Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome by COVID-19 in pregnant and postpartum women

Abstract

Objectives:

to evaluate the morbidity and mortality profile and factors associated with death due to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) by COVID-19 in pregnant and postpartum women.

Methods:

this is a quantitative and retrospective research that analyzed the SIVEP-gripe Database (Influenza Epidemiological Surveillance Information System), from 01/01/2020 to 04/01/2021. All pregnant women and postpartum women diagnosed with SARS caused by COVID-19 in the State of Minas Gerais were included. After the descriptive analysis of the hospitalizations profile, the association between different exposure variables and the occurrence of death was evaluated.

Results:

of the 227 records obtained, 94.3% required hospitalization. Among hospitalizations in the Intensive Care Unit, 29.8% used invasive ventilatory support. Fifteen deaths were recorded. The most frequent clinical manifestations were: cough and fever; the predominant comorbidities were cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. The variables “ICU stay”, “use of ventilatory support” and “heart disease” were associated with the occurrence of deaths.

Conclusions:

hospitalization was necessary for most pregnant women with SARS and the presence of previous heart disease increased the risk of death. Knowing the SARS morbidity and mortality profile is important in the definition of public health strategies aimed at reducing the impacts of COVID-19 during pregnancy and the puerperium.

Key words
COVID-19; Severe acute respiratory syndrome; Pregnancy; Postpartum period; Pregnancy infectious complications

Resumo

Objetivos:

avaliar o perfil de morbimortalidade e fatores associados ao óbito pela Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave (SRAG) por COVID-19 em gestantes e puérperas.

Métodos:

tratase de urna pesquisa quantitativa e retrospectiva que analisou o Banco de Dados SIVEP-gripe (Sistema de Informação de Vigilância Epidemiológica da Gripe), no período de 01/01/2020 a 04/01/2021. Foram incluídas todas as gestantes e puérperas com diagnóstico de SRAG causada por COVID-19 no Estado de Minas Gerais. Após a análise descritiva do perfil das internações, avaliou-se a associação entre diferentes variáveis de exposição e a ocurrência de óbito.

Resultados:

dos 227 registros obtidos, 94,3% necessitaram de hospitalização. Dentre as internações em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva, 29,8%fizeram uso de suporte ventilatório invasivo. Quinze óbitos foram registrados. As manifestações clínicas mais frequentes foram: tosse e febre; já as comorbidades predominantes foram doença cardiovascular e diabetes mellitus. As variáveis “internação em UTI”, “uso de suporte ventilatório” e “cardiopatia” apresentaram associação com ao corrência de óbitos.

Conclusão:

a hospitalização foi necessária para a maioria das gestantes com SRAG e a presença de cardiopatia prévia aumentou o risco de óbito. Conhecer o perfil de morbimortalidade por SRAG é importante na definição de estratégias de saúde pública que visem à redução dos impactos da COVID-19 na gestação e puerpério.

Palavras-chave
COVID-19; Síndrome respiratória aguda grave; Gravidez; Período pósparto; Complicações infecciosas na gravidez

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the Coronavirus of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has already affected 111 million victims in the world and was responsible for over 2.4 million deaths until February 24, 2021. Brazil is at the third rank in number of cases, with more than 10 million people with the disease, and at the second rank in number of deaths, with over 247 thousands.11. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard [database on the Internet]. World Health Organization. 2020. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
https://covid19.who.int/...
The inexistence of effective therapy aggravates the situation even more.

Among the already known risk groups, we highlight pregnant women, once the physiological alterations of the pregnancy increase the risk of infections. The physiological dyspnea caused by the increase of maternal metabolism, with a higher oxygen consumption, aggravated by gestational anemia, should be properly evaluated in order to not to be confused with pathological dyspnea. Other alterations may also contribute to a worse prognosis, such as altered lung volumes and decrease of immunity mediated by Th1 cells, due to the dominant environment of Th2 cells.22. Dashraath P, Wong JLJ, Lim MXK, Lim LM, Li S, Biswas A, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222(6):521-31. It is worth highlighting that, initially, only high-risk pregnant women were considered at risk group, however, after epidemiological analyses and considering the increase of maternal death ratio in developing countries, all pregnant women were included.33. Brasil. Manual de Recomendações para a Assistência à Gestante e Puérpera frente à Pandemia de Covid-19. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2020. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manual_de_recomendações_para_a_assistência_da_gestante_e_puerpera_frente_a_Pandemia_de_Covid-19_v.1.pdf.
http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoe...

In Brazil, there is no exclusive system for registering and monitoring cases of COVID-19 in pregnant and puerperal women. Nevertheless, there is a national data system, the Information System of Epidemiological Surveillance of Influenza (SIVEP-Gripe – Portuguese acronym), which includes cases of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), including those caused by SARS-CoV-2 and which contemplates this population. SRAS in pregnant and puerperal women is considered an aggravation of the clinical status of a patient with COVID-19 and is characterized as an influenza-like illness which meet the following criteria: (1) dyspnea or respiratory distress,; (2) persistent chest pressure; (3) O2 inferior to 95% in room air; (4) facial or lip cyanosis. It is also important to observe the presence of hypotension and oliguria.33. Brasil. Manual de Recomendações para a Assistência à Gestante e Puérpera frente à Pandemia de Covid-19. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2020. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manual_de_recomendações_para_a_assistência_da_gestante_e_puerpera_frente_a_Pandemia_de_Covid-19_v.1.pdf.
http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoe...

The follow-up of SRAS cases due to COVID-19, in puerperal and pregnant women is necessary once high lethality rates have been reported in these groups.44. Takemoto MLS, Menezes MO, Andreucci CB, Nakamura-Pereira M, Amorim MMR, Katz L, et al. The tragedy of COVID-19 in Brazil: 124 maternal deaths and counting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020. Therefore, this study evaluated the morbimortality profile and factors associated with death by SRAS in pregnant and puerperal women with COVID-19 in the state of Minas Gerais.

Methods

This is a quantitative and retrospective research, which analyzed the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome database from SIVEP-gripe, including data from COVID-19, provided by the Department of Computing of the Unified Health System (DATASUS), regarding the period from January 1, 2020 to January 4, 2021.55. SRAG 2020 - Banco de Dados de Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave - incluindo dados da COVID-19 [database on the Internet]. Ministério da Saúde. 2020 [cited 30 set 2020]. Available from: https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset/bd-srag-2020.
https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset...

Pregnant women in different gestational periods and puerperal women in Minas Gerais were included, with final diagnosis of SRAS caused by COVID-19. Variables were selected, related to sociodemographic factors (age, race/color and schooling), signs and symptoms (fever, cough, sore throat, dyspnea, respiratory distress, O2 saturation, diarrhea and vomit), presence of comorbidities (chronic cardiovascular disease, chronic hematological disease, asthma, diabetes mellitus, neurological disease, other chronic pneumopathy, immunodeficiency, chronic kidney disease and obesity), characteristics of hospitalization (hospitalization in intensive care unit, need for ventilatory support and clinical evolution) and in regard of radiography alterations (chest X-ray).

The spatial distribution of cases of SRAS by COVID-19 was presented by means of a choropleth map. The analysis of normality of quantitative variables was performed by the Shapiro-wilk test, and the comparison of medians of ages in relation to death, by means of Mann-Whitney test. Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as well as the relative risks and their confidence intervals were used for the analysis of association between the studied qualitative variables and the occurrence of death. Statistical analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS® software, with a common level of significance of 5%.

Once they are secondary data, of public, unrestricted access and without identification of participants, this study is exempted of evaluation by the Research Ethics Committee, according to the resolution CNS n° 510, April 7, 2016.66. Saúde Md. Resolução n° 510, de 07 de abril de 2016. Dispõe sobre as normas aplicáveis a pesquisas em Ciências Humanas e Sociais cujos procedimentos metodológicos envolvam a utilização de dados diretamente obtidos com os participantes ou de informações identificáveis ou que possam acarretar riscos maiores do que os existentes na vida cotidiana. Brasília2016).

Results

In Brazil, 10,421 SRAS cases were registered in pregnant and puerperal women, between January 1, 2020 to January 4, 2021, according to SIVEP-gripe, and 4,765 of these had COVID-19 diagnosis. Yet, in the same database, in Minas Gerais, there was a registry of 765 pregnant and puerperal women with SRAS and 227 of these had COVID-19 diagnosis, representing 30% of cases.

Thus, the registries of 210 pregnant women (92.4%) and 17 puerperal women (7.5%), with mean age of 32 ±9 years, with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome caused by COVID-19. Most of these declared themselves brown (53.1%) and completed high school (61.4%). In relation to gestational age. 45.8% (n=104) of patients with SARS caused by COVID-19 were in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy (Table 1). The criterion of diagnosis was laboratorial in 219 (96.5%) cases. For six patients, the information on the type of test that was performed was absent, however, these women had COVID-19 as final classification. The most frequent test was Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), executed in samples of 193 (88.1%) pregnant and puerperal women. One pregnant woman (0.46%) had epidemiological diagnosis criterion, and other one (0.46%) had her diagnosis performed by image

Table 1
Sociodemographic data of pregnant and puerperal women with SRAS caused by COVID-19, in the state of Minas Gerais, from January 1, 2020 to January 4, 2021, n=227.

The distribution of cases by epidemiological week is demonstrated in Figure 1, being week 28 the one with the highest number of notifications (n=17). The cities with more COVID-19 case registries in Minas Gerais were Belo Horizonte (26.9%) and Uberlândia (12.3%) and of deaths, Contagem (20.0%) and Poços de Caldas (20.0%). Deaths occurred in nine distinct municipalities (Figure 2).

Figure 1
Registries of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome caused by COVID-19 in the state of Minas Gerais, from January 1, 2020 to January 4, 2021, according to the epidemiological week, n=227.
Figure 2
Distribution of cases of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome caused by COVID-19 in pregnant and puerperal women, in the state of Minas Gerais, by city of occurrence, from January 1, 2020, to January 4, 2021, n=227.

In relation to clinical manifestations, there was predominance of fever, cough and dyspnea. The most frequent comorbidities were chronic cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and obesity, followed by asthma. The most frequent radiological alteration was interstitial infiltrate (Table 2). Of the total of patients, 94.3% (n=214) needed hospitalization, being 47 of these in Intensive Care Units (ICU). Invasive ventilatory support was used in 29.8% (n=14) of patients hospitalized in ICU and in nine patients that did not need intensive care, totaling 23 patients. Non-invasive ventilatory support was necessary in 66 pregnant and puerperal women (Table 2).

Table 2
Clinical data from pregnant and puerperal women with SRAS caused by COVID-19 in the state of Minas Gerais, between January 1, 2020 to January 4, 2021.

When evaluating the vaccine coverage against influenza, it was observed that only 63 women were immunized. In relation to the use of antiviral medication, it was observed that 47 received antiviral therapy, 44 (93.6%) with Osetalmivir and one (2.1%), Zanamivir.

Fifteen deaths (6.7%) of pregnant and puerperal women were registered. The variables “presence of comorbidities”, “hospitalization in ICU”, “use of ventilatory support” and “cardiopathy” had statistically significant association with the evolution to death (p<0.05) (Table 3). There was no significant differentiation between the medians of age of women that evolved or not to death. Given that between the assessed risk factors, only “cardiopathy” was significantly associated with the occurrence of deaths, multivariate analysis of data was not performed.

Table 3
Analysis of association of variables of patients with SRAS caused by COVID-19 in the state of Minas Gerais, between January 1, 2020 to January 4, 2021, n=227.

Discussion

The occurrence of SRAS by COVID-19 in pregnant and puerperal women from the state of Minas Gerais was more common in brown patients, aged from 20 to 34 years, at the 3rd trimester of pregnancy and with comorbidities. COVID-19 was responsible for the death of 6.4% of pregnant and puerperal women with SRAS and the risk of death was more associated with the presence of the comorbidity “cardiopathy”, as well as the use of ventilators and intensive care. However, only cardiopathy may be considered an increased risk factor for death, being the other associated variables considered as indicators of severity of the case.

In this study, characteristics of 227 pregnant and puerperal women with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome caused by COVID-19 were assessed in Minas Gerais. After the first registration, at epidemiological week 12, there was an increase of cases with peak at week 28 (n=17), although with a remarkable reduction and stabilization after week 36 (n=4), returning to an increase in weeks 49 (n=9) and 51 (n=10), with progressive reduction in the other weeks. Compared to data from hospitalizations by SRAS in the state, the peak period is accordant, once the period with more registries was between epidemiological weeks 27 and 30.7 These data confirm the findings in other viral outbreaks and endemics, in which the risk of viral pneumonia was significantly higher between pregnant women compared to the general population.88. Mertz D, Kim TH, Johnstone J, Lam PP, Science M, Kuster SP, et al. Populations at risk for severe or complicated influenza illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013; 347: f5061.,99. Mertz D, Geraci J, Winkup J, Gessner BD, Ortiz JR, Loeb M. Pregnancy as a risk factor for severe outcomes from influenza virus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Vaccine. 2017; 35(4): 521-8.

In relation to the distribution of cases per city, the two cities with the highest number of inhabitants of the state, Belo Horizonte and Uberlândia, were responsible for the registry of 39.2% of cases of SRAS by COVID-19 in pregnant and puerperal women. Betim and Contagem, two cities among five with the highest number of inhabitants in the state, and Muriaé were responsible for 13.2% of cases, with 10 registries each. However, Muriaé city is only at the 29th position in the rank of most populous cities in Minas Gerais.1010. Cidades@ [database on the Internet]. IBGE. 2020 [cited 22 out 2020]. Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/.
https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/...
In relation to deaths, Contagem and Poços de Caldas were responsible for 40% of cases, with three registries each, followed by Governador Valadares and Uberaba, with two registries each. It is worth highlighting that Poços de Caldas is only at the 15th position in that rank.1010. Cidades@ [database on the Internet]. IBGE. 2020 [cited 22 out 2020]. Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/.
https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/...
These data suggest that there is no direct relationship between the number of cases and death by SRAG caused by COVID-19 in pregnant and puerperal women with the local population.

The gold-standard test for COVID-19 diagnosis is the RT-PCR and this was the most used test in this population. However, since July 2020, the MH (Ministry of Health) emphasized the need for expansion of RT-PCR tests in priority groups, in which pregnant and puerperal women are embedded.33. Brasil. Manual de Recomendações para a Assistência à Gestante e Puérpera frente à Pandemia de Covid-19. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2020. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manual_de_recomendações_para_a_assistência_da_gestante_e_puerpera_frente_a_Pandemia_de_Covid-19_v.1.pdf.
http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoe...
Nevertheless, the proportion of individuals tested with RT-PCR is defined according to the capability of collection of each municipality.

The great loss of information in relation to schooling of users may have influenced the result of non-association between schooling and aggravation of cases of SRAS by COVID-19 in the studied population. However, other studies demonstrated that socio-economic status and low schooling level may accelerate the aggravation of maternal health status, given that these variables influence in self-care and interfere in the quality of prenatal consultation and effectiveness of treatment, thus being directly related to maternal lethality.1111. Morse ML, Fonseca SC, Barbosa MD, Calil MB, Eyer FP. [Maternal mortality in Brazil: what has the scientific literature shown in the last 30 years?]. Cad Saúde Publica. 2011; 27 (4): 623-38.,1212. Carreno I, Bonilha AL, Costa JS. Temporal evolution and spatial distribution of maternal death. Rev Saúde Publica. 2014; 48(4):662-70.

Most patients in the study were hospitalized and 23.4% of these needed to be admitted in Intensive Care Units, and even invasive ventilatory support in some cases. In 2009, during H1N1 pandemics, 12% to 25% of hospitalized pregnant women needed hospitalization in ICUs and 6% to 19% used mechanical ventilation.1313. Siston AM, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA, Fry AM, Seib K, Callaghan WM, et al. Pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus illness among pregnant women in the United States. JAMA. 2010; 303 (15): 1517-25.,1414. Creanga AA, Kamimoto L, Newsome K, D'Mello T, Jamieson DJ, Zotti ME, et al. Seasonal and 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection during pregnancy: a population-based study of hospitalized cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204 (6 Suppl. 1): S38-45.

In relation to clinical manifestations, the most frequent in this study were cough (76.1%), fever (63.9%) and dyspnea (58.4%), corroborating with a previous study, which observed that pregnant women with COVID-19 are less prone to have fever compared to non-pregnant women, although in reproductive age, with COVID-19.1515. Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, Yap M, Chatterjee S, Kew T, et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020; 370: m3320. The comorbidities that stood out were chronic cardiovascular disease (17.5%), diabetes mellitus (16.1%) and obesity (14.1%), whilst in radiological alterations, interstitial infiltrate (43.6%) was more frequent. A French study that assessed 33 maternity hospitals between March 1 and April 14, 2020, revealed that the most severe COVID-19 cases were related to maternal ages over 35 years old and presence of comorbidities.1616. Ellington S, Strid P, Tong VT, Woodworth K, Galang RR, Zambrano LD, et al. Characteristics of Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status - United States, January 22-June 7, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69 (25): 769-75.

Regarding gestational age, 45.8% of pregnant women were at the third trimester, although the entirety of effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection to pregnant women and their fetuses is still unknown. Some infections such as influenza, malaria, hepatitis and herpes simplex may be more severe when occur at more advanced gestational ages.1717. Kourtis AP, Read JS, Jamieson DJ. Pregnancy and infection. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370 (23): 2211-8. Nevertheless, there are reports of cases in which hospitalization occurred with hospital discharge and gestational course without intercurrences or unknown course, as well as reports of gestational loss after such infection at the first gestational trimester and beginning of second trimester.1818. Yan J, Guo J, Fan C, Juan J, Yu X, Li J, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnant women: a report based on 116 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223 (1): 111 e1 - e14.

At the time of assessment of influenza vaccine coverage of these women, it was noticed that only 63 (50.8%) users were immunized. The vaccine against H1N1 was offered initially for pregnant women in 2010.19 Although, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in order to support the differential diagnosis of other respiratory infections, the pregnant women were encouraged to receive the immunization earlier.2020. Brasil. Calendário Nacional de Vacinação da Gestante 2020. In: Saúde Md, editor. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2020. A study demonstrated that pregnant women that were immunized against Influenza A had a mean reduction of 40% of the risk of hospitalization by influenza, besides offering secondary protection for babies during the first months of life.2121. Thompson MG, Kwong JC, Regan AK, Katz MA, Drews SJ, Azziz-Baumgartner E, et al. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing Influenza-associated Hospitalizations During Pregnancy: A Multi-country Retrospective Test Negative Design Study, 2010-2016. Clin Infect Dis. 2019; 68(9): 1444-53. In Minas Gerais, in the year 2020, 29,504 puerperal women and 153,764 pregnant women were immunized, with an estimated coverage of 101.8% of this population in the state.2222. SESMG. Informe Epidemiológico da Gripe - 19/08/2020. Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Minas Gerais; 2020.

In relation to antiviral therapy, it was observed that 47 (24.1%) users have used these medications, with highlight for Oseltamivir (93.6%). The MH recommends that pregnant and puerperal women with influenza-like syndrome and at risk for COVID-19, even if immunized, be treated with Oseltamivir in the usual dose in order to reduce maternal morbimortality.2323. Saúde Md. Protocolo de Manejo Clínico do CoronaVírus (COVID-19) na Atenção Primária à Saúde. In: (SAPS) SdAPàS, editor. 7 ed. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2020. p. 38. According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the antiviral therapy started early has more probability of benefits to users.2424. CDC. Recommendations for Obstetric Health Care Providers Related to Use of Antiviral Medications in the Treatment and Prevention of InfluenzaCenters forDisease Control and Prevention; 2020 23 Out 2020; Disponível em: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/antivirals/avrec_ob.htm.
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/an...
It is worth highlighting that Oseltamivir and other antiviral used by the study population, although with less frequency, Zanamivir, is approved by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA – Portuguese acronym) for chemoprophylaxis of influenza.2323. Saúde Md. Protocolo de Manejo Clínico do CoronaVírus (COVID-19) na Atenção Primária à Saúde. In: (SAPS) SdAPàS, editor. 7 ed. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2020. p. 38.

Regarding lethality, 6.6% of pregnant and puerperal women with SRAS by COVID-19 in the analyzed period died. During H1N1 pandemic in 2009, lethality rate was between 1% and 4.3%,1313. Siston AM, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA, Fry AM, Seib K, Callaghan WM, et al. Pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus illness among pregnant women in the United States. JAMA. 2010; 303 (15): 1517-25.,1414. Creanga AA, Kamimoto L, Newsome K, D'Mello T, Jamieson DJ, Zotti ME, et al. Seasonal and 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection during pregnancy: a population-based study of hospitalized cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204 (6 Suppl. 1): S38-45. and more unfavorable outcomesmay be explained partially by the changes of respiratory and immunological physio-modulation during pregnancy.2525. LoMauro A, Aliverti A. Respiratory physiology of pregnancy: Physiology masterclass. Breathe (Sheff). 2015; 11 (4): 297-301. The greater risk of death was associated with the time of hospitalization in an intensive care unit. In this perspective, a study in New York City (USA) demonstrated that maternal lethality was 15% and the mean of days of ICU stay due to COVID-19 was of eight days.2626. Blitz MJ, Rochelson B, Minkoff H, Meirowitz N, Prasannan L, London V, et al. Maternal mortality among women with Coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to the intensive care unit. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223 (4): 595-9 e5. In this study, the mean of days of ICU stay was six days, with considerable hospital lethality (25%).

In this study, we also confirmed that pregnant women with cardiopathies presented 3.07 times more risk of death compared to pregnant women without cardiopathy. These data comply with other studies in which pregnant women with heart disease presented greater risk of severe cardiologic complications.2727. Marques-Santos C, Avila WS, Carvalho RCM, Lucena AJG, Freire CMV, Alexandre ERG, et al. Position Statement on COVID-19 and Pregnancy in Women with Heart Disease Department of Women Cardiology of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology - 2020. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115 (5): 975-86.,2828. Pfaller B, Sathananthan G, Grewal J, Mason J, D'Souza R, Spears D, et al. Preventing Complications in Pregnant Women With Cardiac Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75 (12): 1443-52.

Even during pandemic, studies about the impacts of COVID-19 infection in the clinical presentation and perinatal and/or puerperal outcomes are still being developed. However, data are still limited and inconclusive in regard of the risk of increase of severe forms of COVID-19 associated with pregnancy. Nevertheless, due to physiological alterations of gestational and puerperal period, these women may be seriously affected by infections. Therefore, it is important to adopt measures of caution against COVID-19 and the systematic follow-up of pregnant women, yet this follow-up occurs in non-presential attendance, mainly those whose profile is similar to the high risk one described in this study.1616. Ellington S, Strid P, Tong VT, Woodworth K, Galang RR, Zambrano LD, et al. Characteristics of Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status - United States, January 22-June 7, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69 (25): 769-75.,2929. Poon LC, Yang H, Kapur A, Melamed N, Dao B, Divakar H, et al. Global interim guidance on Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during pregnancy and Puerperium from FIGO and allied partners: Information for healthcare professionals. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020; 149 (3): 273-86.,3030. Westgren M, Pettersson K, Hagberg H, Acharya G Severe maternal morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19: The risk should not be downplayed. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99 (7): 815-6. The morbimortality profile of SRAS by COVID-19 in pregnant and puerperal women, in Minas Gerais, obtained in this study, may support the definition of public health policies aiming the study population. Besides that, the results shown may contribute to the development of new studies that assess the direct impact of this infection in pregnancy and Puerperium. It is still worth to highlight that this study has limitations, once it comprises only the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Database and it may exist subnotification due to the strategies of testing in the state. Furthermore, the possibility of errors in data registry cannot be excluded, and those ignored were treated as negative. However, we believe that these limitations did not impaired the validation of obtained results, once they were not frequent in the assessed database and, during the pandemic, SIVEP-gripe is the main source of data in the country.

Thus, we conclude that hospitalization was necessary to most pregnant women with SRAS and the presence of previous heart diseases increased the risk of death. Thus, the attendance to pregnant and puerperal women with SRAS by COVID-19 should be prioritized mainly in cases in which patients have comorbidities. Furthermore, early diagnosis and monitoring may aid in the reduction of severity of cases, diminishing the necessity and time of hospitalization in ICU, and, consequently, reducing the risk of death.

Author’s contribution

Nogueira AP, Bernardes GCS, Almeida NA, Nogueira LS and Pinheiro MB participated in the conceptua-lization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writing of the original draft and writing of the review/edition of the manuscript. Melo SN and Belo VS participated in the formal analysis, methodology, software and writing of the review/edition of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the article.

References

  • 1.
    WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard [database on the Internet]. World Health Organization. 2020. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/
    » https://covid19.who.int/
  • 2.
    Dashraath P, Wong JLJ, Lim MXK, Lim LM, Li S, Biswas A, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222(6):521-31.
  • 3.
    Brasil. Manual de Recomendações para a Assistência à Gestante e Puérpera frente à Pandemia de Covid-19. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2020. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manual_de_recomendações_para_a_assistência_da_gestante_e_puerpera_frente_a_Pandemia_de_Covid-19_v.1.pdf
    » http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manual_de_recomendações_para_a_assistência_da_gestante_e_puerpera_frente_a_Pandemia_de_Covid-19_v.1.pdf
  • 4.
    Takemoto MLS, Menezes MO, Andreucci CB, Nakamura-Pereira M, Amorim MMR, Katz L, et al. The tragedy of COVID-19 in Brazil: 124 maternal deaths and counting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020.
  • 5.
    SRAG 2020 - Banco de Dados de Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave - incluindo dados da COVID-19 [database on the Internet]. Ministério da Saúde. 2020 [cited 30 set 2020]. Available from: https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset/bd-srag-2020
    » https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset/bd-srag-2020
  • 6.
    Saúde Md. Resolução n° 510, de 07 de abril de 2016. Dispõe sobre as normas aplicáveis a pesquisas em Ciências Humanas e Sociais cujos procedimentos metodológicos envolvam a utilização de dados diretamente obtidos com os participantes ou de informações identificáveis ou que possam acarretar riscos maiores do que os existentes na vida cotidiana. Brasília2016).
  • 7.
    SESMG. Boletim epidemiológico - Cenário em Minas Gerais - COVID-19 Coronavirus. In: Gerais SdEdSdM, editor. Belo Horizonte: Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Minas Gerais; 2020.
  • 8.
    Mertz D, Kim TH, Johnstone J, Lam PP, Science M, Kuster SP, et al. Populations at risk for severe or complicated influenza illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013; 347: f5061.
  • 9.
    Mertz D, Geraci J, Winkup J, Gessner BD, Ortiz JR, Loeb M. Pregnancy as a risk factor for severe outcomes from influenza virus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Vaccine. 2017; 35(4): 521-8.
  • 10.
    Cidades@ [database on the Internet]. IBGE. 2020 [cited 22 out 2020]. Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/
    » https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/
  • 11.
    Morse ML, Fonseca SC, Barbosa MD, Calil MB, Eyer FP. [Maternal mortality in Brazil: what has the scientific literature shown in the last 30 years?]. Cad Saúde Publica. 2011; 27 (4): 623-38.
  • 12.
    Carreno I, Bonilha AL, Costa JS. Temporal evolution and spatial distribution of maternal death. Rev Saúde Publica. 2014; 48(4):662-70.
  • 13.
    Siston AM, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA, Fry AM, Seib K, Callaghan WM, et al. Pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus illness among pregnant women in the United States. JAMA. 2010; 303 (15): 1517-25.
  • 14.
    Creanga AA, Kamimoto L, Newsome K, D'Mello T, Jamieson DJ, Zotti ME, et al. Seasonal and 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection during pregnancy: a population-based study of hospitalized cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204 (6 Suppl. 1): S38-45.
  • 15.
    Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, Yap M, Chatterjee S, Kew T, et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020; 370: m3320.
  • 16.
    Ellington S, Strid P, Tong VT, Woodworth K, Galang RR, Zambrano LD, et al. Characteristics of Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status - United States, January 22-June 7, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69 (25): 769-75.
  • 17.
    Kourtis AP, Read JS, Jamieson DJ. Pregnancy and infection. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370 (23): 2211-8.
  • 18.
    Yan J, Guo J, Fan C, Juan J, Yu X, Li J, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnant women: a report based on 116 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223 (1): 111 e1 - e14.
  • 19.
    Pereira BFB, Martins MAS, Barbosa TLA, Silva CSO, Gomes LMX. Motivos que levaram as gestantes a não se vacinarem contra H1N1. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2013; 18 (6): 1745-52.
  • 20.
    Brasil. Calendário Nacional de Vacinação da Gestante 2020. In: Saúde Md, editor. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2020.
  • 21.
    Thompson MG, Kwong JC, Regan AK, Katz MA, Drews SJ, Azziz-Baumgartner E, et al. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing Influenza-associated Hospitalizations During Pregnancy: A Multi-country Retrospective Test Negative Design Study, 2010-2016. Clin Infect Dis. 2019; 68(9): 1444-53.
  • 22.
    SESMG. Informe Epidemiológico da Gripe - 19/08/2020. Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Minas Gerais; 2020.
  • 23.
    Saúde Md. Protocolo de Manejo Clínico do CoronaVírus (COVID-19) na Atenção Primária à Saúde. In: (SAPS) SdAPàS, editor. 7 ed. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2020. p. 38.
  • 24.
    CDC. Recommendations for Obstetric Health Care Providers Related to Use of Antiviral Medications in the Treatment and Prevention of InfluenzaCenters forDisease Control and Prevention; 2020 23 Out 2020; Disponível em: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/antivirals/avrec_ob.htm
    » https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/antivirals/avrec_ob.htm
  • 25.
    LoMauro A, Aliverti A. Respiratory physiology of pregnancy: Physiology masterclass. Breathe (Sheff). 2015; 11 (4): 297-301.
  • 26.
    Blitz MJ, Rochelson B, Minkoff H, Meirowitz N, Prasannan L, London V, et al. Maternal mortality among women with Coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to the intensive care unit. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223 (4): 595-9 e5.
  • 27.
    Marques-Santos C, Avila WS, Carvalho RCM, Lucena AJG, Freire CMV, Alexandre ERG, et al. Position Statement on COVID-19 and Pregnancy in Women with Heart Disease Department of Women Cardiology of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology - 2020. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115 (5): 975-86.
  • 28.
    Pfaller B, Sathananthan G, Grewal J, Mason J, D'Souza R, Spears D, et al. Preventing Complications in Pregnant Women With Cardiac Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75 (12): 1443-52.
  • 29.
    Poon LC, Yang H, Kapur A, Melamed N, Dao B, Divakar H, et al. Global interim guidance on Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during pregnancy and Puerperium from FIGO and allied partners: Information for healthcare professionals. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020; 149 (3): 273-86.
  • 30.
    Westgren M, Pettersson K, Hagberg H, Acharya G Severe maternal morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19: The risk should not be downplayed. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99 (7): 815-6.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    30 June 2021
  • Date of issue
    May 2021

History

  • Received
    20 Nov 2020
  • Accepted
    04 Mar 2021
Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira Rua dos Coelhos, 300. Boa Vista, 50070-550 Recife PE Brasil, Tel./Fax: +55 81 2122-4141 - Recife - PR - Brazil
E-mail: revista@imip.org.br