Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Nov 11, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 4, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 5, 2021

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Surveillance of the Second Wave of COVID-19 in Europe: Longitudinal Trend Analyses

Post L, Culler K, Moss CB, Murphy RL, Achenbach CJ, Ison MG, Resnick D, Singh LN, White J, Boctor MJ, Welch SB, Oehmke JF

Surveillance of the Second Wave of COVID-19 in Europe: Longitudinal Trend Analyses

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(4):e25695

DOI: 10.2196/25695

PMID: 33818391

PMCID: 8080962

European SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance: Longitudinal Trend Analyses of Wave Two

  • Lori Post; 
  • Kasen Culler; 
  • Charles B Moss; 
  • Robert L Murphy; 
  • Chad J Achenbach; 
  • Michael G Ison; 
  • Danielle Resnick; 
  • Lauren Nadya Singh; 
  • Janine White; 
  • Michael J Boctor; 
  • Sarah B Welch; 
  • James Francis Oehmke

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 global pandemic has severely impacted Western Europe, resulting in a high caseload and deaths that varied by country in Spring 2020. The varying severity of the pandemic is explained by differences in prevention efforts in the form of public health policy, adherence to those guidelines, as well as socio-cultural, climate, and population characteristics. The second wave of the COVID-19 currently is breaching the borders of Europe. Public health surveillance is necessary to inform policy and guide leaders, however, existing surveillance explains past transmissions obscuring shifts in the pandemic, increases in infection rates, and the persistence in the transmission of COVID-19.

Objective:

The goal of this study is to provide advanced surveillance metrics for COVID-19 transmission that account for shifts in the pandemic, week over week, speed, acceleration, jerk and persistence, to better understand country risk for explosive growth and those who are managing the pandemic successfully. Existing surveillance coupled with our dynamic metrics of transmission will inform health policy to control the COVID-19 pandemic until an effective vaccine is developed and provides novel metrics to measure the transmission of disease.

Methods:

Using a longitudinal trend analysis study design, we extracted 47-50 days of COVID data from public health registries. We use an empirical difference equation to measure the daily number of cases in Europe as a function of the prior number of cases, the level of testing, and weekly shift variables based on a dynamic panel model that was estimated using the generalized method of moments (GMM) approach by implementing the Arellano-Bond estimator in R.

Results:

The countries with the largest COVID caseloads and infection rates also had positive acceleration and jerk as well as large 7-day persistence rates. The combination of large populations with an increase in COVID caseload with increases in rates are indicative of large outbreaks. The UK, Spain and Belgium had the highest number of observed cases during the first two weeks of October at 11,993, 9,530, and 4,236 during October 1-7th. During October 8-14th their infection rate increased for Belgium at 102.2, Czech Republic at 78.03, Netherlands at 42.51, UK at 25.78, Spain at 25.43, and Iceland at 23.80. Speed mirrored infection rates in that speed increased between Oct 1 and Oct 14 in Belgium from 29.90 to 60.96, Czech Republic from 29.70 to 53.19, and the Netherlands from 22.60 to 36.12 over two weeks. These increases are consistent with a second wave. Belgium, Czech Republic, and the Netherlands had the largest acceleration during the week of 10/8-10/14, with increases to 7.53, 5.18, and 2.35. Belgium and the Czech Republic had positive jerk during weeks one and two meaning week over week, the acceleration rate was increasing.

Conclusions:

These dynamic data suggest that the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic has breached European borders. Belgium, Czech Republic, and the Netherlands, in particular, are at risk for a rapid expansion in the transmission of COVID-19. An examination of the European region suggests that there was an increase in caseload of COVID-19 between October 1 and October 14. Moreover, the rates of jerk which were negative for Europe at the beginning of the month, reversed course and became positive, along with increases of speed and increases of acceleration. Finally, the 7-day persistence rate during the second week was larger than the first week. In combination, these indicators suggest the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic occurred between weeks 1 and 2 of October. Clinical Trial: NA


 Citation

Please cite as:

Post L, Culler K, Moss CB, Murphy RL, Achenbach CJ, Ison MG, Resnick D, Singh LN, White J, Boctor MJ, Welch SB, Oehmke JF

Surveillance of the Second Wave of COVID-19 in Europe: Longitudinal Trend Analyses

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7(4):e25695

DOI: 10.2196/25695

PMID: 33818391

PMCID: 8080962

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement