To read this content please select one of the options below:

Impact of the confirmation bias on returns, expectations and hedging of optimistic and pessimistic traders before and during COVID-19 pandemic

Yousra Trichilli (Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia)
Sahbi Gaadane (Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia)
Mouna Boujelbène Abbes (Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia)
Afif Masmoudi (Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia)

EuroMed Journal of Business

ISSN: 1450-2194

Article publication date: 22 July 2022

322

Abstract

Purpose

In this paper, the authors investigate the impact of the confirmation bias on returns, expectations and hedging of optimistic and pessimistic traders in the cryptocurrencies, commodities and stock markets before and during COVID-19 periods.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors investigate the impact of the confirmation bias on the estimated returns and the expectations of optimistic and pessimistic traders by employing the financial stochastic model with confirmation bias. Indeed, the authors compute the optimal portfolio weights, the optimal hedge ratios and the hedging effectiveness.

Findings

The authors find that without confirmation bias, during the two sub periods, the expectations of optimistic and pessimistic trader’s seem to convergence toward zero. However, when confirmation bias is particularly strong, the average distance between these two expectations are farer. The authors further show that, with and without confirmation bias, the optimal weights (the optimal hedge ratios) are found to be lower (higher) for all pairs of financial market during the COVID-19 period as compared to the pre-COVID-19 period. The authors also document that the stronger the confirmation bias is, the lower the optimal weight and the higher the optimal hedge ratio. Moreover, results reveal that the values of the optimal hedge ratio for optimistic and pessimistic traders affected or not by the confirmation bias are higher during the COVID-19 period compared to the estimates for the pre-COVID period and inversely for the optimal hedge ratios and the hedging effectiveness index. Indeed, either for optimists or pessimists, the presence of confirmation bias leads to higher optimal hedge ratio, higher optimal weights and higher hedging effectiveness index.

Practical implications

The findings of the study provided additional evidence for investors, portfolio managers and financial analysts to exploit confirmation bias to make an optimal portfolio allocation especially during COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 periods. Moreover, the findings of this study might be useful for investors as they help them to make successful investment decision in potential hedging strategies.

Originality/value

First, this is the first scientific work that conducts a stochastic analysis about the impact of emotional biases on the estimated returns and the expectations of optimists and pessimists in cryptocurrency and commodity markets. Second, the originality of this study stems from the fact that the authors make a comparative analysis of hedging behavior across different markets and different periods with and without the impact of confirmation bias. Third, this paper pays attention to the impact of confirmation bias on the expectations and hedging behavior in cryptocurrencies and commodities markets in extremely stressful periods such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords

Citation

Trichilli, Y., Gaadane, S., Boujelbène Abbes, M. and Masmoudi, A. (2022), "Impact of the confirmation bias on returns, expectations and hedging of optimistic and pessimistic traders before and during COVID-19 pandemic", EuroMed Journal of Business, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-03-2022-0046

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles