eISSN: 1731-2531
ISSN: 1642-5758
Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2022
vol. 54
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original article

Predicting the effectiveness of high-flow oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients: a single-centre observational study

Felicitas M. Schmidt
1
,
Lorenz Nowak
1
,
Florian Obereisenbuchler
2
,
Justin Hetrodt
2
,
Marion Heiß-Neumann
2
,
Anna Schönlebe
1
,
Katharina Heinig-Menhard
1
,
Wolfgang Gesierich
2
,
Jürgen Behr
2, 3, 4
,
Rudolf A. Hatz
5, 6
,
Julien Dinkel
5, 6, 7
,
Mircea-Gabriel Stoleriu
4, 5, 6

1.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Asklepios Lung Clinic Munich-Gauting, Gauting, Germany
2.
Department of Pneumology, Asklepios Lung Clinic Munich-Gauting, Gauting, Germany; member of the German Centre for Lung Research
3.
Department of Internal Medicine V, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany; member of the German Centre for Lung Research
4.
Comprehensive Pneumology Centre, Helmholtz Center Munich, Munich, Germany; member of the German Centre for Lung Research
5.
Center for Thoracic Surgery Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
6.
Asklepios Lung Clinic Munich-Gauting, Gauting, Germany
7.
Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich (LMU) Munich, Germany
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2022; 54, 1: 12–17
Online publish date: 2022/03/16
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Background
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is a helpful tool in the treatment of hypoxaemic respiratory failure. However, the clinical parameters predicting the effectiveness of HFNC in coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) patients remain unclear.

Methods
Sixteen COVID-19 patients undergoing HFNC in the Asklepios Lung Clinic Munich-Gauting, Germany between 16 March and 3 June 2020 were retrospectively included into the study. Seven patients successfully recovered after HFNC (Group 1), while 9 patients required intubation upon HFNC failure (Group 2). Relevant predictors for an effective HFNC therapy were analysed on day 0 and 4 after HFNC initiation via receiver operating characteristics.

Results
The groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities. Five patients died in Group 2 upon disease progression and HFNC failure. Group 1 required a lower oxygen supplementation (FiO2 0.46 [0.31–0.54] vs. 0.72 [0.54–0.76], P = 0.022) and displayed a higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio (115 [111–201] vs. 93.3 [67.2–145], P = 0.042) on day 0. In Group 2, fever persisted on day 4 (38.5 [38.0–39.4]°C vs. 36.5 [31.1–37.1]°C, P = 0.010). Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels > 108 mg L–1 (day 0) and persistent oxygen saturation < 89% and PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 91 (day 4) were identified as significant predictors for HFNC failure (area under curve 0.929, 0.933, and 0.893).

Conclusions
Elevated oxygen saturation, decreased FiO2 and reduced serum CRP on day 4 significantly predict HFNC effectiveness in COVID-19 patients. Based on these parameters, larger prospective studies are necessary to further investigate the effectiveness of HFNC in the treatment of COVID-19-associated hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

keywords:

COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, high-flow therapy, intensive care

Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.