Dear Editor,
We read with great interest the recent publication by Sparano et al. on the prognostic significance of fT3 in COVID-19 [1], in which consecutive hospitalized mild COVID patients had TSH, fT4 and fT3 evaluated on admission. Remarkably, abnormal thyroid function (defined as any abnormality in TSH, fT4 and fT3) occurred in 70%, and non-thyroidal illness syndrome (NTIS) in 57% of the cohort. In contrast, with a very similar study protocol, we previously reported lower rates of abnormal thyroid function at 16.9% and NTIS at 7.4% in our cohort with predominantly mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients in Hong Kong (75% mild) [2].
The apparent paradox demonstrated in Sparano’s study that mild patients showed a much higher rate of NTIS than the mild-to-moderate patients in our study could be possibly explained by the differences in clinical severity scoring systems adopted by the two studies. Sparano’s study included patients with mild severity defined by the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement, meaning hospitalized patients without oxygen requirement (category 3), and those requiring oxygen via mask/nasal prongs (category 4). Radiological manifestation of pneumonia is not a consideration in this classification. In contrast, patients in our study were classified according to the Chinese National Health Commission (NHC) guideline, which is similar to the one proposed by the National Institutes of Health, with higher resolution: mild—no manifestation of pneumonia; moderate—evidence of pneumonia but without desaturation; severe—desaturation requiring supplemental oxygen. Therefore, it will be interesting to know the proportion of patients having abnormal chest X-ray (from mild involvement onwards) or requiring oxygen on admission in Sparano’s study, so that the two cohorts can be compared, using the same severity definition, and evaluate whether possible geographical variations or differences exist across the period of pandemic. Indeed, Sparano’s study may have included patients with a more severe disease spectrum (mean PO2/FiO2 at admission was < 300 mmHg—which would be classified as severe according to NHC guideline), thus associated with a higher rate of NTIS. On the other hand, it is important to note that the public health ordinance in Hong Kong required all patients who were tested positive for COVID-19 be admitted to the hospital, including those detected on contact tracing and Universal Community Testing Programme, regardless of symptoms [2]. Although our study evaluated hospitalized patients, our cohort is likely representative of the general population at large. Therefore, the results of ours and Sparano’s study might in fact complement each other, with our study demonstrating the prognostic role of NTIS in the COVID-19 patients in the community at large, while Sparano’s study further demonstrating the prognostic role of NTIS in non-intensive care hospitalized patients.
Putting all the existing studies together, NTIS has been shown to carry prognostic significance in COVID-19 across the whole spectrum of disease severity [3]. Looking ahead, it may be helpful to harmonize the severity classification criteria in future systematic reviews or meta-analyses of NTIS in COVID-19 for better understanding of thyroid dysfunction in COVID-19.
References
Sparano C, Zago E, Morettini A et al (2021) Euthyroid sick syndrome as an early surrogate marker of poor outcome in mild SARS-CoV-2 disease. J Endocrinol Invest. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-021-01714-1
Lui DTW, Lee CH, Chow WS et al (2021) Role of non-thyroidal illness syndrome in predicting adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients predominantly of mild-to-moderate severity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 95(3):469–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.14476
Llamas M, Garo ML, Giovanella L (2021) Low free-T3 serum levels and prognosis of COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 59(12):1906–1913. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0805
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
No informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lui, D.T.W., Lee, C.H. & Lam, K.S.L. Letter to the Editor: ‘Euthyroid sick syndrome as an early surrogate marker of poor outcome in mild SARS‑CoV‑2 disease’—prognostic significance of non-thyroidal illness syndrome across the whole spectrum of COVID-19 severity. J Endocrinol Invest 45, 901–902 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-021-01732-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-021-01732-z