Skip to main content

ACEI/ARB therapy in COVID-19: the double-edged sword of ACE2 and SARS-CoV-2 viral docking

The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with severe infection from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been the subject of considerable debate. The question is whether these drugs are harmful or helpful in the therapeutic management of the disease.

ACEIs and ARBs act on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) by attenuating the hypertensive effects of angiotensin II (Fig. 1) [1,2,3,4]. One of the body’s natural angiotensin II attenuators is angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), an extracellular transmembrane enzyme that is responsible for breaking down angiotensin II into the angiotensin-(1-7) heptapeptide. Yet, ACE2 is the main receptor for binding and uptake of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) into the cell. Indeed, in vitro data support the concept that respiratory epithelium, which appears to be the main route of SARS-CoV-2 entry into the body, has multiple cell types with high ACE2 expression [1]. Viral binding leads to internalization and enzymatic degradation of ACE2, thereby promoting hypertensive effects by increasing angiotensin II levels [2]. ACEIs and ARBs are therapeutic because they block angiotensin II signaling, but their use is known to induce higher expression of ACE2 at the membrane, which could allow increased viral entry, especially into the lungs, heart, and kidneys [2]. The debate was fueled further by clinical data from Zhang et al. [4], who reported that all-cause mortality for patients with COVID-19 was lower among patients taking ACEIs/ARBs compared with patients not taking those drugs. Those findings prompted a statement from various medical societies advising physicians to continue to follow current guidelines for using these drugs in virus-positive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 [4].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Model for engagement of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The virus binds angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) 2 (ACE2), promoting internalization of the viral receptor. ACE2-dependent production of angiotensin-(1-7) is disrupted, and production of angiotensin II-(1-8) increases. Changes in angiotensin levels alter the target receptor activity in select tissues. Major organs for gene expression are represented with images, and sites for secondary expression are listed in parentheses. Underlining indicates that the data are from only cell-line analysis. AGT indicates angiotensinogen; AT1, angiotensin II type 1 receptor; AT2, angiotensin II type 2 receptor; CoV-2, coronavirus 2; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MAS, mitochondrial assembly; TMPRSS2, transmembrane serine protease 2. Expression data were sourced from the Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org); organ icons made by Vitaly Gorbachev, Smashicons, Prettycons, and Freepik from www.flaticon.com

It seems counterintuitive to use ARBs to upregulate ACE2 as a therapy, while SARS-CoV-2 downregulates ACE2 through viral docking and endocytosis of the ACE2–SARS-CoV-2 complex. However, in animal models, ARB-mediated ACE2 upregulation protects the lungs from coronavirus infection presumably by decreasing downstream ACE-produced angiotensin II and increasing the angiotensin-(1-7) heptapeptide, a potent vasodilator. Although a benefit from the drug is suggested, larger clinical studies of patients with COVID-19 are needed to determine whether the harm outweighs the benefits of administering ACEI/ARB therapy. In addition to these modulators of the RAAS, which can be prescribed or potentially repurposed, recombinant ACE2 enzyme may serve as a potential therapy by binding the virus in the blood [5]. Ultimately, the most successful approach will likely involve polytherapy that interferes with viral uptake and replication and mitigates host-factor comorbidities.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ACE2:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2

ACEI:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

ARB:

Angiotensin receptor blocker

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

RAAS:

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

References

  1. Sungnak W, Huang N, Becavin C, et al. SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat Med. 2020;26:681–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh AK, Gupta R, Misra A. Comorbidities in COVID-19: outcomes in hypertensive cohort and controversies with renin angiotensin system blockers. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14:283–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gurwitz D. Angiotensin receptor blockers as tentative SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics. Drug Dev Res. 2020:10.1002/ddr.21656. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21656. Online ahead of print.

  4. Zhang P, Zhu L, Cai J, et al. Association of Inpatient Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers With Mortality Among Patients With Hypertension Hospitalized With COVID-19. Circ Res. 2020;126(12):1671-81. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317134. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

  5. Hodgson J. The pandemic pipeline. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:523–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally in the generation of the idea, writing, editing, and completion of the paper. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William D. Freeman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onweni, C.L., Zhang, Y.S., Caulfield, T. et al. ACEI/ARB therapy in COVID-19: the double-edged sword of ACE2 and SARS-CoV-2 viral docking. Crit Care 24, 475 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03195-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03195-9

Keywords