Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jul 12, 2021
Date Accepted: Jan 17, 2022
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jan 24, 2022

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Psychometric Evaluation of a Fear of COVID-19 Scale in China: Cross-sectional Study

CHOI EP, Duan W, Fong DY, Lok KY, Ho M, Wong JY, Lin CC

Psychometric Evaluation of a Fear of COVID-19 Scale in China: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(3):e31992

DOI: 10.2196/31992

PMID: 35072632

PMCID: 8893716

Psychometric evaluation of a Fear of COVID-19 scale in China: Cross-sectional Study

  • Edmond PH CHOI; 
  • Wenjie Duan; 
  • Daniel YT Fong; 
  • Kris YW Lok; 
  • Mandy Ho; 
  • Janet YH Wong; 
  • Chia-Chin Lin

ABSTRACT

Background:

At the very beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, information about fear of COVID-19 was very limited in Chinese populations and there was no standardised and validated scale to measure the fear associated with the pandemic.

Objective:

This cross-sectional study aimed to adapt and validate a fear scale to determine the levels of fear of COVID-19 among the general population in mainland China and Hong Kong.

Methods:

An online questionnaire platform was developed for data collection; the study instruments were an adapted version of the eight-item Breast Cancer Fear Scale (‘the Fear Scale’) and the four-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4). The internal construct validity, concurrent validity, known-group validity, and reliability of the adapted Fear Scale were assessed, and descriptive statistics were used to summarise the participants’ fear levels.

Results:

A total of 2,822 study participants aged 18 or older were included in the analysis. The reliability of the adapted scale was satisfactory, with a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.93.The item-total correlations corrected for overlap were >0.4, confirming its internal construct validity. Regarding concurrent validity, a small to moderate correlation between the Fear Scale and the PHQ-4 scores was found. Regarding known-group validity, we found that study participants who were recruited from Hong Kong had a higher level of fear than the study participants from mainland China. Older adults had a higher level of fear than the younger adults. Study participants who were separated/divorced/widowed had a higher level of fear than those who were single or married. Furthermore, having hypertension, liver diseases, heart diseases, cancer, anxiety and insomnia were associated with a higher fear level. The descriptive analysis found that more than 40% of the study participants reported that the thought of COVID-19 scared them. About one-third of the study participants reported that when they thought about COVID-19, they felt nervous, uneasy and depressed.

Conclusions:

To conclude, the adapted Fear Scale is a valid and reliable scale for measuring the fear of COVID-19 among Chinese people. Our study stresses the need for more psychosocial support and care to help this population cope with their fears during the pandemic.


 Citation

Please cite as:

CHOI EP, Duan W, Fong DY, Lok KY, Ho M, Wong JY, Lin CC

Psychometric Evaluation of a Fear of COVID-19 Scale in China: Cross-sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2022;6(3):e31992

DOI: 10.2196/31992

PMID: 35072632

PMCID: 8893716

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement