Curating pandemic contingencies: Remote collaboration and display reconfiguration in practice | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art
  4. Volume 8, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 8, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN: 2051-7041
  • E-ISSN: 2051-705X

Abstract

Amid the restrictions on travelling and gathering imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic, exhibitions with international collaborations in Hong Kong experimented with curating across borders and time. This article examines recent curatorial practices in Hong Kong’s art institutions, particularly relating to site-specific installations and performances that had to cope with the artist’s physical absence and institutional restrictions. Two site-specific art commissions – Shirley Tse’s (2020), installed at the M+ Pavilion, and Eisa Jocson’s (2020), performed at Tai Kwun Contemporary – serve as cases in point illustrating how curatorial practices enabled remote collaboration and display reconfiguration to address authorial absence and institutional interventions during the installation and exhibition phases due to the pandemic. The former case study decentralized the authorial control of artistic criticality from the artist to a collective curation and installation process, while the latter evolved in accordance with protean institutional and social contexts by actively changing the display during the exhibition. Despite the pandemic-imposed separation and restrictions, these two case studies shed light on how curators collaborated with artists and participants across distance and time, actively and flexibly forging responsive and relevant connections between site-specific artworks and the immediate present. Their curatorial practices – as artistic mediation – complicated the conceptual framework of artworks and exhibitions through co-curation and co-production with artists, thus lending a collaborative dimension to the model of exhibition-making and the role of the curator as the ‘curator-as-artist’.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00049_1
2021-11-01
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acord, Sophia Krzys. ( 2010;), ‘ Beyond the head: The practical work of curating contemporary art. ’, Qualitative Sociology, 33:4, pp. 447–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bishop, Claire. ( 2005), Installation Art: A Critical History, London:: Tate;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bishop, Claire. ( 2018;), ‘ Black box, white cube, gray zone: Dance exhibitions and audience attention. ’, TDR: The Drama Review, 62:2, pp. 22–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bresnahan, Aili. ( 2015;), ‘ Improvisation in the arts. ’, Philosophy Compass, 10:9, pp. 573–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chow, Olivia. ( 2020;), online interview with M. Lai. , 27 November.
  6. Cook, Sarah. ( 2003;), ‘ Towards a theory of the practice of curating new media art. ’, in M. Townsend. (ed.), Beyond the Box: Diverging Curatorial Practices, Banff:: Banff Centre Press;, pp. 169–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Crimp, Douglas. ( 1993), On the Museum’s Ruins, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Foucault, Michel. ( 1978), The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction (trans. R. Hurley.), New York:: Pantheon Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Foucault, Michel. ( 1995), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (trans. A. Sheridan.), New York:: Vintage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Kwon, Miwon. ( 2002), One Place after Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, Christina. ( 2020;), ‘ Stakes and holders: Negotiations in situ. ’, in Stake and Holder, exhibition catalogue, M+, Hong Kong, 1 July–1 November.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, Christina. ( 2021;), e-mail to author. , 24 March.
  13. Obrist, Hans Ulrich. ( 2001;), ‘ Battery, Kraftwerk, and laboratory (Alexander Dorner revisited). ’, in C. Kuoni. (ed.), Words of Wisdom: A Curator’s Vade Mecum on Contemporary Art, New York:: Independent Curators International;, pp. 127–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Obrist, Hans Ulrich. ( 2004), Do It, New York:: E-flux and Revolver;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Obrist, Hans Ulrich. ( 2014), Ways of Curating, New York:: Faber and Faber;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. O’Doherty, Brian. ( 1976;), ‘ Inside the white cube: The ideology of the gallery space, part I. ’, Artforum, 14:7, pp. 24–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. O’Neill, Paul. ( 2007;), ‘ The curatorial turn: From practice to discourse. ’, in J. Rugg, and M. Sedgwick. (eds), Issues in Curating Contemporary Art and Performance, Bristol:: Intellect Books;, pp. 13–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. O’Neill, Paul. ( [2009] 2010;), ‘ Beyond group practice. ’, Manifesta Journal: Journal of Contemporary Curatorship, 8, pp. 37–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. O’Neill, Paul. ( 2012), The Culture of Curating and the Curating of Culture, London:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Richter, Dorothee. ( 2013;), ‘ Artists and curators as authors: Competitors, collaborators, or team workers?. ’, Oncurating.org, 19, pp. 43–57, https://on-curating.org/files/oc/dateiverwaltung/issue-19/Print_to_download/ONCURATING_Issue19_A4.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Schlieben, Katharina. ( [2009] 2010;), ‘ The crux of polyphonic language, or the thing as gathering. ’, Manifesta Journal: Journal of Contemporary Curatorship, 8, pp. 16–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith, Terry. ( 2012), Thinking Contemporary Curating, New York:: Independent Curators International;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Tan, Xue. ( 2020a;), ‘ Eisa Jocson explodes the frame. ’, Ocula, 29 September, https://ocula.com/magazine/conversations/eisa-jocson. Accessed 2 March 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Tan, Xue. ( 2020b;), in-person interview with M. Lai. , 3 December.
  25. Tse, Shirley. ( 2021;), online interview with M. Lai. , 12 February.
  26. Watkins, Jonathan. ( 1987;), ‘ The curator as artist. ’, Art Monthly, 111, pp. 27–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lai, Mankit. ( 2021;), ‘ Curating pandemic contingencies: Remote collaboration and display reconfiguration in practice. ’, Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art, 8:2&3, pp. 313–37, https://doi.org/10.1386/jcca_00049_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00049_1
Loading
Curating pandemic contingencies: Remote collaboration and display reconfiguration in practice
Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art 8, 313 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/jcca_00049_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00049_1
/content/journals/10.1386/jcca_00049_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): contemporary curating; COVID-19; curatorial practice in the pandemic; display reconfiguration; M+; remote collaboration; site-specific art; Tai Kwun contemporary

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error