Update: COVID-19 pandemic-associated changes in emergency department visits—United States, December 2020-January 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70 (15) 552-556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Tomfohr-Madsen LM, Racine N, Giesbrecht GF, Lebel C, Madigan S. Depression and anxiety in pregnancy during COVID-19: a rapid review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res 2021; 300: 113912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Harkness M, Yuill C, Cheyne H, Stock SJ, McCourt C. CHOICE Study Consortia. Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21 (01) 310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Holand BL, de Oliveira Agostini C, Pacheco MCM, de Leon DMZ, Drehmer M, Bosa VL. Association between breastfeeding and complementary feeding in prepandemic and pandemic COVID-19 times: Maternar cohort study. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2022; S0021-7557 (22)00004-3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Naurin E, Markstedt E, Stolle D. et al. Pregnant under the pressure of a pandemic: a large-scale longitudinal survey before and during the COVID-19 outbreak. Eur J Public Health 2021; 31 (01) 7-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Driscoll AK, Gregory ECW. Increases in prepregnancy obesity: United States, 2016–2019. NCHS Data Brief 2020; (392) 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Mortazavi F, Mehrabadi M, KiaeeTabar R. Pregnant women's well-being and worry during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21 (01) 59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Stanhope KK, Piper K, Goedken P. et al. Quality and satisfaction with care following changes to the structure of obstetric care during the COVID-19 pandemic in a safety-net hospital in Georgia: results from a mixed-methods study. J Nat Med Assoc 2022; 114: 94-103
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lieneck C, Weaver E, Maryon T. Outpatient telehealth implementation in the United States during the COVID-19 global pandemic: a systematic review. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021; 57 (05) 462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kumar D, Hemmige V, Kallen MA, Giordano TP, Arya M. Mobile phones may not bridge the digital divide: a look at mobile phone literacy in an underserved patient population. Cureus 2019; 11 (02) e4104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 DeNicola N, Grossman D, Marko K. et al. Telehealth interventions to improve obstetric and gynecologic health outcomes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135 (02) 371-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Shachar C, Engel J, Elwyn G. Implications for telehealth in a postpandemic future: regulatory and privacy issues. JAMA 2020; 323 (23) 2375-2376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Peahl AF, Novara A, Heisler M, Dalton VK, Moniz MH, Smith RD. Patient preferences for prenatal and postpartum care delivery: a survey of postpartum women. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135 (05) 1038-1046
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Thomas NA, Drewry A, Racine Passmore S, Assad N, Hoppe KK. Patient perceptions, opinions and satisfaction of telehealth with remote blood pressure monitoring postpartum. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21 (01) 153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Jeganathan S, Prasannan L, Blitz MJ, Vohra N, Rochelson B, Meirowitz N. Adherence and acceptability of telehealth appointments for high-risk obstetrical patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 2 (04) 100233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Holcomb D, Faucher MA, Bouzid J, Quint-Bouzid M, Nelson DB, Duryea E. Patient perspectives on audio-only virtual prenatal visits amidst the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (02) 317-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Theiler RN, Butler-Tobah Y, Hathcock MA, Famuyide A. OB Nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21 (01) 71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zhang X, Hailu B, Tabor DC. et al. Role of health information technology in addressing health disparities: patient, clinician, and system perspectives. Med Care 2019; 57 (suppl 6 2): S115-S120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Chunara R, Zhao Y, Chen J. et al. Telemedicine and healthcare disparities: a cohort study in a large healthcare system in New York City during COVID-19. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (01) 33-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 “Ensuring the Growth of Telehealth During COVID-19 Does Not Exacerbate Disparities In Care. Health Affairs Blog. 2020 . Accessed July 7, 2022 at: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/forefront.20200505.591306/full/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Labgold K, Stanhope KK, Joseph NT, Platner M, Jamieson DJ, Boulet SL. Validation of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: ICD-10 codes in a high-burden Southeastern United States Hospital. Epidemiology 2021; 32 (04) 591-597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Stanhope KK, Joseph NT, Platner M. et al. Validation of ICD-10 codes for gestational and pregestational diabetes during pregnancy in a large, public hospital. Epidemiology 2021; 32 (02) 277-281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar