Clinical and Demographic Risk Factors for COVID-19 during Delivery Hospitalizations in New York City

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study was aimed to review 4 weeks of universal novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) screening among delivery hospitalizations, at two hospitals in March and April 2020 in New York City, to compare outcomes between patients based on COVID-19 status and to determine whether demographic risk factors and symptoms predicted screening positive for COVID-19.

Study Design This retrospective cohort study evaluated all patients admitted for delivery from March 22 to April 18, 2020, at two New York City hospitals. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were collected. The relationship between COVID-19 and demographic, clinical, and maternal and neonatal outcome data was evaluated. Demographic data included the number of COVID-19 cases ascertained by ZIP code of residence. Adjusted logistic regression models were performed to determine predictability of demographic risk factors for COVID-19.

Results Of 454 women delivered, 79 (17%) had COVID-19. Of those, 27.9% (n = 22) had symptoms such as cough (13.9%), fever (10.1%), chest pain (5.1%), and myalgia (5.1%). While women with COVID-19 were more likely to live in the ZIP codes quartile with the most cases (47 vs. 41%) and less likely to live in the ZIP code quartile with the fewest cases (6 vs. 14%), these comparisons were not statistically significant (p = 0.18). Women with COVID-19 were less likely to have a vaginal delivery (55.2 vs. 51.9%, p = 0.04) and had a significantly longer postpartum length of stay with cesarean (2.00 vs. 2.67days, p < 0.01). COVID-19 was associated with higher risk for diagnoses of chorioamnionitis and pneumonia and fevers without a focal diagnosis. In adjusted analyses, including demographic factors, logistic regression demonstrated a c-statistic of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69, 0.80).

Conclusion COVID-19 symptoms were present in a minority of COVID-19-positive women admitted for delivery. Significant differences in obstetrical outcomes were found. While demographic risk factors demonstrated acceptable discrimination, risk prediction does not capture a significant portion of COVID-19-positive patients.

Key Points

• COVID-19 symptoms were present in a minority of COVID-19-positive women admitted.

• COVID-19 symptomatology did not appear to differ before or after the apex of infection in New York.

• Demographic risk factors are unlikely to capture a significant portion of COVID-19-positive patients.

Publication History

Received: 13 August 2020

Accepted: 02 March 2021

Article published online:
20 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 World Health Organization. Rolling updates on coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Accessed June 30, 2020 at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-as-they-happen
  Google Scholar
• 2 New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. COVID 19: data. Accessed November 5, 2020 at: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid-19-data.page
  Google Scholar
• 3 Breslin N, Baptiste C, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 infection among asymptomatic and symptomatic pregnant women: two weeks of confirmed presentations to an affiliated pair of New York City hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 2 (02) 100118
  Google Scholar
• 4 Miller ES, Grobman WA, Sakowicz A, Rosati J, Peaceman AM. Clinical implications of universal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (02) 232-234
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Vintzileos WS, Muscat J, Hoffmann E. et al. Screening all pregnant women admitted to labor and delivery for the virus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223 (02) 284-286
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Metz TD. Is universal testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) needed on all labor and delivery units?. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (02) 227-228
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. COVID-19: data. Accessed June 30, 2020 at: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid-19-data.page
  Google Scholar
• 8 New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Total count of COVID-19 cases based on patient address by ZIP code. Accessed June 1, 2020 at: https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/imm/covid-19-cases-by-zip-05132020-1.pdf
  Google Scholar
• 9 Patankar S, Burke WM, Hou JY. et al. Risk stratification and outcomes of women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 138 (01) 62-69
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Kullar R, Marcelin JR, Swartz TH. et al. Racial Disparity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in African American Communities. J Infect Dis 2020; 222 (06) 890-893
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Yancy CW. COVID-19 and African Americans. JAMA 2020; 323 (19) 1891-1892
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Ahmed F, Ahmed N, Pissarides C, Stiglitz J. Why inequality could spread COVID-19. Lancet Public Health 2020; 5 (05) e240
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Findings from investigation and analysis of re-positive cases. Accessed June 30, 2020 at: https://www.cdc.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a30402000000&bid=0030
  Google Scholar
• 14 Xiao AT, Tong YX, Zhang S. False negative of RT-PCR and prolonged nucleic acid conversion in COVID-19: Rather than recurrence. J Med Virol 2020; 92 (10) 1755-1756
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Emeruwa UN, Ona S, Shaman JL. et al. Associations between built environment, neighborhood socioeconomic status, and SARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant women in New York City. JAMA 2020; 324 (04) 390-392
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material